Military Wiki

Skulls of victims of the Rwandan Genocide

Genocide is a term coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin to describe the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. It is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) of 1948 as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the groups conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."[1]

The preamble to the CPPCG not only states that "genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world", but also that "at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on humanity".[1]

Determining what historical events constitute a genocide and which are merely criminal or inhuman behavior is not a clear-cut matter. In nearly every case where accusations of genocide have circulated, partisans of various sides have fiercely disputed the interpretation and details of the event, often to the point of promoting wildly different versions of the facts. An accusation of genocide is certainly not taken lightly and will almost always be controversial. The following list of genocides and alleged genocides should be understood in this context and cannot be regarded as the final word on these subjects.


Alternative meanings of genocide[]

The term genocide has been used in varying contexts to describe modern conflicts, from the Rwandan genocide to the War in Darfur. But the term itself has become a source of conflict, as many look to whether or not governments and leaders recognize and punish genocide. However, while the US has pointed to genocide in Darfur, the United Nations has refrained from using that term to describe the killings in Sudan. Questions on what constitutes genocide are: where do you draw the lines between ‘land conflict’, ‘ethnic cleansing’ and genocide’, and what are the political values of doing so? Or how is an event designated as a genocide? Is it legally-only when the ICC at the Hague says so?[2]

Much of the debate about genocides revolves around the proper definition of the word "genocide". The exclusion of social and political groups as targets of genocide in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide legal definition has been criticized by some historians and sociologists, for example M. Hassan Kakar in his book The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979–1982[3] argues that the international definition of genocide is too restricted,[4] and that it should include political groups or any group so defined by the perpetrator and quotes Chalk and Jonassohn: "Genocide is a form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority intends to destroy a group so defined by the perpetrator."[5]

Some critics of the definition of genocide under international law have also argued that the definition was partly influenced by Joseph Stalin, and that this is the reason why it does not include political groups.[6][7]

According to R. J. Rummel, genocide has 3 different meanings. The ordinary meaning is murder by a government of people due to their national, ethnic, racial, or religious group membership. The legal meaning of genocide refers to the international treaty, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This also includes actions that are not actually killings but tend to eliminate the group, such as preventing births or forcibly transferring children out of the group to another group. A generalized meaning of genocide is similar to the ordinary meaning but also includes government killings of political opponents or otherwise intentional murder. It is to avoid confusion regarding what meaning is intended that Rummel created the term democide for the third meaning.[8]

Timeline of genocides[]

Before 1490[]

Adam Jones explains, in his book Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction, that people throughout history have always had the ability to see other groups as alien; he quotes Chalk and Jonassohn: "Historically and anthropologically peoples have always had a name for themselves. In a great many cases, that name meant 'the people' to set the owners of that name off against all other people who were considered of lesser quality in some way. If the differences between the people and some other society were particularly large in terms of religion, language, manners, customs, and so on, then such others were seen as less than fully human: pagans, savages, or even animals. (Chalk and Jonassohn, The History and Sociology of Genocide, p. 28.)"[9]

Jones continues by saying that the less a people have in common with another group the easier it is for the aliens to be defined as less than human and from there it is but a short step to an argument that says if they are a threat, then they should "be eliminated in order that we may live (Them or us)."[10] But after making this assessment Jones continues "The difficulty, as Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn pointed out in their early study, is that such historical records as exist are ambiguous and undependable. While history today is generally written with some fealty to 'objective' facts, most previous accounts aimed rather to praise the writer's patron (normally the leader) and to emphasize the superiority of one's own gods and religious beliefs."[11]

Scholars of antiquity differentiate between genocide and gendercide, in which males were killed but the children (particularly the girls) and women were incorporated into the conquering society. Jones notes that "Chalk and Jonassohn provide a wide-ranging selection of historical events such as the Assyrian Empire's root-and branch depredations in the first half of the first millennium BCE, and the destruction of Melos by Athens during the Peloponnesian War (fifth century BCE), a gendercidal rampage described by Thucydides in his 'Melian Dialogue'."[12]

Jared Diamond has suggested that genocidal violence may have caused the Neanderthals to go extinct.[13] Ronald Wright has also suggested such a genocide.[14]

The Old Testament describes the genocides of Amalekites and Midianites,[9] the latter taking place during the life of Moses in the 2nd millennium BC. The Book of Numbers chapter 31 recounts that an army of Israelites kill every Midianite man but capture the women and children as plunder. These are later killed at the command of Moses, with the exception of girls who have not slept with a man. The total number killed is not recorded but the number of surviving girls is recorded as thirty two thousand. Jones quotes Jerusalem-based Holocaust Studies Professor Yehuda Bauer: "As a Jew, I must live with the fact that the civilization I inherited ... encompasses the call for genocide in its canon."[15]

Ben Kiernan, a Yale scholar, has labelled the destruction of Carthage at the end of the Third Punic War (149–146 BC) "The First Genocide".[12]

The Anasazi civilization in the American Southwest was destroyed in a genocide that took place circa 800 AD, suggests a 2010 study.[16][17]

Quoting Eric Margolis, Jones observes that in the 13th century the Mongol horsemen of Temüjin Genghis Khan were genocidal killers (génocidaires)[9] who were known to kill whole nations, leaving nothing but empty ruins and bones.[18] He ordered the extermination of the Tata Mongols, and all Kankalis males in Bukhara "taller than a wheel"[19] using a technique called measuring against the linchpin. Rosanne Klass has referred to the Mongols' rule of Afghanistan as "genocide".[20]

Similarly, the Turko-Mongol conqueror Tamerlane was known for his extreme brutality and his conquests were accompanied by genocidal massacres in the cities he occupied.[21] William Rubinstein wrote: "In Assyria (1393–4) – Tamerlane got around – he killed all the Christians he could find, including everyone in the, then, Christian city of Tikrit, thus virtually destroying Christianity in Mesopotamia. Impartially, however, Tamerlane also slaughtered Shi'ite Muslims, Jews and heathens."[22]

1490 to 1914[]


Zulu Kingdom[]

Adam Jones wrote: "Between 1810 and 1828, the Zulu kingdom under its dictatorial leader, Shaka Zulu, waged one of the most ambitious campaigns of expansion and annihilation the region has ever known. Huge swathes of present-day South Africa and Zimbabwe were laid waste by Zulu armies. ... According to Yale historian Michael Mahoney, Zulu armies often aimed not only at defeating enemies but at “their total destruction. Those exterminated included not only whole armies, but also prisoners of war, women, children, and even dogs.” ... Mahoney characterizes these policies as genocidal. “If genocide is defined as a state-mandated effort to annihilate whole peoples, then Shaka's actions in this regard must certainly qualify.”[23] Normal estimates for the death toll range from 1 million to 2 million. These numbers are however controversial.[24][25][26][27]

Congo Free State[]

In the 1890s, the Congo Free State became privately controlled by Leopold II of Belgium, who forcibly conscripted the population into the collection of ivory and sap from rubber plants. Many were tortured, maimed and killed until the start of the 20th century, when the European and American press exposed the conditions, and public pressure and diplomatic maneuvers forced an end to Leopold's personal rule. Rwandan president Paul Kagame, who was himself accused by the UN of genocide in Congo,[28] called Leopold's rule over the Congo Free State genocide.[29]

As the first census did not take place until 1924, it is difficult to quantify the population loss of the period. Sleeping sickness and smallpox ravaged the country and must also be taken into account.[30] Excess deaths in this period are believed to number up to 10 million.[31] One view is that the forced labour system directly and indirectly eliminated 20% of the population.[32] To the contrary, historian William Rubinstein wrote that "More basically, it appears almost certain that the population figures given by Hochschild are inaccurate. There is, of course, no way of ascertaining the population of the Congo before the twentieth century, and estimates like 20 million are purely guesses."[33]

German South-West Africa[]

The Herero and Namaqua Genocide in German South-West Africa (present-day Namibia) occurred between 1904 and 1907.[34] Eighty percent of the total Herero population and 50 percent of the total Nama population were killed in a brutal scorched earth campaign led by German GeneralLothar von Trotha. In total, between 24,000 and 100,000 Herero perished along with 10,000 Nama.[35][36][37][38][39] A lone copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives, and one reads of his intention that "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."[40] Olusoga and Erichsen write: "It is an almost unique document: an explicit, written declaration of intent to commit genocide."[41]


From the 1490s when Christopher Columbus set foot on the Americas to the 1890 massacre of Sioux at Wounded Knee by the United States military, the indigenous population of the Western Hemisphere has declined, the direct cause mostly from disease, to 1.8 million from around 50 million.[42] In Brazil alone the indigenous population has declined from a pre-Columbian high of an estimated 3 million to some 300,000 (1997).[43][44] Estimates of how many people were living in the Americas when Columbus arrived have varied tremendously; 20th century scholarly estimates ranged from a low of 8.4 million to a high of 112.5 million. This population debate has often had ideological underpinnings.[45] Robert Royal writes that "estimates of pre-Columbian population figures have become heavily politicized with scholars who are particularly critical of Europe and/or Western civilization often favoring wildly higher figures."[46]

Epidemic disease was the overwhelming direct cause of the population decline of the American natives.[47][48] After first contacts with Europeans and Africans, some believe that the death of 90 to 95 percent of the native population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases such as smallpox and measles.[49] Some estimates indicate case fatality rates of 80–90% in Native American populations during smallpox epidemics.[50]

One of the most important yet highly disputed pieces of information regarding the intentional ethnocide of indigenous populations in the Americas was possible intentional use of disease as a biological weapon, which was first posited by British forces under the command of Jeffery Amherst.[51][52] There is, however, only one documented case of germ warfare, involving British commander Jeffrey Amherst.[53] It is uncertain whether this documented British attempt successfully infected the natives.[54]

Some historians argue that genocide, a crime of intent, was not the intent of European colonization while in America. Stafford Poole, a research historian, wrote: "There are other terms to describe what happened in the Western Hemisphere, but genocide is not one of them. It is a good propaganda term in an age where slogans and shouting have replaced reflection and learning, but to use it in this context is to cheapen both the word itself and the appalling experiences of the Jews and Armenians, to mention but two of the major victims of this century."[55]

In his book American Holocaust, David Stannard argues that the destruction of the aboriginal peoples of the Americas, in a "string of genocide campaigns" by Europeans and their descendants, was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world.[56] Stannard's claim of 100 million deaths has been challenged because he does not cite any demographic evidence to support this number, and because he makes no distinction between death from violence and death from disease. Noble David Cook, Latin Americanist and history professor at Florida International University, considers books such as Stannard's–a number of which were released around the year 1992 to coincide with the 500th anniversary of the Columbus voyage to America–to be an unproductive return to Black Legend-type explanations for depopulation. According to Noble David Cook, "There were too few Spaniards to have killed the millions who were reported to have died in the first century after Old and New World contact."[57]

In 2003, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez urged Latin Americans to not celebrate the Columbus Day holiday. Chavez blamed Christopher Columbus for leading the way in the mass genocide of the Native Americans by the Spanish.[58]

American writer David Quammen has likened the colonial American policies and practices toward Native Americans with those of Australia toward its aboriginal populations, calling them "brutal, hypocritical, opportunistic, and even genocidal in the fullest sense of the word."[59]


The Conquest of the Desert was a military campaign directed mainly by General Julio Argentino Roca in the 1870s, which established Argentine dominance over Patagonia, which was inhabited by indigenous peoples, leaving more than 1,300 indigenous dead.[60]

Jens Andermann has noted that the contemporary sources on that campaign indicate that it was a genocide by the Argentine government against the indigenous tribes.[61] Others perceive the campaign as intending to suppress specifically those groups of aboriginals that refused to submit to the white government and carried out attacks on the white and mestizo civilian settlements.[62] This recent argument – usually summarized as "Civilization or Genocide?"[63]– questions whether the Conquest of the Desert was really intended to exterminate the aborigines.


The Haitian revolution also caused the mass killings of white Haitians.

Jean-Jacques Dessalines, the first ruler of an independent Haiti, ordered the killing of the remaining white population of French creoles on Haiti by the 1804 Haiti Massacre. According to Philippe Girard, "when the genocide was over, Haiti's white population was virtually non-existent."[64]


The Caste War of Yucatán (approx. 1847–1901) against the population of European descent, called Yucatecos, who held political and economic control of the region. Adam Jones wrote: "This ferocious race war featured genocidal atrocities on both sides, with up to 200,000 killed."[65]

James L. Haley wrote: "In 1835 Don Ignacio Zuniga, who was the long-time commander of the presidios of northern Sonora, asserted that since 1820 the Apaches had killed at least five thousand settlers ... The state of Sonora resorted to paying a bounty on Apache scalps in 1835. Beginning in 1837 Chihuahua state also offered bounty, 100 pesos per warrior, 50 pesos per woman, and 25 pesos per child, nothing more or less than genocide."[66]


The indigenous rebellions of Túpac Amaru II and Túpac Katari against the Spanish. Adam Jones wrote: "Between 1780 and 1782, Peru and Upper Peru (present-day Bolivia) were ravaged by an Indian uprising in which over 100,000 people perished ... Throughout the region, non-Indians were systematically slaughtered."[67]

United States[]

Authors such as the Holocaust expert David Cesarani have argued that the government and policies of the United States against certain indigenous peoples in furtherance of Manifest Destiny constituted genocide. Cesarani states that "in terms of the sheer numbers killed, the Native American Genocide exceeds that of the Holocaust".[68] He quotes David E. Stannard, author of American Holocaust,[69] who speaks of the "genocidal and racist horrors against the indigenous peoples that have been and are being perpetrated by many nations in the Western Hemisphere, including the United States".[70]

Determining how many people died as a direct result of armed conflict between Native Americans, and Europeans and their descendants, is difficult because accurate records were not always kept.[71] Various statistics have been developed concerning the devastation of the American Indian Wars on the peoples involved. One notable study by Gregory Michno used records dealing with figures "as a direct result of" engagements and concluded that "of the 21,586 total casualties tabulated in this survey, military personnel and civilians accounted for 6,596 (31%), while Indian casualties totaled about 14,990 (69%)." for the period of 1850–90. However, Michno says he "used the army's estimates in almost every case" and "the number of casualties in this study are inherently biased toward army estimations".[72]

According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census (1894), "The Indian wars under the government of the United States have been more than 40 in number. They have cost the lives of about 19,000 white men, women and children, including those killed in individual combats, and the lives of about 30,000 Indians."[73]

In God, Greed, and Genocide: The Holocaust Through the Centuries, Grenke quotes Chalk and Jonassohn with regards to the Cherokee Trail of Tears that "an act like the Cherokee deportation would almost certainly be considered an act of genocide today".[74] The Indian Removal Act of 1830 led to the Trail of Tears. About 17,000 Cherokees — along with approximately 2,000 black slaves owned by Cherokees — were removed from their homes.[75] The number of people who died as a result of the Trail of Tears has been variously estimated. American doctor and missionary Elizur Butler, who made the journey with one party, estimated 4,000 deaths.[76]



In an article "We Charge Genocide: A Brief History of US in the Philippines" that appeared in the December 2005 issue of Political Affairs,E. San Juan, Jr., director of the Philippines Cultural Studies Center, Connecticut, argued that during the Philippine-American War(1899–1902) and pacification campaign (1902–1913), the operations launched by the U.S. against the Filipinos, an integral part of its pacification program, which he asserts claimed the lives of over a million Filipinos, constituted genocide.[77][78]

In contrast, John M. Gates estimated that some 34,000 Filipino soldiers were killed in combat, while as many as 200,000 civilians died due to acholera epidemic largely unrelated to the war. Gates opined that the "genocidal" label "highlight[s] the unscholarly and polemical nature of much that has been written about the Philippine war", adding that the U.S. "persisted in a policy of pacification emphasizing good works instead of more draconian measures".[79]

Qing empire[]

The Dzungar (or Zunghar), Oirat Mongols who lived in an area that stretched from the west end of the Great Wall of China to present-day eastern Kazakhstan and from present-day northern Kyrgyzstan to southern Siberia (most of which is located in present-day Xinjiang), were the last nomadic empire to threaten China, which they did from the early 17th century to the middle of the 18th century.[80] After a series of inconclusive military conflicts that started in the 1680s, the Dzungars were subjugated by theManchu-led Qing dynasty (1644–1911) in the late 1750s. According to Qing scholar Wei Yuan, 40 percent of the 600,000 Zunghar people were killed by smallpox, 20 percent fled to Russia or sought refuge among the Kazakh tribes, and 30 percent were killed by the army.[81][82] Clarke has argued that the Qing campaign in 1757–58 "amounted to the complete destruction of not only the Zunghar state but of the Zunghars as a people."[83] Historian Peter Perdue has attributed the decimation of the Dzungars to a "deliberate use of massacre" and has described it as an "ethnic genocide".[82] Mark Levene, a historian whose recent research interests focus on genocide,[84] has stated that the extermination of the Dzungars was "arguably the eighteenth century genocide par excellence."[85]

The Taiping Rebellion during the 1850s and 1860s resulted in some 20 to 25 million deaths. Large scale massacres by Imperial Forces, and a deliberate scorched earth policy, contributed to the massive death toll.



