Military Wiki
m (Remove some templates. interwiki links, delink non military terms, cleanup and move Wikipedia link above categories)
m (Remove some templates, interwiki links, delink non military terms and cleanup, replaced: }} → }})
(47 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Redirect|Operation Desert Storm|the video game|Operation: Desert Storm (video game)}}
 
 
{{Infobox military conflict
 
{{Infobox military conflict
 
|conflict= Gulf War
 
|conflict= Gulf War
 
|image=[[File:Gulf War Photobox.jpg|border|300px]]
 
|image=[[File:Gulf War Photobox.jpg|border|300px]]
 
|partof=
 
|partof=
|caption=Clockwise from top: [[United States Air Force|USAF]] [[McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle|F-15Es]], [[General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon|F-16s]], and a USAF [[McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle|F-15C]] flying over [[Kuwaiti oil fires|burning Kuwaiti oil wells]]; British troops from the [[Staffordshire Regiment]] in [[Operation Granby]]; camera view from a [[Lockheed AC-130]]; [[Highway of Death]]; [[M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle]]
+
|caption=Clockwise from top: [[United States Air Force|USAF]] [[McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle|F-15Es]], [[General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon|F-16s]], and a USAF [[McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle|F-15C]] flying over [[Kuwaiti oil fires|burning Kuwaiti oil wells]]; British troops from the [[Staffordshire Regiment]] in [[Operation Granby]]; camera view from a [[Lockheed AC-130]]; Highway of Death; [[M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle]]
 
|date= 2 August 1990&nbsp;–&nbsp;28 February 1991<br>({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=08|day1=02|year1=1990|month2=02|day2=28|year2=1991}})<br><small>(Operation Desert Storm officially ended on 30 November 1995)</small><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.historyorb.com/events/november/30 |title=Historical Events on 30th November |publisher=Historyorb.com |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
 
|date= 2 August 1990&nbsp;–&nbsp;28 February 1991<br>({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=08|day1=02|year1=1990|month2=02|day2=28|year2=1991}})<br><small>(Operation Desert Storm officially ended on 30 November 1995)</small><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.historyorb.com/events/november/30 |title=Historical Events on 30th November |publisher=Historyorb.com |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
|place=[[Ba'athist Iraq|Iraq]], [[Kuwait]], [[Saudi Arabia]], [[Israel]]
+
|place=Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Israel
 
|result= Decisive Coalition victory
 
|result= Decisive Coalition victory
 
*Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait; Emir [[Jaber III]] restored
 
*Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait; Emir [[Jaber III]] restored
Line 22: Line 21:
 
| {{Flag|Bangladesh}}<br>
 
| {{Flag|Bangladesh}}<br>
 
| {{Flag|Belgium}}<br>
 
| {{Flag|Belgium}}<br>
| {{flagicon image|Flag of Czechoslovakia.svg}} [[Czechoslovakia]]<br>
+
| {{flagicon image|Flag of Czechoslovakia.svg}} Czechoslovakia<br>
 
| {{flag|China}}<br>
 
| {{flag|China}}<br>
 
| {{Flag|Denmark}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forsvaret.dk/SOK/Internationalt/Tidligere/Golf1/Pages/default.aspx |title=Den 1. Golfkrig |publisher=Forsvaret.dk |date=24 September 2010 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><br>
 
| {{Flag|Denmark}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forsvaret.dk/SOK/Internationalt/Tidligere/Golf1/Pages/default.aspx |title=Den 1. Golfkrig |publisher=Forsvaret.dk |date=24 September 2010 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><br>
Line 56: Line 55:
 
| {{Flag icon|Kurdistan}} [[Peshmerga]]
 
| {{Flag icon|Kurdistan}} [[Peshmerga]]
 
}}
 
}}
|combatant2={{Flagicon image|Flag of Iraq (1963-1991).svg}} [[Ba'athist Iraq|Iraq]]<!-- Iraq had this flag in 1990, see [[Flag of Iraq]] (historical section), a newer flag was introduced in 1991, by which time the Persian Gulf War had already started --><br/>
+
|combatant2={{Flagicon image|Flag of Iraq (1963-1991).svg}} Iraq<!-- Iraq had this flag in 1990, see [[Flag of Iraq]] (historical section), a newer flag was introduced in 1991, by which time the Persian Gulf War had already started --><br/>
 
{{flagicon|Kuwait}} [[Republic of Kuwait]]
 
{{flagicon|Kuwait}} [[Republic of Kuwait]]
 
|combatant2a = {{Collapsible list
 
|combatant2a = {{Collapsible list
Line 68: Line 67:
 
| {{Flag|Yemen}}
 
| {{Flag|Yemen}}
 
| {{Flag|Palestine}}
 
| {{Flag|Palestine}}
| {{Flagicon|Brazil|1968}} [[Brazil]]
+
| {{Flagicon|Brazil|1968}} Brazil
 
}}
 
}}
 
|commander1={{flagicon|Kuwait}} '''[[Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]]'''<br>
 
|commander1={{flagicon|Kuwait}} '''[[Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]]'''<br>
Line 114: Line 113:
 
|casualties3='''Kuwaiti civilian losses:'''<br>Over 1,000 killed<ref name=useofterrorkuwait>{{cite web|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050124091425/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |archivedate=24 January 2005|url=http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |title=The Use of Terror during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait|accessdate=22 June 2010 |publisher=The Jewish Agency for Israel}}</ref><br>
 
|casualties3='''Kuwaiti civilian losses:'''<br>Over 1,000 killed<ref name=useofterrorkuwait>{{cite web|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050124091425/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |archivedate=24 January 2005|url=http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html |title=The Use of Terror during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait|accessdate=22 June 2010 |publisher=The Jewish Agency for Israel}}</ref><br>
 
'''Iraqi civilian losses:'''<br>About 3,664 killed<ref name=Wagesofwar>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html#1.%20Iraqi%20civilian%20fatalities%20in%20the%201991%20Gulf |title=The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict|accessdate=9 May 2009 |publisher=Project on Defense Alternatives}}</ref><br>
 
'''Iraqi civilian losses:'''<br>About 3,664 killed<ref name=Wagesofwar>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html#1.%20Iraqi%20civilian%20fatalities%20in%20the%201991%20Gulf |title=The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict|accessdate=9 May 2009 |publisher=Project on Defense Alternatives}}</ref><br>
'''Other civilian losses:'''<br>2 Israeli civilians killed directly, 297 injured<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fetter | first1 = Steve | last2 = Lewis | first2 = George N. | last3 = Gronlund | first3 = Lisbeth | title = Why were Casualties so low? | journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] | volume = 361 | pages = 293–296 | location = London | date = 28 January 1993 | url = http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf | doi = 10.1038/361293a0 | issue = 6410 | ref = harv}}</ref><br>
+
'''Other civilian losses:'''<br>2 Israeli civilians killed directly, 297 injured<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fetter | first1 = Steve | last2 = Lewis | first2 = George N. | last3 = Gronlund | first3 = Lisbeth | title = Why were Casualties so low? | journal = Nature | volume = 361 | pages = 293–296 | location = London | date = 28 January 1993 | url = http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf | doi = 10.1038/361293a0 | issue = 6410 | ref = harv}}</ref><br>
 
72 Israeli civilians killed indirectly<ref name="JVL"/><br>
 
72 Israeli civilians killed indirectly<ref name="JVL"/><br>
 
1 Saudi civilian killed, 65 injured<ref name="iraqwatch.org"/>
 
1 Saudi civilian killed, 65 injured<ref name="iraqwatch.org"/>
Line 120: Line 119:
 
{{Campaignbox Persian Gulf Wars}}
 
{{Campaignbox Persian Gulf Wars}}
 
{{Campaignbox Gulf War}}
 
{{Campaignbox Gulf War}}
 
The '''Gulf War''' (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed '''Operation Desert Storm''' (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized [[Coalition of the Gulf War|coalition force]] from 34 nations led by the United States against Iraq in response to Iraq's [[Invasion of Kuwait|invasion and annexation of Kuwait]].
{{Ba'athism sidebar}}
 
 
The '''Gulf War''' (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed '''Operation Desert Storm''' (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized [[Coalition of the Gulf War|coalition force]] from 34 nations led by the United States against [[Ba'athist Iraq|Iraq]] in response to Iraq's [[Invasion of Kuwait|invasion and annexation of Kuwait]].
 
   
 
The war is also known under [[Gulf War#Alternative names for the Gulf War|other names]], such as the '''Persian Gulf War''', '''First Gulf War''', '''Gulf War I''', or the '''First Iraq War''',<ref name=FrontlineCron>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/cron/ |title=Frontline Chronology |accessdate=20 March 2007 |format=PDF |publisher=Public Broadcasting Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|publisher=CNN |date=17 January 2001 |title=Tenth anniversary of the Gulf War: A look back |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archivedate=17 January 2001 |ref=harv}}</ref><ref name="cfr.org">{{cite web|author=Kenneth Estes |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/13865/isn.html |title=ISN: The Second Gulf War (1990–1991) – Council on Foreign Relations |publisher=Cfr.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> before the [[Iraq War (disambiguation)|term "Iraq War"]] became identified instead with the [[Iraq War|2003 Iraq War]] (also referred to in the U.S. as "Operation Iraqi Freedom").<ref>http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34387.pdf</ref>
 
The war is also known under [[Gulf War#Alternative names for the Gulf War|other names]], such as the '''Persian Gulf War''', '''First Gulf War''', '''Gulf War I''', or the '''First Iraq War''',<ref name=FrontlineCron>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/cron/ |title=Frontline Chronology |accessdate=20 March 2007 |format=PDF |publisher=Public Broadcasting Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|publisher=CNN |date=17 January 2001 |title=Tenth anniversary of the Gulf War: A look back |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html |archivedate=17 January 2001 |ref=harv}}</ref><ref name="cfr.org">{{cite web|author=Kenneth Estes |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/13865/isn.html |title=ISN: The Second Gulf War (1990–1991) – Council on Foreign Relations |publisher=Cfr.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> before the [[Iraq War (disambiguation)|term "Iraq War"]] became identified instead with the [[Iraq War|2003 Iraq War]] (also referred to in the U.S. as "Operation Iraqi Freedom").<ref>http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34387.pdf</ref>
Kuwait's invasion by [[Iraqi Army|Iraqi troops]] that began 2 August 1990 was met with international condemnation, and brought immediate [[Sanctions against Iraq|economic sanctions against Iraq]] by members of the [[United Nations Security Council|U.N. Security Council]]. U.S. President [[George H. W. Bush]] deployed [[United States Armed Forces|U.S. forces]] into [[Saudi Arabia]], and urged other countries to send their own forces to the scene. An array of nations joined the Coalition, the biggest coalition since [[World War II]]. The great majority of the Coalition's military forces were from the U.S., with Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Egypt as leading contributors, in that order. Saudi Arabia paid around US$36 billion of the US$60 billion cost.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Peters |first1=John E |last2=Deshong |first2=Howard |title= Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia |url=http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR629.pdf |year= 1995 |publisher=RAND Corporation |isbn=0-8330-2329-2}}{{Page needed|date=August 2010}}</ref>
+
Kuwait's invasion by [[Iraqi Army|Iraqi troops]] that began 2 August 1990 was met with international condemnation, and brought immediate [[Sanctions against Iraq|economic sanctions against Iraq]] by members of the [[United Nations Security Council|U.N. Security Council]]. U.S. President [[George H. W. Bush]] deployed [[United States Armed Forces|U.S. forces]] into Saudi Arabia, and urged other countries to send their own forces to the scene. An array of nations joined the Coalition, the biggest coalition since [[World War II]]. The great majority of the Coalition's military forces were from the U.S., with Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Egypt as leading contributors, in that order. Saudi Arabia paid around US$36 billion of the US$60 billion cost.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Peters |first1=John E |last2=Deshong |first2=Howard |title= Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia |url=http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR629.pdf |year= 1995 |publisher=RAND Corporation |isbn=0-8330-2329-2}}{{Page needed|date=August 2015}}</ref>
   
 
The war was marked by the beginning of live news on the front lines of the fight, with the primacy of the U.S. network CNN.<ref>[http://memoriaglobo.globo.com/Memoriaglobo/0,27723,GYN0-5273-256436,00.html Memória Globo], access on 29 March 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/livrariadafolha/794646-livro-conta-como-guerra-do-golfo-colocou-a-cnn-no-foco-internacional.shtml |title=Livraria da Folha – Livro conta como Guerra do Golfo colocou a CNN no foco internacional – 08/09/2010 |publisher=.folha.uol.com.br |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref><ref>[http://www.colegioweb.com.br/historia/guerra-do-golfo.html A Guerra do Golfo], accessed on 29 March 2011</ref> The war has also earned the nickname ''Video Game War'' after the daily broadcast images on board the U.S. [[bomber]]s during Operation Desert Storm.<ref>[http://www.uel.br/grupo-pesquisa/gepal/segundosimposio/sandrohelenomoraiszarpelao.pdf A Guerra do Golfo, os Estados Unidos e as Relações Internacionais] accessed on 29 March 2011.</ref><ref>[http://www.iraquenewst55.jex.com.br/3+guerra+terrorismo/o+maior+bombardeio+da+historia Guerra/Terrorismo – O maior bombardeio da história], access on 27 November 2011.</ref>
 
The war was marked by the beginning of live news on the front lines of the fight, with the primacy of the U.S. network CNN.<ref>[http://memoriaglobo.globo.com/Memoriaglobo/0,27723,GYN0-5273-256436,00.html Memória Globo], access on 29 March 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/livrariadafolha/794646-livro-conta-como-guerra-do-golfo-colocou-a-cnn-no-foco-internacional.shtml |title=Livraria da Folha – Livro conta como Guerra do Golfo colocou a CNN no foco internacional – 08/09/2010 |publisher=.folha.uol.com.br |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref><ref>[http://www.colegioweb.com.br/historia/guerra-do-golfo.html A Guerra do Golfo], accessed on 29 March 2011</ref> The war has also earned the nickname ''Video Game War'' after the daily broadcast images on board the U.S. [[bomber]]s during Operation Desert Storm.<ref>[http://www.uel.br/grupo-pesquisa/gepal/segundosimposio/sandrohelenomoraiszarpelao.pdf A Guerra do Golfo, os Estados Unidos e as Relações Internacionais] accessed on 29 March 2011.</ref><ref>[http://www.iraquenewst55.jex.com.br/3+guerra+terrorismo/o+maior+bombardeio+da+historia Guerra/Terrorismo – O maior bombardeio da história], access on 27 November 2011.</ref>
   
The initial conflict to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait began with an aerial bombardment on 17 January 1991. This was followed by a ground assault on 24 February. This was a decisive victory for the Coalition forces, who liberated Kuwait and advanced into Iraqi territory. The Coalition ceased their advance, and declared a cease-fire 100 hours after the ground campaign started. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas on Saudi Arabia's border. Iraq launched [[Scud]] missiles against Coalition military targets in Saudi Arabia and against [[Israel]].
+
The initial conflict to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait began with an aerial bombardment on 17 January 1991. This was followed by a ground assault on 24 February. This was a decisive victory for the Coalition forces, who liberated Kuwait and advanced into Iraqi territory. The Coalition ceased their advance, and declared a cease-fire 100 hours after the ground campaign started. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas on Saudi Arabia's border. Iraq launched [[Scud]] missiles against Coalition military targets in Saudi Arabia and against Israel.
   
