A commander-in-chief is the person or body exercising supreme operational command and control of a nation's military forces or significant elements of those forces. In the latter case, the force element may be defined as those forces within a particular region or those forces which are associated by function. As a practical term it refers to the military competencies that reside in a nation-state's executive leadership; either a head of state, a head of government, a minister of defence, or a national cabinet. Often, a given country's commander-in-chief need not be or have been a commissioned officer or even a veteran, and it is by this legal statute that civilian control of the military is realized in states where it is constitutionally required.
The role of commander-in-chief derives from the Latin, imperator. Imperatores of the Roman Republic and Roman Empire possessed imperium (command) powers. In its modern usage, the term was first used by King Charles I of England in 1639. A nation's head of state (monarchical or republican) usually holds the nominal position of commander-in-chief, even if effective executive power is held by a separate head of government. In a parliamentary system, the executive branch is ultimately dependent upon the will of the legislature; although the legislature does not issue orders directly to the armed forces and therefore does not control the military in any operational sense. governors-general and colonial governors are also often appointed commander-in-chief of the military forces within their territory. A commander-in-chief is sometimes referred to as Supreme Commander, which is sometimes used as a specific term. The term is also used for military officers who hold such power and authority, not always through dictatorship, and as a subordinate (usually) to a head of state (see Generalissimo). The term is also used for officers that hold authority over individual branches or within a theatre of operations
- 1 Heads of state as commanders-in-chief
- 1.1 Albania
- 1.2 Argentina
- 1.3 Australia
- 1.4 Austria
- 1.5 Bangladesh
- 1.6 Brazil
- 1.7 Brunei
- 1.8 Canada
- 1.9 Croatia
- 1.10 Czech Republic
- 1.11 Denmark
- 1.12 Dominican Republic
- 1.13 Egypt
- 1.14 Finland
- 1.15 France
- 1.16 India
- 1.17 Iran
- 1.18 Ireland
- 1.19 Italy
- 1.20 Kenya
- 1.21 Malaysia
- 1.22 Mauritius
- 1.23 Pakistan
- 1.24 People's Republic of China
- 1.25 Philippines
- 1.26 Poland
- 1.27 Portugal
- 1.28 Republic of China
- 1.29 Russia
- 1.30 Slovenia
- 1.31 Spain
- 1.32 Sri Lanka
- 1.33 Suriname
- 1.34 Switzerland
- 1.35 Turkey
- 1.36 United Kingdom
- 1.37 United States
- 1.38 Vietnam
- 2 Non-heads of state as commanders-in-chief
- 3 See also
- 4 References
Heads of state as commanders-in-chief[edit | edit source]
Albania[edit | edit source]
Argentina[edit | edit source]
Under part II, chapter III, article 99, subsections 12, 13, 14 and 15, the Constitution of Argentina states that the president is the "Commander-in-chief of all the armed forces of the Nation". It also states that the president is entitled to provide military posts in the granting of the jobs or grades of senior officers of the armed forces, and by itself on the battlefield; runs with its organization and distribution according to needs of the Nation and declares war and orders reprisals with the consent and approval of Congress. The incumbent Commander-in-chief is President Cristina Fernández.
Australia[edit | edit source]
Under chapter II of section 68 titled Command of the naval and military forces, the Constitution of Australia states that: "The commander in chief of the naval and military forces of the Commonwealth is vested in the Governor General as the Queen's representative."
In practice, however, the governor-general does not play an active part in the Australian Defence Force's command structure, and the elected Australian Government controls the ADF. The Minister for Defence and several subordinate ministers exercise this control.
Austria[edit | edit source]
The Constitution (German language: Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz) states, in Article 80, that the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the Federal Armed Forces. However, it further provides that the President may only have the Federal Armed Forces at his disposal to the extent provided in the Defence Act (German language: Wehgesetz); and that the supreme command over the Federal Armed Forces is exercised by the federal minister authorized to serve in this capacity by the Federal Government, i.e. the cabinet under the chairmanship of the Federal Chancellor, as defined in Article 69.