Mass shootings at Nantes, 1793

In 1986 Reynald Secher wrote a controversial book entitled: A French Genocide: The Vendée, in which he argued that the actions of the French republican government during the revolt in the Vendée (1793–1796), a popular mostly Catholic uprising against the anti-clerical Republican government during the French Revolution. Secher claims this was the first modern genocide.[86] Secher's claims caused a minor uproar in France amongst scholars of modern French history, as mainstream authorities on the period — both French and foreign — published articles rejecting Secher's claims.[87][88][89][90][91] Claude Langlois (of the Institute of History of the French Revolution) derides Secher's claims as "quasi-mythological".[92] Timothy Tackett of the University of California summarizes the case as such: "In reality... the Vendée was a tragic civil war with endless horrors committed by both sides — initiated, in fact, by the rebels themselves. The Vendeans were no more blameless than were the republicans. The use of the word genocide is wholly inaccurate and inappropriate."[93] Hugh Gough (Professor of history at University College Dublin) called Secher's book an attempt at historical revisionismunlikely to have any lasting impact.[94]

Concerning the controversy, Michel Vovelle, a specialist on the French Revolution, remarked: "A whole literature is forming on "Franco-French genocide", starting from risky estimates of the number of fatalities in the Vendean wars: 128,000, 400,000... and why not 600,000? Despite not being specialists in the subject, historians such as Pierre Chanu have put all the weight of their great moral authority behind the development of an anathematizing discourse, and have dismissed any effort to look at the subject reasonably."[95] Roger Price writes in a similar manner: "Some historians like Pierre Chanu, supported by the conservative media... frequently exaggerating the number of deaths they have described the repression of counter-revolutionary movements in the Vendée as heralding Nazi genocide. This essentially ahistorical, and indeed hysterical approach, can only be understood as a feature of the politics of the reactionary right of our own time."[96] Ferenc Féhér comments that Secher draws conclusions "on the basis of almost no evidence".[97]

War of the Three Kingdoms[]

Toward the end of the War of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651) the English Rump Parliament sent the New Model Army to Ireland to subdue and take revenge on the Catholic population of the country and to prevent Royalists loyal to Charles IIfrom using Ireland as a base to threaten England. Initially under the command of Oliver Cromwell and later under other parliamentary generals, the New Model army carried this out. Coupled to the war aim of securing the country for the English Parliament were several other interrelated objectives. Punitive confiscation of the lands of Irish families involved in fighting the parliamentary forces was implemented . This became a continuation of the Elizabethan policy of encouraging Protestant settlement of Ireland, because New Model army soldiers—Protestant to a man and who were owed considerable back pay—could be paid in confiscated Irish lands rather than in cash raised through English parliamentary taxes.[98]

During the Interregnum (1651–1660), this policy was enhanced with the passing of the Act of Settlement of Ireland in 1652 whose goal was a further transfer of land from Irish to English hands.[98] The immediate war aims and the longer term policies of the English Parliamentarians resulted in an attempt by the English to transfer the native Irish Catholic population to the western fringes of Ireland to make way for Protestant settlers. This policy has been summed up by a phrase attributed to Cromwell "To Hell or to Connaught" and has been described by historians as ethnic cleansing, if not genocide.[99]

Great Irish Famine[]

Great Irish Famine

During the Irish Potato Famine (1845–1852) approximately 1 million people died and a million more emigrated from Ireland,[100] causing the island's population to fall by between 20% and 25%.[101] The proximate cause of famine was a potato disease commonly known as potato blight.[102] Although blight ravaged potato crops throughout Europe during the 1840s, the impact and human cost in Ireland – where one-third of the population was entirely dependent on the potato for food – was exacerbated by a host of political, social and economic factors which remain the subject of historical debate.[103][104]

During the years of the Famine, Ireland produced enough food, flax and wool not only to feed and clothe its nine million people, but enough for eighteen million.[105] When Ireland had experienced a famine in 1782–83, ports were closed to keep Irish-grown food in Ireland to feed the Irish. Local food prices promptly dropped. Merchants lobbied against the export ban, but government in the 1780s overrode their protests. There was no such export ban in the 1840s.[106] Some historians[107][108] argue that in this sense the famine was artificial, not caused by a shortage of food but by the British government's choice not to close the ports as had been done in previous Irish crop blights; as John Mitchell put it, "The Almighty sent the potato blight... but the English created the famine".[105]

Francis A. Boyle, a professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, finding that the government violated sections (a), (b), and (c) of Article 2 of the CPPCG and committed genocide, issued a formal legal opinion to the New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education on May 2, 1996, stating that "Clearly, during [the Irish Potato Famine] years [of] 1845 to 1850 the British government pursued a policy of mass starvation in Ireland with intent to destroy in substantial part the national, ethnical, and racial group commonly known as the Irish People."[109][110] Law professor Charles E. Rice of Notre Dame likewise issued a formal opinion, also based on Article 2, that the government had committed genocide.[111]

Contesting claims of genocide, Belfast-born and Cambridge-educated historian Peter Gray concludes that UK government policy "was not a policy of deliberate genocide", but a dogmatic refusal to admit that the policy was wrong, which "amounted to a sentence of death to many thousands". Professor James S. Donnelly Jr., a historian at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, wrote that "it is also my contention that while genocide was not in fact committed, what happened during and as a result of the clearances had the look of genocide to a great many Irish".[112]

Cecil Woodham-Smith, an authority on the Irish Famine, wrote in The Great Hunger; Ireland 1845–1849 that, " issue has provoked so much anger or so embittered relations between the two countries as the indisputable fact that huge quantities of food were exported from Ireland to England throughout the period when the people of Ireland were dying of starvation."[113] Ireland remained a net exporter of food throughout most of the five-year famine. However, Woodham-Smith does not accept that the famine amounted to genocide: "These misfortunes were not part of a plan to destroy the Irish nation; they fell on the people because the government of Lord John Russell was afflicted with an extraordinary inability to foresee consequences. It has been frequently declared that the parsimony of the British government during the famine was the main cause of the sufferings of the people, and parsimony was certainly carried to remarkable lengths; but obtuseness, short-sightedness and ignorance probably contributed more."[113]

Irish historian Cormac O' Grada disagrees with the claim that the famine was genocide on two grounds: firstly, he writes, "genocide includes murderous intent and it must be said that not even the most bigoted and racist commentators of the day sought the extermination of the Irish".[114] and that most people in Whitehall "hoped for better times in Ireland".[114] and secondly accusations of genocide overlook or ignore "the enormous challenges facing relief efforts, both central, local, public and private".[114] Cormac views that a case of neglect is easier to sustain than that of genocide.[114] He also says that "no academic historian takes seriously any more the claim of 'genocide'", which were only supported by "a few nationalist historians".[107]

Genocide scholar W.D. Rubinstein seems to agree with O'Grada. In his book Genocide he wrote that: "The Irish Famine cannot in truth be described as an example of genocide, but nor, in truth, was it nineteenth-century Britain's finest hour."[115]

Russian Empire[]

The Russian Tsarist Empire waged war against Circassia in the Northwest Caucasus for more than a hundred years, trying to get Circassia's prominent position along the Black Sea coast. After a century of insurgency and all-out war and continual failure to end the affair, the Tsar ordered the expulsion of most of the Muslim population of the North Caucasus. This event is remembered among Circassians as a national tragedy and is well-known among other Caucasian peoples and in Turkey as well. In the modern context of the word, there have been many claims, by Circassians, by Western historians (Colarusso, Charles King, etc.), by Turks and by Chechens that the events of the 1860s constituted one of the first "modern" horrible genocides in modern history, where a whole population is eliminated to satisfy the desires (in this case economic) of a powerful country.

Antero Leitzinger wrote in an article titled "The Circassian Genocide", that a genocide committed against the Circassian nation by Czarist Russia in the 19th century has been almost entirely forgotten, and that it was the largest genocide of the 19th century.[116] Approximately 1-1.5 million Circassians were killed, and upon the order of the Tsar, most of the Muslim population was deported (i.e., all except Ossete Muslims and Kabardins; the modern Circassians and Abazins either managed to escape or, as is the case with most, returned; at the time after the deportation, as Charles King notes in his books, travelers who searched throughout the area for Circassians could not find any left except the Kabardins), mainly to the Ottoman Empire, causing the exile of another 1.5 million Circassians and others. This effectively annihilated (or deported) 90% of the nation.[117] Circassians were viewed as tools by the Ottoman government, and settled in restive areas whose populations had nationalist yearnings- Armenia, the Arab regions and the Balkans. Many more Circassians were killed by the policies of the Balkan states, primarily Serbia and Bulgaria, which became independent at that time.[citation needed] Still more Circassians were forcefully assimilated by nationalist Muslim states (Turkey, Syria, Iraq, etc.) who looked upon non-Turk/Arab ethnicity as a foreign presence and a threat.

In May 1994, the then Russian President Boris Yeltsin admitted that resistance to the tsarist forces was legitimate, but he did not recognize "the guilt of the tsarist government for the genocide."[118] In 1997 and 1998, the leaders of Kabardino-Balkaria and of Adygea sent appeals to the Duma to reconsider the situation and to issue the needed apology; to date, there has been no response from Moscow. In October 2006, the Adygeyan public organizations of Russia, Turkey, Israel, Jordan, Syria, the USA, Belgium, Canada and Germany sent the president of the European Parliament a letter with a request to recognize the genocide against Adygean (Circassian) people.[citation needed]

On 5 July 2005 the Circassian Congress, an organisation that unites representatives of the various Circassian peoples in the Russian Federation, called on Moscow first to acknowledge and then to apologize for Tsarist policies that Circassians say constituted a genocide. Their appeal pointed out that "according to the official tsarist documents more than 400,000 Circassians were killed, 497,000 were forced to flee abroad to Turkey, and only 80,000 were left alive in their native area."[118] The movement has since been campaigning for the recognition of the "Circassian genocide".[119] Nevertheless, whether it is considered genocide or not, just as is the case with the Armenians and Jews, the Circassians view the memory of the brutal expulsions and killings at the hands of Russia and the suffering that the Russians inflicted upon them as a central part of the Circassian identity.



The Black War was a period of conflict between the British colonists and Tasmanian Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land (now Tasmania) in the early years of the 19th century. The conflict, in combination with introduced diseases and other factors, had such devastating impact on the Tasmanian Aboriginal population that it was reported the Tasmanian Aborigines had been exterminated.[120][121][122] Historian Geoffrey Blainey says that by 1830 in Tasmania: "Disease had killed most of them but warfare and private violence had also been devastating."[123] In the 19th century, smallpox was the principal cause of Aboriginal deaths.[124]

After the introduction of the word genocide in the 1940s by Raphael Lemkin, Lemkin and most other comparative genocide scholars, basing their analysis on previously published histories, present the extinction of the Tasmanian Aborigines as a text book example of a genocide; however, the majority of Australian experts are more circumspect,[125][126] because more recent detailed studies of the events surrounding the extinction by historians who specialise in Australian history have raised questions about some of the details and interpretations in the earlier histories.[127][128] In a chapter describing these developments, Ann Curthoys concludes "It is time for a more robust exchange between genocide and Tasmanian historical scholarship if we are to understand better what did happen in Tasmania in the first half of the nineteenth century, how best to conceptualize it, and how to consider what that historical knowledge might mean for us now, morally and intellectually, in the present."[125]

On the Australian continent itself during the British colonial period (1788–1901), a population of 500,000–750,000 Australian Aborigines was reduced to fewer than 50,000.[129][130] Most were devastated by the introduction of alien diseases after contact with Europeans, though perhaps 20,000 were killed by massacre, fighting, and other colonial violence.[129]

New Zealand[]

In the early 19th Century there was a genocide of the Moriori people by the Maori tribes of Ngati Mutunga and Ngati Tama. Moriori were the indigenous people of the Chatham Islands (Rekohu in Moriori, Wharekauri in Māori), east of the New Zealand archipelago in the Pacific Ocean. These people lived by a code of non-violence and passive resistance (see Nunuku-whenua), which led to their near-extinction at the hands of Taranaki Māori invaders in the 1830s.[131]

In 1835 some Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama people, Māori from the Taranaki region of the North Island of New Zealand invaded the Chathams. On 19 November 1835, the Rodney, a European ship hired by the Māori, arrived carrying 500 Maori armed with guns, clubs and axes, followed by another ship with 400 more Maori on 5 December 1835. They proceeded to enslave some Moriori and kill and cannibalise others. "Parties of warriors armed with muskets, clubs and tomahawks, led by their chiefs, walked through Moriori tribal territories and settlements without warning, permission or greeting. If the districts were wanted by the invaders, they curtly informed the inhabitants that their land had been taken and the Moriori living there were now vassals."[132]

A council of Moriori elders was convened at the settlement called Te Awapatiki. Despite knowing of the Māori predilection for killing and eating the conquered, and despite the admonition by some of the elder chiefs that the principle of Nunuku was not appropriate now, two chiefs — Tapata and Torea — declared that "the law of Nunuku was not a strategy for survival, to be varied as conditions changed; it was a moral imperative."[133] A Moriori survivor recalled: "[The Maori] commenced to kill us like sheep.... [We] were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground, and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered and killed – men, women and children indiscriminately." A Maori conqueror explained, "We took possession... in accordance with our customs and we caught all the people. Not one escaped..." [134]

After the invasion, Moriori were forbidden to marry Moriori, or to have children with each other. All became slaves of the Ngati Tama and Ngati Mutunga invaders. Many Moriori women had children by their Maori masters. A small number of Moriori women eventually married either Maori or European men. Some were taken from the Chathams and never returned. Only 101 Moriori out of a population of about 2,000 were left alive by 1862 (Kopel et al., 2003). Although the last Moriori of unmixed ancestry, Tommy Solomon,[135] died in 1933 there are several thousand mixed ancestry Moriori alive today.

1915 to 1950[]

In 1915, during World War I, the concept of Crimes against humanity was introduced into international relations for the first time when the Allied Powers sent a correspondence to the government of the Ottoman Empire, a member of the Central Powers, over massacres that were taking place within the Empire.[136] (For more details see the section Ottoman Empire).

Ottoman Empire/Turkey[]

On May 24, 1915, the Allied Powers (Britain, France, and Russia) jointly issued a statement explicitly charging for the first time ever another government of committing "a crime against humanity" in reference to that regime's persecution of its Christian minorities including Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks among others.[137] Many researchers consider these events to be part of the same policy of planned ethnoreligious purification of the Turkish state followed by the Young Turks.[138] [139][140][141][142]

This joint statement stated, "[i]n view of these new crimes of Turkey against humanity and civilization, the Allied Governments announce publicly to the Sublime Porte that they will hold personally responsible for these crimes all members of the Ottoman Government, as well as those of their agents who are implicated in such massacres."[136]


Armenian civilians, escorted by armed Ottoman soldiers, are marched through Kharpert to a prison in the nearby Mezireh district, April 1915.

The Armenian Genocide (Armenian language: Հայոց Ցեղասպանություն , translit.: Hayots’ Ts’eġaspanout’youn; Turkish language: Ermeni Soykırımı and Ermeni Kıyımı)—also called a host of other names, refers to the deliberate and systematic destruction of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire during and just after World War I. It was implemented through wholesale massacres and deportations, with the deportations consisting of forced marches under conditions designed to lead to the death of the deportees. The total number of resulting Armenian deaths is generally held to have been between one and one and a half million.[143][144][145][146]

The starting date of the genocide is conventionally held to be April 24, 1915, the day when Ottoman authorities arrested some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople. Thereafter, the Ottoman military uprooted Armenians from their homes and forced them to march for hundreds of miles, depriving them of food and water, to the desert of what is now Syria. Massacres were indiscriminate of age or gender, with rape and other sexual abuse commonplace.[147] The majority of Armenian diaspora communities were founded as a result of the Armenian genocide. Mass killing of Armenians continued under the Republic of Turkey during the Turkish–Armenian War phase of Turkish War of Independence.[148][149]

The modern Republic of Turkey, which succeeded the Ottoman Empire in 1923, vehemently denies that a genocide took place and has resisted calls in recent years by scholars, countries, and international organizations to recognize them as so. The Armenian Genocide is acknowledged to have been one of the earliest modern genocides, as historians point to the organized manner in which the killings were carried out to eliminate the Armenians, and it is the second most-studied case of genocide after the Holocaust. The word genocide was coined by scholar Raphael Lemkin in order to describe these events.


The Assyrian Genocide (also known as Sayfo or Seyfo; Aramaic: ܩܛܠܐ ܕܥܡܐ ܐܬܘܪܝܐ or ܣܝܦܐ, Turkish language: Süryani Soykırımı) was committed against the Assyrian population of the Ottoman Empire during the First World War by the Young Turks.[150] The Assyrian population of northern Mesopotamia (Tur Abdin, Hakkari, Van, Siirt region in modern-day southeastern Turkey and Urmia region in northwestern Iran) was forcibly relocated and massacred by Ottoman (Turkish and allied Kurdish) forces between 1914 and 1920 under the regime of the Young Turks.[151] This genocide is considered to be a part of the same policy of extermination as the Armenian Genocide and Greek genocide.[152][153] The Assyro-Chaldean National Council stated in a December 4, 1922, memorandum that the total death toll is unknown, but it estimates that about 750,000 Assyrians died between 1914–18.[154]


The Greek genocide[155] refers to the fate of the Greek population of the Ottoman Empire during and in the aftermath of World War I (1914–18). Like Armenians and Assyrians, the Greeks were subjected to various forms of persecution including massacres, expulsions, and death marches by Young Turks.[138][153] Mass killing of Greeks continued under the Republic of Turkey during the Greco-Turkish War phase of Turkish War of Independence.[156] George W. Rendel of the British Foreign Office, among other diplomats, noted the massacres and deportations of Greeks during the post-Armistice period.[157] These persecutions killed an estimate of 348,000 Anatolian Greeks.[158]

Dersim Kurds[]

The Dersim massacre refers to the depopulation of Dersim in Turkish Kurdistan, in 1937–38, in which approximately 65,000–70,000 Alevi Kurds[159] were killed and thousands were driven into exile. A key component of the Turkification process was the policy of massive population resettlement. The main policy document in this context, the 1934 Law on Resettlement, was used to target the region of Dersim as one of its first test cases, with disastrous consequences for the local population.[160]

Many Kurds and some ethnic Turks consider the events that took place in Dersim to constitute genocide. A prominent proponent of this view is the academic İsmail Beşikçi.[161] Under international laws, it has been argued, the actions of the Turkish authorities were not genocide, because they were not aimed at the extermination of a people, but at resettlement and suppression,[162] while a Turkish court ruled in 2011 that it could not be considered genocide according to the law because they were not directed systematically against an ethnic group.[163] Scholars, such as Martin van Bruinessen, have instead talked of an ethnocide directed against the local language and identity.[164]

Soviet Union[]

There are several documented instances of unnatural mass death occurring in the Soviet Union. These include the Soviet-wide famines in the early 1920s and early 1930s and deportations of ethnic minorities.