 
[[United Nations Security Council Resolution 687]] passed in April 1991 established formal cease-fire terms. The controversies over enforcing this and subsequent resolutions would lead to the [[Iraq War|outbreak of another war]] 12 years later.
 
[[United Nations Security Council Resolution 687]] passed in April 1991 established formal cease-fire terms. The controversies over enforcing this and subsequent resolutions would lead to the [[Iraq War|outbreak of another war]] 12 years later.
Line 136: Line 133:
 
The following names have been used to describe the conflict itself:
 
The following names have been used to describe the conflict itself:
   
*''Gulf War'' and ''Persian Gulf War'' have been the most common terms for the conflict used within Western countries. These names have been used by the overwhelming majority of popular historians and journalists in the United States. The major problem with these terms is that the usage is ambiguous, having now been applied to at least three conflicts: see [[Gulf War (disambiguation)]]. With no consensus of naming, various publications have attempted to refine the name.{{or|date=January 2013}} Some variants include:
+
*''Gulf War'' and ''Persian Gulf War'' have been the most common terms for the conflict used within Western countries. These names have been used by the overwhelming majority of popular historians and journalists in the United States. The major problem with these terms is that the usage is ambiguous, having now been applied to at least three conflicts: see [[Gulf War (disambiguation)]]. With no consensus of naming, various publications have attempted to refine the name. Some variants include:
 
**''War in the Gulf''
 
**''War in the Gulf''
 
**''1990 Gulf War''
 
**''1990 Gulf War''
Line 162: Line 159:
 
*''[[Opération Daguet]]'' was the French name for French military activities in the conflict.
 
*''[[Opération Daguet]]'' was the French name for French military activities in the conflict.
 
*''[[Operation FRICTION]]'' was the name of the Canadian operations
 
*''[[Operation FRICTION]]'' was the name of the Canadian operations
*''Operazione Locusta'' (Italian for [[Locust]]) was the Italian name for the operations and conflict.
+
*''Operazione Locusta'' (Italian for Locust) was the Italian name for the operations and conflict.
   
 
In addition, various phases of each operation may have a unique operational name.
 
In addition, various phases of each operation may have a unique operational name.
Line 173: Line 170:
 
*''Southwest Asia Cease-Fire'' for the period 12 April 1991, through 30 November 1995, including ''[[Operation Provide Comfort]]''.
 
*''Southwest Asia Cease-Fire'' for the period 12 April 1991, through 30 November 1995, including ''[[Operation Provide Comfort]]''.
   
==Background==
+
==History==
  +
===Background===
 
{{See also|Iraq-United States relations}}
 
{{See also|Iraq-United States relations}}
   
Throughout the [[Cold War]], Iraq had been an ally of the [[Soviet Union]], and there was a history of friction between it and the United States. The U.S. was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–[[Palestinians|Palestinian]] politics, and its disapproval of the nature of the peace between Israel and Egypt. The U.S. also disliked Iraqi support for many Arab and [[Palestinian fedayeen|Palestinian militant]] groups such as [[Abu Nidal]], which led to Iraq's inclusion on the developing U.S. list of [[State Sponsors of Terrorism]] on 29 December 1979. The U.S. remained officially neutral after Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980, which became the [[Iran–Iraq War]], although it provided resources, political support, and some "non-military" aircraft.<ref name="stork">{{Cite journal |title=Background to the Crisis: Why War? |first1=Joe |last1=Stork|first2=Ann M. |last2=Lesch |journal=Middle East Report |issue=167 |date=November–December 1990 |pages=11–18 |publisher=Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP)|jstor=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3012998}}</ref> In March 1982, Iran began a successful [[counteroffensive]] ([[Operation Undeniable Victory]]), and the U.S. [[United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq war|increased its support for Iraq]] to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender. In a U.S. bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Ostensibly this was because of improvement in the regime’s record, although former U.S. Assistant Defense Secretary Noel Koch later stated, "No one had any doubts about [the Iraqis'] continued involvement in [[State terrorism|terrorism]]... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."<ref name="Borer">{{cite web|url=http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html |title=Inverse Engagement: Lessons from U.S.-Iraq Relations, 1982–1990 |accessdate=12 October 2006 |author=Douglas A. Borer |year=2003 |work=U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection |publisher=U.S. Army}}</ref> With Iraq's newfound success in the war, and the Iranian rebuff of a peace offer in July, [[International aid to combatants in the Iran–Iraq War|arms sales to Iraq]] reached a record spike in 1982. When Iraqi President [[Saddam Hussein]] expelled Abu Nidal to Syria at the U.S.' request in November 1983, the [[Presidency of Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]] sent [[Donald Rumsfeld]] to meet Saddam as a special envoy and to cultivate ties. By the time the [[Iran-Iraq War#Towards a ceasefire|ceasefire with Iran]] was signed in August 1988, Iraq was heavily debt-ridden and tensions within society were rising.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 333.</ref> Most of its debt was owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 341–342.</ref>
+
Throughout the [[Cold War]], Iraq had been an ally of the [[Soviet Union]], and there was a history of friction between it and the United States. The U.S. was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–Palestinian politics, and its disapproval of the nature of the peace between Israel and Egypt. The U.S. also disliked Iraqi support for many Arab and [[Palestinian fedayeen|Palestinian militant]] groups such as [[Abu Nidal]], which led to Iraq's inclusion on the developing U.S. list of [[State Sponsors of Terrorism]] on 29 December 1979. The U.S. remained officially neutral after Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980, which became the [[Iran–Iraq War]], although it provided resources, political support, and some "non-military" aircraft.<ref name="stork">{{Cite journal |title=Background to the Crisis: Why War? |first1=Joe |last1=Stork|first2=Ann M. |last2=Lesch |journal=Middle East Report |issue=167 |date=November–December 1990 |pages=11–18 |publisher=Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP)|jstor=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3012998}}</ref> In March 1982, Iran began a successful [[counteroffensive]] ([[Operation Undeniable Victory]]), and the U.S. [[United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq war|increased its support for Iraq]] to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender. In a U.S. bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Ostensibly this was because of improvement in the regime’s record, although former U.S. Assistant Defense Secretary Noel Koch later stated, "No one had any doubts about [the Iraqis'] continued involvement in [[State terrorism|terrorism]]... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."<ref name="Borer">{{cite web|url=http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html |title=Inverse Engagement: Lessons from U.S.-Iraq Relations, 1982–1990 |accessdate=12 October 2006 |author=Douglas A. Borer |year=2003 |work=U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection |publisher=U.S. Army}}</ref> With Iraq's newfound success in the war, and the Iranian rebuff of a peace offer in July, [[International aid to combatants in the Iran–Iraq War|arms sales to Iraq]] reached a record spike in 1982. When Iraqi President [[Saddam Hussein]] expelled Abu Nidal to Syria at the U.S.' request in November 1983, the Reagan administration sent [[Donald Rumsfeld]] to meet Saddam as a special envoy and to cultivate ties. By the time the [[Iran-Iraq War#Towards a ceasefire|ceasefire with Iran]] was signed in August 1988, Iraq was heavily debt-ridden and tensions within society were rising.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 333.</ref> Most of its debt was owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 341–342.</ref>
   
 
[[File:Ku-map.gif|thumb|left|Map of Kuwait]]
 
[[File:Ku-map.gif|thumb|left|Map of Kuwait]]
   
The Iraq-Kuwait dispute also involved Iraqi claims to Kuwait as Iraqi territory.<ref name="stork"/> Kuwait had been a part of the [[Ottoman Empire]]'s [[Basra Vilayet|province of Basra]], something that Iraq claimed made it rightful Iraq territory.<ref name="simons343344">Simons (2003). pp. 343–344.</ref> Its ruling dynasty, the [[House of Sabah|al-Sabah family]], had concluded a [[protectorate]] agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for its foreign affairs to the United Kingdom. The UK drew the border between the two countries in 1922, making Iraq virtually landlocked.<ref name="stork"/> Kuwait rejected Iraqi attempts to secure further provisions in the region.<ref name="simons343344"/>
+
The Iraq-Kuwait dispute also involved Iraqi claims to Kuwait as Iraqi territory.<ref name="stork" /> Kuwait had been a part of the [[Ottoman Empire]]'s [[Basra Vilayet|province of Basra]], something that Iraq claimed made it rightful Iraq territory.<ref name="simons343344">Simons (2003). pp. 343–344.</ref> Its ruling dynasty, the [[House of Sabah|al-Sabah family]], had concluded a [[protectorate]] agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for its foreign affairs to the United Kingdom. The UK drew the border between the two countries in 1922, making Iraq virtually landlocked.<ref name="stork" /> Kuwait rejected Iraqi attempts to secure further provisions in the region.<ref name="simons343344" />
   
Iraq also accused Kuwait of exceeding its [[OPEC]] quotas for oil production. In order for the cartel to maintain its desired price of $18 a barrel, discipline was required. The [[United Arab Emirates]] and [[Kuwait]] were consistently overproducing; the latter at least in part to repair losses caused by Iranian attacks in the Iran–Iraq War and to pay for the losses of an economic scandal. The result was a slump in the oil price – as low as $10 a barrel – with a resulting loss of $7 billion a year to Iraq, equal to its 1989 [[balance of payments]] deficit.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 339–340.</ref> Resulting revenues struggled to support the government's basic costs, let alone repair Iraq's damaged infrastructure. Jordan and Iraq both looked for more discipline, with little success.<ref name="simons341">Simons (2003). p. 341.</ref> The Iraqi government described it as a form of economic warfare,<ref name="simons341"/> which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait [[Directional drilling|slant-drilling]] across the border into Iraq's [[Rumaila oil field]].<ref>Cleveland, William L. ''A History of the Modern Middle East. 2nd Ed'' pg. 464</ref> At the same time, Saddam looked for closer ties with those Arab states that had supported Iraq in the war. This was supported by the U.S., who believed that Iraqi ties with pro-Western Gulf states would help bring and maintain Iraq inside the U.S.' sphere of influence.<ref name="Simons334">Simons (2003). p. 334.</ref>
+
Iraq also accused Kuwait of exceeding its OPEC quotas for oil production. In order for the cartel to maintain its desired price of $18 a barrel, discipline was required. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait were consistently overproducing; the latter at least in part to repair losses caused by Iranian attacks in the Iran–Iraq War and to pay for the losses of an economic scandal. The result was a slump in the oil price – as low as $10 a barrel – with a resulting loss of $7 billion a year to Iraq, equal to its 1989 [[balance of payments]] deficit.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 339–340.</ref> Resulting revenues struggled to support the government's basic costs, let alone repair Iraq's damaged infrastructure. Jordan and Iraq both looked for more discipline, with little success.<ref name="simons341">Simons (2003). p. 341.</ref> The Iraqi government described it as a form of economic warfare,<ref name="simons341" /> which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait [[Directional drilling|slant-drilling]] across the border into Iraq's [[Rumaila oil field]].<ref>Cleveland, William L. ''A History of the Modern Middle East. 2nd Ed'' pg. 464</ref> At the same time, Saddam looked for closer ties with those Arab states that had supported Iraq in the war. This was supported by the U.S., who believed that Iraqi ties with pro-Western Gulf states would help bring and maintain Iraq inside the U.S.' sphere of influence.<ref name="Simons334">Simons (2003). p. 334.</ref>
   
In 1989, it appeared that Saudi-Iraqi relations, strong during the war, would be maintained. A pact of non-interference and non-aggression was signed between the countries, followed by a Kuwaiti-Iraqi deal for Iraq to supply Kuwait with water for drinking and irrigation, although a request for Kuwait to lease Iraq [[Umm Qasr]] was rejected.<ref name="Simons334"/> Saudi-backed development projects were hampered by Iraq's large debts, even with the [[demobilization]] of 200,000 soldiers. Iraq also looked to increase arms production so as to become an exporter, although the success of these projects was also restrained by Iraq's obligations; in Iraq, resentment to OPEC's controls mounted.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 335.</ref>
+
In 1989, it appeared that Saudi-Iraqi relations, strong during the war, would be maintained. A pact of non-interference and non-aggression was signed between the countries, followed by a Kuwaiti-Iraqi deal for Iraq to supply Kuwait with water for drinking and irrigation, although a request for Kuwait to lease Iraq Umm Qasr was rejected.<ref name="Simons334" /> Saudi-backed development projects were hampered by Iraq's large debts, even with the [[demobilization]] of 200,000 soldiers. Iraq also looked to increase arms production so as to become an exporter, although the success of these projects was also restrained by Iraq's obligations; in Iraq, resentment to OPEC's controls mounted.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 335.</ref>
   
Iraq's relations with its Arab neighbors – in particular Egypt – were degraded by mounting violence in Iraq against expatriate groups, well-employed during the war, by Iraqi unemployed, among them demobilized soldiers. These events drew little notice outside the Arab world because of fast-moving events in Eastern Europe. The U.S. did, however, begin to condemn Iraq's human rights record, including the well-known use of torture.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 336.</ref> The UK also condemned the execution of [[Farzad Bazoft]], a journalist working for the British newspaper ''The Observer''.<ref name="stork"/> Following Saddam's declaration that "binary chemical weapons" would be used on Israel if it used military force against Iraq, Washington halted part of its funding.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 337–338.</ref> A U.N. mission to the [[Israeli-occupied territories]], where riots had resulted in Palestinian deaths, was vetoed by the U.S., making Iraq deeply skeptical of U.S. foreign policy aims in the region, combined with the U.S.' reliance on Middle Eastern energy reserves.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 338.</ref>
+
Iraq's relations with its Arab neighbors – in particular Egypt – were degraded by mounting violence in Iraq against expatriate groups, well-employed during the war, by Iraqi unemployed, among them demobilized soldiers. These events drew little notice outside the Arab world because of fast-moving events in Eastern Europe. The U.S. did, however, begin to condemn Iraq's human rights record, including the well-known use of torture.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 336.</ref> The UK also condemned the execution of [[Farzad Bazoft]], a journalist working for the British newspaper ''The Observer''.<ref name="stork" /> Following Saddam's declaration that "binary chemical weapons" would be used on Israel if it used military force against Iraq, Washington halted part of its funding.<ref>Simons (2003). pp. 337–338.</ref> A U.N. mission to the [[Israeli-occupied territories]], where riots had resulted in Palestinian deaths, was vetoed by the U.S., making Iraq deeply skeptical of U.S. foreign policy aims in the region, combined with the U.S.' reliance on Middle Eastern energy reserves.<ref>Simons (2003). p. 338.</ref>
   