Bangladesh[edit | edit source]
The commander-in-chief is the president, although executive power and responsibility for national defense resides with the prime minister. The only exception was the first commander-in-chief, General M. A. G. Osmany, during Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971, who was commander of all Bangladesh Forces, reinstated to active duty by official BD government order, which after independence was gazetted in 1972. He retired in 7 April 1972 and relinquished all authority and duties to the President of Bangladesh.
Brazil[edit | edit source]
Brunei[edit | edit source]
Canada[edit | edit source]
The powers of command-in-chief over the Canadian Forces are constitutionally vested in the Canadian monarch, and are delegated to the Governor General of Canada, who also uses the title Commander-in-Chief. In this capacity, the Governor General is entitled to the uniform of a general/flag officer, with the crest of the office and special cuff braid serving as rank insignia.
By constitutional convention, the Crown's prerogative powers over the armed forces and constitutional powers as commander-in-chief are exercised by the prime minister and, the governing ministry that commands the confidence of the . According to the National Defence Act, the Minister of National Defence, is responsible and accountable to Parliament for all matters related to national defence and the Canadian Forces. In theory, Governor General could also use his or her powers as commander-in-chief to stop any attempts to use the Canadian Forces unconstitutionally, though this has never occurred and would likely be highly controversial.
Croatia[edit | edit source]
According to the Croatian constitution, the President of Croatia is the Commander-in-Chief of Armed Forces of the Republic of Croatia. In peace, the commander-in-chief exercises his command through the Minister of Defense. In war and in cases where the Minister of Defense is not fulfilling orders, the commander-in-chief exercises his command directly through the chief of General Staff.
Czech Republic[edit | edit source]
According to the 1992 constitution, the President of the Czech Republic is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, and appoints and promotes generals. The President is required to obtain the countersignature of the Prime Minister for decisions concerning appointment and promotion of generals, and for decisions taken as the commander-in-chief. The Prime Minister may delegate to other ministers the right to countersign these decisions of the President. However, the President does not command the armed forces on daily basis in peace times. The actual day-to-day command is vested to the Chief of the General Staff, under the supervision of the Minister of Defence.
Denmark[edit | edit source]
According to the Constitution of the Denmark, the head-of-state is the commander-in-chief. The head-of-state of Denmark is the Queen, however, the government of Denmark is the actual commander-in-chief although any military action that does not serve the purpose of defending Danish territory requires approval by the Danish parliament (Folketinget).
Dominican Republic[edit | edit source]
According to the Constitution, Article 128, Section II, Tittle IV, the President is the head of foreign policy, the civil administration and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the National Police and all other state's security agencies.
Egypt[edit | edit source]
In Egypt the President of the Republic holds the ceremonial title of Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, currently Adly Mansour. A member of the Government, usually Minister for Defence, is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, the incumbent being Abdul Fatah al-Sisi. The President still remains the only individual capable of declaring war. Until the election of Morsi in June 2012, prior Egyptian presidents had all been former military officers, and during the Yom Kippur War the president played a major role at all levels of the planning of the war, and was in a literal sense Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces giving direct orders to the commanders from the headquarters during the war as field marshal of the army, colonel general of the air force and air defence forces and admiral of the navy. Anwar el-Sadat often wore his military uniform, while former president Hosni Mubarak had abandoned this tradition.
Finland[edit | edit source]
According to the Finnish constitution, the President of Finland is the commander-in-chief of all Finnish military forces. In practice, the everyday command and control is in the hands of Chief of Defence and the Commander of the Finnish Border Guard. The economic administration of the Finnish Defence Force is the responsibility of Ministry of Defence. Since the constitutional reform of 2000, the Minister of Defence has the right to be present when the president uses his command powers, unless the matter is of immediate concern. In questions of strategic importance, the Prime Minister has the same right.
The president commissions officers and decides on the mobilisation of the Defence Forces. If Parliament is not in session when a decision to mobilise is taken, it must be immediately convened. A declaration of war is made by a presidential decree, which must be afterwards accepted by Parliament.
France[edit | edit source]
In France, the President of the Republic is designated as "Chef des Armées" (literally "Chief of the Armies") under article 15 of the constitution, and is as such the supreme executive authority in military affairs. Article 16 provides the president with extensive emergency powers. However, owing to the nature of the semi-presidential system, the prime minister also has key constitutional powers under article 21: "He shall be responsible for national defence" and has "power to make regulations and shall make appointments to civil and military posts".