Soviet diplomatic efforts removed the extermination of political groups from the United Nations Convention on Genocide, so many of the atrocities committed by the Soviet authorities do not fall under the United Nations definition of genocide because the perpetrators of the atrocities were targeting members of political or economic groupings rather than the ethnic, racial, religious, or national groups listed in the UN convention. Nevertheless some of the gross violations of human rights committed by agents of the Bolshevik and Soviet governments have been described by some authorities as genocide.


During the Russian Civil War the Bolsheviks engaged in a campaign of genocide against the Don Cossacks.[165][166][167][168][169] The most reliable estimates indicate that out of a population of three million, between 300,000 and 500,000 were killed or deported in 1919–20.[170]


Passers-by ignore corpses of starved peasants on a street in Kharkiv, 1933.

During the Soviet famine of 1932–33 that affected Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and some densely populated regions of Russia, the scale of death in Ukraine is referred to as the Holodomor, and is recognized as genocide by the governments of Australia, Argentina, Georgia, Estonia, Italy, Canada, Lithuania, Poland, the USA, and Hungary. The famine was caused by the confiscation of the whole 1933 harvest in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the Kuban (a densely Ukrainian region), and some other parts of the Soviet Union, leaving the peasants too little to feed themselves. As a result, an estimated ten million died Soviet-wide, including over seven million in Ukraine, one million in the North Caucasus, and one million elsewhere.[171] American historian Timothy Snyder speaks of "3.3 million Soviet citizens (mostly Ukrainians) deliberately starved by their own government in Soviet Ukraine in 1932–1933"[172]

In addition to the requisitioning of crops in Ukraine, all food was confiscated by Soviet authorities. Any and all aid and food was prohibited from entering specifically the Ukrainian republic. Ukraine's Yuschenko's administration recognised the Holodomor as an act of genocide, and pushed international policy to reflect this.[173] This move is opposed by the Russian government and some Russophile members of the Ukrainian parliament. A Ukrainian court found Joseph Stalin, Vyacheslav Molotov, Lazar Kaganovich, Stanislav Kosior, Pavel Postyshev, Vlas Chubar and Mendel Khatayevich guilty of genocide on 13 January 2010[174] As of 2010, Moscow's official position is that the famine took place, but it is not an ethnic genocide;[173] current Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych has supported this position.[175][176] A ruling of January 13, 2010 by Kyiv's Court of Appeal recognized the leaders of the totalitarian Bolshevik regime as those guilty of 'genocide against the Ukrainian national group in 1932–33 through the artificial creation of living conditions intended for its partial physical destruction.'"[177]

Poles, 1937–38[]

A few scholars have argued that the killing, on the basis of nationality and politics, of more than 120,000 ethnic Poles in the Soviet Union during 1937–38 was genocide.[178]

Deportation of Chechen people[]

On February 26, 2004 the plenary assembly of the European Parliament recognized the deportation of Chechen people during Operation Lentil (23 February 1944), as an act of genocide, on the basis of the 1907 IV Hague Convention: The Laws and Customs of War on Land and the CPPCG adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948.[179]

The event in question began on 23 February 1944, when the entire population of Checheno-Ingushetia was summoned to local party buildings where they were told they were going to be deported as punishment for their alleged collaboration with the Germans. The inhabitants were rounded up and imprisoned in Studebaker trucks and sent to Siberia.[180][181] Many times, resistance was met with slaughter, and in one such instance, in the aul of Khaibakh, about 700 people were locked in a barn and burned to death. By the next summer, Checheno-Ingushetia was dissolved; a number of Chechen and Ingush placenames were replaced with Russian ones; mosques and graveyards were destroyed, and a massive campaign to burn numerous historical Chechen texts was nearly complete.[182][183] Throughout the North Caucasus, about 700,000 (according to Dalkhat Ediev, 724297,[184] of which the majority, 412,548, were Chechens, along with 96,327 Ingush, 104,146 Kalmyks, 39,407 Balkars and 71,869 Karachais). Many died on the trip, and of exposure in the extremely harsh environment of Siberia. The NKVD, supplying the Russian perspective, gives the statistic of 144,704 people killed in 1944–1948 alone (with a death rate of 23.5% for all groups), though other scholars give larger estimates. Estimates for Chechen deaths alone (excluding the NKVD statistic), range from about 170,000 to 200,000,[185][186][187] thus ranging from over a third of the total Chechen population to nearly half being killed (of those that were deported, not counting those killed on the spot) in those 4 years alone. In addition to being recognized by the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, the European Union Parliament also recognized it as a genocide in 2004.[188]

Deportations of Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians[]

Some scholars believe the mass deportations of up to 17500 Lithuanians, 17000 Latvians and 6000 Estonians carried out by Stalin were the start of a genocide. When added with the killing of the Forest Brethren and the renewed Dekulakization which followed the Soviet reconquest of the Baltic states at the end of world war two. The total number of people deported to Siberia was 118559 from Lithuania 52541 from Latvia and 32540 from Estonia.[189] Due to the high death rate of deportees during the first few years of their Siberian exile, caused by the failure of Soviet authorities to provide suitable clothing or housing at the destination, whether through neglect or premeditation, some sources consider these deportations an act of genocide.[190][191][192] Based on the Martens Clause and the principles of the Nuremberg Charter, the European Court of Human Rights has held that the March deportation constituted a crime against humanity.[193][194] According to Erwin Oberlander, under the current laws of genocide these mass deportations do not constitute a genocide, rather a crime against humanity.[195]

Lithuania began trials for genocide in 1997. Latvia and Estonia began theirs in 1998.[196] Latvia has since convicted four security officers who had been involved in the mass deportations and in 2003 sentenced a former KGB agent to five years. Estonia has tried and convicted ten men for their actions during the deportations and others are under investigation. In Lithuania by 2004 23 cases were before the courts, but as of the end of the year none have been convicted.[197]

In 2007 Estonia charged Arnold Meri (then 88 years old), a former Soviet Communist Party official and highly decorated former Red Army soldier, with genocide for his alleged role in deportations of Estonians to Soviet gulags in Siberia. Shortly after the trial opened, it was suspended because of Meri's frail health and then abandoned because he died of lung cancer.[198][199] A memorial in Vilnius, Lithuania, is dedicated to the genocide victims of Stalin as well as Hitler,[200] and the Museum of Genocide Victims in Lithuania, that was set up on 14 October 1992 under the auspices of the Lithuanian Minister of Culture and Education and the President of the Lithuanian Union of Political Prisoners and Deportees. The Lithuanian museum was established in the former KGB headquarters and chronicles the imprisonment and deportation of Lithuanians by officials of the Soviet Union.[201]


During the Nanking Massacre in the period of the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese engaged in mass killings and committed genocide against the Chinese. Bradley Campbell, in an article published in the journal Sociological Theory, described the Nanking Massacre as a genocide considering the fact that the Chinese were unilaterally killed by the Japanese en masse during the aftermath, despite the successful and certain outcome of their battle.[202]

Nazi Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe[]

Major deportation routes to the extermination camps in Europe.

Because of the universal acceptance of international laws, defining and forbidding genocide was achieved in 1948, with the promulgation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), those criminals who were prosecuted after the war in international courts, for taking part in the Holocaust were found guilty of crimes against humanity and other more specific crimes like murder. Nevertheless the Holocaust is universally recognized to have been a genocide and the term, that had been coined the year before by Raphael Lemkin,[203] appeared in the indictment of the 24 German leaders, Count 3, stated that all the defendants had "conducted deliberate and systematic genocide – namely, the extermination of racial and national groups…"[204]

The term "the Holocaust" (from the Greek hólos, "whole" and kaustós, "burnt") is generally used to describe the killing of approximately six million European Jews during World War II, as part of a program of deliberate extermination planned and executed by the National Socialist German Workers Party in Germany led by Adolf Hitler.[205] A majority of scholars do not include other groups in the definition of the Holocaust, reserving the term to refer only to the genocide of the Jews,[206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215][216][217][218] or what the Germans called the "Final Solution of the Jewish Question."

However, some scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should also include Germany's genocide of millions of people in other groups, including Romani, communists, Soviet prisoners of war, Polish and Soviet civilians, homosexuals, people with disabilities, Jehovah's Witnesses and other political and religious opponents, which occurred regardless of whether they were of German or non-German ethnic origin. This was the most common definition from the end of WWII to the 1960s.[219] Using this definition, the total number of Holocaust victims is between 11 million and 17 million people.[220]

The Holocaust was accomplished in stages. Legislation to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before the outbreak of World War II. Concentration camps were established in which inmates were used as slave labour until they died of exhaustion or disease. Where the Third Reich conquered new territory in eastern Europe, specialized units called Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and political opponents in mass shootings.[221] Jews and Romani were crammed into ghettos before being transported hundreds of miles by freight train to extermination camps where, if they survived the journey, the majority of them were killed in gas chambers. Every arm of Germany's bureaucracy was involved in the logistics of the mass murder, turning the country into what one Holocaust scholar has called "a genocidal nation."[222]

File:EG A Šiauliai Lithuania July 1941.JPG

Men are forced to dig their own graves before being shot by SS troops. Šiauliai, Lithuania, July 1941

Other targets of the German mass murder or "German genocidal policy",[223] included Slavs (Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Serbs, Czechoslovaks, and others), Romani people (see Porajmos), mentally ill (see T-4 Euthanasia Program), homosexuals and "sexual deviants", Jehovah's Witnesses, and political opponents. R. J. Rummel estimates that 16,315,000 people died as a result of genocide, just over 10.5 million Slavs, just under 5.3 million Jews, 258,000 Romani and 220,000 homosexuals.[224][225] Donald Niewyk suggests that the broadest definition would produce a death toll of 17 million.[226] A figure of 26 million is given in Service d'Information des Crimes de Guerre: Crimes contre la Personne Humain, Camps de Concentration. Paris, 1946, p. 197. Adam Jones has argued that the German killing of 2.8 million Soviet POWs in eight months in 1941-2 was an act of "gendercide" (since only men were killed) and that it "vies with the genocide in Rwanda as the most concentrated mass killing in human history."[227]

In the longer term,[228] the Germans wanted to exterminate some 30–45 million Slavs.[229] According to Roger Chickering, "Had the Germans won the war, they would have undertaken the largest genocide in history."[230] Some historians speak of the siege of Leningrad operations in terms of genocide, as a "racially motivated starvation policy" that became an integral part of the unprecedented German war of extermination against populations of the Soviet Union generally.[231] German historian Dieter Pohl estimates the total death toll of Nazi genocide and other mass murder at 12 to 14 million.[232] The victims of the siege of Leningrad are not included in Pohl's estimate.

Independent State of Croatia[]

After the Nazi invasion of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the Nazis and fascists established the Croatian state known as the Nezavisna Država Hrvatska (Independent State of Croatia) or NDH. Immediately after its establishment, the NDH began a terror campaign against Serbs, Jews and Romani people. From 1941 to 1945, when Josip Broz Tito's Partisans liberated Croatia, the Ustaše regime killed approximately 300,000 to 350,000 people,[233] mostly Serbs and almost the entire Jewish and Romani population, many of them in the Jasenovac concentration camp. Helen Fein has estimated that the Ustaše killed virtually every Romani in the country.[234] The Ustaše enacted a policy that called for a solution to the "Serbian problem" in the Independent State of Croatia. The solution was to "kill one-third of the Serbs, expel one-third, and convert one-third".[235] According to the United States Holocaust Museum, 320,000–340,000 ethnic Serbs were murdered under Ustaše rule in the Independent State of Croatia.[236] The Yad Vashem World Holocaust Museum and Research Center concludes that "more than 500,000 Serbs were murdered in horribly sadistic ways, 250,000 were expelled, and another 200,000 were forced to convert" during the Second World War.[237] Nearly 80,000 Roma and 35,000 Jews were also killed by the Ustaše.

Some historians also consider the crimes of the Chetniks in Bosnia against non-Serbs to constitute acts of Genocide.[238][239]

Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia[]

Massacres of Poles in Volhynia in 1943. Most Poles of Volhynia (now in Ukraine) had either been murdered or had fled the area

The Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia were part of an ethnic cleansing operation carried out by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) West in the Nazi occupied regions of the Eastern Galicia (Nazi created Distrikt Galizien in General Government), and UPA North in Volhynia (in Nazi created Reichskommissariat Ukraine), beginning in March 1943 and lasting until the end of 1944. The peak of the massacres took place in July and August 1943 when a senior UPA commander, Dmytro Klyachkivsky, ordered the liquidation of the entire male Polish population between 16 and 60 years of age.[240][241] Despite this, most of the victims were women and children. The actions of the UPA resulted in 40,000–60,000 Polish civilian casualties in Volhynia,[242] from 25,000[243] to 30,000–40,000 in Eastern Galicia.[242] The killings were directly linked with the policies of the Bandera fraction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, whose goal, specified at the Second Conference of the OUN-B, was to remove non-Ukrainians from the social and economic spheres of a future Ukrainian state.[244]

The massacres are recognized in Poland as ethnic cleansing with "marks of genocide."[245] According to the IPN prosecutor Piotr Zając, the crimes have a "character of genocide".[246] However, according to Katchanovski, the actions which occurred in Volhynia cannot be classified as genocide "because there is no evidence of an intent to eliminate entire or a significant party of the Polish population, and the anti-Polish action was mostly limited to a relatively small region."

Flight and expulsion of Germans during and after World War II[]

With at least 12 million[247][248][249] Germans directly involved, it was the largest movement or transfer of any single ethnic population in modern history[248] and the largest among the post-war expulsions in Central and Eastern Europe (which displaced more than twenty million people in total).[247] Estimates of the total number of dead range from 500,000 to 2,000,000, where the higher figures include "unsolved cases" of persons reported as missing and presumed dead. Many German civilians were also sent to internment and labor camps. RJ Rummel estimates that 1,585,000 Germans were killed in Poland and 197,000 were killed in Czechoslovakia.[250] The German-Czech Historians Commission, on the other hand, established for Czechoslovakia a death toll ranging between a minimum of 15,000 and a maximum of 30,000.[251] The events have been usually classified as population transfer,[252][253] or as ethnic cleansing.[254][255][256][257][258][259][260][261][262][263] Martin Shaw (2007) and W.D. Rubinstein (2004) describe the expulsions as genocide.[264][265] Felix Ermacora, in line with a minority of legal scholars, considered ethnic cleansing to be genocide,[266][267] and stated that the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans was genocide.[268]

Dominican Republic[]

In 1937, Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo ordered the execution of Haitians living in the Dominican Republic. The Parsley Massacre, known in the Dominican Republic as "El Corte" (the Cutting), lasted approximately five days. Trujillo had his soldiers apply parsley to suspected Haitians and they would ask, "What is this?" Spanish speaking people would be able to pronounce the Spanish word for parsley perfectly, "perejil". In Haitian Creole, the word for parsley is "persil". Those who would have trouble pronouncing "perejil" would be assumed to be Haitian and slaughtered. The violence resulted in the deaths of 20,000 to 30,000 people.[269][better source needed]

Republic of China and Tibet[]

The Kuomintang's Republic of China government supported Muslim warlord Ma Bufang when he launched seven expeditions into Golog, causing the deaths of thousands of Tibetans.[270] Uradyn Erden Bulag called the events that followed genocidal and David Goodman called them ethnic cleansing. One Tibetan counted the number of times Ma attacked him, remembering the seventh attack which made life impossible.[271] Ma was highly anti-communist, and he and his army wiped out many Tibetans in the northeast and eastern Qinghai, and also destroyed Tibetan Buddhist Temples.[272][273] Ma also patronized the Panchen Lama, who was exiled from Tibet by the Dalai Lama's government.

1951 to 2000[]

Universal acceptance of international laws, defining and forbidding genocide was achieved in 1948, with the promulgation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). The CPPCG was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1948 and came into effect on 12 January 1951 (Resolution 260 (III)). After the minimum 20 countries became parties to the Convention, it came into force as international law on 12 January 1951. At that time however, only two of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) were parties to the treaty, which caused the Convention to languish for over four decades.