In early July 1990, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the U.S. naval fleet in the Persian Gulf was placed on alert. Saddam believed an anti-Iraq conspiracy was developing– Kuwait had begun talks with Iran, and Iraq's rival Syria had arranged a visit to Egypt.<ref name="simons343">Simons (2003). p. 343.</ref> On 15 July 1990, Saddam's government laid out its combined objections to the [[Arab League]], including that policy moves were costing Iraq $1 billion a year, that Kuwait was still using the Rumaila oil field, that loans made by the U.A.E. and Kuwait could not be considered debts to its "Arab brothers".<ref name="simons343"/> He threatened force against Kuwait and the U.A.E. saying "The policies of some Arab rulers are American... They are inspired by America to undermine Arab interests and security." <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/18/business/iraq-threatens-emirates-and-kuwait-on-oil-glut.html? Iraq Threatens Emirates And Kuwait on Oil Glut] New York Times 18 July 1990</ref> The U.S. sent aerial planes and combat ships to the Persian Gulf in response to these threats.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/25/world/us-deploys-air-and-sea-forces-after-iraq-threatens-2-neighbors.html? U.S. Deploys Air and Sea Forces After Iraq Threatens 2 Neighbors] New York Times 25 July 1990</ref> Discussions in [[Jeddah]], Saudi Arabia, mediated on the Arab League's behalf by Egyptian President [[Hosni Mubarak]], were held on 31 July and led Mubarak to believe that a peaceful course could be established.<ref name="finlan2526">Finlan (2003). pp. 25–26.</ref>
+
In early July 1990, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the U.S. naval fleet in the Persian Gulf was placed on alert. Saddam believed an anti-Iraq conspiracy was developing– Kuwait had begun talks with Iran, and Iraq's rival Syria had arranged a visit to Egypt.<ref name="simons343">Simons (2003). p. 343.</ref> On 15 July 1990, Saddam's government laid out its combined objections to the Arab League, including that policy moves were costing Iraq $1 billion a year, that Kuwait was still using the Rumaila oil field, that loans made by the U.A.E. and Kuwait could not be considered debts to its "Arab brothers".<ref name="simons343" /> He threatened force against Kuwait and the U.A.E. saying "The policies of some Arab rulers are American... They are inspired by America to undermine Arab interests and security." <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/18/business/iraq-threatens-emirates-and-kuwait-on-oil-glut.html? Iraq Threatens Emirates And Kuwait on Oil Glut] New York Times 18 July 1990</ref> The U.S. sent aerial planes and combat ships to the Persian Gulf in response to these threats.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/25/world/us-deploys-air-and-sea-forces-after-iraq-threatens-2-neighbors.html? U.S. Deploys Air and Sea Forces After Iraq Threatens 2 Neighbors] New York Times 25 July 1990</ref> Discussions in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, mediated on the Arab League's behalf by Egyptian President [[Hosni Mubarak]], were held on 31 July and led Mubarak to believe that a peaceful course could be established.<ref name="finlan2526">Finlan (2003). pp. 25–26.</ref>
   
On the 25th, Saddam met with [[April Glaspie]], the [[United States Ambassador to Iraq|U.S. Ambassador to Iraq]], in Baghdad. the Iraqi leader attacked American policy with regards to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates:
+
On the 25th, Saddam met with [[April Glaspie]], the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, in Baghdad. the Iraqi leader attacked American policy with regards to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates:
   
 
:"So what can it mean when America says it will now protect its friends? It can only mean prejudice against Iraq. This stance plus maneuvers and statements which have been made has encouraged the U.A.E. and Kuwait to disregard Iraqi rights... If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you... We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends." <ref name="nytimes.com">[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/23/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-excerpts-from-iraqi-document-on-meeting-with-us-envoy.html? CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Excerpts From Iraqi Document on Meeting With U.S. Envoy] New York Times 23 September 1990</ref>
 
:"So what can it mean when America says it will now protect its friends? It can only mean prejudice against Iraq. This stance plus maneuvers and statements which have been made has encouraged the U.A.E. and Kuwait to disregard Iraqi rights... If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you... We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends." <ref name="nytimes.com">[http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/23/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-excerpts-from-iraqi-document-on-meeting-with-us-envoy.html? CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Excerpts From Iraqi Document on Meeting With U.S. Envoy] New York Times 23 September 1990</ref>
Line 196: Line 194:
 
Glaspie replied:
 
Glaspie replied:
   
:"I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait... Frankly, we can only see that you have deployed massive troops in the south. Normally that would not be any of our business. But when this happens in the context of what you said on your national day, then when we read the details in the two letters of the Foreign Minister, then when we see the Iraqi point of view that the measures taken by the U.A.E. and Kuwait is, in the final analysis, parallel to military aggression against Iraq, then it would be reasonable for me to be concerned." <ref name="nytimes.com"/>
+
:"I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait... Frankly, we can only see that you have deployed massive troops in the south. Normally that would not be any of our business. But when this happens in the context of what you said on your national day, then when we read the details in the two letters of the Foreign Minister, then when we see the Iraqi point of view that the measures taken by the U.A.E. and Kuwait is, in the final analysis, parallel to military aggression against Iraq, then it would be reasonable for me to be concerned." <ref name="nytimes.com" />
   
Saddam stated that he would attempt last-ditch negotiations with the Kuwaitis but Iraq "would not accept death".<ref name="nytimes.com"/>
+
Saddam stated that he would attempt last-ditch negotiations with the Kuwaitis but Iraq "would not accept death".<ref name="nytimes.com" />
   
According to Glaspie's own account, she stated in reference to the precise border between Kuwait and Iraq, "(...) that she had served in Kuwait 20 years before; 'then, as now, we took no position on these Arab affairs'."<ref name="90BAGHDAD4237">{{cite web|url=http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/1990/07/90BAGHDAD4237.html| title=Saddam's message of friendship to president Bush (Wikileaks telegram 90BAGHDAD4237)| accessdate=2. January 2011 | publisher = U.S. Department of State| date= 25 July 1990}}</ref> Glaspie similarly believed that war was not imminent.<ref name="finlan2526"/>
+
According to Glaspie's own account, she stated in reference to the precise border between Kuwait and Iraq, "(...) that she had served in Kuwait 20 years before; 'then, as now, we took no position on these Arab affairs'."<ref name="90BAGHDAD4237">{{cite web|url=http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/1990/07/90BAGHDAD4237.html| title=Saddam's message of friendship to president Bush (Wikileaks telegram 90BAGHDAD4237)| accessdate=2. January 2011 | publisher = U.S. Department of State| date= 25 July 1990}}</ref> Glaspie similarly believed that war was not imminent.<ref name="finlan2526" />
   
==Invasion of Kuwait==
+
===Invasion of Kuwait===
 
{{Main|Invasion of Kuwait}}
 
{{Main|Invasion of Kuwait}}
 
[[File:Kuwaiti main battle tanks.JPEG|thumb|left|[[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti Armed Forces]] [[M-84]] [[main battle tank]]s.]]
 
[[File:Kuwaiti main battle tanks.JPEG|thumb|left|[[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti Armed Forces]] [[M-84]] [[main battle tank]]s.]]
Line 209: Line 207:
 
[[File:Iraqi Model 214ST SuperTransport helicopter, 1991.JPEG|thumb|right|[[Iraqi Air Force]] [[Bell 214ST]] [[Military transport aircraft|transport helicopter]].]]
 
[[File:Iraqi Model 214ST SuperTransport helicopter, 1991.JPEG|thumb|right|[[Iraqi Air Force]] [[Bell 214ST]] [[Military transport aircraft|transport helicopter]].]]
   
The result of the Jeddah talks was an Iraqi demand for $10 billion to cover the lost revenues from Rumaila; the Kuwaiti response was to offer $9 billion. The Iraqi response was to immediately order the invasion.<ref name="finlan26">Finlan (2003). p. 26.</ref> On 2 August 1990, Iraq launched the invasion by bombing Kuwait's capital, [[Kuwait City]].
+
The result of the Jeddah talks was an Iraqi demand for $10 billion to cover the lost revenues from Rumaila; the Kuwaiti response was to offer $9 billion. The Iraqi response was to immediately order the invasion.<ref name="finlan26">Finlan (2003). p. 26.</ref> On 2 August 1990, Iraq launched the invasion by bombing Kuwait's capital, Kuwait City.
   
At the time of the invasion, the [[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti military]] was believed to have numbered 16,000 men, arranged into three armored, one mechanised infantry and one under-strength artillery brigade.<ref name="loccs">{{cite web |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+kw0058) |title=Kuwait: Organization and Mission of the Forces |publisher=Library of Congress Country Studies |accessdate=14 April 2012}}</ref> The pre-war strength of the [[Kuwait Air Force]] was around 2,200 Kuwaiti personnel, with 80 aircraft and forty helicopters.<ref name="loccs"/> In spite of Iraqi [[saber-rattling]], Kuwait didn't have its forces on alert; the army had been stood down on 19 July.<ref>Finlan (2003). p. 25.</ref>
+
At the time of the invasion, the [[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti military]] was believed to have numbered 16,000 men, arranged into three armored, one mechanised infantry and one under-strength artillery brigade.<ref name="loccs">{{cite web |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+kw0058) |title=Kuwait: Organization and Mission of the Forces |publisher=Library of Congress Country Studies |accessdate=14 April 2012}}</ref> The pre-war strength of the [[Kuwait Air Force]] was around 2,200 Kuwaiti personnel, with 80 aircraft and forty helicopters.<ref name="loccs" /> In spite of Iraqi [[saber-rattling]], Kuwait didn't have its forces on alert; the army had been stood down on 19 July.<ref>Finlan (2003). p. 25.</ref>
   
 
By 1988, at the Iran–Iraq War's end, the [[Iraqi Army]] was the world's fourth largest army; it consisted of 955,000 standing soldiers and 650,000 paramilitary forces in the Popular Army. According to John Childs and André Corvisier, a low estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding 4,500 tanks, 484 combat aircraft and 232 combat helicopters.<ref name="MilSize">{{cite book | author = Childs, John; Corvisier, André | page = [http://books.google.no/books?id=nEQ7FUAdmc8C&pg=PA403 403] | title = A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War | location = [[Wiley-Blackwell]] | year = 1994 | isbn = 9780631168485}}</ref> According to Michael Knights, a high estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding one million men and 850,000 reservists, 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, 700 combat aircraft and helicopters; and held 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias, and had a strong air defense.<ref>{{cite book | author = Knights, Michael | page = [http://books.google.no/books?id=FDJmjUUR9CUC&pg=PA20 20] | title = Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power | location = [[United States Naval Institute]] | year = 2005 | isbn = 9781591144441}}</ref>
 
By 1988, at the Iran–Iraq War's end, the [[Iraqi Army]] was the world's fourth largest army; it consisted of 955,000 standing soldiers and 650,000 paramilitary forces in the Popular Army. According to John Childs and André Corvisier, a low estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding 4,500 tanks, 484 combat aircraft and 232 combat helicopters.<ref name="MilSize">{{cite book | author = Childs, John; Corvisier, André | page = [http://books.google.no/books?id=nEQ7FUAdmc8C&pg=PA403 403] | title = A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War | location = [[Wiley-Blackwell]] | year = 1994 | isbn = 9780631168485}}</ref> According to Michael Knights, a high estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding one million men and 850,000 reservists, 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, 700 combat aircraft and helicopters; and held 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias, and had a strong air defense.<ref>{{cite book | author = Knights, Michael | page = [http://books.google.no/books?id=FDJmjUUR9CUC&pg=PA20 20] | title = Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power | location = [[United States Naval Institute]] | year = 2005 | isbn = 9781591144441}}</ref>
   
Iraqi commandos infiltrated the Kuwaiti border first to prepare for the major units which began the attack at midnight. The Iraqi attack had two prongs, with the primary attack force driving south straight for Kuwait City down the main highway, and a supporting attack force entering Kuwait farther west, but then turning and driving east, cutting off Kuwait City from the country's southern half. The commander of a Kuwaiti armored battalion, 35th Armoured [[Brigade]], deployed them against the Iraqi attack and was able to conduct a robust defense ([[Battle of the Bridges]]), near [[Al Jahra]], west of Kuwait City.<ref>{{cite web|author=Dan Vaught |url=http://users.lighthouse.net/danvaught/eyewitness01.html |title=Eyewitness, Col. Fred Hart 1 |publisher=Users.lighthouse.net |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
Iraqi commandos infiltrated the Kuwaiti border first to prepare for the major units which began the attack at midnight. The Iraqi attack had two prongs, with the primary attack force driving south straight for Kuwait City down the main highway, and a supporting attack force entering Kuwait farther west, but then turning and driving east, cutting off Kuwait City from the country's southern half. The commander of a Kuwaiti armored battalion, 35th Armoured [[Brigade]], deployed them against the Iraqi attack and was able to conduct a robust defense ([[Battle of the Bridges]]), near [[Al Jahra]], west of Kuwait City.<ref>{{cite web|author=Dan Vaught |url=http://users.lighthouse.net/danvaught/eyewitness01.html |title=Eyewitness, Col. Fred Hart 1 |publisher=Users.lighthouse.net |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
   
 
Kuwaiti aircraft [[scrambling (military)|scrambled]] to meet the invading force, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. A few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces.<ref name="airCombatInformationGroup">{{Cite journal|last=Cooper |first=Tom |last2=Sadik |first2=Ahmad |title=Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 |date=16 September 2003 |journal=Air Combat Information Group |url=http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_213.shtml |accessdate=17 April 2010|ref=harv}}</ref>
 
Kuwaiti aircraft [[scrambling (military)|scrambled]] to meet the invading force, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. A few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces.<ref name="airCombatInformationGroup">{{Cite journal|last=Cooper |first=Tom |last2=Sadik |first2=Ahmad |title=Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 |date=16 September 2003 |journal=Air Combat Information Group |url=http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_213.shtml |accessdate=17 April 2010|ref=harv}}</ref>
Line 221: Line 219:
 
The main Iraqi thrust into Kuwait City was conducted by [[commando]]s deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city from the sea, while other divisions seized the airports and two [[airbase]]s. The Iraqis [[Battle of Dasman Palace|attacked the Dasman Palace]], the Royal Residence of [[List of emirs of Kuwait|Kuwait's Emir]], [[Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]], which was defended by the Emiri Guard supported with [[M-84]] tanks. In the process, the Iraqis killed [[Fahad Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]], the Emir's youngest brother.
 
The main Iraqi thrust into Kuwait City was conducted by [[commando]]s deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city from the sea, while other divisions seized the airports and two [[airbase]]s. The Iraqis [[Battle of Dasman Palace|attacked the Dasman Palace]], the Royal Residence of [[List of emirs of Kuwait|Kuwait's Emir]], [[Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]], which was defended by the Emiri Guard supported with [[M-84]] tanks. In the process, the Iraqis killed [[Fahad Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al-Sabah]], the Emir's youngest brother.
   
Within 12 hours, most resistance had ended within Kuwait and the royal family had fled, leaving Iraq in control of most of Kuwait.<ref name="finlan26"/> After two days of intense combat, most of the [[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti military]] were either overrun by the [[Iraqi Republican Guard]], or had escaped to Saudi Arabia. The Emir and key ministers were able to get out and head south along the highway for refuge in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi ground forces consolidated their control of Kuwait City, then headed south and redeployed along the Saudi border. After the decisive Iraqi victory, Saddam initially installed a puppet regime known as the "[[Republic of Kuwait|Provisional Government of Free Kuwait]]" before installing his cousin [[Ali Hassan al-Majid]] as Kuwait's governor on 8 August.
+
Within 12 hours, most resistance had ended within Kuwait and the royal family had fled, leaving Iraq in control of most of Kuwait.<ref name="finlan26" /> After two days of intense combat, most of the [[Military of Kuwait|Kuwaiti military]] were either overrun by the [[Iraqi Republican Guard]], or had escaped to Saudi Arabia. The Emir and key ministers were able to get out and head south along the highway for refuge in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi ground forces consolidated their control of Kuwait City, then headed south and redeployed along the Saudi border. After the decisive Iraqi victory, Saddam initially installed a puppet regime known as the "[[Republic of Kuwait|Provisional Government of Free Kuwait]]" before installing his cousin [[Ali Hassan al-Majid]] as Kuwait's governor on 8 August.
   