Pre-1958[edit | edit source]
Since the reign of Louis XIV France has been strongly centralized. After crushing local nobles engaged in warlord-ism, the Kings of France retained all authority with the help of able yet discreet Prime ministers (Mazarin, Richelieu).
The 1789 Revolution transferred the supreme authority to the King (in the context of the short-lived constitutional Monarchy), then to the multi-member ' during the Convention, and later to the Directoire, before being regained in the hands of Consul Napoléon Bonaparte, later Emperor Napoléon I, alone.
The Restoration restored authority of the King, in an absolute, then constitutional way before being overthrown by the Second Empire. The following Third Republic was a parliamentary system, where the military authority was held by the President of the Council (prime minister).
During World War II, Maréchal Philippe Pétain assumed power and held the supreme authority in Vichy France, while Général Charles De Gaulle, acting on behalf of the previous regime, founded the Free French Forces, upon which he held supreme authority all through the war.
The following and short-lived Fourth Republic was a parliamentary system, which was replaced by the present Fifth Republic, a semi-presidential system.
India[edit | edit source]
Supreme command of the Indian Armed Forces is vested in the President, although effective executive power and responsibility for national defence resides with the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister. This is discharged through the Ministry of Defence, headed by the Minister of Defence, which provides the policy framework and resources to the Armed Forces to discharge their responsibilities in the context of the defence of the country.
On 15 August 1947, each Service was placed under its own Chief Commander. In 1955, the three Service Chiefs were redesignated as the Chief of the Army Staff (General), the Chief of the Naval Staff (Admiral) and the Chief of the Air Staff (Air Chief Marshal) with the president as the supreme commander.
Iran[edit | edit source]
Before 1979, the Shah was the commander-in-chief in Iran. After the inception of the Islamic Republic, the President of Iran was initially appointed that task, with Abolhassan Bani Sadr being the first commander-in-chief. However, Abolhassan Bani Sadr was impeached in 22 June 1981. It was after this event that the role of commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran was given to the Supreme Leader of Iran.
Ireland[edit | edit source]
In Ireland, the Supreme Commander of the Irish Defence Forces is the President of Ireland.
Italy[edit | edit source]
The Constitution of Italy, article 87, states that the President of the Republic: is the commander of the armed forces and chairman of the supreme defense council constituted by law; he declares war according to the decision of the parliament
Kenya[edit | edit source]
Malaysia[edit | edit source]
In accordance with Article 41 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is Supreme Commander of the Malaysian Armed Forces of the Malaysian Armed Forces. As such, he is the highest-ranking officer in the military establishment, with the power to appoint the Chief of Staff (on the advice of the Armed Forces Council). He also appoints the service heads of each of the three branches of the military.
The Federal Constitution establishes that the office of Supreme Commander is attached to the person of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as the Federation's head of state:
- Federal Constitution, Article 41 - The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall be the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Federation.
The Federal Armed Forces Act was passed by the Federal Parliament in order to consolidate in one law all the regulations governing the three services ( Army, Navy and Air Force ), it establishes the function and duties of the Federal Head of State in his capacity as Supreme Commander.
Mauritius[edit | edit source]
In the Republic of Mauritius, the President of the Republic is the commander-in-chief.
1968–1992[edit | edit source]
After independence in 1968, Mauritius continued to recognise the British Sovereign, as represented by the Governor-General of Mauritius, as commander-in-chief.
After 1992[edit | edit source]
After the country was proclaimed Commonwealth Republic, the new constitution stipulated that a President would assume the position of the head of state and hence commander-in-chief.
Pakistan[edit | edit source]
In the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, before the 1973 Constitution, the head of the Army, i.e., the Chief of the Army Staff, was referred as Commander-in-Chief. The term was replaced by Army Chief per recommendation of the Hamoodur Rehman Commission's report. The report also recommended that the president, being the head of state, be referred to as Supreme Commander. (The role of President is only a ceremonial position since the real power rests with the elected prime minister, who is the chief executive of the state.) Since 1973 these roles have been changed. Today, the President of the Federation holds the real power since most of the Presidents (especially Dictators and Army Rulers) have played a more significant role.