Australia 1900–1969[]

Sir Ronald Wilson, former president of Australia's Human Rights Commission thinks that Australia's "Stolen Generation" — where from 1900 to 1970, 20,000 to 25,000 Aboriginal children were forcibly separated from their natural families (see the Bringing Them Home report)[274] — "It clearly was attempted genocide ... [because it] was believed that the Aboriginal people would die out".[275] However the nature and extent of the removals have been disputed within Australia, with some commentators questioning the findings contained in the report and asserting that the Stolen Generation has been exaggerated. Not only has the number of children removed from their parents been questioned, but also the intent and effects of the government policy.[274]


In 1964, towards the end of the Zanzibar Revolution—which led to the overthrow of the Sultan of Zanzibar and his mainly Arab government by local African revolutionaries—John Okello claimed in radio speeches to have killed or imprisoned tens of thousands of his "enemies and stooges,"[276] but actual estimates of the number of deaths vary greatly, from "hundreds" to 20,000. Some Western newspapers give figures of 2,000–4,000;[277][278] the higher numbers may be inflated by Okello's own broadcasts and exaggerated reports in some Western and Arab news media.[276][279][280] The killing of Arab prisoners and their burial in mass graves was documented by an Italian film crew, filming from a helicopter, in Africa Addio.[281] Many Arabs fled to safety in Oman,[279] and by Okello's order no Europeans were harmed.[282] The post-revolution violence did not spread to Pemba.[280] Leo Kuper described the killing of Arabs in Zanzibar as a genocide.[283]

Guatemala 1966–1996[]

During the Guatemalan civil war, some 200,000 people died. More than one million people were forced to flee their homes and hundreds of villages were destroyed. The officially chartered Historical Clarification Commission attributed more than 93% of all documented violations of human rights to Guatemala's military government; and estimated that Maya Indians accounted for 83% of the victims. It concluded in 1999 that state actions constituted genocide.[284][285]

In 1999, Nobel peace prize winner Rigoberta Menchú brought a case against the military leadership in a Spanish Court. Six officials, among them Efraín Ríos Montt and Óscar Humberto Mejía Victores, were formally charged on 7 July 2006 to appear in the Spanish National Court after Spain's Constitutional Court ruled in 2005 that Spanish courts can exercise universal jurisdiction over war crimes committed during the Guatemalan Civil War[286] In May 2013, Rios Montt was found guilty of genocide 1,700 indigenous Ixil Mayans during 1982–83 by a Guatemalan court and sentenced to 80 years in prison.[287]

Pakistan (Bangladesh War of 1971)[]

There is an academic consensus the that events which took place during the Bangladesh Liberation War were a genocide[288] During the nine month long conflict it has been estimated that approximately 3 million people were killed, and that the Pakistani armed forces raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women and girls in an act of genocidal rape.[289] According to Sarmila Bose, between 50,000 and 100,000 combatants and civilians were killed by both sides during the war.[290][unreliable source?] Bose's work and methodology has been heavily critiqued.[291] A 2008 British Medical Journal study by Ziad Obermeyer, Christopher J. L. Murray, and Emmanuela Gakidou estimated that up to 269,000 civilians died as a result of the conflict; the authors note that this is far higher than a previous estimate of 58,000 from Uppsala University and the Peace Research Institute, Oslo.[292] According to Serajur Rahman, the official Bangladeshi estimate of "3 lahks" (300,000) was wrongly translated into English as 3 million.[293][unreliable source?]

A case was filed in the Federal Court of Australia on 20 September 2006 for alleged crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity during 1971 by the Pakistani Armed Forces and its collaborators:[294]

We are glad to announce that a case has been filed in the Federal Magistrate's Court of Australia today under the Genocide Conventions Act 1949 and War Crimes Act. This is the first time in history that someone is attending a court proceeding in relation to the [alleged] crimes of Genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity during 1971 by the Pakistani Armed Forces and its collaborators. The Proceeding number is SYG 2672 of 2006. On 25 October 2006, a direction hearing will take place in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, Sydney registry before Federal Magistrate His Honor Nicholls.

On 21 May 2007, at the request of the applicant "Leave is granted to the applicant to discontinue his application filed on 20 September 2006." (FILE NO: (P)SYG2672/2006)[295]

Burundi 1972 and 1993[]

Since Burundi's independence in 1962, there have been two events called genocide in the country. The 1972 mass-killings of Hutu by the Tutsi army,[296] and the 1993 killing of Tutsi by the Hutu population that is recognised as an act of genocide in the final report of the International Commission of Inquiry for Burundi presented to the United Nations Security Council in 2002.[297]

North Korea[]

Several millions in North Korea have died of starvation since the mid-1990s, with aid groups and human rights NGOs stating often that North Korea has systematically and deliberately prevented food aid from reaching the areas most devastated by food shortages.[298] Up to one million have died in North Korea's political prison camps which detain dissidents and their entire families, including children, for perceived political offences.[299]

In 2004, Yad Vashem, in response to the BBC documentary, "Access to Evil", which includes witness testimonies from camp survivors and a former guard of gas chambers and mass killings occurring systematically in the camps, called on the international community in 2004 to investigate "political genocide" in North Korea, yet no substantial action has been taken to this day to intervene.[299]

In September 2011, the Harvard International Review published an article which argued that North Korea was violating the UN Genocide Convention in every possible way, through its systematic killing of half-Chinese babies and religious groups.[300] North Korea's Christian population, which included 25–30% of the inhabitants of Pyongyang and was considered to be the center of Christianity in East Asia in 1945, has been systematically massacred and persecuted; 50,000–70,000 Christians are imprisoned in North Korea’s concentration camps today.[301]

Equatorial Guinea[]

Francisco Macías Nguema was the first President of Equatorial Guinea, from 1968 until his overthrow in 1979.[302] During his presidency, his country was nicknamed "the Auschwitz of Africa". Nguema's regime was characterized by its abandonment of all government functions except internal security, which was accomplished by terror; he acted as chief judge and sentenced thousands to death. This led to the death or exile of up to 1/3 of the country's population. Out of a population of 300,000, an estimated 80,000 had been killed, in particular those of the Bubi ethnic minority on Bioko associated with relative wealth and intellectualism.[303][304] Uneasy around educated people, he had killed everyone who wore spectacles. All schools were ordered closed in 1975. The economy collapsed, and skilled citizens and foreigners left.[305]

On August 3, 1979, he was overthrown by Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo.[306] Macías Nguema was captured, tried for genocide and other crimes along with 10 others. All of them were found guilty, four received terms of imprisonment, while Nguema and the other six were executed a few weeks later on September 29.[307][308]

John B. Quigley in The Genocide Convention: An International Law Analysis points out that at Macías Nguema's trial for genocide that Equatorial Guinea had not ratified the Genocide convention and that records of the court proceedings show that there was some confusion over whether Nguema and his co-defendants were tried under the laws of Spain (the former colonial power), or whether the trial was justified on the claim that the Genocide Convention was part of customary international law. Quigley states that "The Macias case stands out as the most confusing of domestic genocide prosecutions from the standpoint of the applicable law. The Macias conviction is also problematic from the standpoint of the identity of the protected group."[309]

East Timor under Indonesian occupation[]

East Timor was occupied by Indonesia from 1975 to 1999 as an annexed territory with Indonesian provincial status. A detailed statistical report prepared for the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor cited a lower range of 102,800 conflict-related deaths in the period 1974–1999, namely, approximately 18,600 killings and 84,200 excess deaths from hunger and illness, including the Indonesian military using "starvation as a weapon to exterminate the East Timorese"[310] most of which occurred during the Indonesian occupation.[311] Earlier estimates of deaths during the occupation range from 60,000 to 200,000.[312]

According to Sian Powell writing in The Australian, a UN report states that the Indonesian military used starvation as a weapon to exterminate the East Timorese, along with Napalm and chemical weapons, which poisoned the food and water supply.[313] Ben Kiernan has written in War, Genocide, and Resistance in East Timor, 1975–99: Comparative Reflections on Cambodia that

the crimes committed ... in East Timor, with a toll of 150,000 in a population of 650,000, clearly meet a range of sociological definitions of genocide used by most scholars of the phenomenon, who see both political and ethnic groups as possible victims of genocide. The victims in East Timor included not only that substantial 'part' of the Timorese 'national group' targeted for destruction because of their resistance to Indonesian annexation—along with their relatives, as we shall see—but also most members of the twenty-thousand strong ethnic Chinese minority prominent in the towns of East Timor, whom Indonesian forces singled out for destruction, apparently because of their ethnicity 'as such.'[314][315]


The communist Pathet Lao overthrew the royalist government of Laos in December 1975, establishing the Lao People's Democratic Republic.[316] The conflict between Hmong rebels and the Pathet Lao continued in isolated pockets. The government of Laos in collaboration with Vietnam has been accused of committing genocide against the Hmong,[317][318] with up to 100,000 killed out of a population 400,000.[319] [320]

Dirty War in Argentina[]

Commemoration in Argentina

In September 2006, Miguel Osvaldo Etchecolatz, who had been the police commissioner of the province of Buenos Aires during the Dirty War (1976–1983), was found guilty of six counts of murder, six counts of unlawful imprisonment, and seven counts of torture in a federal court. The judge who presided over the case, Carlos Rozanski, described the offences as part of a systematic attack that was intended to destroy parts of society that the victims represented and as such it was genocide.[321] Rozanski noted that the CPPCG does not include the elimination of political groups (because that group was removed at the behest of Stalin), but instead based his findings on 11 December 1946 United Nations General Assembly Resolution 96 barring acts of genocide "when racial, religious, political and other groups have been destroyed, entirely or in part" (which passed unanimously), because he considered the original UN definition to be more legitimate than the politically compromised CPPCG definition.[321]


Ethiopia's former Soviet-backed Marxist dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam was tried in an Ethiopian court, in absentia, for his role in mass killings. Mengistu's charge sheet and evidence list was 8,000 pages long. The evidence against him included signed execution orders, videos of torture sessions and personal testimonies.[322] The trial began in 1994 and on 12 December 2006 Mengistu was found guilty of genocide and other offences. He was sentenced to life in prison in January 2007.[323][324] Ethiopian law defines genocide as any act committed with the intent to wipe out political and not just ethnic groups.[325] 106 Derg officials were accused of genocide during the trials, but only 36 of them were present in the court. Several former members of the Derg have been sentenced to death.[326] Zimbabwe has refused to respond to Ethiopia's request that Mengistu be extradited, which has permitted him to avoid his Ethiopian life imprisonment sentence. Mengistu supported Robert Mugabe, the long-standing President of Zimbabwe, during his leadership of Ethiopia.[327]

Michael Clough, a US attorney and longtime observer of Ethiopia told Voice of America in a statement released on December 13, 2006,[328]

“The biggest problem with prosecuting Mengistu for genocide is that his actions did not necessarily target a particular group. They were directed against anybody who was opposing his government, and they were generally much more political than based on any ethnic targeting. In contrast, the irony is the Ethiopian government itself has been accused of genocide based on atrocities committed in Gambella. I’m not sure that they qualify as genocide either. But in Gambella, the incidents, which were well documented in a human rights report of about 2 years ago, were clearly directed at a particular group, the tribal group, the Anuak.”

Some experts have estimated that 150,000 university students, intellectuals and politicians were killed during Mengistu's rule.[329] Amnesty International estimates that up to 500,000 people were killed during the Ethiopian Red Terror[330][331][332] Human Rights Watch describes the Red Terror as "one of the most systematic uses of mass murder by a state ever witnessed in Africa."[322] During his reign it was not uncommon to see students, suspected government critics or rebel sympathisers hanging from lampposts each morning. Mengistu himself is alleged to have murdered opponents by garroting or shooting them, saying that he was leading by example.[333]

Iraqi Kurds[]

See also 1988 Anfal campaign
File:بانو و کودک شهید حلبچه‌ای.jpg

Dead Iraqi Kurds of Halabja in 1988

On December 23, 2005 a Dutch court ruled in a case brought against Frans van Anraat for supplying chemicals to Iraq, that "[it] thinks and considers it legally and convincingly proven that the Kurdish population meets the requirement under the genocide conventions as an ethnic group. The court has no other conclusion than that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq." and because he supplied the chemicals before 16 March 1988, the date of the Halabja poison gas attack he is guilty of a war crime but not guilty of complicity in genocide.[334][335]


On 5 June 1959 Shri Purshottam Trikamdas, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India, presented a report on Tibet to the International Commission of Jurists (an NGO). The press conference address on the report states in paragraph 26 that

From the facts stated above the following conclusions may be drawn: ... (e) To examine all such evidence obtained by this Committee and from other sources and to take appropriate action thereon and in particular to determine whether the crime of Genocide – for which already there is strong presumption – is established and, in that case, to initiate such action as envisaged by the Genocide Convention of 1948 and by the Charter of the United Nations for suppression of these acts and appropriate redress;[336]

The report of the International Commission of Jurists (1960) is widely misquoted as stating that there was physical genocide (mass killings). It actually claims that there was 'only' cultural genocide.

ICJ Report (1960) page 346: "The committee found that acts of genocide had been committed in Tibet in an attempt to destroy the Tibetans as a religious group, and that such acts are acts of genocide independently of any conventional obligation. The committee did not find that there was sufficient proof of the destruction of Tibetans as a race, nation or ethnic group as such by methods that can be regarded as genocide in international law".

However cultural genocide is also contested by some academics such as Barry Sautman.[337] Tibetan is the everyday language of Tibetans in Tibet. In addition Tibetans are exempt from the one child policy.[338][339]

The Central Tibetan Administration & other Tibetan in excile media have claimed that the actual number of Tibetans that have died of starvation, violence, or other indirect causes since 1950 is approximately 1.2 million.[340][341] White states this figure as '...In all, over one million Tibetans, a fifth of the population, had died as a result of Chinese occupation up until the end of the Cultural Revolution..'[342]

Adam Jones, a specialist on genocide, argued that the struggle sessions after the 1959 Tibetan uprising may be considered genocide, based on the claim that the conflict resulted in 92,000 deaths.[343] However, according to tibetologist Tom Grunfeld, "the veracity of such a claim is difficult to verify."[344]

Spain's top criminal court has decided to hear a case brought by Tibetan rights activists who allege that China's former President Hu Jintao committed genocide in Tibet [345]

Democratic Republic of Congo[]

During the Congo Civil War (1998–2003), Pygmies were hunted down and eaten by both sides in the conflict, who regarded them as subhuman.[346] Sinafasi Makelo, a representative of Mbuti pygmies, has asked the UN Security Council to recognize cannibalism as a crime against humanity and also as an act of genocide.[347] According to a report by Minority Rights Group International there is evidence of mass killings, cannibalism and rape. The report, which labeled these events as a campaign of extermination, linked much of the violence to beliefs about special powers held by the Bambuti.[348] In Ituri district, rebel forces ran an operation code-named "Effacer le tableau" (to wipe the slate clean). The aim of the operation, according to witnesses, was to rid the forest of pygmies.[349][350]

Hutu genocide in DR Congo[]

A leaked United Nations draft report accused Rwanda's Tutsi-led army of committing a possible genocide against the ethnic Hutus in neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo. The report accused the Rwandan Army and allied Congolese rebels of killing tens of thousands of ethnic Hutu men, women and children (refugees from Rwanda and locals alike) in a series of systematic attacks between 1996 and 1997. The government of Rwanda rejected the accusation.[351][352]


The Social Science Research Council (2007) reported genocidal killings committed against Somalia's Bantu population and Jubba Valley dwellers from 1991 onwards noting that "Somalia is a rare case in which genocidal acts were carried out by militias in the utter absence of a governing state structure."[353]

Sri Lanka[]


Bodies of Female minors killed in an Sri Lankan air raid on an orphanage

Both the Sri Lankan military and the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam were accused of human rights violations during Sri Lanka's 26-year civil war.[354][355] An United Nations Panel of Experts looking into these alleged violations found "credible allegations, which if proven, indicate that serious violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law were committed both by the Government of Sri Lanka and the LTTE, some of which would amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity".[356] Some activists and politicians have gone further and accused the Sri Lankan government of carrying out genocide against the minority Sri Lankan Tamil people during and after the war.

Human rights lawyer Bruce Fein believes that Sri Lanka's leaders committed genocide, stating "It's hard to come to conclusion that the aim wasn't to destroy the Tamil people in whole or substantial part",[357] while leading Sri Lankan Tamil Parliamentarian Suresh Premachandran labelled the Sri Lankan military's actions during the final months of the civil war as genocide.[358][359] Refugees escaping Sri Lanka have also stated that they fled from genocide,[360] and various Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora groups have echoed these accusations.[361][362][363][364]

In 2009 thousands of Tamils protested in cities all over the world against what they claimed was genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka.[365][366] Various diaspora activists have formed a campaign group called Tamils Against Genocide.[367] Some have taken legal action against Sri Lankan leaders for alleged genocide. Norwegian human rights lawyer Harald Stabell has filed a case in Norwegian courts against Sri Lankan President Rajapaksa and others officials.[368][369]

Politicians from various political parties in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu have also made genocide accusations.[370][371] In 2008 and 2009 the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu M. Karunanidhi appealed to the Indian government on a number of occasions to intervene to "stop the genocide of Tamils",[372][373][374] while his successor J. Jayalalithaa called on the Indian government to bring Rajapaksa before international courts for genocide.[375] The women's wing of the Communist Party of India, passed a resolution in August 2012 finding that the "Systematic sexual violence against Tamil women" by Sri Lankan forces constitutes genocide, calling for an "independent international investigation".[376]

In January 2010 a Permanent Peoples' Tribunal (PPT) held in Dublin, Ireland found Sri Lanka guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity but could not find enough evidence to justify the charge of genocide.[377][378] The tribunal requested that a thorough investigation be held as some of the evidence indicated "possible acts of genocide".[377] The PPT will convene in Germany in April 2013 to examine reports on the matter.[379] The International Commission of Jurists has stated that the camps used by the Sri Lankan government/military to intern nearly 300,000 Tamils after the war's end may have breached the convention against genocide.[380]

The Sri Lankan government has denied the allegations of genocide and war crimes.[381]


The Srebrenica genocide (or Srebrenica massacre) was the July 1995 killing of more than 8,000[382][383][384][385][386] Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims), mainly men and boys, in and around the town of Srebrenica during the Bosnian War. The killing was perpetrated by units of the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS) under the command of General Ratko Mladić. The Secretary-General of the United Nations described the mass murder as the worst crime on European soil since the Second World War.[387][388] A paramilitary unit from Serbia known as the Scorpions, officially part of the Serbian Interior Ministry until 1991, participated in the massacre,[389][390] along with several hundred Russian and Greek volunteers.[391][392]

International prosecution of genocide[]

Ad hoc tribunals[]

In 1951 only two of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) were parties to the CPPCG: France and the Republic of China. The CPPCG was ratified by the Soviet Union in 1954, the United Kingdom in 1970, the People's Republic of China in 1983 (having replaced the Taiwan-based Republic of China on the UNSC in 1971), and the United States in 1988. So it was only in the 1990s that the international law on the crime of genocide began to be enforced.