==Run-up to the war==
+
===Run-up to the war===
 
====Diplomatic means====
 
A key element of US political-military and energy economic planning occurred in early 1984. The Iran-Iraq war had been going on for five years and there were significant casualties on both sides, reaching hundreds of thousands. Within the Reagan National Security Council concern was growing that the war could spread beyond the boundaries of the two belligerents. A National Security Planning Group meeting was called chaired by then Vice President [[George Bush Sr.|George Bush]] to review US options. It was determined that there was a high likelihood that the conflict would spread into Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, but that the US had little capability to defend the region. Furthermore it was determined that a prolonged war in the region would induce much higher oil prices and threaten the fragile recovery of the world economy which was just beginning to gain momentum. On 22 May 1984, [[President Reagan]] was briefed on the project conclusions in the Oval Office by [[William Flynn Martin]] who had served as the head of the NSC staff that organized the study.The full declassified presentation can be seen here.<ref>http://www.wpainc.com/Archive/Reagan%20Administration/WFM%20Papers%20from%20Reagan%20Archives/Iran-Iraq/Presentation%20on%20Gulf%20Oil%20Disruption%205-22-84.pdf</ref> The conclusions were threefold:  first oil stocks needed to be increased among members of the [[International Energy Agency]] and, if necessary, released early in the event of oil market disruption; second the United States needed to beef up the security of friendly Arab states in the region and thirdly an embargo should be placed on sales of military equipment to Iran and Iraq. The Plan was approved by the President and later affirmed by the G-7 leaders headed by [[Margaret Thatcher]] in the [[10th G7 summit|London Summit of 1984]]. The plan was implemented and became the basis for US preparedness to respond to the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait in 1991.
   
 
Within hours of the invasion, Kuwait and U.S. delegations requested a meeting of the [[United Nations Security Council]], which passed [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 660|Resolution 660]], condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops.<ref>Finlan (2003). p. 29.</ref> On 3 August, the Arab League passed its own resolution, which called for a solution to the conflict from within the League, and warned against outside intervention; Iraq and Libya were the only two Arab League states which opposed a resolution for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. The PLO opposed it as well.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf12.html |title=Myths & Facts – The Gulf Wars |publisher=Jewishvirtuallibrary.org |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref> The Arab states of Yemen and Jordan – a Western ally which bordered Iraq and relied on the country for economic support<ref name="lkjomzvc" /> – opposed military intervention from non-Arab states.<ref>{{Cite journal |first=David A |last=Deese |url=http://www.laughtergenealogy.com/bin/histprof/misc/desertstorm.html |title=Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm – War with Iraqi |publisher=Concord Learning Systems |work=The History Professor |ref=harv}}</ref> The Arab state of Sudan aligned itself with Saddam.<ref name="lkjomzvc">{{cite journal |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2002/issue2/jv6n2a7.html |title=The 1991 Gulf War And Jordan's Economy |author1=Ziad Swaidan |author2=Mihai Nica |journal=Middle East Review of International Affairs |volume=6 |issue=2 |month=June |year=2002 |ref=harv}}</ref>
===Diplomatic means===
 
A key element of US political-military and energy economic planning occurred in early 1984. The Iran-Iraq war had been going on for five years and there were significant casualties on both sides, reaching hundreds of thousands. Within the Reagan [[National Security Council (USA)|National Security Council]] concern was growing that the war could spread beyond the boundaries of the two belligerents. A National Security Planning Group meeting was called chaired by then Vice President [[George Bush Sr.|George Bush]] to review US options. It was determined that there was a high likelihood that the conflict would spread into Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, but that the US had little capability to defend the region. Furthermore it was determined that a prolonged war in the region would induce much higher oil prices and threaten the fragile recovery of the world economy which was just beginning to gain momentum. On 22 May 1984, [[President Reagan]] was briefed on the project conclusions in the Oval Office by [[William Flynn Martin]] who had served as the head of the NSC staff that organized the study.The full declassified presentation can be seen here.<ref>http://www.wpainc.com/Archive/Reagan%20Administration/WFM%20Papers%20from%20Reagan%20Archives/Iran-Iraq/Presentation%20on%20Gulf%20Oil%20Disruption%205-22-84.pdf</ref> The conclusions were threefold:  first oil stocks needed to be increased among members of the [[International Energy Agency]] and, if necessary, released early in the event of oil market disruption; second the United States needed to beef up the security of friendly Arab states in the region and thirdly an embargo should be placed on sales of military equipment to Iran and Iraq. The Plan was approved by the President and later affirmed by the G-7 leaders headed by [[Margaret Thatcher]] in the [[10th G7 summit|London Summit of 1984]]. The plan was implemented and became the basis for US preparedness to respond to the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait in 1991.
 
   
 
On 6 August, [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Resolution 661]] placed economic sanctions on Iraq.<ref>*Finlan (2003). p. 29. *{{cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |title=Resolution 661 (1990) |publisher=United Nations |accessdate=13 April 2012}}</ref> [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 665|Resolution 665]] followed soon after, which authorized a naval blockade to enforce the sanctions. It said the "use of measures commensurate to the specific circumstances as may be necessary ... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping in order to inspect and verify their cargoes and destinations and to ensure strict implementation of resolution 661."<ref>Lori Fisler Damrosch, ''International Law, Cases and Materials'', West Group, 2001</ref>
Within hours of the invasion, Kuwait and U.S. delegations requested a meeting of the [[United Nations Security Council]], which passed [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 660|Resolution 660]], condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops.<ref>Finlan (2003). p. 29.</ref> On 3 August, the [[Arab League]] passed its own resolution, which called for a solution to the conflict from within the League, and warned against outside intervention; Iraq and Libya were the only two Arab League states which opposed a resolution for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. The PLO opposed it as well.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf12.html |title=Myths & Facts – The Gulf Wars |publisher=Jewishvirtuallibrary.org |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref> The Arab states of Yemen and Jordan – a Western ally which bordered Iraq and relied on the country for economic support<ref name="lkjomzvc" /> – opposed military intervention from non-Arab states.<ref>{{Cite journal |first=David A |last=Deese |url=http://www.laughtergenealogy.com/bin/histprof/misc/desertstorm.html |title=Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm – War with Iraqi |publisher=Concord Learning Systems |work=The History Professor |ref=harv}}</ref> The Arab state of Sudan aligned itself with Saddam.<ref name="lkjomzvc">{{cite journal |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2002/issue2/jv6n2a7.html |title=The 1991 Gulf War And Jordan's Economy |author1=Ziad Swaidan |author2=Mihai Nica |journal=Middle East Review of International Affairs |volume=6 |issue=2 |month=June |year=2002 |ref=harv}}</ref>
 
   
 
[[File:Bush troops.jpg|thumb|President Bush visiting American troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.]]
On 6 August, [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Resolution 661]] placed [[economic sanctions]] on Iraq.<ref>*Finlan (2003). p. 29. *{{cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |title=Resolution 661 (1990) |publisher=United Nations |accessdate=13 April 2012}}</ref> [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 665|Resolution 665]] followed soon after, which authorized a naval blockade to enforce the sanctions. It said the "use of measures commensurate to the specific circumstances as may be necessary ... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping in order to inspect and verify their cargoes and destinations and to ensure strict implementation of resolution 661."<ref>Lori Fisler Damrosch, ''International Law, Cases and Materials'', West Group, 2001</ref>
 
   
 
From the beginning, U.S. officials insisted on a total Iraqi pullout from Kuwait, without any linkage to other Middle Eastern problems, fearing any concessions would strengthen Iraqi influence in the region for years to come.<ref name="hard line">{{Cite news | last=Friedman | first=Thomas L. | title=Confrontation in the Gulf: Behind Bush's Hard Line; Washington Considers a Clear Iraqi Defeat To Be Necessary to Bolster Its Arab Allies | newspaper=The New York Times | location = New York | pages = A1 | date = 22 August 1990 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/22/world/confrontation-gulf-behind-bush-s-hard-line-washington-considers-clear-iraqi.html?scp=1&sq=Confrontation+in+the+Gulf%3A+Behind+Bush%27s+Hard+Line&st=nyt | accessdate=16 September 2010 | authorlink= Thomas Friedman}}</ref>
[[File:Bush troops.jpg|thumb|President Bush visiting American troops in Saudi Arabia on [[Thanksgiving (United States)|Thanksgiving Day]], 1990.]]
 
   
 
On 12 August 1990, Saddam "propose[d] that all cases of occupation, and those cases that have been portrayed as occupation, in the region, be resolved simultaneously". Specifically, he called for Israel to withdraw from occupied territories in Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and "mutual withdrawals by Iraq and Iran and arrangement for the situation in Kuwait." He also called for a replacement of U.S. troops that mobilized in Saudi Arabia in response to Kuwait's invasion with "an Arab force", as long as that force did not involve Egypt. Additionally, he requested an "immediate freeze of all boycott and siege decisions" and a general normalization of relations with Iraq.<ref>{{Cite news | title = Confrontation in the Gulf; Proposals by Iraqi President: Excerpts From His Address | newspaper = The New York Times | location = New York | pages = A8 | date = 13 August 1990 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/13/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-proposals-by-iraqi-president-excerpts-from-his-address.html | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref> From the beginning of the crisis, President Bush was strongly opposed to any "linkage" between Iraq's occupation of Kuwait and the Palestinian issue.<ref name="sam" />
From the beginning, U.S. officials insisted on a total Iraqi pullout from Kuwait, without any linkage to other Middle Eastern problems, fearing any concessions would strengthen [[Iraq]]i influence in the region for years to come.<ref name="hard line">{{Cite news | last=Friedman | first=Thomas L. | title=Confrontation in the Gulf: Behind Bush's Hard Line; Washington Considers a Clear Iraqi Defeat To Be Necessary to Bolster Its Arab Allies | newspaper=The New York Times | location = New York | pages = A1 | date = 22 August 1990 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/22/world/confrontation-gulf-behind-bush-s-hard-line-washington-considers-clear-iraqi.html?scp=1&sq=Confrontation+in+the+Gulf%3A+Behind+Bush%27s+Hard+Line&st=nyt | accessdate=16 September 2010 | authorlink= Thomas Friedman}}</ref>
 
 
On 12 August 1990, Saddam "propose[d] that all cases of occupation, and those cases that have been portrayed as occupation, in the region, be resolved simultaneously". Specifically, he called for Israel to withdraw from occupied territories in Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and "mutual withdrawals by Iraq and Iran and arrangement for the situation in Kuwait." He also called for a replacement of U.S. troops that mobilized in Saudi Arabia in response to Kuwait's invasion with "an Arab force", as long as that force did not involve Egypt. Additionally, he requested an "immediate freeze of all boycott and siege decisions" and a general normalization of relations with Iraq.<ref>{{Cite news | title = Confrontation in the Gulf; Proposals by Iraqi President: Excerpts From His Address | newspaper = The New York Times | location = New York | pages = A8 | date = 13 August 1990 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/13/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-proposals-by-iraqi-president-excerpts-from-his-address.html | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref> From the beginning of the crisis, President Bush was strongly opposed to any "linkage" between Iraq's occupation of Kuwait and the Palestinian issue.<ref name=sam/>
 
   
 
{{anchor|Stuart Lockwood}}
 
{{anchor|Stuart Lockwood}}
Line 242: Line 239:
 
On 23 August, Saddam appeared on state television with Western hostages to whom he had refused exit visas. In the video, he asks a young British boy, Stuart Lockwood, whether he is getting his milk, and goes on to say, through his interpreter, "We hope your presence as guests here will not be for too long. Your presence here, and in other places, is meant to prevent the scourge of war."<ref name="BBCOTD">BBC News. "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/23/newsid_2512000/2512289.stm 1990: Outrage at Iraqi TV hostage show]". Retrieved 2 September 2007.</ref>
 
On 23 August, Saddam appeared on state television with Western hostages to whom he had refused exit visas. In the video, he asks a young British boy, Stuart Lockwood, whether he is getting his milk, and goes on to say, through his interpreter, "We hope your presence as guests here will not be for too long. Your presence here, and in other places, is meant to prevent the scourge of war."<ref name="BBCOTD">BBC News. "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/23/newsid_2512000/2512289.stm 1990: Outrage at Iraqi TV hostage show]". Retrieved 2 September 2007.</ref>
   
Another Iraqi proposal communicated in August 1990 was delivered to U.S. National Security Advisor [[Brent Scowcroft]] by an unidentified Iraqi official. The official communicated to the White House that Iraq would "withdraw from Kuwait and allow foreigners to leave" provided that the U.N. lifted sanctions, allowed "guaranteed access to the Persian Gulf through the Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah", and allowed Iraq to "gain full control of the Rumaila oil field that extends slightly into Kuwaiti territory". The proposal also "include[d] offers to negotiate an oil agreement with the United States 'satisfactory to both nations' national security interests,' develop a joint plan 'to alleviate Iraq's economical and financial problems' and 'jointly work on the stability of the gulf.'"<ref name="Secret Offer">{{Cite news | last = Royce | first = Knut | title = MIDDLE EAST CRISIS Secret Offer Iraq Sent Pullout Deal to U.S | newspaper = [[Newsday]] Washington Bureau | location = New York | date = 29 August 1990 | url = http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969813/MIDDLE-EAST-CRISIS-Secret-Offer-Iraq-Sent-Pullout-Deal-to-U-S-ALL-EDITIONS | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref>
+
Another Iraqi proposal communicated in August 1990 was delivered to U.S. National Security Advisor [[Brent Scowcroft]] by an unidentified Iraqi official. The official communicated to the White House that Iraq would "withdraw from Kuwait and allow foreigners to leave" provided that the U.N. lifted sanctions, allowed "guaranteed access to the Persian Gulf through the Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah", and allowed Iraq to "gain full control of the Rumaila oil field that extends slightly into Kuwaiti territory". The proposal also "include[d] offers to negotiate an oil agreement with the United States 'satisfactory to both nations' national security interests,' develop a joint plan 'to alleviate Iraq's economical and financial problems' and 'jointly work on the stability of the gulf.'"<ref name="Secret Offer">{{Cite news | last = Royce | first = Knut | title = MIDDLE EAST CRISIS Secret Offer Iraq Sent Pullout Deal to U.S | newspaper = Newsday Washington Bureau | location = New York | date = 29 August 1990 | url = http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969813/MIDDLE-EAST-CRISIS-Secret-Offer-Iraq-Sent-Pullout-Deal-to-U-S-ALL-EDITIONS | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref>
   