People's Republic of China[edit | edit source]
Article 93 of the Constitution places the authority to direct the Armed Forces of the People's Republic of China on the Central Military Commission. However, Article 80 gives the President of the People's Republic of China the power to proclaim martial law, proclaim a state of war, and issue mobilisation orders upon the decision of National People's Congress, the highest state body. Since the mid-1990s, it has been standard practice to have the president, the CMC Chairman, and the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China be the same person, although the differences in the start of terms means that there is some overlap between an occupant and his predecessor.
Hong Kong SAR[edit | edit source]
When Hong Kong was under British authority, Hong Kong was ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces Overseas Hong Kong. After the territory's handover to the People's Republic of China in 1997, the commander of the People's Liberation Army Hong Kong Garrison are PLA personnel from the mainland China.
Philippines[edit | edit source]
The President of the Philippines is both head of state and head of government, and is mandated by Article VII, Section 18 of the 1987 Constitution to be Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP).
During the Fourth Republic, the 1973 Constitution introduced by dictator Ferdinand Marcos created a semi-presidential system that split the Executive into two, with the prime minister retaining the office of commander-in-chief and the president reduced to a figurehead. The wording of Article VII, Section 10 in the previous constitution enabled Marcos as commander-in-chief to declare Martial Law and suspend the writ of habeas corpus on 21 September 1972. He consequently sat as both president and prime minister until 1981, when Cesar Virata succeeded him to the latter office. Salvador Laurel was the country's last prime minister when the office was abolished after the 1986 People Power Revolution, and the position's powers (including military authority) were again merged with the Presidency.
Poland[edit | edit source]
In Poland, the President is Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Armed Forces. However, the art. 134 ust. 4 of the constitution states:
The President of the Republic, for a period of war, shall appoint the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces on request of the Prime Minister. He may dismiss the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces in accordance with the same procedure. The authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, as well as the principle of his subordination to the constitutional organs of the Republic of Poland, shall be specified by statute.
During the interbellum period, the General Inspector of the Armed Forces was appointed the commander-in-chief for the time of war (Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces). However, after the war this function ceased to exist thus it is expected that in case of formal participation in war by Poland, Chief of the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces will be appointed Supreme Commander.
Portugal[edit | edit source]
The President of the Portuguese Republic is the constitutional Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of Portugal. However, the operational command is delegated in the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces.
Republic of China[edit | edit source]
As stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of China, the President is also the Commander-in-Chief of the ROC Armed Forces (including the Military Police), the Special Forces, and the National Space Organization.
Russia[edit | edit source]
According to the Constitution of Russia, the President of Russia is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. He approves the military doctrine and appoints the defense minister and the chief and other members of the general staff.
Slovenia[edit | edit source]
In Slovenia, the commander-in-chief is formally the President of Slovenia, although he or she does not exercise this position in peacetime. Instead, this role is usually assumed by the Minister of Defence.
Spain[edit | edit source]
Sri Lanka[edit | edit source]
As head of state, the President of Sri Lanka, is nominally the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The National Security Council, chaired by the president is the authority charged with formulating and executing defence policy for the nation. The highest level of military headquarters is the Ministry of Defence, since 1978 except for a few rare occasions the president retained the portfolio defence, thus being the Minister of Defence. The ministry and the armed forces have been controlled by the during these periods by either a Minister of State, Deputy Minister for defence, and of recently the Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Defence. Prior to 1978 the prime minister held the portfolio of Minister of Defence and External Affairs, and was supported by a Parliamentary Secretary for Defence and External Affairs.
Responsibility for the management of the forces is Ministry of Defence, while the planning and execution of combined operations is the responsibility of the Joint Operations Command (JOC). The JOC is headed by the Chief of the Defence Staff who is the most senior officer in the Armed Forces and is an appointment that can be held by an Air Chief Marshal, Admiral, or General. The three services have their own respective professional chiefs: the Commander of the Army, the Commander of the Navy and the Commander of the Air Force, who have much autonomy.