Bosnia and Herzegovina[]

Male mourners at the reburial ceremony for an exhumed victim of the Srebrenica massacre.

In 2001 the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) delivered its first conviction for the crime of genocide, against General Krstić for his role in the 1994 Srebrenica Genocide.[393] This judgement was upheld by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its February 2007 ruling in the case of Bosnia vs Serbia. However, contrary to the claim made by Bosnia, the ICJ did not find that genocide had been committed on the wider territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina during the war, limiting local genocide to Srebrenica and Žepa. The ICJ also ruled that Serbia was not responsible for the genocide nor for "aiding and abetting it", although it ruled that Serbia could have done more to prevent the genocide and that Serbia failed to punish the perpetrators.[394] Before this ruling the term Bosnian Genocide had been used by some academics,[395] and human rights officials.[396]

In 2010, Vujadin Popović, Lieutenant Colonel and the Chief of Security of the Drina Corps of the Bosnian Serb Army, and Ljubiša Beara, Colonel and Chief of Security of the same army, were convicted of genocide, extermination, murder and persecution by the ICTY for their role in the Srebrenice massacre and sentenced to a life in prison.[397][398][399][400]

German courts have handed down several convictions for genocide during the Bosnian War. Novislav Djajic was indicted for participation in genocide, but the Higher Regional Court failed to find that there was sufficient certainty, for a criminal conviction, that he had intended to commit genocide. Nevertheless Djajic was found guilty of 14 cases of murder and one case of attempted murder.[401] At Djajic's appeal on 23 May 1997, the Bavarian Appeals Chamber found that acts of genocide were committed in June 1992, confined within the administrative district of Foca.[402] The Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Düsseldorf, in September 1997, handed down a genocide conviction against Nikola Jorgic, a Bosnian Serb from the Doboj region who was the leader of a paramilitary group located in the Doboj region. He was sentenced to four terms of life imprisonment for his involvement in genocidal actions that took place in regions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, other than Srebrenica;[403] and "On 29 November 1999, the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Düsseldorf condemned Maksim Sokolovic to 9 years in prison for aiding and abetting the crime of genocide and for grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions".[404]


The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is a court under the auspices of the United Nations for the prosecution of offenses committed in Rwanda during the genocide that occurred there during April and May, 1994, commencing on April 6. The ICTR was created on November 8, 1994 by the Security Council of the United Nations to judge those people responsible for the acts of genocide and other serious violations of international law performed in the territory of Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, between January 1 and December 31, 1994. Over the course of approximately 100 days from the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana on April 6 through mid-July, at least 800,000 people were killed, according to a Human Rights Watch estimate.

As of mid-2011, the ICTR has convicted 57 accused persons (including 19 whose cases are on appeal) and acquitted eight. Another ten persons are still on trial while one is awaiting trial. Nine remain at large.[405] The first trial, of Jean-Paul Akayesu, ended in 1998 with his conviction for genocide and crimes against humanity.[406] This was notable as the world's first conviction for the crime of genocide, as defined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Jean Kambanda, interim Prime Minister during the genocide, pled guilty.


Skulls at Choeung Ek memorial in Cambodia

The Khmer Rouge, led by Pol Pot, Ta Mok and other leaders, organized the mass killing of ideologically suspect groups, ethnic minorities like the ethnic Vietnamese, Chinese (or Sino-Khmers), Chams and Thais, former civil servants, former government soldiers, Buddhist monks, secular intellectuals and professionals, and former city dwellers. Khmer Rouge cadres defeated in factional struggles were also liquidated in purges. Man-made famine and slave labor resulted in many hundreds of thousands of deaths.[407] Researcher Craig Etcheson of the Documentation Center of Cambodia suggests that the death toll was between 2 and 2.5 million, with a "most likely" figure of 2.2 million. After 5 years of researching 20,000 grave sites, he concluded that "these mass graves contain the remains of 1,386,734 victims of execution."[408] However, some scholars have argued that the Khmer Rouge were not racist and had no intention of exterminating ethnic minorities or the Cambodian people; in this view, their brutality was the product of an extreme version of communist ideology.[409]

On 6 June 2003 the Cambodian government and the United Nations reached an agreement to set up the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) which would focus exclusively on crimes committed by the most senior Khmer Rouge officials during the period of Khmer Rouge rule from 1975–1979.[410] The judges were sworn in in early July 2006.[411][412][413]

The investigating judges were presented with the names of five possible suspects by the prosecution on 18 July 2007.[411][414]

Khieu Samphan at a public hearing before the Pre-Trial Cambodia Tribunal on 3 July 2009.

  • Kang Kek Iew was formally charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity and detained by the Tribunal on 31 July 2007. He was indicted on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity on 12 August 2008.[415] His appeal against his conviction for war crimes and crimes against humanity was rejected on 3 February 2012, and he is serving a sentence of life imprisonment.[416]
  • Nuon Chea, a former prime minister, was indicted on charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and several other crimes under Cambodian law on 15 September 2010. He was transferred into the custody of the ECCC on 19 September 2007. His trial, which is ongoing, started on 27 June 2011.[417][418]
  • Khieu Samphan, a former head of state, was indicted on charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and several other crimes under Cambodian law on 15 September 2010. He was transferred into the custody of the ECCC on 19 September 2007. His trial, which is ongoing, started on 27 June 2011.[417][418]
  • Ieng Sary, a former foreign minister, was indicted on charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and several other crimes under Cambodian law on 15 September 2010. He was transferred into the custody of the ECCC on 12 November 2007. His trial, which is ongoing, started on 27 June 2011.[417][418] He died in March 2013.
  • Ieng Thirith, wife of Ieng Sary and a former minister for social affairs, was indicted on charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and several other crimes under Cambodian law on 15 September 2010. She was transferred into the custody of the ECCC on 12 November 2007. Proceedings against her have been suspended pending a health evaluation.[418][419]

There has been disagreement between some of the international jurists and the Cambodian government over whether any other people should be tried by the Tribunal.[414]

International Criminal Court[]

The ICC can only prosecute crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002.[420][421]

Darfur, Sudan[]

See also: Second Sudanese Civil War, Darfur conflict

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, wanted by the ICC

The on-going racial[422][423][424][425][426][427][428] conflict in Darfur, Sudan, which started in 2003, was declared a "genocide" by United States Secretary of State Colin Powell on September 9, 2004 in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[429] Since that time however, no other permanent member of the UN Security Council has followed suit. In fact, in January 2005, an International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur, authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1564 of 2004, issued a report to the Secretary-General stating that "the Government of the Sudan has not pursued a policy of genocide."[430] Nevertheless, the Commission cautioned that "The conclusion that no genocidal policy has been pursued and implemented in Darfur by the Government authorities, directly or through the militias under their control, should not be taken in any way as detracting from the gravity of the crimes perpetrated in that region. International offences such as the crimes against humanity and war crimes that have been committed in Darfur may be no less serious and heinous than genocide."[430]

In March 2005, the Security Council formally referred the situation in Darfur to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), taking into account the Commission report but without mentioning any specific crimes.[431] Two permanent members of the Security Council, the United States and China, abstained from the vote on the referral resolution.[432] As of his fourth report to the Security Council, the Prosecutor has found "reasonable grounds to believe that the individuals identified [in the UN Security Council Resolution 1593] have committed crimes against humanity and war crimes", but did not find sufficient evidence to prosecute for genocide.[433]

In April 2007, the Judges of the ICC issued arrest warrants against the former Minister of State for the Interior, Ahmad Harun, and a Militia Janjaweed leader, Ali Kushayb, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.[434]

On July 14, 2008, prosecutors at the ICC, filed ten charges of war crimes against Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir, three counts of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and two of murder. The ICC's prosecutors have claimed that al-Bashir "masterminded and implemented a plan to destroy in substantial part" three tribal groups in Darfur because of their ethnicity. The ICC's prosecutor for Darfur, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, is expected within months to ask a panel of ICC judges to issue an arrest warrant for al-Bashir.[435] On 4 March 2009 the ICC issued a warrant for al-Bashir's arrest for crimes against humanity and war crimes, but not genocide. This is the first warrant issued by the ICC against a sitting head of state.[436]

See also[]

  • Democide – murder by government, includes historical genocide and politicide
  • Command responsibility
  • Mass killings under Communist regimes
  • List of genocides by death toll