In December 1990, Iraq made a proposal to withdraw from Kuwait provided that foreign troops left the region and that an agreement was reached regarding the Palestinian problem and the dismantlement of both Israel's and Iraq's [[weapons of mass destruction]]. The White House rejected the proposal.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Royce | first = Knut | title = Iraq Offers Deal to Quit Kuwait U.S. rejects it, but stays 'interested' | newspaper = [[Newsday]] Washington Bureau | date = 3 January 1991| location = Long Island, N.Y | page = 5 | url = http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969954/Iraq-Offers-Deal-to-Quit-Kuwait-U-S-rejects-it-but-stays-interested-NASSAU-AND-SUFFOLK-Edition | accessdate =24 October 2010}}</ref> The [[Palestine Liberation Organization|PLO]]'s [[Yasser Arafat]] expressed that neither he nor Saddam insisted that solving the Israel-Palestine issues should be a precondition to solving the issues in Kuwait, though he did acknowledge a "strong link" between these problems.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Tyler | first = Patrick E. | title = CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Arafat Eases Stand on Kuwait-Palestine Link | newspaper = The New York Times | location = New York | date = 3 January 1991 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-arafat-eases-stand-on-kuwait-palestine-link.html | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref>
+
In December 1990, Iraq made a proposal to withdraw from Kuwait provided that foreign troops left the region and that an agreement was reached regarding the Palestinian problem and the dismantlement of both Israel's and Iraq's [[weapons of mass destruction]]. The White House rejected the proposal.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Royce | first = Knut | title = Iraq Offers Deal to Quit Kuwait U.S. rejects it, but stays 'interested' | newspaper = Newsday Washington Bureau | date = 3 January 1991| location = Long Island, N.Y | page = 5 | url = http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969954/Iraq-Offers-Deal-to-Quit-Kuwait-U-S-rejects-it-but-stays-interested-NASSAU-AND-SUFFOLK-Edition | accessdate =24 October 2010}}</ref> The [[Palestine Liberation Organization|PLO]]'s Yasser Arafat expressed that neither he nor Saddam insisted that solving the Israel-Palestine issues should be a precondition to solving the issues in Kuwait, though he did acknowledge a "strong link" between these problems.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Tyler | first = Patrick E. | title = CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Arafat Eases Stand on Kuwait-Palestine Link | newspaper = The New York Times | location = New York | date = 3 January 1991 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-arafat-eases-stand-on-kuwait-palestine-link.html | accessdate =17 October 2010}}</ref>
   
 
Ultimately, the U.S. stuck to its position that there would be no negotiations until Iraq withdrew from Kuwait and that they should not grant Iraq concessions, lest they give the impression that Iraq benefited from its military campaign.<ref name="hard line" /> Also, when U.S. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] met with [[Tariq Aziz]] in Geneva, Switzerland, for last minute peace talks in early 1991, Aziz reportedly made no concrete proposals and did not outline any hypothetical Iraqi moves.<ref>{{Cite news|last = Friedman|first = Thomas L.|title = CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; As U.S. Officials See It, Hands of Aziz Were Tied|newspaper = The New York Times|pages = A10|date = 11 1991|url = http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/11/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-as-us-officials-see-it-hands-of-aziz-were-tied.html?scp=151&sq=Iraq&st=nyt|accessdate =30 September 2010}}</ref>
 
Ultimately, the U.S. stuck to its position that there would be no negotiations until Iraq withdrew from Kuwait and that they should not grant Iraq concessions, lest they give the impression that Iraq benefited from its military campaign.<ref name="hard line" /> Also, when U.S. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] met with [[Tariq Aziz]] in Geneva, Switzerland, for last minute peace talks in early 1991, Aziz reportedly made no concrete proposals and did not outline any hypothetical Iraqi moves.<ref>{{Cite news|last = Friedman|first = Thomas L.|title = CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; As U.S. Officials See It, Hands of Aziz Were Tied|newspaper = The New York Times|pages = A10|date = 11 1991|url = http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/11/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-as-us-officials-see-it-hands-of-aziz-were-tied.html?scp=151&sq=Iraq&st=nyt|accessdate =30 September 2010}}</ref>
Line 252: Line 249:
 
On 14 January 1991, France proposed that the U.N. Security Council call for "a rapid and massive withdrawal" from Kuwait along with a statement to Iraq that Council members would bring their "active contribution" to a settlement of the region's other problems, "in particular, of the Arab-Israeli conflict and in particular to the Palestinian problem by convening, at an appropriate moment, an international conference" to assure "the security, stability and development of this region of the world." The French proposal was supported by Belgium (at the moment one of the rotating Council members), Germany, Spain, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and several non-aligned nations. The U.S., the UK, and the Soviet Union, rejected it; U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Thomas Pickering stated that the French proposal was unacceptable, because it went beyond previous Council resolutions on the Iraqi invasion.<ref>See Paul Lewis, "Confrontation in the Gulf: The U.N.; France and 3 Arab States Issue an Appeal to Hussein," New York Times, 15 January 1991, p. A12</ref><ref>Michael Kranish et al., "World waits on brink of war: Late effort at diplomacy in gulf fails," Boston Globe, 16 January 1991, p. 1</ref><ref>Ellen Nimmons, A.P., "Last-ditch pitches for peace; But U.S. claims Iraqis hold key," Houston Chronicle, 15 January 1991, p. 1</ref> France dropped this proposal when it found "no tangible sign of interest" from Baghdad.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/16/world/confrontation-gulf-france-paris-says-its-last-ditch-peace-effort-has-failed.html? CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF: France; Paris Says Its Last-Ditch Peace Effort Has Failed] New York Times 16 January 1991</ref>
 
On 14 January 1991, France proposed that the U.N. Security Council call for "a rapid and massive withdrawal" from Kuwait along with a statement to Iraq that Council members would bring their "active contribution" to a settlement of the region's other problems, "in particular, of the Arab-Israeli conflict and in particular to the Palestinian problem by convening, at an appropriate moment, an international conference" to assure "the security, stability and development of this region of the world." The French proposal was supported by Belgium (at the moment one of the rotating Council members), Germany, Spain, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and several non-aligned nations. The U.S., the UK, and the Soviet Union, rejected it; U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Thomas Pickering stated that the French proposal was unacceptable, because it went beyond previous Council resolutions on the Iraqi invasion.<ref>See Paul Lewis, "Confrontation in the Gulf: The U.N.; France and 3 Arab States Issue an Appeal to Hussein," New York Times, 15 January 1991, p. A12</ref><ref>Michael Kranish et al., "World waits on brink of war: Late effort at diplomacy in gulf fails," Boston Globe, 16 January 1991, p. 1</ref><ref>Ellen Nimmons, A.P., "Last-ditch pitches for peace; But U.S. claims Iraqis hold key," Houston Chronicle, 15 January 1991, p. 1</ref> France dropped this proposal when it found "no tangible sign of interest" from Baghdad.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/16/world/confrontation-gulf-france-paris-says-its-last-ditch-peace-effort-has-failed.html? CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF: France; Paris Says Its Last-Ditch Peace Effort Has Failed] New York Times 16 January 1991</ref>
   
===Military means===
+
====Military means====
 
{{Anchor|Operation Desert Shield}}
 
{{Anchor|Operation Desert Shield}}
 
{{Redirect|Operation Desert Shield|the 2006 operation by the Iraqi insurgency|Operation Desert Shield (Iraq)}}
 
{{Redirect|Operation Desert Shield|the 2006 operation by the Iraqi insurgency|Operation Desert Shield (Iraq)}}
Line 259: Line 256:
 
One of the West's main concerns was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following Kuwait's conquest, the Iraqi Army was within easy striking distance of Saudi oil fields. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Saddam control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq some 26 billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis had backed Iraq in that war, as they feared the influence of Shia Iran's [[Islamic revolution]] on its own Shia minority. After the war, Saddam felt he shouldn't have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by fighting Iran.
 
One of the West's main concerns was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following Kuwait's conquest, the Iraqi Army was within easy striking distance of Saudi oil fields. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Saddam control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq some 26 billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis had backed Iraq in that war, as they feared the influence of Shia Iran's [[Islamic revolution]] on its own Shia minority. After the war, Saddam felt he shouldn't have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by fighting Iran.
   
Soon after his conquest of Kuwait, Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudis. He argued that the U.S.-supported Saudi state was an illegitimate and unworthy guardian of the holy cities of Mecca and [[Medina]]. He combined the language of the Islamist groups that had recently fought in Afghanistan with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.<ref>[[Gilles Kepel]] ''Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.''</ref>
+
Soon after his conquest of Kuwait, Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudis. He argued that the U.S.-supported Saudi state was an illegitimate and unworthy guardian of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. He combined the language of the Islamist groups that had recently fought in Afghanistan with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.<ref>[[Gilles Kepel]] ''Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.''</ref>
 
[[File:Stinger Crew Operation Desert Shield.jpg|thumb|left|U.S. Army soldiers from the [[11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (United States)|11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade]] during the Gulf War]]
 
[[File:Stinger Crew Operation Desert Shield.jpg|thumb|left|U.S. Army soldiers from the [[11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (United States)|11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade]] during the Gulf War]]
   
Acting on the [[Carter Doctrine]]'s policy, and out of fear the Iraqi Army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, U.S. President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the U.S. would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia under the codename '''Operation Desert Shield'''. Operation Desert Shield began on 7 August 1990 when U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, [[King Fahd]], who had earlier called for U.S. military assistance.<ref name="AFPS Timeline">{{cite web|title=The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm Timeline |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2000/n08082000_20008088.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080526135240rn_1/www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45404 |archivedate=25 May 2008 |accessdate=30 June 2010}}</ref> This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be Iraq's 19th province and Saddam named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid, as its military-governor.<ref name=AFPS15years>{{cite web|title=15 Years After Desert Storm, U.S. Commitment to Region Continues |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792 |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20110608084842/http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792|archivedate=2011-06=-08|accessdate=29 March 2007}}</ref>
+
Acting on the [[Carter Doctrine]]'s policy, and out of fear the Iraqi Army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, U.S. President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the U.S. would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia under the codename '''Operation Desert Shield'''. Operation Desert Shield began on 7 August 1990 when U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, [[King Fahd]], who had earlier called for U.S. military assistance.<ref name="AFPS Timeline">{{cite web|title=The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm Timeline |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2000/n08082000_20008088.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080526135240rn_1/www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45404 |archivedate=25 May 2008 |accessdate=30 June 2010}}</ref> This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be Iraq's 19th province and Saddam named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid, as its military-governor.<ref name="AFPS15years">{{cite web|title=15 Years After Desert Storm, U.S. Commitment to Region Continues |url=http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792 |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20110608084842/http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792|archivedate=2011-06=-08|accessdate=29 March 2007}}</ref>
   
The [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] dispatched two naval battle groups built around the [[aircraft carriers]] [[USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)|USS ''Dwight D. Eisenhower'']] and [[USS Independence (CV-62)|USS ''Independence'']] to the Gulf, where they were ready by 8 August. The U.S. also sent the battleships [[USS Missouri (BB-63)|USS ''Missouri'']] and [[USS Wisconsin (BB-64)|USS ''Wisconsin'']] to the region. A total of 48 U.S. Air Force F-15s from the [[1st Fighter Wing]] at [[Langley Air Force Base]], Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia, and immediately commenced round the clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border to discourage further Iraqi military advances. They were joined by 36 F-15 A-Ds from the [[36th Wing|36th Tactical Fighter Wing]] at Bitburg, Germany. The Bitburg contingent was based at [[Al Kharj Air Base]], approximately 1-hour southeast of Riyadh. The 36th TFW would be responsible for 11 confirmed Iraqi Air Force aircraft shot down during the war. There were also two Air National Guard units stationed at Al Kharj Air Base, the South Carolina Air National Guard's 169th Fighter Wing flew bombing missions with 24 F-16s flying 2,000 combat missions and dropping 4 million pounds of munitions, and the New York Air National Guard's 174th Fighter Wing from Syracuse flew 24 F-16s on bombing missions. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]]. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via [[Fast Sealift Ship|fast sealift ships]], allowing a quick buildup.
+
The [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] dispatched two naval battle groups built around the [[aircraft carriers]] [[USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)|USS ''Dwight D. Eisenhower'']] and [[USS Independence (CV-62)|USS ''Independence'']] to the Gulf, where they were ready by 8 August. The U.S. also sent the battleships [[USS Missouri (BB-63)|USS ''Missouri'']] and [[USS Wisconsin (BB-64)|USS ''Wisconsin'']] to the region. A total of 48 U.S. Air Force F-15s from the [[1st Fighter Wing]] at [[Langley Air Force Base]], Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia, and immediately commenced round the clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border to discourage further Iraqi military advances. They were joined by 36 F-15 A-Ds from the [[36th Wing|36th Tactical Fighter Wing]] at Bitburg, Germany. The Bitburg contingent was based at [[Al Kharj Air Base]], approximately 1-hour southeast of Riyadh. The 36th TFW would be responsible for 11 confirmed Iraqi Air Force aircraft shot down during the war. There were also two Air National Guard units stationed at Al Kharj Air Base, the South Carolina Air National Guard's 169th Fighter Wing flew bombing missions with 24 F-16s flying 2,000 combat missions and dropping 4 million pounds of munitions, and the New York Air National Guard's 174th Fighter Wing from Syracuse flew 24 F-16s on bombing missions. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]]. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via [[Fast Sealift Ship|fast sealift ships]], allowing a quick buildup.
   
====Creating a coalition====
+
=====Creating a coalition=====
 
A [[List of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iraq|series of U.N. Security Council resolutions]] and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. One of the most important was [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 678|Resolution 678]], passed on 29 November 1990, which gave Iraq a withdrawal deadline until 15 January 1991, and authorized "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", and a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force if Iraq failed to comply.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/11205/un_security_council_resolution_678_iraq_kuwait.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F408%2Fkuwait |publisher=Council on Foreign Relations |title=Essential Documents: UN Security Council Resolution 678 |ref=harv}}</ref>
 
A [[List of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iraq|series of U.N. Security Council resolutions]] and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. One of the most important was [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 678|Resolution 678]], passed on 29 November 1990, which gave Iraq a withdrawal deadline until 15 January 1991, and authorized "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", and a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force if Iraq failed to comply.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/11205/un_security_council_resolution_678_iraq_kuwait.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F408%2Fkuwait |publisher=Council on Foreign Relations |title=Essential Documents: UN Security Council Resolution 678 |ref=harv}}</ref>
   
[[File:Bush saudi arabia.jpg|thumb|right|General [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]] and President [[George H. W. Bush]] visit U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia on [[Thanksgiving (United States)|Thanksgiving Day]], 1990.]]
+
[[File:Bush saudi arabia.jpg|thumb|right|General [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]] and President [[George H. W. Bush]] visit U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.]]
 
A coalition of forces opposing Iraq's aggression was formed, consisting of forces from 34 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the U.S. itself.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/|title=The Unfinished War: A Decade Since Desert Storm|publisher=CNN In-Depth Specials|year=2001|accessdate=5 April 2008 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080317110507/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate = 17 March 2008}}</ref> U.S. Army General [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]] was designated to be the commander of the Coalition forces in the Persian Gulf area.
 
A coalition of forces opposing Iraq's aggression was formed, consisting of forces from 34 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the U.S. itself.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/|title=The Unfinished War: A Decade Since Desert Storm|publisher=CNN In-Depth Specials|year=2001|accessdate=5 April 2008 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080317110507/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate = 17 March 2008}}</ref> U.S. Army General [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]] was designated to be the commander of the Coalition forces in the Persian Gulf area.
   