Suriname[edit | edit source]
Switzerland[edit | edit source]
Supreme authority over the military belongs to the Federal Council, which is the Swiss collegial head of state. In peacetime, the Armed Forces are led by the Chief of the Armed Forces who has the rank of "Corps commander" (Korpskommandant or Commandant de corps. Ranking OF-8 in NATO equivalence). In a time of declared war or national emergency, however, the Federal Assembly appoints a General (OF-9 by NATO) as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces under Article 168 of the Constitution. While The General acts as the highest military authority with a high degree of autonomy, he is still subordinate to the Federal Council (See Articles 58, 60, 174, 177, 180 & 185). Four generals were appointed in Swiss history, General Henri Dufour during the Swiss Civil War, General Hans Herzog during the Franco-Prussian War, General Ulrich Wille during the First World War, and General Henri Guisan during the Second World War ("la Mob", "the Mobilisation"). Although Switzerland remained neutral during the latter three conflicts, the threat of having its territory used as a battlefield by the much bigger war parties of Germany and France required mobilization of the army.
Turkey[edit | edit source]
President of the Republic of Turkey has the constitutional right to represent the Supreme Military Command of the Turkish Armed Forces, on behalf of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, and to decide on the mobilization of the Turkish Armed Forces, to appoint the Chief of the General Staff, to call the National Security Council to meet, to preside over the National Security Council, to proclaim martial law or state of emergency, and to issue decrees having the force of law, upon a decision of the Council of Ministers meeting under his/her chairmanship. With all these issues above written in the Constitution of Turkey, the executive rights are given to the President of the Republic of Turkey to be represented as the commander-in-chief of the nation.
United Kingdom[edit | edit source]
The British monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II, as Sovereign and head of state is the "Head of the Armed Forces" and their commander-in-chief. Long-standing constitutional convention, however, has vested de facto executive authority, by the exercise of Royal Prerogative powers, in the prime minister and the Secretary of State for Defence, and the prime minister (acting with the support of the ) makes the key decisions on the use of the armed forces. The Queen, however, remains the "ultimate authority" of the military, with officers and personnel swearing allegiance only to the monarch.
The Ministry of Defence is the Government department and highest level of military headquarters charged with formulating and executing defence policy for the Armed Forces; it employed 103,930 civilians in 2006. The department is controlled by the Secretary of State for Defence (or "the Defence Secretary") and contains three deputy appointments: Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Minister for Defence Procurement, and Minister for Veterans' Affairs.
Responsibility for the management of the forces is delegated to a number of committees: the Defence Council, Chiefs of Staff Committee, Defence Management Board, and three single-service boards. The Defence Council, composed of senior representatives of the services and the Ministry of Defence, provides the "formal legal basis for the conduct of defence". The three constituent single-service committees (Admiralty Board, Army Board, and Air Force Board) are chaired by the Secretary of State for Defence.
The Chief of the Defence Staff is the professional head of the Armed Forces and is an appointment that can be held by an Admiral, General or Air Chief Marshal (four-star officers). Before the practice was discontinued in the 1990s, those who were appointed to the position of CDS (head of the Armed Forces) had been elevated to the most senior rank in their respective service (a five-star officer). The CDS, along with the Permanent Under Secretary, are the principal advisers to the departmental minister. The three services have their own respective professional chiefs: the First Sea Lord who is also Chief of Naval Staff, the Chief of the General Staff and the Chief of the Air Staff.
Each of the three services also has one or more commands with a commander-in-chief in charge of operations. These are currently Commander-in-Chief Fleet (CINCFLEET - sharing a Command HQ with Commander-in-Chief Naval Home Command (CINCNAVHOME)), Commander-in-Chief, Land Forces (CINCLAND) and Commander-in-Chief Air (CINCAIR). Previously, there were also territorial Commands, e.g. Commander-in-Chief Far East.
United States[edit | edit source]
According to Article II, Section 2, Clause I of the Constitution, the President of the United States is Commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
The amount of military detail handled personally by the president in wartime has varied dramatically. The structure of U.S. ranks has its roots in British military traditions, with the president taking the highest military rank. Abraham Lincoln was deeply involved in overall strategy and in day-to-day operations during the American Civil War, 1861–1865; historians have given Lincoln high praise for his strategic sense and his ability to select and encourage commanders such as Ulysses S. Grant. On the other extreme, Woodrow Wilson paid very little attention to operational military details of World War I and had very little contact with the War Department or with General John J. Pershing, who had a high degree of autonomy as commander of the armies in France. As President in World War II, Franklin D. Roosevelt worked closely with his generals, and admirals, and assigned Admiral William D. Leahy as Chief of Staff to the Commander in Chief. Harry S. Truman believed in a high amount of civilian leadership of the military, making many tactical and policy decisions based on the recommendations of his advisors— including the decision to use nuclear weapons on Japan, to commit American forces in the Korean War, and to terminate Douglas MacArthur from his command. President Lyndon B. Johnson kept a very tight personal control of operations during the Vietnam War, which some historians have sharply criticized.