  1. 1.0 1.1 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Note: "ethnical", although unusual, is found in several dictionaries
  2. "Debate continues over what constitutes genocide". Blogwatch. Worldfocus. 5 February 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2012. 
  3. M. Hassan Kakar Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979–1982 University of California press © 1995 The Regents of the University of California.
  4. M. Hassan Kakar 4. The Story of Genocide in Afghanistan: 13. Genocide Throughout the Country
  5. Frank Chalk, Kurt Jonassohn The History and Sociology of Genocide: Analyses and Case Studies, Yale University Press, 1990, ISBN 0-300-04446-1
  6. Robert Gellately & Ben Kiernan (2003). The Specter of Genocide: Mass Murder in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 267. ISBN 0-521-52750-3. 
  7. Staub, Ervin. The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 0-521-42214-0. 
  8. Domocide versus genocide; which is what?
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Adam Jones References p. 3, footnote 4
  10. Adam Jones p.3 footnote 5 cites Helen Fein, Genocide: A Sociological Perspective, (London: Sage, 1993), p. 26
  11. Adam Jones References p. 3
  12. 12.0 12.1 Adam Jones References p. 5
  13. Diamond, Jared (1992). The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-06-098403-1. 
  14. Jones, Adam (2010-08-31). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. ISBN 9780203846964. 
  15. Adam Jones References p. 4, note 6, citing Bauer, Rethinking the Holocaust, (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2001), p. 41
  16. Potter, James M.; Jason P. Chuipka (2010). "Perimortem mutilation of human remains in an early village in the American Southwest: A case for ethnic violence". pp. 507–523. Digital object identifier:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.08.001. Retrieved 18 May 2012. 
  17. "How genocide wiped out a Native American population ". September 20, 2010.
  18. Jones References, p.4 note 12 Eric s. Margolis War at the top of the World, the struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir and Tibet (New York, Routledge, 2001) p.155.
  19. The Secret History of the Mongols
  20. The Encyclopedia of Genocide, ABC-CLIO, 1999, page 48, article "Afghanistan, Genocide of"
  21. Samuel Totten, Paul Robert Bartrop, Dictionary of genocide: M-Z, p.422
  22. William Rubinstein, Genocide: a history, p. 28
  23. Adam Jones, Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction, Part One: Overview
  24. Eugene Walter, Terror and Resistance (1969)
  25. Major Charters, Royal Artillery, “Notices Of The Cape And Southern Africa, Since The Appointment, As Governor, Of Major-Gen. Sir Geo. Napier.” United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine, London: W. Clowes and Son, 1839, Part III, p.24
  26. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edition
  27. Hanson, Carnage and Culture, p. 313
  28. "A second Rwanda genocide is revealed in Congo". NBC News. October 10, 2010. 
  29. Colin M. Waugh (1 January 2004). Paul Kagame And Rwanda: Power, Genocide and the Rwandan Patriotic Front. McFarland. pp. 141–. ISBN 978-0-7864-1941-8. Retrieved 18 June 2013. 
  30. "The Cambridge history of Africa: From the earliest times to c. 500 BC." John D. Fage (1982) Cambridge University Press, p. 748. ISBN 0-521-22803-4
  31. Belgium confronts its colonial demons, the guardian.
  32. [1] In the Heart of Darkness (Adam Hochschild – The New York Review of Books)
  33. Rubinstein, W. D. (2004). Genocide: a history. Pearson Education. pp. 98–99. ISBN 0-582-50601-8
  34. Cooper, Allan D. (3 August 2006). "Reparations for the Herero Genocide: Defining the limits of international litigation". pp. 113–126. Digital object identifier:10.1093/afraf/adl005. 
  35. Colonial Genocide and Reparations Claims in the 21st Century: The Socio-Legal Context of Claims under International Law by the Herero against Germany for Genocide in Namibia, 1904–1908 (PSI Reports) by Jeremy Sarkin-Hughes
  36. Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation and Subaltern Resistance in World History (War and Genocide) (War and Genocide) (War and Genocide) A. Dirk Moses -page 296(From Conquest to Genocide: Colonial Rule in German Southwest Africa and German East Africa. 296, (29). Dominik J. Schaller)
  37. The Imperialist Imagination: German Colonialism and Its Legacy (Social History, Popular Culture, and Politics in Germany) by Sara L. Friedrichsmeyer, Sara Lennox, and Susanne M. Zantop page 87 University of Michigan Press 1999
  38. Walter Nuhn: Sturm über Südwest. Der Hereroaufstand von 1904. Bernhard & Graefe-Verlag, Koblenz 1989. ISBN 3-7637-5852-6.
  39. Marie-Aude Baronian, Stephan Besser, Yolande Jansen, "Diaspora and memory: figures of displacement in contemporary literature, arts and politics", Rodopi, 2007, pg. 33,[2]
  40. Olusoga & Erichsen 2010, p. 150–1.
  41. Olusoga & Erichsen 2010, p. 151.
  42. Alan Taylor (2002). American colonies; Volume 1 of The Penguin history of the United States, History of the United States Series. Penguin. p. 40. ISBN 9780142002100. 
  43. '500 Years of Brazil's Discovery'
  44. Brazil urged to protect Indians
  45. Henige, David (1998). Numbers from nowhere: the American Indian contact population debate. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 179. ISBN 0-8061-3044-X. 
  46. Jennings, p. 83; Royal's quote
  47. Smallpox: Eradicating the Scourge
  48. Maddison, Angus (2001). The world economy: a millennial perspective. OECD Publishing. p. 233. ISBN 92-64-18608-5. 
  49. The Story of... Smallpox
  50. Arthur C. Aufderheide, Conrado Rodríguez-Martín, Odin Langsjoen (1998). The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge University Press. p.205. ISBN 0-521-55203-6
  51. Henderson, Donald A. et al. Smallpox as a Biological Weapon. Medical and Public Health Management. JAMA 1999, 281(22):2127–2137. doi:10.1001/jama.281.22.2127
  52. d'Errico, Peter. Jeffrey Amherst and Smallpox Blankets. UMass personal pages.
  53. Diamond, Jared (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-03891-2. 
  54. Dixon, Never Come to Peace, 152–55; McConnell, A Country Between, 195–96; Dowd, War under Heaven, 190. For historians who believe the attempt at infection was successful, see Nester, Haughty Conquerors, 112; Jennings, Empire of Fortune, 447–48.
  55. Stafford Poole, quoted in Royal, p. 63.
  56. Staff. A review of American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World (by David Stannard), on the website of Oxford University Press (the publishers)
  57. Noble David Cook, Born to die: disease and New World conquest, 1492–1650, p. 9.
  58. "Columbus 'sparked a genocide'". BBC News. October 12, 2003. Retrieved 2006-10-21. 
  59. Quammen, David (2003). Monster of God: the man-eating predator in the jungles of history and the mind. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 252. ISBN 0-393-05140-4. 
  60. Carlos A. Floria and César A. García Belsunce, 1971. Historia de los Argentinos I and II; ISBN 84-599-5081-6.[page needed]
  61. Andermann, Jens. Argentine Literature and the 'Conquest of the Desert', 1872–1896, Birkbeck, University of London. "It is this sudden acceleration, this abrupt change from the discourse of 'defensive warfare' and 'merciful civilization' to that of 'offensive warfare' and of genocide, which is perhaps the most distinctive mark of the literature of the Argentine frontier."
  62. Rock, David. State Building and Political Movements in Argentina, 1860–1916. Stanford University Press, 2002. Pages 93–94.
  63. "Civilización o genocidio, un debate que nunca se cierra" by Cacho Fernández – Qollasuyu Tawaintisuyu Indymedia (Spanish)
  64. Nicholas A. Robins, Adam Jones (2009). "Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice". Indiana University Press. p.3. ISBN 0253220777
  65. Nicholas A. Robins, Adam Jones (2009). "Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice". Indiana University Press. p.50. ISBN 0253220777
  66. James L. Haley (1981). "Apaches: A History and Culture Portrait". University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0806129786
  67. Nicholas A. Robins, Adam Jones (2009). "Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice". Indiana University Press. p.1. ISBN 0253220777
  68. David Cesarani, Holocaust: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, Routledge, 2004. (p. 381)
  69. David E. Stannard, American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World, Oxford University Press, 1993.
  70. David Cesarani, Holocaust: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, Routledge, 2004. (p. 380–381).
  71. Rubinstein, W. D. (2004). Genocide: A History. Pearson Education. p. 47. ISBN 0-582-50601-8. 
  72. Michno, Gregory (2003). Encyclopedia of Indian wars: western battles and skirmishes, 1850–1890. Mountain Press Publishing. p. 353. ISBN 0-87842-468-7. 
  73. Thornton, Russell (1990). American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History since 1492. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-8061-2220-5
  74. Arthur Grenke, God, Greed, and Genocide: The Holocaust Through the Centuries, New Academia Publishing, 2005. (p. 161).
  75. Carter (III), Samuel (1976). Cherokee sunset: A nation betrayed: a narrative of travail and triumph, persecution and exile. New York: Doubleday, p. 232.
  76. Prucha, Great Father, p. 241 note 58; Ehle, Trail of Tears, pp. 390–92; Russel Thornton, "Demography of the Trail of Tears" in Anderson, Trail of Tears, pp. 75–93.
  77. E. San Juan, Jr. (2005). "We Charge Genocide: A Brief History of US in the Philippines". Archived from the original on 2008-06-24. Retrieved 2008-07-26. 
  78. In November 1901, the Manila correspondent of the Philadelphia Ledger reported: "The present war is no bloodless, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog" (Howard Zinn,A People's History of the United States (Harper & Row, 1980). ISBN 0-06-014803-9).
  79. John M. Gates, "War-Related Deaths in the Philippines",Pacific Historical Review, v. 53, No. 3 (August, 1984), 367–378.
  80. Chapters 3–7 of Perdue 2005 describe the rise and fall of the Dzungar empire and its relations with other Mongol tribes, the Qing dynasty, and the Russian empire.
  81. Wei Yuan, 聖武記 Military history of the Qing Dynasty, vol.4. "計數十萬戶中,先痘死者十之四,繼竄入俄羅斯哈薩克者十之二,卒殲於大兵者十之三。"
  82. 82.0 82.1 Perdue 2005, p. 283-285
  83. Clarke 2004, p. 37.
  84. Dr. Mark Levene, Southampton University, see "Areas where I can offer Postgraduate Supervision". Retrieved 2009-02-09.
  85. Levene 2008, p. 188
  86. Secher, Reynald. A French Genocide: The Vendée, University of Notre Dame Press, (2003), ISBN 0-268-02865-6.
  87. Stefan Berger, Mark Donovan, Kevin Passmore (dir.), Writing National Histories—Western Europe Since 1800, Routledge, Londres, 1999, 247 pages, contribution by Julian Jackson. (jackson biography published by QMUL ),
  88. François Lebrun, « La guerre de Vendée : massacre ou génocide ? », L'Histoire, Paris, n°78, May 1985, p.93 to 99 et no. 81, September 1985, p. 99 to 101.
  89. Paul Tallonneau, Les Lucs et le génocide vendéen : comment on a manipulé les textes, éditions Hécate, 1993
  90. Claude Petitfrère, La Vendée et les Vendéens, Editions Gallimard/Julliard, 1982.
  91. Voir Jean-Clément Martin, La Vendée et la France, Le Seuil, 1987.
  92. Claude Langlois, « Les héros quasi mythiques de la Vendée ou les dérives de l'imaginaire », in F. Lebrun, 1987, p. 426–434, et « Les dérives vendéennes de l'imaginaire révolutionnaire », AESC, n°3, 1988, p. 771–797.
  93. Voir l'intervention de Timothy Tackett, dans French Historical Studies, Autumn 2001, p. 572.
  94. Hugh Gough, "Genocide & the Bicentenary: the French Revolution and the revenge of the Vendée", (Historical Journal, vol. 30, 4, 1987, pp. 977–88.) p. 987.
  95. Vovelle, Michel (1987). Bourgeoisies de province et Revolution. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. p. quoted in Féhér. 
  96. Price, Roger (1993). A Concise History of France. Cambridge University Press. p. 107. 
  97. Féhér, Ferenc (1990). The French Revolution and the birth of modernity. University of California Press. p. 62. 
  98. 98.0 98.1 "To Hell or to Connaught" Oliver Cromwell's Settlement of Ireland[dead link]
  99. genocidal or near-genocidal:
    • Breton, Albert (ed). 1995. Nationalism and Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Chapter "Regulating nations and ethnic communities" by Brendam O'Leary and John McGarry p 248. "Oliver Cromwell offered the Irish Catholics a choice between genocide and forced mass population transfer. They could go 'To Hell or to Connaught!'"
    • Coogan, Tim-Pat. 2002. The Troubles: Ireland's Ordeal and the Search for Peace. ISBN 978-0-312-29418-2. Page 6. "The massacres by Catholics of Protestants, which occurred in the religious wars of the 1640s, were magnified for propagandist purposes to justify Cromwell's subsequent genocide."
    • Ellis, Peter Berresford. 2002. Eyewitness to Irish History. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Page 108. ISBN 978-0-471-26633-4. "It was to be the justification for Cromwell's genocidal campaign and settlement."
    • Levene Mark. 2005. Genocide in the Age of the Nation-State, I.B. Tauris: London: "Considered overall, an Irish population collapse from 1.5 or possibly over 2 million inhabitants at the onset of the Irish wars in 1641, to no more than 850,000 eleven years later represents an absolutely devastating demographic catastrophe. Undoubted the largest proportion of this massive death toll did not arise from direct massacre but from hunger and then bubonic plagues, especially from the outbreak between 1649 and 1652. Even so, the relationship to the worst years of the fighting is all too apparent.
      [The Act of Settlement of Ireland], and the parliamentary legislation which succeeded it the following year, is the nearest thing on paper in the English, and more broadly British, domestic record, to a programme of state-sanctioned and systematic ethnic cleansing of another people. The fact that it did not include 'total' genocide in its remit, or that it failed to put into practice the vast majority of its proposed expulsions, ultimately, however, says less about the lethal determination of its makers and more about the political, structural and financial weakness of the early modern English state. For instance, though the Act begins rather ominously by claiming that it was not its intention to extirpate the whole Irish nation, it then goes on to list five categories of people who, as participators in or alleged supporters of the 1641 rebellion and its aftermath, would automatically be forfeit of their lives. It has been suggested that as many as 100,000 people would have been liable under these headings. A further five categories—by implication an even larger body of 'passive' supporters of the rebellion—were to be spared their lives but not their property."
  100. Ross, David (2002). Ireland: History of a Nation. New Lanark: Geddes & Grosset. p. 226. ISBN 1-84205-164-4. 
  101. Kinealy, Christine (1995). This Great Calamity: The Irish Famine 1845–52. Gill & Macmillan. p. 357. ISBN 1-57098-034-9. 
  102. Ó Gráda 2002, p. 7.
  103. Woodham-Smith, Cecil (1964). "The Great Hunger: Ireland 1845–1849". Signet: New York. p. 19. 
  104. Kinealy 1994, pp. xvi–ii, 2–3.
  105. 105.0 105.1 Finnegan, Richard B. and Edward T. McCarron Ireland: Historical Echoes, Contemporary Politics(2000 Westview Press) ISBN 0-8133-3247-8
  106. Kinealy, Christine (1995). This Great Calamity: The Irish Famine 1845–52. Gill & Macmillan. p. 354. ISBN 1-57098-034-9. 
  107. 107.0 107.1 Cormac Ó Gráda, Economic History Society (1995). The great Irish famine. New studies in economic and social history (illustrated, reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 4, 68. ISBN 978-0-521-55787-0. "[page 4] While no academic historian takes seriously any more the claim of 'genocide', the issue of blame remains controversial. [page 68] In sum the Great Famine of the 1840s, instead of being inevitable and inherent in the potato economy, was a tragic ecological accident. Ireland's experience during these years supports neither the complacency exemplified by the Whig view of political economy nor the genocide theories formerly espoused by a few nationalist historians." 
  108. Kevin Kenny (2003). New directions in Irish-American history. History of Ireland and the Irish diaspora (illustrated ed.). University of Wisconsin Press. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-299-18714-9. "And, while few, if any, historians in Ireland today would endorse the idea of British genocide (in the sense of conscious intent to slaughter), this does not mean that government policies, whether adopted or rejected, had no impact on starvation, disease, mortality and emigration." 
  109. James Mullin "Irish Famine Education and the Holocaust 'Straw Man'", WebsiteAmerican Chronicle, April 28, 2006.
  110. The Great Irish Famine Approved by the New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education on September 10, 1996, for inclusion in the Holocaust and Genocide Curriculum at the secondary level. Revision submitted 11/26/98.
  111. Mullin, James V.The New Jersey Famine Curriculum: a report Eire-Ireland:Journal of Irish Studies, Spring-Summer, 2002
  112. Irish Famine Unit VI Genocide of the The Great Irish Famine Approved by the New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education on September 10, 1996
  113. 113.0 113.1 Cecil Woodham-Smith (1991). The great hunger: Ireland 1845–1849. Penguin. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-14-014515-1. Retrieved 24 August 2010.  Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Woodham-Smith1991" defined multiple times with different content
  114. 114.0 114.1 114.2 114.3 Cormac O' Grada, "Black '47 and Beyond: The Great Irish Famine in History, Economy and Memory", p. 10
  115. W. D. Rubinstein (2004). Genocide: a history. Pearson Longman. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-582-50601-5. Retrieved 24 August 2010. 
  116. Antero Leitzinger "The Circassian Genocide" in The Eurasian Politician – Issue 2, October 2000, in the article it states that it was originally published in Turkistan News
  117. "145th Anniversary of the Circassian Genocide and the Sochi Olympics Issue". Reuters. 22 May 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2009. 
  118. 118.0 118.1 Goble 2005
  119. (Russian) Circassian Genocide. The Circassian Congress. 2008
  120. Bonwick 1870.
  121. Turnbull, Clive (1948) Black war : the extermination of the Tasmanian Aborigines. Melbourne : Cheshire
  122. Flood, Dr Josephine, The Original Australians pp128–132
  123. Geoffrey Blainey, A Land Half Won, Macmillan, South Melbourne, Vic., 1980, p75
  124. Glynn & Glynn 2004, p. 145.
  125. 125.0 125.1 A. Dirk Moses Empire, Colony, Genocide,: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History, Berghahn Books, 2008 ISBN 978-1-84545-452-4 See the chapter entitled "Genocide in Tasmania" by Ann Curthoys p. 240
  126. Mark Levene, Genocide in the Age of the Nation State: The rise of the West and the coming of genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2005 ISBN 978-1-84511-057-4 p. 344 footnote 105
  127. A. Dirk Moses Empire, Colony, Genocide,: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History, Berghahn Books, 2008 ISBN 978-1-84545-452-4 See the chapter entitled "Genocide in Tasmania" by Ann Curthoys pp. 229–247
  128. A. Dirk Moses, Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Berghahn Books, 2004 ISBN 978-1-57181-410-4. Chapter by Henry Reynolds "Genocide in Tasmania?" pp. 127–147.
  129. 129.0 129.1 Kiernan 2002, p. 163.
  130. Madley 2008, p. 77.
  131. Solomon, Māui; Denise Davis (updated 2-Sep-11). "Moriori". Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved 2012-05-04. 
  132. King, pages 59–60
  133. Michael King (2000). Moriori: A People Rediscovered (Revised Edition). Published by Viking. ISBN 0-14-010391-0. Original edition 1989.
  134. Diamond, Jared (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 53. 
  135. Tommy Solomon
  136. 136.0 136.1 1915 declaration:
  137. Midlarsky, Manus I. "The Killing Trap: Genocide in the Twentieth Century". p. 342. .
  138. 138.0 138.1 Jones, Adam (26 October 2010). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Taylor & Francis. pp. 171–172. ISBN 978-0-415-48618-7. Retrieved 27 September 2012. "A resolution was placed before the IAGS membership to recognize the Greek and Assyrian/Chaldean components of the Ottoman genocide against Christians, alongside the Armenian strand of the genocide (which the IAGS has already formally acknowledged). The result, passed emphatically in December 2007 despite not inconsiderable opposition, was a resolution which I co-drafted, reading as follows:... (IAGS resolution is on page 172)" 
  139. Resolution by the International Association of Genocide Scholars retrieved via the Internet Archive
  140. Genocide Resolution approved by Swedish Parliament — full text containing the IAGS resolution and the Swedish Parliament resolution from
  141. Gaunt, David. Massacres, Resistance, Protectors: Muslim-Christian Relations in Eastern Anatolia during World War I. Piscataway, N.J.: Gorgias Press, 2006.