Line 276: Line 273:
 
Many of the Coalition's forces were reluctant to join. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair, or didn't want to increase U.S. influence in the Middle East. In the end, however, many nations were persuaded by Iraq’s belligerence towards other Arab states, offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness, and threats to withhold aid.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/31/AR2006103101217.html |title=Security Council Seat Tied to Aid |work=The Washington Post |accessdate=18 March 2010 | first=Colum | last=Lynch | date=1 November 2006}}</ref>
 
Many of the Coalition's forces were reluctant to join. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair, or didn't want to increase U.S. influence in the Middle East. In the end, however, many nations were persuaded by Iraq’s belligerence towards other Arab states, offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness, and threats to withhold aid.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/31/AR2006103101217.html |title=Security Council Seat Tied to Aid |work=The Washington Post |accessdate=18 March 2010 | first=Colum | last=Lynch | date=1 November 2006}}</ref>
   
====Justification for intervention====
+
=====Justification for intervention=====
 
[[File:Cheney meeting with Prince Sultan.jpg|thumb|left|Cheney meets with [[Sultan, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia|Prince Sultan, Minister of Defence and Aviation]] in Saudi Arabia to discuss how to handle the [[invasion of Kuwait]]]]
 
[[File:Cheney meeting with Prince Sultan.jpg|thumb|left|Cheney meets with [[Sultan, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia|Prince Sultan, Minister of Defence and Aviation]] in Saudi Arabia to discuss how to handle the [[invasion of Kuwait]]]]
The U.S. and the U.N. gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the U.S. moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable [[geopolitics|geopolitical]] importance. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion, U.S. Defense Secretary [[Dick Cheney]] made the first of several visits to Saudi Arabia where [[King Fahd]] requested U.S. military assistance. During a speech in a special joint session of the U.S. Congress given on 11 September 1990, U.S. President George H. W. Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3425|first=George H. W.|last=Bush |title=Address Before a Joint Session of Congress|publisher=Miller Center of Public Affairs|date=11 September 1990 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
The U.S. and the U.N. gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the U.S. moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable geopolitical importance. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion, U.S. Defense Secretary [[Dick Cheney]] made the first of several visits to Saudi Arabia where [[King Fahd]] requested U.S. military assistance. During a speech in a special joint session of the U.S. Congress given on 11 September 1990, U.S. President George H. W. Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3425|first=George H. W.|last=Bush |title=Address Before a Joint Session of Congress|publisher=Miller Center of Public Affairs|date=11 September 1990 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
   
The Pentagon stated that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were this information's source, but this was later alleged to be false. A reporter for the ''[[St. Petersburg Times]]'' acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images made at the time in question, which showed nothing but empty desert.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/tampabay/access/50586247.html?dids=50586247:50586247&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+6%252C+1991&author=JEAN+HELLER&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.A&desc=Photos+don%2527t+show+buildup |title= Photos don't show buildup |work=St. Petersburg Times |date=6 January 1991 |accessdate=13 January 2012}}</ref>
+
The Pentagon stated that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were this information's source, but this was later alleged to be false. A reporter for the ''St. Petersburg Times'' acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images made at the time in question, which showed nothing but empty desert.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/tampabay/access/50586247.html?dids=50586247:50586247&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+6%252C+1991&author=JEAN+HELLER&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.A&desc=Photos+don%2527t+show+buildup |title= Photos don't show buildup |work=St. Petersburg Times |date=6 January 1991 |accessdate=13 January 2012}}</ref>
 
[[File:Powell, Schwarzkopf, and Wolfowitz at Cheney press conference, February 1991.jpg|thumb|Gen. [[Colin Powell]] (left), Gen. [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]], and [[Paul Wolfowitz]] (right) listen as Secretary of Defense [[Dick Cheney]] addresses reporters regarding the 1991 Gulf War.]]
 
[[File:Powell, Schwarzkopf, and Wolfowitz at Cheney press conference, February 1991.jpg|thumb|Gen. [[Colin Powell]] (left), Gen. [[Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.]], and [[Paul Wolfowitz]] (right) listen as Secretary of Defense [[Dick Cheney]] addresses reporters regarding the 1991 Gulf War.]]
   
 
Other justifications for foreign involvement included Iraq’s history of human rights [[Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq|abuses under Saddam]]. Iraq was also known to possess [[biological warfare|biological weapons]] and [[chemical warfare|chemical weapons]], which Saddam had used against Iranian troops during the [[Iran–Iraq War]] and against his own country's Kurdish population in the [[Al-Anfal Campaign]]. Iraq was also known to have a [[nuclear weapon]]s program, but the report about it from January 1991 was partially declassified by the CIA on 26 May 2001.<ref>[[Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists]], Volume 59, page 33, Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science (Chicago, Ill.), Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Organization), 2003.</ref>
 
Other justifications for foreign involvement included Iraq’s history of human rights [[Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq|abuses under Saddam]]. Iraq was also known to possess [[biological warfare|biological weapons]] and [[chemical warfare|chemical weapons]], which Saddam had used against Iranian troops during the [[Iran–Iraq War]] and against his own country's Kurdish population in the [[Al-Anfal Campaign]]. Iraq was also known to have a [[nuclear weapon]]s program, but the report about it from January 1991 was partially declassified by the CIA on 26 May 2001.<ref>[[Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists]], Volume 59, page 33, Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science (Chicago, Ill.), Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Organization), 2003.</ref>
   
Although there were human rights abuses committed in Kuwait by the invading Iraqi military, the ones best known in the U.S. were inventions of the [[public relations]] firm hired by the government of Kuwait to influence U.S. opinion in favor of military intervention. Shortly after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the organization ''[[Citizens for a Free Kuwait]]'' was formed in the U.S. It hired the public relations firm [[Hill & Knowlton]] for about $11 million, paid by [[Government of Kuwait|Kuwait's government]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy10.html |title=How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf &#124; Center for Media and Democracy |publisher=Prwatch.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
Although there were human rights abuses committed in Kuwait by the invading Iraqi military, the ones best known in the U.S. were inventions of the public relations firm hired by the government of Kuwait to influence U.S. opinion in favor of military intervention. Shortly after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the organization ''[[Citizens for a Free Kuwait]]'' was formed in the U.S. It hired the public relations firm [[Hill & Knowlton]] for about $11 million, paid by Kuwait's government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy10.html |title=How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf &#124; Center for Media and Democracy |publisher=Prwatch.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
   
Among many other means of influencing U.S. opinion (distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to U.S. soldiers deployed in the region, 'Free Kuwait' T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations), the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the U.S. Congress in which a woman identifying herself as a [[Nayirah (testimony)|nurse working in the Kuwait City hospital]] described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.<ref name=kuwaitgate />
+
Among many other means of influencing U.S. opinion (distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to U.S. soldiers deployed in the region, 'Free Kuwait' T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations), the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the U.S. Congress in which a woman identifying herself as a [[Nayirah (testimony)|nurse working in the Kuwait City hospital]] described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.<ref name="kuwaitgate" />
   
The story was an influence in tipping both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. A year after the war, however, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The woman who had testified was found to be a member of [[House of Sabah|Kuwait's Royal Family]], in fact the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the U.S.<ref name=kuwaitgate>{{Cite news| url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n9_v24/ai_12529902 | work=Washington Monthly | title=Kuwaitgate – killing of Kuwaiti babies by Iraqi soldiers exaggerated | first=Ted | last=Rowse | year=1992|archiveurl=http://archive.is/oZMm|archivedate=2012-05-29}}</ref> She hadn't lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.
+
The story was an influence in tipping both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. A year after the war, however, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The woman who had testified was found to be a member of [[House of Sabah|Kuwait's Royal Family]], in fact the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the U.S.<ref name="kuwaitgate">{{Cite news| url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n9_v24/ai_12529902 | work=Washington Monthly | title=Kuwaitgate – killing of Kuwaiti babies by Iraqi soldiers exaggerated | first=Ted | last=Rowse | year=1992|archiveurl=http://archive.is/oZMm|archivedate=2012-05-29}}</ref> She hadn't lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.
   
 
The details of the Hill & Knowlton public relations campaign, including the incubator testimony, were published in [[John R. MacArthur]]'s ''Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War'' (Berkeley, CA: University of CA Press, 1992), and came to wide public attention when an [[Op-ed]] by MacArthur was published in ''The New York Times''. This prompted a reexamination by Amnesty International, which had originally promoted an account alleging even greater numbers of babies torn from incubators than the original fake testimony. After finding no evidence to support it, the organization issued a retraction. President Bush then repeated the incubator allegations on television.
 
The details of the Hill & Knowlton public relations campaign, including the incubator testimony, were published in [[John R. MacArthur]]'s ''Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War'' (Berkeley, CA: University of CA Press, 1992), and came to wide public attention when an [[Op-ed]] by MacArthur was published in ''The New York Times''. This prompted a reexamination by Amnesty International, which had originally promoted an account alleging even greater numbers of babies torn from incubators than the original fake testimony. After finding no evidence to support it, the organization issued a retraction. President Bush then repeated the incubator allegations on television.
Line 295: Line 292:
 
At the same time, the Iraqi Army committed several well-documented crimes during its occupation of Kuwait, such as the [[summary execution|summary execution without trial]] of three brothers after which their bodies were stacked in a pile and left to decay in a public street.<ref>Makiya 1993, p 40.</ref> Iraqi troops also ransacked and looted private Kuwaiti homes; one residence was repeatedly defecated in.<ref>Makiya 1993, pp 31–33</ref> A resident later commented, "The whole thing was violence for the sake of violence, destruction for the sake of destruction... Imagine a [[surrealistic]] painting by [[Salvador Dalí]]".<ref>Makiya 1993, p 32.</ref>
 
At the same time, the Iraqi Army committed several well-documented crimes during its occupation of Kuwait, such as the [[summary execution|summary execution without trial]] of three brothers after which their bodies were stacked in a pile and left to decay in a public street.<ref>Makiya 1993, p 40.</ref> Iraqi troops also ransacked and looted private Kuwaiti homes; one residence was repeatedly defecated in.<ref>Makiya 1993, pp 31–33</ref> A resident later commented, "The whole thing was violence for the sake of violence, destruction for the sake of destruction... Imagine a [[surrealistic]] painting by [[Salvador Dalí]]".<ref>Makiya 1993, p 32.</ref>
   
==Early battles==
+
===Early battles===
 
====Air campaign====
 
===Air campaign===
 
 
{{Main|Gulf War air campaign}}
 
{{Main|Gulf War air campaign}}
 
[[File:F-117 Nighthawk Front.jpg|thumb|left|upright|The [[USAF]] [[F-117 Nighthawk]], one of the key players in Desert Storm.]]
 
[[File:F-117 Nighthawk Front.jpg|thumb|left|upright|The [[USAF]] [[F-117 Nighthawk]], one of the key players in Desert Storm.]]
Line 311: Line 307:
 
The air campaign's third and largest phase targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: [[Scud]] missile launchers, weapons research facilities, and naval forces. About one-third of the Coalition's air power was devoted to attacking Scuds, some of which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. U.S. and British [[special forces|special operations forces]] had been covertly inserted into western Iraq to aid in the search and destruction of Scuds.
 
The air campaign's third and largest phase targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: [[Scud]] missile launchers, weapons research facilities, and naval forces. About one-third of the Coalition's air power was devoted to attacking Scuds, some of which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. U.S. and British [[special forces|special operations forces]] had been covertly inserted into western Iraq to aid in the search and destruction of Scuds.
   
Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including [[Man-portable air-defense systems]], were surprisingly ineffective against Coalition aircraft and the Coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 of which were the result of Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground fired weapons.<ref name=cnnstats>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080612131747/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate=12 June 2008 |title=CNN.com In-depth specials&nbsp;— Gulf War (via Internet Archive) |accessdate=23 March 2008 |year=2001 |publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.rjlee.org/aaloss.html | title=Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft Attrition in Desert Storm | year=2002 | accessdate=30 January 2012 | author=Lee, Robin J. |quote= Sources: Gulf War Airpower Survey, Vol. 5; Norman Friedman, Desert Victory; World Air Power Journal. Additionally, Mark Bovankovich and LT Chuck Chase offered corrections and several intriguing details on these incidents. All errors, however, remain entirely mine.}}</ref> One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.<ref>[[Rick Atkinson|Atkinson, Rick]] (1994). ''Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War''. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 47. ISBN 0-395-71083-9</ref>
+
Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including [[Man-portable air-defense systems]], were surprisingly ineffective against Coalition aircraft and the Coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 of which were the result of Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground fired weapons.<ref name="cnnstats">{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080612131747/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate=12 June 2008 |title=CNN.com In-depth specials&nbsp;— Gulf War (via Internet Archive) |accessdate=23 March 2008 |year=2001 |publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.rjlee.org/aaloss.html | title=Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft Attrition in Desert Storm | year=2002 | accessdate=30 January 2012 | author=Lee, Robin J. |quote= Sources: Gulf War Airpower Survey, Vol. 5; Norman Friedman, Desert Victory; World Air Power Journal. Additionally, Mark Bovankovich and LT Chuck Chase offered corrections and several intriguing details on these incidents. All errors, however, remain entirely mine.}}</ref> One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.<ref>[[Rick Atkinson|Atkinson, Rick]] (1994). ''Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War''. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 47. ISBN 0-395-71083-9</ref>
   
===Iraqi missile strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia===
+
====Iraqi missile strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia====
 
[[File:scud TEL launch.jpg|left|thumb|upright|[[Scud]] Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) with missile in upright position.]]
 
[[File:scud TEL launch.jpg|left|thumb|upright|[[Scud]] Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) with missile in upright position.]]
 