Before 1947, the President was the only common superior of the Army (under the Secretary of War) and the Navy and Marine Corps (under the Secretary of the Navy.) In accordance with the National Security Act of 1947 and the 1949 amendements to the same act, the services (Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force) became subject to the civilian control of the Secretary of Defense, a cabinet-level official appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 codified the default operational chain of command: running from the president to the secretary of defense, and from the secretary of defense to the combatant commander. While the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff outranks all other military officers, he does not have operational command authority over the Armed Forces; however, the chairman does assist the president and the secretary of defense in the exercise of their command functions.
As of 2011, there are nine combatant commanders: six have regional responsibilities, and three have functional responsibilities. Before 2002, the combatant commanders were referred to in daily use as "commanders-in-chief" (for instance: "Commander in Chief, U.S. Central Command"), even though the offices were in fact already designated as "combatant commander" in the law specifying the positions. On 24 October 2002, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld announced his decision that the use of "commander-in-chief" would thereafter be reserved for the president only.
Vietnam[edit | edit source]
The commander-in-chief of the armed forces is the President of Vietnam, through his post as Chairman of the Defense and Security Council, though this position is nominal and real power is assumed by the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of Vietnam. The secretary of Central Military Commission (usually the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam) is the de facto Commander. The Minister of Defence oversees operations of the Ministry of Defence, and the VPA. He also oversees such agencies as the General Staff and the General Logistics Department. However, military policy is ultimately directed by the Central Military Commission of the ruling Communist Party of Vietnam.
Non-heads of state as commanders-in-chief[edit | edit source]
Germany[edit | edit source]
Upon the re-militarization of West Germany in 1955, when it joined NATO, the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany was amended in 1956 to include constitutional provisions for the command of the armed forces.
- In peacetime, under Article 65a, the Federal Minister of Defence (German language: Bundesminister der Verteidigung) holds the supreme command authority (German language: Inhaber der Befehls- und Kommandogewalt - IBuK) over the German Armed Forces.
- If the Bundestag declares the state of defence (German language: Verteidigungsfall), the Federal Chancellor, under Article 115, assumes the command authority over the armed forces. As of 2014[update], this has never happened.
- The President of Germany has thus no role in the command of the forces, although he continues to receive the ceremonial honors due to his position as a head of state.
The rationale for placing the command authority over the armed forces directly with the responsible minister in charge of the military establishment, and thus breaking with the German constitutional tradition (in both earlier monarchical and republican systems) of placing it with the head of state, was that in a democratic parliamentary system the command authority should directly reside where it would be exercised and where it is subject to the parliamentarian control of the Bundestag at all times. By assigning it directly to the responsible minister, instead of with the Federal Chancellor at all times, also meant that military policy is but one part of the many integrated responsibilities of the government; in contrast of earlier times when the separate division of the military from the civil administration allowed it to act as a state within a state.
Pre-1945[edit | edit source]
During the Kingdom of Prussia, German Empire, Weimar Republic and the Nazi era, whoever was the head of state—the King of Prussia/German Emperor (under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Prussia/Constitution of the German Empire) to 1918, the Reichspräsident (under the Weimar Constitution) to 1934, and the Führer from 1934—was the Head of the Armed Forces. The Each branch had its own commander-in-chief, holding the highest rank; in the case of the Reichsheer, a Generaloberst; in the Reichsmarine, an Admiral.
When Adolf Hitler assumed power, he granted his war minister, Generalfeldmarschall Werner von Blomberg, the title of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. However, in 1938, Hitler withdrew the Commander-in-Chief title, abolished the war ministerial post and assumed personal command of the Armed Forces.