  142. Schaller, Dominik J.; Zimmerer, Jürgen (2008). "Late Ottoman genocides: the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and Young Turkish population and extermination policies – introduction". pp. 7–14. Digital object identifier:10.1080/14623520801950820. 
  143. Dadrian, Vahakn N (1995). "The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus". Berghahn. .
  144. Balakian, Peter (2003). "The Burning Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and America's Response". HarperCollins. .
  145. Bloxham, Donald (2005). "The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians". Oxford University Press. .
  146. Akçam, Taner (2012). "The Young Turks' Crime Against Humanity: The Armenian Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in the Ottoman Empire". Princeton University Press. .
  147. Kieser, Hans-Lukas; Schaller, Dominik J (2002). "Der Völkermord an den Armeniern und die Shoah" (in German publisher = Chronos). The Armenian Genocide and the Shoah. p. 114. ISBN 3-0340-0561-X. .
  148. Armenia : The Survival of a Nation, Christopher Walker, 1980.
  149. Akçam, Taner (2007). A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility. p. 327. 
  150. Aprim, Frederick A. "Assyrians: The Continuous Saga". p. 40. .
  151. Ye'or, Bat; Kochan, Miriam; Littman, David (2002). Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 148–49. ISBN 0-8386-3943-7. OCLC 47054791.,M1. 
  152. Jones, Adam (26 October 2010). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Taylor & Francis. p. 154. ISBN 978-0-415-48618-7. Retrieved 17 November 2012. 
  153. 153.0 153.1 Betts, Paul (17 August 2010). Years of Persecution, Years of Extermination: Saul Friedlander and the Future of Holocaust Studies. Continuum. pp. 214–. ISBN 978-1-4411-2987-1. Retrieved 17 November 2012. "Already in the period 1912–14, the Young Turk leadership aimed to replace the multi-ethnic and multi-confessional… The elimination of the Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek populations was an integral part of the Young Turk “struggle for…" 
  154. Yacoub, Joseph (1985). "La question assyro-chaldéenne, les Puissances européennes et la SDN (1908–1938)" (in French). The Assyro‐chaldean question: the European Powers and the League of Nations, 1908–38. p. 156. , 4 vol.
  155. "International Genocide Scholars Association Officially Recognizes Assyrian, Greek Genocides". Assyrian International News Agency. 2007 Dec 15. Retrieved 2007-12-15. .
  156. Rummel, Rudolph (1994). "Death by Government". .
  157. Rendel, GW (20 March 1922). "Turkish Massacres and Persecutions of Minorities since the Armistice". Foreign Office. .
  158. Rummel, RJ. "Statistics of Democide". Chapter 5, Statistics Of Turkey's Democide Estimates, Calculations, and Sources. Retrieved 2006-10-04. 
  159. van Bruineßen, Martin. "The Suppression of the Dersim Rebellion in Turkey (1937–38)" (PDF). UU. p. 4. .
  160. Andreopoulos, George J. "Genocide". p. 11. .
  161. Besikçi, İsmail (1990). "Tunceli Kanunu (1935) ve Dersim Jenosidi" (in Turkish). Belge Yayınları. .
  162. van Bruinessen, Martin (1994). "Genocide in Kurdistan?". pp. 141–70. .
  163. Saymaz, Ismail (14 March 2011). "Turkish prosecutor refuses to hear Dersim 'genocide' claim". Retrieved 24 November 2011. 
  164. van Bruineßen, Martin (1994). "Conceptual and historical dimensions of genocide". In Andreopoulos, George J (PDF). University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 141–70. .
  165. Mikhail Heller & Aleksandr Nekrich. Utopia in Power: The History of the Soviet Union from 1917 to the Present. Summit Books, 1988. ISBN 0-671-64535-8 p. 87.
  166. Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois. The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Harvard University Press, 1999. ISBN 0-674-07608-7 pp. 8–9
  167. Orlando Figes. A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891–1924. Penguin Books, 1998. ISBN 0-14-024364-X p. 660.
  168. Donald Rayfield. Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him. Random House, 2004. ISBN 0-375-50632-2. p. 83.
  169. R. J. Rummel. Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917. Transaction Publishers, 1990. ISBN 1-56000-887-3 p. 2.
  170. Robert Gellately. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe. Knopf, 2007 ISBN 1-4000-4005-1 pp. 70–71.
  171. Conquest, Robert (1986). The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. London: Oxford University Press. p. 306. ISBN 0-19-505180-7. 
  172. Snyder, Timothy (2010). Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. New York: Basic Books. p. 412. ISBN 0465002390. 
  173. 173.0 173.1 Fawkes, Helen (24 November 2006). "Legacy of famine divides Ukraine". BBC. 
  174. "Sentence to Stalin, his comrades for organizing Holodomor takes effect in Ukraine". .
  175. "Ukraine must not blame neighbors for famine – Yanukovych". January 16, 2010. .
  176. "Yanukovych: Famine of 1930s was not genocide against Ukrainians". April 27, 2010. .
  177. Interfax-Ukraine (27 April 2010). "Our Ukraine Party: Yanukovych violated law on Holodomor of 1932–1933". Retrieved 10 August 2010. 
  178. Sommer 2010, pp. 417–8.
  179. "Chechnya: European Parliament recognises the genocide of the Chechen People in 1944". Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO). 27 February 2004. 
  180. Dunlop,Russia confronts Chechnya, p65
  181. Gammer, The Lone Wolf and the Bear, p170
  182. Gammer, The Lone Wolf and the Bear, p182
  183. Jaimoukha. Chechens. p212
  184. Ediev, Dalkhat. Demograficheskie poteri deportirovannykh narodov SSSR, Stavropol 2003, Table 109, p302
  185. Nekrich, Punished Peoples
  186. Dunlop.Russia Confronts Chechnya, pp 62–70
  187. Gammer.The Lone Wolf and the Bear, pp166-171
  188. (Russian) Европарламент: депортация вайнахов – геноцид
  189. Naimark, Norman M. (5). Stalin's Genocides. Princeton University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0691152387. 
  190. Rudolph J. Rummel, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917, Transaction Publishers 1990, ISBN 1-56000-887-3
  191. J. Pohl, Stalin’s genocide against the “Repressed Peoples”, Journal of Genocide Research, Volume 2, Number 2, 1 June 2000, pp. 267–293
  192. Lauri Mälksoo, Soviet Genocide? Communist Mass Deportations in the Baltic States and International Law, Leiden Journal of International Law (2001), 14: pp757-787 Cambridge University Press
  193. Postimees 31 March 2009: Martin Arpo: kommunismiaja kuritegude tee Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohtuni
  194. Full text of European Court of Human Rights Decision on the case Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia: Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to Crimes against Humanity
  195. Oberlander, Erwin (5). Martyn Housden, David James Smith. ed. Forgotten Pages in Baltic History: Diversity and Inclusion. Rodopi. pp. 253–254. ISBN 978-9042033153. 
  196. Travis, Hannibal (8). Ethnonationalism, Genocide, and the United Nations. Routledge. p. 82. ISBN 978-0415531252. 
  197. Budryte, Dovile (9). Taming Nationalism? Political Community Building in the Post-Soviet Baltic States. Ashgate. p. 182. ISBN 978-0754642817. 
  198. BBC staff (23 August 2007). "Estonian man on genocide charge". BBC News. 
  199. "Estonian Red Army veteran dies amidst genocide trial". Retrieved March 2012. 
  200. "Genocide in Lithuania". Retrieved March 2012. [better source needed]
  201. Peikštenis, Eugenijus. "Lithuanian Museum of Genocide Victims". Retrieved March 2012. 
  202. Campbell, Bradley (June 2009). "Genocide as social control". p. 154. Digital object identifier:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01341.x. JSTOR 40376129. "Also, genocide may occur in the aftermath of warfare when mass killings continue after the outcome of a battle or a war has been decided. For instance, after the Chinese city of Nanking was occupied by the Japanese in December 1937, Japanese soldiers massacred over 250,000 residents of the city." 
  203. Oxford English Dictionary: 1944 R. Lemkin Axis Rule in Occupied Europe ix. 79 "By 'genocide' we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group."
  204. Oxford English Dictionary "Genocide" citing Sunday Times 21 October 1945
  205. Niewyk, Donald L. The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust, Columbia University Press, 2000, p.45: "The Holocaust is commonly defined as the murder of more than 5,000,000 Jews by the Germans in World War II." Also see "The Holocaust", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007: "the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women and children, and millions of others, by Germany Germany and its collaborators during World War II. The Germans called this "the final solution to the Jewish question."
  206. Weissman, Gary (2004). "Fantasies of Witnessing: Postwar Attempts to Experience the Holocaust". Cornell University Press. p. 94. ISBN 0-8014-4253-2. "Kren illustrates his point with his reference to the Kommissararbefehl. 'Should the (strikingly unreported) systematic mass starvation of Soviet prisoners of war be included in the Holocaust?' he asks. Many scholars would answer no, maintaining that 'the Holocaust' should refer strictly to those events involving the systematic killing of the Jews'." 
  207. "The Holocaust: Definition and Preliminary Discussion". Yad Vashem. "The Holocaust, as presented in this resource center, is defined as the sum total of all anti-Jewish actions carried out by the German regime between 1933 and 1945: from stripping the German Jews of their legal and economic status in the 1930s, to segregating and starving Jews in the various occupied countries, to the murder of close to six million Jews in Europe. The Holocaust is part of a broader aggregate of acts of oppression and murder of various ethnic and political groups in Europe by the Germans." 
  208. Niewyk, Donald L (2000). "The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust". Columbia University Press. p. 45. "The Holocaust is commonly defined as the murder of more than 5,000,000 Jews by the Germans in World War II." 
  209. "Encyclopædia Britannica". 2007. "the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women, and children and millions of others by Germany and its collaborators during World War II. The Germans called this "the final solution to the Jewish question." 
  210. "Encarta". Archived from the original on 2009-10-31. "Holocaust, the almost complete destruction of Jews in Europe by Germany and its collaborators during World War II (1939–1945). The leadership of Germany ordered the extermination of 5.6 million to 5.9 million Jews (see National Socialism). Jews often refer to the Holocaust as Shoah (from the Hebrew word for "catastrophe" or "total destruction")." 
  211. Paulson, Steve. "A View of the Holocaust". BBC. "The Holocaust was the Germans' assault on the Jews between 1933 and 1945. It culminated in what the Germans called the 'Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe', in which six million Jews were murdered." 
  212. "Auschwitz". "The Holocaust was the systematic annihilation of six million Jews by the Germans during World War 2." 
  213. "Encyclopedia of the Holocaust". Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies. "(Heb., sho'ah). In the 1950s the term came to be applied primarily to the destruction of the Jews of Europe under the German regime, and it is also employed in describing the annihilation of other groups of people in World War II. The mass extermination of Jews has become the archetype of GENOCIDE, and the terms sho'ah and ‘holocaust’ have become linked to the attempt by the German state to destroy European Jewry during World War II... One of the first to use the term in the historical perspective was the Jerusalem historian BenZion Dinur (Dinaburg), who, in the spring of 1942, stated that the Holocaust was a ‘catastrophe’ that symbolized the unique situation of the Jewish people among the nations of the world." 
  214. "List of definitions". The Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies. "A term for the state-sponsored, systematic persecution and annihilation of European Jewry by Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945." 
  215. "Compact Oxford English Dictionary". "the mass murder of Jews under the German regime in World War II." 
  216. "The 33rd Annual Scholars' Conference on the Holocaust and the Churches". "the German attempt to annihilate European Jewry" , cited in Hancock, Ian (2004). "The Historiography of the Holocaust". Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 383–96. .
  217. Bauer, Yehuda (2001). "Rethinking the Holocaust". Yale University Press. p. 10. .
  218. Dawidowicz, Lucy (1986). "The War Against the Jews: 1933–1945". Bantam. p. xxxvii. "'The Holocaust' is the term that Jews themselves have chosen to describe their fate during World War II." 
  219. Niewyk, Donald L. (2000). The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust. Columbia University Press. pp. 45–52. ISBN 0231112009.,+Donald+L.+The+Columbia+Guide+to+the+Holocaust#v=onepage&q=Niewyk%2C%20Donald%20L.%20The%20Columbia%20Guide%20to%20the%20Holocaust&f=false. 
  220. Donald Niewyk suggests that the broadest definition, including Soviet civilian deaths, would produce a death toll of 17 million. Google Books Estimates of the death toll of non-Jewish victims vary by millions, partly because the boundary between death by persecution and death by starvation and other means in a context of total war is unclear. Overall, about 5.7 million (78 percent) of the 7.3 million Jews in occupied Europe perished (Gilbert, Martin. Atlas of the Holocaust 1988, pp. 242–244). This was in contrast to the five to 11 million (1.4 percent to 3.0 percent) of the 360 million non-Jews in German-dominated Europe. Small, Melvin and J. David Singer. Resort to Arms: International and civil Wars 1816–1980 and Berenbaum, Michael. A Mosaic of Victims: Non-Jews Persecuted and Murdered by the Germans, New York: New York University Press, 1990
  221. Ukrainian mass Jewish grave found
  222. Berenbaum, Michael. The World Must Know", United States Holocaust Museum, 2006, p. 103.
  223. A Teacher's Guide to the Holocaust-Victims
  224. R.J. Rummel, German Democide: German genocide and mass murder: Chapter 1, Table 1.1.
  225. R.J. Rummel states elsewhere that there are three definitions of genocide, and it is not clear which one he is using in this table. See the section in this article "Alternative meanings of genocide" for more details on this issue.
  226. Niewyk, Donald & Nicosia, Frances (2000): The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust, Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-11200-0.
  227. Gendercide Watch: Soviet Prisoners of War (POW), 1941-2, Adam Jones
  228. William J. Duiker (2009). Contemporary World History. Cengage Learning. p.132. ISBN 0-495-57271-3
  229. Dan Stone (2010). Histories of the Holocaust. Oxford University Press. p.212. ISBN 0-19-956680-1.
  230. Roger Chickering, Stig Förster, Bernd Greiner, German Historical Institute (Washington, D.C.) (2005). A world at total war: global conflict and the politics of destruction, 1937–1945. Cambridge University Press. p.65. ISBN 0-521-83432-5
  231. Ganzenmüller, Jörg (2005). Das belagerte Leningrad 1941–1944. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag, Paderborn. pp. 17, 20. ISBN 3-506-72889-X. ; Ganzenmüller, Ein stiller Völkermord(A Quiet Genocide)
  232. Pohl, Dieter (2008). Verfolgung und Massenmord in der NS-Zeit 1933–1945. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt. ISBN 3534217578. 
  233. Emilio De Diego Garica. "El drama yugoslavo: ¿Europa entre los siglos XIX y XXI?". Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Retrieved 21 June 2010. 
  234. Helen Fein, Accounting for Genocide, New York, The Free Press, 1979, pp.79, 105
  235. Robins, Nicholas. Genocides by the Oppressed. 2009: Indiana University Press. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-253-22077-6. 
  236. US Holocaust Museum, USHMM. "Jasenovac". US Holocaust Museum. 
  237. Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum and Research Center, Yad Vashem. "Independent State of Croatia". Yad Vashem. 
  238. Samuel Totten,William S. Parsons (1997). Century of genocide: critical essays and eyewitness accounts. Routledge. p. 430. ISBN 0-203-89043-4. Retrieved January 11, 2011. 
  239. Redžić, Enver (2005). Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Second World War. New York: Tylor and Francis. p. 84. ISBN 0714656259. 
  240. Tadeusz Piotrowski, Poland's holocaust. Published by McFarland. Page 247
  241. Władysław Filar, Wydarzenia wołyńskie 1939–1944. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. Toruń 2008 ISBN 978-83-7441-884-3
  242. 242.0 242.1 Grzegorz Motyka, Od rzezi wołyńskiej do akcji "Wisła". Konflikt polsko-ukraiński 1943– 1947. Kraków 2011, p.447
  243. Timothy Snyder, Rekonstrukcja narodów. Polska, Ukraina, Litwa, Białoruś 1569–1999, Sejny 2009, p.196
  244. Matthew J. Gibney, Randall Hansen, Immigration and Asylum, page 204. Retrieved on 11 July 2011.
  245. "Uchwala Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 15 lipca 2009 r. w sprawie tragicznego losu Polakow na Kresach Wschodnich". Biuro Prasowe Kancelarii Sejmu. Retrieved 17 August 2011. 
  246. Piotr Zając, Prześladowania ludności narodowości polskiej na terenie Wołynia w latach 1939–1945 – ocena karnoprawna zdarzeń w oparciu o ustalenia śledztwa OKŚZpNP w Lublinie, [in:] Zbrodnie przeszłości. Opracowania i materiały prokuratorów IPN, t. 2: Ludobójstwo, red. Radosław Ignatiew, Antoni Kura, Warszawa 2008, p.34-49
  247. 247.0 247.1 Jürgen Weber, Germany, 1945–1990: A Parallel History, Central European University Press, 2004, p.2, ISBN 963-9241-70-9
  248. 248.0 248.1 Arie Marcelo Kacowicz, Pawel Lutomski, Population resettlement in international conflicts: a comparative study, Lexington Books, 2007, p.100, ISBN 073911607: "...largest movement of European people in modern history" [3]
  249. Peter H. Schuck, Rainer Münz, Paths to Inclusion: The Integration of Migrants in the United States and Germany, Berghahn Books, 1997, p.156, ISBN 1-57181-092-7
  250. | Twentieth Century Atlas – Death Tolls
  251. Stellungnahme der Deutsch-Tschechischen Historikerkommission zu den Vertreibungsverlusten
  252. Expelling the Germans: British Opinion and Post-1945 Population Transfer in Context, Matthew Frank Oxford University Press, 2008
  253. Europe and German unification, Renata Fritsch-Bournazel page 77, Berg Publishers 1992
  254. Osmańczyk, Edmund Jan (2003). Encyclopedia of the United Nations and international agreements. Routledge. p. 656. ISBN 0-415-93924-0. 
  255. Naimark, Norman M. (2001). Fires of hatred: ethnic cleansing in twentieth-century Europe. Harvard University Press. pp. 15, 112. 121, 136. ISBN 0-674-00994-0. 
  256. Curp, T. David (2006). A clean sweep?: the politics of ethnic cleansing in western Poland, 1945–1960. University of Rochester Press. p. 200. ISBN 1-58046-238-3. 
  257. Cordell, Karl (1999). Ethnicity and democratisation in the new Europe. Routledge. p. 175. ISBN 0-415-17312-4. 
    • Diner, Dan; Gross, Raphael; Weiss, Yfaat (2006). Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. p. 163. ISBN 3-525-36288-9. 
  258. [|Gibney, Matthew J.] (2005). Immigration and asylum: from 1900 to the present, Volume 3. ABC-CLIO. p. 196. ISBN 1-57607-796-9. 
  259. Glassheim, Eagle (2001). Ther, Philipp; Siljak, Ana. eds. Redrawing nations: ethnic cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944–1948. Harvard Cold War studies book series. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 197. ISBN 0-7425-1094-8. 
  260. Shaw, Martin (2007). What is genocide?. Polity. p. 56. ISBN 0-7456-3182-7. 
  261. Totten, Paul; Bartrop; Jacobs, Steven L (2008). Dictionary of genocide, Volume 2. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 335. ISBN 0-313-34644-5. 
  262. Frank, Matthew James (2008). Expelling the Germans: British opinion and post-1945 population transfer in context. Oxford historical monographs. Oxford University Press. p. 5. ISBN 0-19-923364-0. 
  263. Shaw, Martin (2007). What is genocide?. Polity. ISBN 0-7456-3182-7.  pp. 56,60,61
  264. Rubinstein, W.D. (2004). Genocide, a history. Pearson Education Ltd.. p. 260. ISBN 0-582-50601-8. 
  265. European Court of Human RightsJorgic v. Germany Judgment, July 12, 2007. § 47
  266. Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich (1995). Encyclopedia of Public International Law. ISBN 978-90-04-14280-0. 
  267. Ermacora, Felix (1991). "Gutachten Ermacora 1991" (PDF). 
  268. Parsley Massacre
  269. Bulag, Uradyn Erden (2002). Dilemmas The Mongols at China's edge: history and the politics of national unity. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 54. ISBN 0-7425-1144-8.'s%20seven%20genocidal%20golog&f=false. Retrieved 2010-06-28. 
  270. Hui, Fu Li (1961). China reconstructs. 10. China Welfare Institute. p. 16.,+life+became+almost+impossible+for+us&dq=the+warlord+Ma+Pu-fang+had+come+for+the+seventh+time+to+massacre+the+people,+life+became+almost+impossible+for+us. Retrieved 2010-06-28. 