Iraq's government made no secret that it would attack if invaded. Prior to the war's start, Tariq Aziz, Iraq's English-speaking Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, was asked in the aftermath of the failed U.S.-Iraq peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, by a reporter. "Mr. Foreign Minister, if war starts...will you attack?" His response was, "Yes, absolutely, yes."<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 332.</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Post Video To Facebook |url=http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/176306&start=607&end=657 |title=Geneva Meeting on Persian Gulf Crisis |publisher=C-SPAN |date=9 January 1991 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
 
Iraq's government made no secret that it would attack if invaded. Prior to the war's start, Tariq Aziz, Iraq's English-speaking Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, was asked in the aftermath of the failed U.S.-Iraq peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, by a reporter. "Mr. Foreign Minister, if war starts...will you attack?" His response was, "Yes, absolutely, yes."<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 332.</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Post Video To Facebook |url=http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/176306&start=607&end=657 |title=Geneva Meeting on Persian Gulf Crisis |publisher=C-SPAN |date=9 January 1991 |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
Line 319: Line 315:
 
Five hours after the first attacks, Iraq's state radio broadcast declaring that "The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins." Iraq fired eight missiles the next day. These missile attacks were to continue throughout the war. A total of 88 Scud missiles were fired by Iraq during the war's seven weeks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm|title=Information Paper: Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles|first=Bernard|last=Rostker|year=2000|publisher=Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control from 2000-2006|accessdate=21 May 2009}}</ref>
 
Five hours after the first attacks, Iraq's state radio broadcast declaring that "The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins." Iraq fired eight missiles the next day. These missile attacks were to continue throughout the war. A total of 88 Scud missiles were fired by Iraq during the war's seven weeks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm|title=Information Paper: Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles|first=Bernard|last=Rostker|year=2000|publisher=Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control from 2000-2006|accessdate=21 May 2009}}</ref>
   
Iraq hoped to provoke a military response from Israel. The Iraqi government hoped that many Arab states would withdraw from the Coalition, as they would be reluctant to fight alongside Israel.<ref name=sam>Waldman, Shmuel (2005). ''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''. Feldheim Publishers, p. 179. ISBN 1-58330-806-7</ref> Following the first attacks, [[Israeli Air Force]] jets were deployed to patrol the northern airspace with Iraq. Israel prepared to militarily retaliate, as its policy for the previous forty years had always been retaliation. However, President Bush pressured Israeli Prime Minister [[Yitzhak Shamir]] not to retaliate and withdraw Israeli jets, fearing that if Israel attacked Iraq, the other Arab nations would either desert the Coalition or join Iraq. It was also feared that if Israel used Syrian or Jordanian airspace to attack Iraq, they would intervene in the war on Iraq's side or attack Israel. The Coalition promised to deploy [[MIM-104 Patriot|Patriot missiles]] to defend Israel if it refrained from responding to the Scud attacks.<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 331–41.</ref><ref>Thomas, Gordon, ''Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad''</ref>
+
Iraq hoped to provoke a military response from Israel. The Iraqi government hoped that many Arab states would withdraw from the Coalition, as they would be reluctant to fight alongside Israel.<ref name="sam">Waldman, Shmuel (2005). ''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''. Feldheim Publishers, p. 179. ISBN 1-58330-806-7</ref> Following the first attacks, [[Israeli Air Force]] jets were deployed to patrol the northern airspace with Iraq. Israel prepared to militarily retaliate, as its policy for the previous forty years had always been retaliation. However, President Bush pressured Israeli Prime Minister [[Yitzhak Shamir]] not to retaliate and withdraw Israeli jets, fearing that if Israel attacked Iraq, the other Arab nations would either desert the Coalition or join Iraq. It was also feared that if Israel used Syrian or Jordanian airspace to attack Iraq, they would intervene in the war on Iraq's side or attack Israel. The Coalition promised to deploy [[MIM-104 Patriot|Patriot missiles]] to defend Israel if it refrained from responding to the Scud attacks.<ref>Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, ''The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order'', 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 331–41.</ref><ref>Thomas, Gordon, ''Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad''</ref>
 
{{Double image|right|Gulfwar 1991 in Israeli shelter.jpg|180|Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - Damage from an Iraqi Scud missile.jpg|180|Israeli civilians taking shelter from rockets (left) and aftermath of attack in Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv (right)}}
 
{{Double image|right|Gulfwar 1991 in Israeli shelter.jpg|180|Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - Damage from an Iraqi Scud missile.jpg|180|Israeli civilians taking shelter from rockets (left) and aftermath of attack in Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv (right)}}
The Scud missiles targeting Israel were relatively ineffective, as firing at extreme range resulted in a dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. [[Jewish Virtual Library]] states that a total of 74 Israelis died as a result of the Iraqi attacks: two directly and the rest from suffocation and heart attacks.<ref name="JVL">[http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html The Gulf War]</ref> Approximately 230 Israelis were injured.<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fetter | first1 = Steve | last2 = Lewis | first2 = George N. | last3 = Gronlund | first3 = Lisbeth | title = Why were Casualties so low? | journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] | volume = 361 | pages = 293–296 | publisher = [[Nature Publishing Group]] | location = London | date = 28 January 1993 | url = http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf | doi = 10.1038/361293a0 | issue = 6410 | ref = harv}}</ref> In one incident, a strike on a neighborhood in Tel Aviv caused three deaths and 96 injuries.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Atkinson|first1=Rick|last2=Balz|first2=Dan|title=Scud Hits Tel Aviv, Leaving 3 Dead, 96 Hurt|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012291.htm|work=The Washington Post|accessdate=2 June 2013|date=23 January 1991}}</ref> Extensive property damage was also caused, and according to Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Damage to general property consisted of 1,302 houses, 6142 apartments, 23 public buildings, 200 shops and 50 cars."<ref>[http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/history/pages/the%20gulf%20war%20-%201991.aspx The Gulf War (1991)]</ref> It was feared that Iraq would fire missiles filled with [[nerve agent]]s or [[sarin]]. As a result, Israel's government issued [[gas mask]]s to its citizens. When the first Iraqi missiles hit Israel, some people injected themselves with an antidote for nerve gas.
+
The Scud missiles targeting Israel were relatively ineffective, as firing at extreme range resulted in a dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. Jewish Virtual Library states that a total of 74 Israelis died as a result of the Iraqi attacks: two directly and the rest from suffocation and heart attacks.<ref name="JVL">[http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html The Gulf War]</ref> Approximately 230 Israelis were injured.<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fetter | first1 = Steve | last2 = Lewis | first2 = George N. | last3 = Gronlund | first3 = Lisbeth | title = Why were Casualties so low? | journal = Nature | volume = 361 | pages = 293–296 | publisher = [[Nature Publishing Group]] | location = London | date = 28 January 1993 | url = http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf | doi = 10.1038/361293a0 | issue = 6410 | ref = harv}}</ref> In one incident, a strike on a neighborhood in Tel Aviv caused three deaths and 96 injuries.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Atkinson|first1=Rick|last2=Balz|first2=Dan|title=Scud Hits Tel Aviv, Leaving 3 Dead, 96 Hurt|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012291.htm|work=The Washington Post|accessdate=2 June 2013|date=23 January 1991}}</ref> Extensive property damage was also caused, and according to Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Damage to general property consisted of 1,302 houses, 6142 apartments, 23 public buildings, 200 shops and 50 cars."<ref>[http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/history/pages/the%20gulf%20war%20-%201991.aspx The Gulf War (1991)]</ref> It was feared that Iraq would fire missiles filled with [[nerve agent]]s or [[sarin]]. As a result, Israel's government issued [[gas mask]]s to its citizens. When the first Iraqi missiles hit Israel, some people injected themselves with an antidote for nerve gas.
 
[[File:AlHussein-Strike.JPEG|thumb|Aftermath of an Iraq Armed forces strike on U.S. barracks.]]
 
[[File:AlHussein-Strike.JPEG|thumb|Aftermath of an Iraq Armed forces strike on U.S. barracks.]]
 
In response to the threat of Scuds on Israel, the U.S. rapidly sent a Patriot missile air defense artillery battalion to Israel along with two batteries of [[MIM-104 Patriot]] missiles for the protection of civilians.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tech.mit.edu/V110/N60/war1.60n.html|title=Three Isrealis killed as Scuds hit Tel Aviv|publisher=The Tech|year=1991|accessdate=11 January 2009}}</ref> Coalition air forces were also extensively exercised in "Scud hunts" in the Iraqi desert, trying to locate the camouflaged trucks before they fired their missiles at Israel or Saudi Arabia. On the ground, special operations forces also infiltrated Iraq, tasked with locating and destroying Scuds. Once special operations were combined with air patrols, the number of attacks fell sharply, then increased slightly as Iraqi forces adjusted to Coalition tactics.
 
In response to the threat of Scuds on Israel, the U.S. rapidly sent a Patriot missile air defense artillery battalion to Israel along with two batteries of [[MIM-104 Patriot]] missiles for the protection of civilians.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tech.mit.edu/V110/N60/war1.60n.html|title=Three Isrealis killed as Scuds hit Tel Aviv|publisher=The Tech|year=1991|accessdate=11 January 2009}}</ref> Coalition air forces were also extensively exercised in "Scud hunts" in the Iraqi desert, trying to locate the camouflaged trucks before they fired their missiles at Israel or Saudi Arabia. On the ground, special operations forces also infiltrated Iraq, tasked with locating and destroying Scuds. Once special operations were combined with air patrols, the number of attacks fell sharply, then increased slightly as Iraqi forces adjusted to Coalition tactics.
   
The [[Royal Netherlands Air Force]] also deployed Patriot missiles to counter the Scud threat. The Dutch Defense Ministry later stated that the military use of the Patriot missile system was largely ineffective, but its psychological value was high, even though the Patriot missiles caused far more casualties and property damage than the Scuds themselves did.<ref>Sprey, Pierre M. [http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/TPL_Essay9_2.9.11.pdf "Evaluating Weapons: Sorting the Good from the Bad."] ''CDI'', February 2011.</ref><ref name=nederland2009>{{cite web|url=http://www.defensie.nl/landmacht/onderwijs/werkstukken_basisvorming/golfoorlog/betrokkenheid_van_nederland|title=Betrokkenheid van Nederland|publisher=[[Ministry of Defence (Netherlands)|Ministerie van Defensie]]|year=2009|accessdate=11 January 2009|language=Dutch}}</ref> It has been suggested that the sturdy construction techniques used in Israeli cities, coupled with the fact that Scuds were only launched at night, played an important role in limiting the number of casualties from Scud attacks.<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu"/>
+
The [[Royal Netherlands Air Force]] also deployed Patriot missiles to counter the Scud threat. The Dutch Defense Ministry later stated that the military use of the Patriot missile system was largely ineffective, but its psychological value was high, even though the Patriot missiles caused far more casualties and property damage than the Scuds themselves did.<ref>Sprey, Pierre M. [http://web.archive.org/web/20110514055131/http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/TPL_Essay9_2.9.11.pdf "Evaluating Weapons: Sorting the Good from the Bad."] ''CDI'', February 2011.</ref><ref name="nederland2009">{{cite web|url=http://www.defensie.nl/landmacht/onderwijs/werkstukken_basisvorming/golfoorlog/betrokkenheid_van_nederland|title=Betrokkenheid van Nederland|publisher=[[Ministry of Defence (Netherlands)|Ministerie van Defensie]]|year=2009|accessdate=11 January 2009|language=Dutch}}</ref> It has been suggested that the sturdy construction techniques used in Israeli cities, coupled with the fact that Scuds were only launched at night, played an important role in limiting the number of casualties from Scud attacks.<ref name="publicpolicy.umd.edu" />
   
 
As the Scud attacks continued, the Israelis grew increasingly impatient, and considered taking unilateral military action against Iraq. After the attack on Ramat Gan, the Israelis warned that unless the U.S. stopped the Scuds, Israel would. At one point, Israeli commandos were loaded onto helicopters prepared to fly into Iraq, but the mission was called off after a phone call from U.S. Defense Secretary [[Dick Cheney]], reporting on the extent of Coalition efforts to destroy Scuds and emphasizing that Israeli intervention could endanger U.S. forces.<ref>Cheney, Richard: ''In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir''</ref>
 
As the Scud attacks continued, the Israelis grew increasingly impatient, and considered taking unilateral military action against Iraq. After the attack on Ramat Gan, the Israelis warned that unless the U.S. stopped the Scuds, Israel would. At one point, Israeli commandos were loaded onto helicopters prepared to fly into Iraq, but the mission was called off after a phone call from U.S. Defense Secretary [[Dick Cheney]], reporting on the extent of Coalition efforts to destroy Scuds and emphasizing that Israeli intervention could endanger U.S. forces.<ref>Cheney, Richard: ''In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir''</ref>
Line 331: Line 327:
 
In addition to the attacks on Israel, 47 Scud missiles were fired into Saudi Arabia, and one missile was fired at Bahrain and another at Qatar. The missiles were fired at both military and civilian targets. One Saudi civilian was killed, and 78 others were injured. No casualties were reported in Bahrain or Qatar. The Saudi government issued all its citizens and expatriates with gas masks in the event of Iraq using missiles with chemical or biological warheads. The government broadcast alerts and 'all clear' messages over television to warn citizens during Scud attacks.
 
In addition to the attacks on Israel, 47 Scud missiles were fired into Saudi Arabia, and one missile was fired at Bahrain and another at Qatar. The missiles were fired at both military and civilian targets. One Saudi civilian was killed, and 78 others were injured. No casualties were reported in Bahrain or Qatar. The Saudi government issued all its citizens and expatriates with gas masks in the event of Iraq using missiles with chemical or biological warheads. The government broadcast alerts and 'all clear' messages over television to warn citizens during Scud attacks.
   
On 25 February 1991, a Scud missile hit a U.S. Army barracks of the 14th Quartermaster Detachment, out of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, stationed in [[Dhahran]], Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers and injuring over 100.<ref name="iraqwatch.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm |title=DOD: Information Paper- Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles |publisher=Iraqwatch.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
+
On 25 February 1991, a Scud missile hit a U.S. Army barracks of the 14th Quartermaster Detachment, out of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, stationed in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers and injuring over 100.<ref name="iraqwatch.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm |title=DOD: Information Paper- Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles |publisher=Iraqwatch.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
   
===Battle of Khafji===
+
====Battle of Khafji====
 
{{Unreferenced section}}
 
{{Unreferenced section}}
 
{{Main|Battle of Khafji}}
 
{{Main|Battle of Khafji}}
Line 344: Line 340:
 
Khafji was a strategically important city immediately after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Iraq's reluctance to commit several [[armored division]]s to the occupation, and its subsequent use of Khafji as a launching pad into the initially lightly defended eastern Saudi Arabia was assessed by Coalition intelligence as a grave strategic error. Not only would Iraq have secured a majority of Middle Eastern oil supplies, but it would have found itself better able to threaten the subsequent U.S. deployment along superior defensive lines.{{sfn|Higgins|2012}}
 
Khafji was a strategically important city immediately after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Iraq's reluctance to commit several [[armored division]]s to the occupation, and its subsequent use of Khafji as a launching pad into the initially lightly defended eastern Saudi Arabia was assessed by Coalition intelligence as a grave strategic error. Not only would Iraq have secured a majority of Middle Eastern oil supplies, but it would have found itself better able to threaten the subsequent U.S. deployment along superior defensive lines.{{sfn|Higgins|2012}}
   
==Ground campaign==
+
===Ground campaign===
 
 
[[File:DesertStormMap v2.svg|thumb|350px|right|Ground troop movements 24–28 February 1991 during Operation Desert Storm]]
 
[[File:DesertStormMap v2.svg|thumb|350px|right|Ground troop movements 24–28 February 1991 during Operation Desert Storm]]
   
Line 352: Line 347:
 
# The use of [[Global Positioning System|GPS]] made it possible for Coalition forces to navigate without reference to roads or other fixed landmarks. This, along with aerial [[reconnaissance]], allowed them to fight a [[maneuver warfare|battle of maneuver]] rather than a [[Decisive Battle|battle of encounter]]: they knew where they were and where the enemy was, so they could attack a specific target rather than searching on the ground for enemy forces.
 
# The use of [[Global Positioning System|GPS]] made it possible for Coalition forces to navigate without reference to roads or other fixed landmarks. This, along with aerial [[reconnaissance]], allowed them to fight a [[maneuver warfare|battle of maneuver]] rather than a [[Decisive Battle|battle of encounter]]: they knew where they were and where the enemy was, so they could attack a specific target rather than searching on the ground for enemy forces.
   
===Kuwait's Liberation===
+
====Kuwait's Liberation====
 
{{Main|Liberation of Kuwait campaign}}
 
{{Main|Liberation of Kuwait campaign}}
{{see also|Gulf War order of battle ground campaign}}
+
{{See also|Gulf War order of battle ground campaign}}
   
 
U.S. decoy attacks by air attacks and naval gunfire the night before Kuwait's liberation were designed to make the Iraqis believe the main Coalition ground attack would focus on central Kuwait.
 