East Germany[edit | edit source]
The parliament of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), the Volkskammer, enacted on 13 February 1960 the "Law on the Formation of the National Defense Council of the GDR", which established a council consisting of a chairman and at least 12 members. This was later incorporated into the GDR Constitution in April 1968. The National Defense Council held the supreme command of the National People's Army (including the internal security forces), and the Council's chairman (usually the General Secretary of the ruling Socialist Unity Party) was considered the GDR's commander-in-chief. The GDR joined with the Federal Republic of Germany on 3 October 1990, upon which the GDR's constitution and armed forces were abolished.
Israel[edit | edit source]
In Israel, the applicable basic law states that the ultimate authority over the Israel Defense Forces rests with the Government of Israel (chaired by the Prime Minister) as a collective body. The authority of the Government is exercised by the Minister of Defense on behalf of the Government, and subordinate to the Minister is the Chief of General Staff who holds the highest level of command within the military.
Japan[edit | edit source]
In Japan, prior to the Meiji Restoration the role of the commander-in-chief was vested in the Shogun (The most militarily powerful Samurai daimyo. ). After the dissolution of the Tokugawa Shogunate the role of the commander-in-chief, resided with the Emperor of Japan, though current implications of the Emperor are highly figurative and ceremonial. After Japan's move towards democracy, the position of Commander-in-Chief of the Japanese Self-Defence Forces is held by the Prime Minister of Japan.
Netherlands[edit | edit source]
The Constitution of the Netherlands states, in article 97, that "the Government shall have supreme authority over the armed forces". Article 42 defines the Government as the Monarch and the ministers, and that only ministers are responsible for acts of government. Article 45 further defines the ministers as constituting the Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister, with "authority to decide upon overall government policy".
Before a constitution change took place in 1983, the Monarch was previously designated as commander in chief.
Sweden[edit | edit source]
In Sweden, with the Ordinance of Alsnö in 1280, nobles were exempted from land taxation if they provided cavalrymen to the King's service. Following the Swedish War of Liberation (1521–53) from the Kalmar Union, a Guards Regiment was formed under the King and from there the modern Swedish Army has its roots. During the age of the Swedish Empire, several kings—Gustavus Adolphus, Charles X, Charles XI & Charles XII—personally led their forces into battle. Under the Instrument of Government of 1809, which was in force until the current Instrument of Government of 1974 went into force on 1 January 1975; the Monarch was explicitly designated as the Commander-in-Chief of the Swedish Armed Forces (Swedish language: Högste befälhavare ). At present, the Government (Swedish language: Regeringen ) as a collective body, chaired and formed by the Prime Minister of Sweden, holds the highest Executive Authority, subject to the will of the Riksdag; and is thus the present day closest equivalent of a command-in-chief, although not explicitly designated as such. The reason for this change was, apart from the fact that the King was since 1917 no longer expected to make political decisions without ministerial advice, that the new Instrument of Government was intended to be made as descriptive on the workings of the State as possible, and reflective on how decisions are actually made. Minister of Justice Lennart Geijer further remarked in the government bill that any continued pretensions of royal involvement in government decisions would be of a "fictitious nature" and "highly unsatisfactory". Certain Government decisions regarding the Armed Forces (Swedish language: Särskilda regeringsbeslut ) may be delegated to the Minister for Defence, under the supervision of the Prime Minister and to the extent laid down in ordinances.
To add to some confusion to the above, the title of the agency head of the Swedish Armed Forces and highest ranked commissioned officer on active duty, is actually Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces (Swedish language: Överbefälhavaren ).
However, the Monarch (as of present King Carl XVI Gustaf), is still a four-star general and admiral à la suite in the Swedish Army, Navy and Air Force and is by unwritten convention regarded as the foremost representative of the Swedish Armed Forces. The King has, as part of his court, a military staff. The military staff is headed by a senior officer (usually a general or admiral, retired from active service) and is composed of active duty military officers serving as aides to the King and his family.
See also[edit | edit source]
Within NATO and the European Union, the term Chief of Defence (CHOD) is usually used as a generic term for the highest-ranked office held by a professional military officer on active duty, irrespective of their actual title or powers.