  271. Goodman, David SG (2004). China's campaign to "Open up the West": national, provincial, and local perspectives. Cambridge University Press. p. 72. ISBN 0-521-61349-3. Retrieved 2010-06-28. 
  272. Mayaram, Shail (2009). The other global city. US: Taylor & Francis. pp. 76–7. ISBN 0-415-99194-3. Retrieved 2010-07-30. 
  273. 274.0 274.1 Manne, Robert "The cruelty of denial", The Age, September 9, 2006
  274. "A Stolen Generation Cries Out". Reuters. May 1997. 
  275. 276.0 276.1 Parsons, Timothy (2003). The 1964 Army Mutinies and the Making of Modern East Africa. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-325-07068-7. OCLC = p. 107 pages = p. 107. 
  276. Conley, Robert (19 January 1964). "Nationalism Is Viewed as Camouflage for Reds". p. 1. Retrieved 16 November 2008. 
  277. Los Angeles Times (20 January 1964). "Slaughter in Zanzibar of Asians, Arabs Told". p. 4. 
  278. 279.0 279.1 Plekhanov 2004, p. 91
  279. 280.0 280.1 Sheriff & Ferguson 1991, p. 241
  280. Jacopetti, Gualtiero (Director). (1970). Africa Addio [Video in English]. Retrieved on 16 November 2008.
  281. Speller 2007, p. 7
  282. Israel W. Charny. Encyclopedia of Genocide, ABC-CLIO, 1999 ISBN 978-0-87436-928-1 p. 378 cites Genocide:Its Political Use in the 20th Century, London: Penguin Books, 1981; New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University Press 1982.
  283. Press conference by members of the Guatemala Historical Clarification Commission, United Nations website, 1 March 1999
  284. Staff. Guatemala 'genocide' probe blames state, BBC, 25 February 1999.
  285. Spain judge charges ex-generals in Guatemala genocide case, Jurist, July 8, 2006.
  286. Castillo, Mariano (13 May 2013). Guatemala's Rios Montt guilty of genocide. CNN. Retrieved 17 May 2013.
  287. Payaslian, Simon. "20th Century Genocides". Oxford bibliographies. 
  288. Sharlach, Lisa (2010). "Rape as Genocide: Bangladesh, the Former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda". Digital object identifier:10.1080/713687893. 
  289. Jack, Ian, "It's not the arithmetic of genocide that's important. It's that we pay attention", The Guardian, May 20, 2011.
  290. Mohaiemen, Naeem (2011). "Flying Blind: Waiting for a Real Reckoning on 1971". 
  291. Obermeyer, Ziad, et al., "Fifty years of violent war deaths from Vietnam to Bosnia: analysis of data from the world health survey programme", British Medical Jornal, June 2008.
  292. Rahman, Serajur, "Mujib's confusion on Bangladeshi deaths", Letters, The Guardian, May 23, 2011.
  293. Raymond Faisal Solaiman v People's Republic of Bangladesh & Ors In The Federal Magistrates Court of Australia at Sydney
  294. This judgement can be found via the Federal Court of Australia home page by following the links and using SYG/2672/2006 as the key for the database
  295. Staff. pastgenocides, Burundi resources on the website of [Prevent Genocide International lists the following resources:
    • Michael Bowen, Passing by;: The United States and genocide in Burundi, 1972, (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1973), 49 pp.
    • René Lemarchand, Selective genocide in Burundi (Report – Minority Rights Group; no. 20, 1974), 36 pp.
    • Rene Lemarchand, Burundi: Ethnic Conflict and Genocide (New York: Woodrow Wilson Center and Cambridge University Press, 1996), 232 pp.
    • Edward L. Nyankanzi, Genocide: Rwanda and Burundi (Schenkman Books, 1998), 198 pp.
    • Christian P. Scherrer, Genocide and crisis in Central Africa: conflict roots, mass violence, and regional war; foreword by Robert Melson. Westport, Conn. : Praeger, 2002.
    • Weissman, Stephen R. "Preventing Genocide in Burundi Lessons from International Diplomacy", United States Institute of Peace
  296. International Commission of Inquiry for Burundi: Final Report Source Name: United Nations Security Council, S/1996/682; received from Ambassador Thomas Ndikumana, Burundi Ambassador to the United States, Date received: 7 June 2002. Paragraph 496.
  297. Action Against Hunger Stops Its Activities in North Korea
  298. 299.0 299.1 When will we stop the genocide in North Korea?
  299. North Korea and the Genocide Movement
  300. Park, Robert, "The Case for Genocide in North Korea," The Korea Herald, February 8, 2012.
  301. Francisco Macias Nguema
  302. Coup plotter faces life in Africa's most notorious jail
  303. True hell on earth: Simon Mann faces imprisonment in the cruellest jail on the planet
  304. If you think this one's bad you should have seen his uncle
  305. "Chinese President Meets Equatorial Guinean President". People's Daily Online. Beijing, China. 2001-11-20. 
  306. John B. Quigley (2006) The Genocide Convention: An International Law Analysis, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, ISBN 0-7546-4730-7. p.31, 32
  307. "Equatorial Guinea". Encyclopedia of the Nations. Thomson Corporation. 2006. 
  308. John B. Quigley (2006) The Genocide Convention: An International Law Analysis, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, ISBN 0-7546-4730-7. p.32
  309. UN verdict on East Timor
  310. Benetech Human Rights Data Analysis Group (9 February 2006). "The Profile of Human Rights Violations in Timor-Leste, 1974–1999". A Report to the Commission on Reception, Truth and Reconciliation of Timor-Leste. Human Rights Data Analysis Group (HRDAG). 
  311. Nunes, Joe (1996). "East Timor: Acceptable Slaughters". The architecture of modern political power. 
  312. Sian Powell UN verdict on East Timor, Jakarta correspondent, The Australian, January 19, 2006
  313. Ben Kiernam War, Genocide, and Resistance in East Timor, 1975–99: Comparative Reflections on Cambodia PDF (218 KB), Chapter 9 page 202
  314. Ben Kiernan's footnotes "clearly meet a range of sociological definitions of genocide..." with [13] – Leo Kuper, Genocide (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981), pages 174–175
  315. "CIA – The World Factbook – Laos". Retrieved 11 June 2008. 
  316. Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. "WGIP: Side event on the Hmong Lao, at the United Nations". Retrieved 20 April 2011. 
  317. Jane Hamilton-Merritt, Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942–1992 (Indiana University Press, 1999), pp337-460
  318. Forced Back and Forgotten (Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, 1989), p8.
  319. Statistics of Democide Rudolph Rummel
  320. 321.0 321.1 Naomi Klein. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Macmillan, 2007 ISBN 978-0-8050-7983-8. pp. 100–102
  321. 322.0 322.1 Ethiopian Dictator Sentenced to Prison by Les Neuhaus, The Associated Press, January 11, 2007
  322. Mengistu is handed life sentence BBC, January 11, 2007
  323. BBC, "Mengistu found guilty of genocide", 12 December 2006.
  324. Ethiopian leader guilty of genocide TVNZ, December 13, 2006
  325. Court sentences Major Melaku Tefera to death Ethiopian Reporter
  326. University of Pittsburgh legal news, 13 December 2006.
  327. Ex-Ethiopian dictator guilty of genocide -
  328. 'Butcher of Addis Ababa' is guilty of genocide with torture regime
  329. The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, pg 457
  330. US admits helping Mengistu escape BBC, 22 December 1999
  331. Talk of the Devil: Encounters with Seven Dictators by Riccardo Orizio, pg 151
  332. Guilty of genocide: the leader who unleashed a 'Red Terror' on Africa by Jonathan Clayton, The Times Online, December 13, 2006
  333. Anne Penketh and Robert Verkaik Dutch court says gassing of Iraqi Kurds was 'genocide' in The Independent 24 December 2005
  334. "Dutch man sentenced for role in gassing death of Kurds" CBC News 23 December 2005
  335. Tibet – Summary of a Report on Tibet Submitted to the International Commission of Jurists by Shri Purshottam Trikamdas, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
  336. Sautman, Barry (October 2006). "Colonialism, genocide, and Tibet". pp. 243–265. Digital object identifier:10.1080/14631360600926949. 
  337. Melvyn C. Goldstein, William Siebenschuh, and Tashi Tsering. The Struggle for Modern Tibet: The Autobiography of Tashi Tsering. Armonk, New York: M.E.Sharpe, Inc. 1997
  338. Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1991). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913–1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press
  339. CTA: Chinese Government Covering Up Dark Facts
  340. BBC News - Tibet country profile - Overview
  341. David White (2002). Himalayan Tragedy: The Story of Tibet's Panchen Lamas. Tibet Society of the UK. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-9542179-0-7. 
  342. Adam Jones. Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge; 2 edition (August 1, 2010). ISBN 0-415-48619-X pp. 95–96
  343. Grunfeld, A. Tom. The Making of Modern Tibet. East Gate Book, 1996. Page 247.
  345. Pygmies struggle to survive
  346. DR Congo Pygmies appeal to UN
  347. DR Congo Pygmies 'exterminated'
  348. Pygmies today in Africa
  349. rebels 'eating pygmies'
  350. "Rwanda dismisses UN report detailing possible Hutu genocide in Congo". The Christian Science Monitor. August 27, 2010. 
  351. "Rwanda's Kagame rejects as 'absurd' genocide assertions". CNN. September 17, 2010. 
  352. Catherine L. Besteman, "Genocide in Somalia's Jubba Valley and Somali Bantu Refugees in the U.S" Apr 09, 2007 Accessed January 25, 2011
  353. "Recurring Nightmare". Human Rights Watch. March 2008. p. 16. 
  354. "Factual Supplement to the Report to Congress on Measures Taken by the Government of Sri Lanka and International Bodies To Investigate and Hold Accountable Violators of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law". United States Department of State. 4 April 2012. 
  355. Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka. United Nations. 31 March 2011. 
  356. Alex Spillius; Emanuel Stoakes (18 December 2011). "Sri Lankan army commanders 'assassinated surrendering Tamils'". 
  357. "Leading Sri Lanka Tamil Politician Claims 'Genocide' by Military". 12 May 2009. 
  358. Gopalan, T. N. (12 January 2009). "TNA team in India". 
  359. Allard, Tom (15 October 2009). "Tamil boat people fleeing 'genocide'". 
  360. Haviland, Charles (6 April 2011). "US calls for 'accountability' in Sri Lanka's war". 
  361. Pathirana, Saroj (28 January 2009). "End Sri Lanka killings – UK". 
  362. "UN helping Sri Lanka in genocide: Canadian Tamils". 17 February 2009. 
  363. Surendiran, Suren (21 April 2009). "Britain and the slaughter of the Tamils". 
  364. Taylor, Lesley Ciarula (31 January 2009). "Thousands protest Tamil 'genocide'". 
  365. "Thousands march for Tamil rights". 20 June 2009. 
  366. "About TAG". Tamils Against Genocide. 
  367. "War Crimes, Genocide Case Filed In Norway Courts". 15 May 2011. 
  368. "War crime, genocide case against Rajapaksa placed in Norway courts". 8 May 2011. 
  369. "Parties condemn "genocide of Sri Lankan Tamils"". 23 December 2006. 
  370. "CPI to protest Lanka violence". 29 September 2008. 
  371. "Stop genocide of Sri Lankan Tamils". 6 October 2008. 
  372. Gopalan, T. N. (5 October 2008). "Send telegrams to Delhi -CM". 
  373. "Help stop genocide, Karunanidhi tells Sonia". 10 April 2009. 
  374. "Summon Mahinda to international court- Jayalalitha". 13 May 2011. 
  375. "Women’s conference in Tamil Nadu terms oppression of Eezham Tamils as genocide". 11 August 2012. 
  376. 377.0 377.1 "People's Tribunal on Sri Lanka". Permanent Peoples' Tribunal. 
  377. "Sri Lanka 'guilty' of war crimes". 17 January 2010. 
  378. "Dublin tribunal takes up genocide investigation". 3 November 2012. 
  379. "Sri Lankan camps breach convention against genocide". 7 June 2009. 
  380. "Sri Lanka 'counting civilian war deaths'". 24 November 2011. 
  381. Potocari Memorial Center PRELIMINARY LIST of Missing Persons from Srebrenica '95 [4]
  382. "ICTY: The Conflicts". The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Retrieved 5 August 2013. 
  383. Kirsten Nakjavani Bookmiller (2008). The United Nations. Infobase Publishing. Retrieved 4 August 2013. , p. 81.
  384. Christopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke, Beth Grill (2010). Victory Has a Thousand Fathers: Sources of Success in Counterinsurgency. Rand Corporation. Retrieved 4 August 2013. , p. 25.
  385. "Mladic Arrives in The Hague". The New York Times. 2011-05-31. 
  386. UN Press Release SG/SM/9993UN, 11/07/2005 "Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s message to the ceremony marking the tenth anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre in Potocari-Srebrenica". Retrieved 9 August 2010.
  387. Institute for War and Peace Reporting, Tribunal Update: Briefly Noted (TU No 398, 18 March 2005) [5]
  388. Williams, Daniel. "Srebrenica Video Vindicates Long Pursuit by Serb Activist". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 May 2011. 
  389. "ICTY – Kordic and Cerkez Judgement – 3. After the Conflict" (PDF). Retrieved 11 July 2012. 
  390. Norman M. Naimark (2011). Memories of Mass Repression: Narrating Life Stories in the Aftermath of Atrocity. Transaction Publishers. Retrieved 4 August 2013. , p. 3.
  391. "Greece faces shame of role in Serb massacre". The Guardian. 2013-01-05. 
  392. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia found in Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Trial Chamber I – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001) that genocide had been committed. (see paragraph 560 for name of group in English on whom the genocide was committed). The judgement was upheld in Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Appeals Chamber – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2004) ICTY 7 (19 April 2004)
  393. On the tenth commemoration of the Srebrenica Massacre, the United States Congress ruled in a near unanimous resolution that "Expresses the sense of the [House of Representatives/[Senate] that: (1) the thousands of innocent people executed at Srebrenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 1995, along with all individuals who were victimized during the conflict and genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1992 to 1995, should be remembered and honored; (2) the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide; (3) foreign nationals,and including U.S. citizens, who have risked, and in some cases lost, their lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina should be remembered and honored; (4) the United Nations (U.N.) and its member states should accept their share of responsibility for allowing the Srebrenica massacre and genocide to occur, and seek to ensure that this does not happen in future crises; (5) it is in the U.S. national interest that the responsible individuals should be held accountable for their actions; (6) persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) should be apprehended and transferred to The Hague without further delay, and countries should meet their obligations to cooperate with the ICTY; and (7) the United States should support the independence and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and peace and stability in southeastern Europe." —CRS Summary.[30][31][32] f=/n/a/2007/02/26/international/i033600S38.DTL&type=politics "Courte: Serbia failed to prevent genocide, UN court rules"]. The San Francisco Chronicle. 2007-02-26. On the tenth commemoration of the Srebrenica Massacre, the United States Congress ruled in a near unanimous resolution that "Expresses the sense of the [House of Representatives]/[Senate] that: (1) the thousands of innocent people executed at Srebrenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 1995, along with all individuals who were victimized during the conflict and genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1992 to 1995, should be remembered and honored; (2) the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide; (3) foreign nationals,and including U.S. citizens, who have risked, and in some cases lost, their lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina should be remembered and honored; (4) the United Nations (U.N.) and its member states should accept their share of responsibility for allowing the Srebrenica massacre and genocide to occur, and seek to ensure that this does not happen in future crises; (5) it is in the U.S. national interest that the responsible individuals should be held accountable for their actions; (6) persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) should be apprehended and transferred to The Hague without further delay, and countries should meet their obligations to cooperate with the ICTY; and (7) the United States should support the independence and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and peace and stability in southeastern Europe." —CRS Summary.[30][31][32] f=/n/a/2007/02/26/international/i033600S38.DTL&type=politics. [dead link]
  394. University of California Riverside:
  395. Human Rights Watch: Milosevic to Face Bosnian Genocide Charges 11 December 2001
  396. "Seven convicted over 1995 Srebrenica massacre". CNN. June 10, 2010. 
  397. "Life for Bosnian Serbs over genocide at Srebrenica". BBC News. June 10, 2010. 
  398. Charter, David (June 10, 2010). "Hague court sentences Bosnian Serbs to life for Srebrenica genocide". London: Times Online. 
  399. Waterfield, Bruno (June 10, 2010). "Bosnian Serbs convicted of genocide over Srebrenica massacre". The Telegraph. London. 
  400. Novislav Djajic, TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)
  401. Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Trial Chamber I – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001), The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, paragraph 589. citing Bavarian Appeals Court, Novislav Djajic case, 23 May 1997, 3 St 20/96, section VI, p. 24 of the English translation.
  402. Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, "Public Prosecutor v Jorgic", 26 September 1997 (Trial Watch) Nikola Jorgic
  403. Trial watch Maksim Sokolovic
  404. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda - UNICTR > Cases > Status of Cases
  405. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
  406. Marek Sliwinski, Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique (L’Harmattan, 1995), pp. 82.
  407. Sharp, Bruce (April 1, 2005). "Counting Hell: The Death Toll of the Khmer Rouge Regime in Cambodia". Retrieved January 13, 2013. 
  408. Rosefielde, Steven (2009). Red Holocaust. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-77757-5. 
  409. "A/RES/57/228B". 2003-05-022. Retrieved 2010-12-11. 
  410. 411.0 411.1 Doyle, Kevin. "Putting the Khmer Rouge on Trial", Time magazine, July 26, 2007
  411. MacKinnon, Ian "Crisis talks to save Khmer Rouge trial", The Guardian, 7 March 2007
  412. The Khmer Rouge Trial Task Force, Royal Cambodian Government
  413. 414.0 414.1 Buncombe, Andrew. "Judge quits Cambodia genocide tribunal". 
  414. Ker Munthit (12 August 2008). "Cambodian tribunal indicts Khmer Rouge jailer". Retrieved April 2012. 
  415. "Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch Sentenced to Life Imprisonment by the Supreme Court Chamber". Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. 3 February 2012. Retrieved April 2012. 
  416. 417.0 417.1 417.2 "Case 002". Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Retrieved April 2012. 
  417. 418.0 418.1 418.2 418.3 "002/19-09-2007: Closing Order" (PDF). Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. 15 September 2010. Retrieved April 2012. 
  418. "002/19-09-2007: Decision on immediate appeal against Trial Chamber's order to release the accused Ieng Thirith" (PDF). Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. 13 December 2011. Retrieved April 2012. 
  419. Article 11 of the [ Rome Statute]. Retrieved 20 March 2008.
  420. ICC: About the court, ICC website. Retrieved 2009-02-06.
  421. "Witnessing Genocide In Sudan". CBS News. 8 October 2004. 
  422. Racism at root of Sudan's Darfur crisis -
  423. "Humanitarian Intervention in Darfur: A Viable Option?". 7 November 2008. Retrieved 2013-09-09. 
  424. Encyclopædia Britannica
  425. "Sudan country profile". BBC News. 27 April 2010. Retrieved 3 May 2010. 
  426. "Al-Bashir Arrest Warrant Issued By International Criminal Court". Huffington Post. 4 March 2009. 
  427. The Online NewsHour: Crisis in Sudan | Janjaweed Militia | PBS
  428. POWELL DECLARES KILLING IN DARFUR 'GENOCIDE', The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, Sep. 9, 2004
  429. 430.0 430.1 Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the United Nations Secretary-General PDF (1.14 MB), January 25, 2005, at 4
  430. Security Council Resolution 1593 (2005) PDF (24.8 KB)
  432. Fourth Report of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to the Security Council pursuant to UNSC 1593 (2005) PDF (597 KB), Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Dec. 14, 2006.
  433. Statement by Mr. Luis Moreno Ocampo, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to the United Nations Security Council pursuant to UNSCR 1593 (2005), International Criminal Court, 5 June 2008
  434. Walker, Peter (2008-07-14). "Darfur genocide charges for Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2008-07-15. 
  435. Staff. Warrant issued for Sudan's leader, BBC, 4 March 2009


External links[]

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).