|Boirault machine (No1)|
Top:The Boirault machine used a huge rotating frame around a motorized center.
Bottom: Boirault machine underway.
|Place of origin||France|
|In service||January 1915–November 1915 (experimental)|
|Wars||World War I|
The Boirault machine (French: Appareil Boirault), was an early French experimental landship, designed in 1914 and built in early 1915. It has been considered as "another interesting ancestor of the tank", and described as a "rhomboid-shaped skeleton tank without armour, with single overhead track". Ultimately, the machine was deemed impractical and was nicknamed Diplodocus militaris. It preceded the design and development of the English Little Willie tank by six months.
Background[edit | edit source]
The immobility of the trench warfare characterizing the First World War led to a need for a powerfully armed military engine that would be at the same time protected from enemy fire and could move on the extremely irregular terrain of battlefields.
"Victory in this war will belong to the belligerent who is the first to put a cannon on a vehicle capable of moving on all kinds of terrain"
Development[edit | edit source]
First Boirault machine[edit | edit source]
One of the first attempts was made in France with the early experiment made with the Boirault machine, developed in 1914 by French engineer Louis Boirault, proposed to the French War Ministry in December 1914, and ordered for construction on 3 January 1915. On 19 January a commission, headed by Sub-secretary of State of Inventions Paul Painlevé, was formed to evaluate the project.
The objective of the machine was flattening barbed wire defences and riding over gaps in a battlefield. The machine was made of huge parallel tracks, formed by six 4x3 meter metallic frames, each with four transverse beams, so that it could also be described as a single track covering the entire width of the vehicle, rotating around a triangular motorized center, and driven via chains and rods by a 80 hp petrol engine.
This device proved too fragile and slow however, as well as incapable of changing direction easily, as was indicated be a report on 17 May. The project was officially abandoned on 10 June 1915. Upon the insistence of the inventor, modifications were made, a new commission was formed and new trials organized on 4 November 1915, for the benefit of the Engineer Arm. The machine, loaded with nine tonnes of simulation weights, successfully flattened an eight metre wide barbed wire obstacle, overcame a funnel with a diameter of five metres and crossed a trench two metres wide. It reached a speed of 1,6 km/h. A second test on 13 November showed however that it was still extremely difficult to change direction. The whole assembly had to be lifted by a main jack, after which it could be turned for a maximum of 45° by hand from the outside or by a system of smaller jacks from the inside of the machine. Again the project was rejected, because of its visibility, noise, vulnerability, low speed and lack of manoeuvrability. Military historian Lieutenant-Colonel André Duvignac concluded that those that had baptised it Diplodocus militaris (after a giant sauropod dinosaur, well-known at the period) "were not only poor humorists but also good judges".
Second Boirault machine[edit | edit source]
|Boirault machine (No2)|
Second Boirault machine, with Paul Boirault standing (bottom).
|Place of origin||France|
|In service||August 1916 (experimental)|
|Wars||World War I|
A new model was developed, more compact and lighter, with armour for the engine and the driver compartment. It was composed of six metal plates rotating around the core chassis, and had some level of steering control, allowing for a turning radius of 100 meters. Speed however was extremely low, at 1 km/h. The new model was tried by the Artillery Arm on 17 August 1916 at Souain-Perthes-lès-Hurlus, until complete abandonment of the project.
General Henri Gouraud commented on the performance of the machine on 20 August 1916, explaining that it ran for 1,500 meters in flat terrain, at about 1 km/h. It managed to cross a railroad, flatten a line of barbed wire, and crossed trenches 1.5 and 1.8 meters wide, and a hole two meters in diameter.
General Gouraud commented on the sheer strength of the machine, but its weak ability to properly direct itself:
The direction is not precise (...) If this machine is capable of squashing everything on its way, it cannot be affirmed that it will be able to meet with certainty such and such designated enemy objective, such as a bunker, machine gun housing, observatory... Realized away from the battlefield, on a training ground, in conditions that do not reflect reality in the least, these trials are far from being conclusive—General Gouraud, 20 August 1916.
Aftermath[edit | edit source]
The project was actually abandoned, as regular tanks were being developed. A few months before, in October 1914, the French arms manufacturer Schneider & Co. had already sent out its chief designer, Eugène Brillié, to investigate tracked tractors from the American Holt Company, at that time participating in a test programme in England. This Schneider program was met with approval by the French War Ministry and was merged with the Estienne plan, and a production order of 400 Schneider CA1, the first French tank to see the battlefield, was made on 25 February 1916.
See also[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- Harper's pictorial library of the world war by Albert Bushnell Hart, 1920, p.153
- Encyclopedia of tanks by Duncan Crow, Robert Joseph Icks, 1975 p.133
- Gougaud, p.104
- Gudmundsson, p.38 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "Gudmundsson38" defined multiple times with different content
- Vauvilliers, 2008, p. 29
- Original French "La direction est imprécise (...) Il en résulte que si l'appareil est susceptible de tout écraser sur son passage on ne peut affirmer qu'il rencontrera d'une façon certaine, telle ou telle organisation ennemie de dimensions restreintes qui lui auront été désignées, par exemple, blockhaus, abri de mitrailleuse, observatoire...(...) Executés loin de l'ennemi, sur un terrain d'exercice, dans des conditions ne reflétant en rien la réalité, ces essais sont loin d'être concluants.", in Gougaud, p.104
- Gougaud, p.124
References[edit | edit source]
- Alain Gougaud L'Aube de la Gloire, Les Autos-Mitrailleuses et les Chars Français pendant la Grande Guerre, 1987, Musée des Blindés, ISBN 2-904255-02-8
- Bruce I. Gudmundsson On armor Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, ISBN 0-275-95019-0
- François Vauvillier, 2008, "L'Aube du char en France — L'idée de l'engin du no man's land avant Estienne", Tank Zone 2: 20-31
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|