Other Articles of Interest
- Civilian control of the military
- Command and control
- Commanding officer
- Military junta
- Minister of Defence
- State within a state
- Supreme Commander
References[edit | edit source]
- Dupuy, Trevor N., Curt Johnson, and Grace P. Hayes. "Supreme Commander." Dictionary of Military Terms. New York: The H.W. Wilson Company, 1986.
- The Constitution as in force on 1 June 2003 together with proclamation declaring the establishment of the Commonwealth, letters patent relating to the Office of Governor-General, Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, Australia Act 1986., ComLaw, Government of Australia (2003) ISBN 0 642 78285 7. Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz (B-VG). (English and German versions). from Rechtsinformationssystem, RIS. Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- Bangladesh : General M.A.G. Osmani (1918-1984) - C-IN-C Liberation Forces 1v MNH 1986
- Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil: 3rd Edition, Chamber of Deputies (2010) ISBN 978-85-736-5737-1. Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- Constitution of 4 October 1958, National Assembly of France. Retrieved on 2013-05-13.
- Suriname Constitution See Article 100
- Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation (English translation) (as of March 2012), The Federal Authorities of the Swiss Confederation. Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- Queen and Armed Forces, royal.gov.uk.
- The Royal Prerogative SN/PC/03861, House of Commons of the United Kingdom. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- Governance of Britain, July 2007. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- Review of the Royal Prerogative Powers: Final Report, Ministry of Justice, October 2009. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- "Whose hand is on the button?". BBC. 2 December 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7758314.stm. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- Civilian personnel by budgetary area and grade equivalence, at 1 April each year, dasa.mod.uk
- Defence Organisation, mod.uk
- Defence Council and Chief of the Defence Staff, armedforces.co.uk
- Hansard (1998), House of Commons Written Answers, publications.parliament.uk
- Joseph G. Dawson, ed. Commanders in Chief: Presidential Leadership in Modern Wars (1993)
- Carol E. Lee, "President Obama's evolution as commander-in-chief" (2010) www.politico.com
- Andrew J. Polsky, Elusive Victories: The American Presidency at War (Oxford University Press, 2012) online review
- James M. McPherson, Tried by War: Abraham Lincoln As Commander in Chief (2009)
- John Milton Cooper, Woodrow Wilson: A Biography (2009) ch 18
- Eric Larrabee, Commander in Chief: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, His Lieutenants, and Their War (2004)
- The Awesome Power: Harry S. Truman as Commander in Chief. LSU Press. pp. 265–269. http://books.google.com/books?id=nzRtzNNglMIC&pg=PA264&dq=Harry+S+Truman+as+commander+in+chief&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VHlnT-KnOdOnsAKj5qm3Dw&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Harry%20S%20Truman%20as%20commander%20in%20chief&f=false.
- Larry Berman, Lyndon Johnson's War: The Road to Stalemate in Vietnam (1991)
- 50 U.S.C. § 401
- 10 U.S.C. § 113
- 10 U.S.C. § 162
- 10 U.S.C. § 152.
- 10 U.S.C. § 164)
- "CINC" Is Sunk, American Forces Press Service, 25 October 2002. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, Bundestag (Print version. As at: October 2010). Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- (German) Die Befehls- und Kommandogewalt des Art. 65a GG im Lichte ..., Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- (German) Politik und Militär in Deutschland: die Bundespräsidenten und Bundeskanzler und ihre Beziehung zu Soldatentum und Bundeswehr, 2011. Retrieved on 2013-08-21.
- Basic Law of Israel: The Military, Knesset. Retrieved on 2011-11-11.
- The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2008, Government of the Netherlands. Retrieved on 2012-08-21.
- The Instrument of Government (English translation), The Riksdag. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- (Swedish) Prop. 1973:90. Kungl. Maj:ts proposition med förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m. m.; given Stockholms slott den 16 mars 1973. p. 172-175.
- SOU 2013:18 Regeringsbeslut av ett statsråd - SRÄ (with English summary), Retrieved on 2013-08-20.
- [http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/en/About-the-Armed-Forces/ About the Armed Forces, Swedish Armed Forces. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- Duties of the Monarch, Royal Court of Sweden. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- (Swedish) Övriga funktioner, Royal Court of Sweden. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
- NATO Chiefs of Defence. Retrieved on 2013-05-12.
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|