U.S. decoy attacks by air attacks and naval gunfire the night before Kuwait's liberation were designed to make the Iraqis believe the main Coalition ground attack would focus on central Kuwait.
 
[[File:3 AD Iraq.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.5|U.S. tanks from the [[3rd Armored Division (United States)|3rd Armored Division]] along the Line of Departure.]]
 
[[File:3 AD Iraq.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.5|U.S. tanks from the [[3rd Armored Division (United States)|3rd Armored Division]] along the Line of Departure.]]
   
[[File:An abandoned Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into Kuwait City during the Gulf War.JPEG|thumb|Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into [[Kuwait City]] during the Gulf War.]]
+
[[File:An abandoned Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into Kuwait City during the Gulf War.JPEG|thumb|Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into Kuwait City during the Gulf War.]]
 
[[File:An Iraqi T-54, T-55 or Type 59 and T-55A on Basra-Kuwait Highway near Kuwait.JPEG|thumb|Two Iraqi tanks lie abandoned near Kuwait City on 26 February 1991.]]
 
[[File:An Iraqi T-54, T-55 or Type 59 and T-55A on Basra-Kuwait Highway near Kuwait.JPEG|thumb|Two Iraqi tanks lie abandoned near Kuwait City on 26 February 1991.]]
   
Line 368: Line 363:
 
Kuwaiti forces were tasked with liberating the city. Iraqi troops offered only light resistance. The Kuwaitis lost one soldier killed and one plane shot down, and quickly liberated the city. On 27 February, Saddam ordered a retreat from Kuwait, and President Bush declared it liberated. However, an Iraqi unit at [[Kuwait International Airport]] appeared not to have gotten the message, and fiercely resisted. U.S. Marines had to fight for hours before securing the airport, after which Kuwait was declared secure. After four days of fighting, Iraqi forces were expelled from Kuwait. As part of a [[scorched earth]] policy, they [[Kuwaiti oil fires|set fire]] to nearly 700 oil wells, and placed land mines around the wells to make extinguishing the fires more difficult.
 
Kuwaiti forces were tasked with liberating the city. Iraqi troops offered only light resistance. The Kuwaitis lost one soldier killed and one plane shot down, and quickly liberated the city. On 27 February, Saddam ordered a retreat from Kuwait, and President Bush declared it liberated. However, an Iraqi unit at [[Kuwait International Airport]] appeared not to have gotten the message, and fiercely resisted. U.S. Marines had to fight for hours before securing the airport, after which Kuwait was declared secure. After four days of fighting, Iraqi forces were expelled from Kuwait. As part of a [[scorched earth]] policy, they [[Kuwaiti oil fires|set fire]] to nearly 700 oil wells, and placed land mines around the wells to make extinguishing the fires more difficult.
   
===Initial moves into Iraq===
+
====Initial moves into Iraq====
 
[[File:Destroyed Iraqi T-62.jpg|upright|thumb|Iraqi [[T-62]] knocked out by [[3rd Armored Division (United States)|3rd Armored Division]] fire]]
 
[[File:Destroyed Iraqi T-62.jpg|upright|thumb|Iraqi [[T-62]] knocked out by [[3rd Armored Division (United States)|3rd Armored Division]] fire]]
 
[[File:RemnantsofLAV25.jpg|thumb|left|Destroyed LAV-25]]
 
[[File:RemnantsofLAV25.jpg|thumb|left|Destroyed LAV-25]]
Line 374: Line 369:
 
The war's ground phase was officially designated Operation Desert Saber.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/desert_sabre.htm |title=Operation Desert Sabre / Gulf War Ground Campaign |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
 
The war's ground phase was officially designated Operation Desert Saber.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/desert_sabre.htm |title=Operation Desert Sabre / Gulf War Ground Campaign |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
   
The first units to move into Iraq were three patrols of the British [[Special Air Service]]'s B squadron, call signs Bravo One Zero, [[Bravo Two Zero]], and Bravo Three Zero, in late January. These eight-man patrols landed behind Iraqi lines to gather intelligence on the movements of Scud mobile missile launchers, which couldn't be detected from the air, as they were hidden under bridges and camouflage netting during the day.{{sfn|Riley|2010|p=207}} Other objectives included the destruction of the launchers and their fiber-optic communications arrays that lay in pipelines and relayed coordinates to the [[Transporter erector launcher|TEL]] operators that were launching attacks against Israel. The operations were designed to prevent any possible Israeli intervention. Due to lack of sufficient ground cover to carry out their assignment, One Zero and Three Zero abandoned their operations, while Two Zero remained, and was later compromised, with only Sergeant [[Chris Ryan]] escaping to Syria.
+
The first units to move into Iraq were three patrols of the British [[Special Air Service]]'s B squadron, call signs Bravo One Zero, [[Bravo Two Zero]], and Bravo Three Zero, in late January. These eight-man patrols landed behind Iraqi lines to gather intelligence on the movements of Scud mobile missile launchers, which couldn't be detected from the air, as they were hidden under bridges and camouflage netting during the day.{{sfn|Riley|2010|p = 207}} Other objectives included the destruction of the launchers and their fiber-optic communications arrays that lay in pipelines and relayed coordinates to the [[Transporter erector launcher|TEL]] operators that were launching attacks against Israel. The operations were designed to prevent any possible Israeli intervention. Due to lack of sufficient ground cover to carry out their assignment, One Zero and Three Zero abandoned their operations, while Two Zero remained, and was later compromised, with only Sergeant [[Chris Ryan]] escaping to Syria.
   
Elements of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Battalion [[5th Cavalry Regiment (United States)|5th Cavalry]] of the [[1st Cavalry Division (United States)|1st Cavalry Division]] of the U.S. Army performed a direct attack into Iraq on 15 February 1991, followed by one in force on 20 February that led directly through 7 Iraqi divisions which were caught off guard.{{Citation needed|date=November 2013}} From 15–20 February, the [[Battle of Wadi Al-Batin]] took place inside Iraq; this was the first of two attacks by 1 Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division. It was a feint attack, designed to make the Iraqis think that a Coalition invasion would take place from the south. The Iraqis fiercely resisted, and the Americans eventually withdrew as planned back into the Wadi Al-Batin. Three U.S. soldiers were killed and nine wounded as well with only 1 M-2 IFV turret destroyed, but they had taken 40 prisoners and destroyed five tanks, and successfully deceived the Iraqis. This attack led the way for the XVIII Airborne Corps to sweep around behind the 1st Cav and attack Iraqi forces to the west. On 22 February 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed ceasefire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within six weeks following a total cease-fire, and called for monitoring of the cease-fire and withdrawal to be overseen by the U.N. Security Council.
+
Elements of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Battalion [[5th Cavalry Regiment (United States)|5th Cavalry]] of the [[1st Cavalry Division (United States)|1st Cavalry Division]] of the U.S. Army performed a direct attack into Iraq on 15 February 1991, followed by one in force on 20 February that led directly through 7 Iraqi divisions which were caught off guard.{{Citation needed|date=November 2014}} From 15–20 February, the [[Battle of Wadi Al-Batin]] took place inside Iraq; this was the first of two attacks by 1 Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division. It was a feint attack, designed to make the Iraqis think that a Coalition invasion would take place from the south. The Iraqis fiercely resisted, and the Americans eventually withdrew as planned back into the Wadi Al-Batin. Three U.S. soldiers were killed and nine wounded as well with only 1 M-2 IFV turret destroyed, but they had taken 40 prisoners and destroyed five tanks, and successfully deceived the Iraqis. This attack led the way for the XVIII Airborne Corps to sweep around behind the 1st Cav and attack Iraqi forces to the west. On 22 February 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed ceasefire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within six weeks following a total cease-fire, and called for monitoring of the cease-fire and withdrawal to be overseen by the U.N. Security Council.
   
The Coalition rejected the proposal, but said that retreating Iraqi forces wouldn't be attacked,{{Citation needed|date=November 2013}} and gave twenty-four hours for Iraq to begin withdrawing forces. On 23 February, fighting resulted in the capture of 500 Iraqi soldiers. On 24 February, British and American armored forces crossed the Iraq-Kuwait border and entered Iraq in large numbers, taking hundreds of prisoners. Iraqi resistance was light, and 4 Americans were killed.<ref name="leyden.com">{{cite web|author=Andrew Leydon |url=http://www.leyden.com/gulfwar/week6.html |title=Carriers in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Leyden.com |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
+
The Coalition rejected the proposal, but said that retreating Iraqi forces wouldn't be attacked,{{Citation needed|date=November 2014}} and gave twenty-four hours for Iraq to begin withdrawing forces. On 23 February, fighting resulted in the capture of 500 Iraqi soldiers. On 24 February, British and American armored forces crossed the Iraq-Kuwait border and entered Iraq in large numbers, taking hundreds of prisoners. Iraqi resistance was light, and 4 Americans were killed.<ref name="leyden.com">{{cite web|author=Andrew Leydon |url=http://www.leyden.com/gulfwar/week6.html |title=Carriers in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Leyden.com |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref>
   
===Coalition forces enter Iraq===
+
====Coalition forces enter Iraq====
[[File:Demolished vehicles line Highway 80 on 18 Apr 1991.jpg|thumb|right|Destroyed Iraqi civilian and military vehicles on the [[Highway of Death]].]]
+
[[File:Demolished vehicles line Highway 80 on 18 Apr 1991.jpg|thumb|right|Destroyed Iraqi civilian and military vehicles on the Highway of Death.]]
 
[[File:IrakDesertStorm1991.jpg|right|thumb|Aerial view of destroyed Iraqi [[T-72]] tank, [[BMP-1]] and [[Type 63 (armoured personnel carrier)|Type 63]] armored personnel carriers and trucks on Highway 8 in March 1991]]
 
[[File:IrakDesertStorm1991.jpg|right|thumb|Aerial view of destroyed Iraqi [[T-72]] tank, [[BMP-1]] and [[Type 63 (armoured personnel carrier)|Type 63]] armored personnel carriers and trucks on Highway 8 in March 1991]]
 
[[File:BrennendeOelquellenKuwait1991.jpg|thumb|right|The oil fires caused were a result of the [[scorched earth]] policy of Iraqi [[Military of Iraq|military forces]] retreating from Kuwait]]
 
[[File:BrennendeOelquellenKuwait1991.jpg|thumb|right|The oil fires caused were a result of the [[scorched earth]] policy of Iraqi [[Military of Iraq|military forces]] retreating from Kuwait]]
Line 397: Line 392:
 
On 25 February 1991, Iraqi forces fired a Scud missile at an American barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The missile attack killed 28 U.S. military personnel.<ref>twentieth century battlefields, the gulf war</ref>
 
On 25 February 1991, Iraqi forces fired a Scud missile at an American barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The missile attack killed 28 U.S. military personnel.<ref>twentieth century battlefields, the gulf war</ref>
   
The Coalition's advance was much swifter than U.S. generals had expected. On 26 February, Iraqi troops began retreating from Kuwait, after they had set its oil fields on fire (737 oil wells were set on fire). A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq-Kuwait highway. Although they were retreating, this convoy was bombed so extensively by Coalition air forces that it came to be known as the [[Highway of Death]]. Hundreds of Iraqi troops were killed. American, British, and French forces continued to pursue retreating Iraqi forces over the border and back into Iraq, eventually moving to within 150 miles (240&nbsp;km) of Baghdad before withdrawing back to Iraq's border with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
+
The Coalition's advance was much swifter than U.S. generals had expected. On 26 February, Iraqi troops began retreating from Kuwait, after they had set its oil fields on fire (737 oil wells were set on fire). A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq-Kuwait highway. Although they were retreating, this convoy was bombed so extensively by Coalition air forces that it came to be known as the Highway of Death. Hundreds of Iraqi troops were killed. American, British, and French forces continued to pursue retreating Iraqi forces over the border and back into Iraq, eventually moving to within 150 miles (240&nbsp;km) of Baghdad before withdrawing back to Iraq's border with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
   
 
One hundred hours after the ground campaign started, on 28 February, President Bush declared a ceasefire, and he also declared that Kuwait had been liberated.
 
One hundred hours after the ground campaign started, on 28 February, President Bush declared a ceasefire, and he also declared that Kuwait had been liberated.
   
===Post-war military analysis===
+
====Post-war military analysis====
 
{{Unreferenced section}}
 
{{Unreferenced section}}
   
Line 408: Line 403:
 
The Coalition committed 540,000 troops, and a further 100,000 [[Turkish Army|Turkish troops]] were deployed along the Turkish-Iraqi border. This caused a significant force dilution of Iraq's military by forcing it to deploy its forces along all its borders. This allowed the main thrust by the U.S. to possess not only a significant technological advantage, but also a numerical superiority.
 
The Coalition committed 540,000 troops, and a further 100,000 [[Turkish Army|Turkish troops]] were deployed along the Turkish-Iraqi border. This caused a significant force dilution of Iraq's military by forcing it to deploy its forces along all its borders. This allowed the main thrust by the U.S. to possess not only a significant technological advantage, but also a numerical superiority.
   
The widespread support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War equipped Iraq with military equipment from most major world arms dealers. This resulted in a lack of standardization in this large heterogeneous force, which additionally suffered from poor training and poor motivation. The majority of Iraqi armored forces still used old Chinese [[Type 59]]s and [[Type 69/79|Type 69s]], Soviet-made [[T-54/55|T-55s]] from the 1950s and 1960s, and poor quality [[Lion of Babylon (tank)|Asad Babil tanks]] (domestically assembled tank based on Polish T-72 hulls with other parts of mixed origin). These machines were not equipped with up-to-date equipment, such as [[Night vision|thermal sights]] or [[laser rangefinder]]s, and their effectiveness in modern combat was very limited.
+
The widespread support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War equipped Iraq with military equipment from most major world arms dealers. This resulted in a lack of standardization in this large heterogeneous force, which additionally suffered from poor training and poor motivation. The majority of Iraqi armored forces still used old Chinese [[Type 59]]s and [[Type 69/79|Type 69s]], Soviet-made [[T-54/55|T-55s]] from the 1950s and 1960s, and poor quality [[Lion of Babylon (tank)|Asad Babil tanks]] (domestically assembled tank based on Polish T-72 hulls with other parts of mixed origin). These machines were not equipped with up-to-date equipment, such as thermal sights or laser rangefinders, and their effectiveness in modern combat was very limited.
   
 
The Iraqis failed to find an effective countermeasure to the thermal sights and [[Kinetic energy penetrator|sabot rounds]] used by Coalition tanks. This equipment enabled them to engage and destroy Iraqi tanks from more than three times the range that Iraqi tanks could engage Coalition tanks. The Iraqi crews used old, cheap steel penetrators against the advanced [[Chobham Armour]] of the U.S. and British tanks, with ineffective results. The Iraqis also failed to exploit the advantage that could be gained from using [[urban warfare]] — fighting within Kuwait City – which could have inflicted significant casualties on the attacking forces. Urban combat reduces the range at which fighting occurs, and can negate some of the technological advantages of well-equipped forces.
 
The Iraqis failed to find an effective countermeasure to the thermal sights and [[Kinetic energy penetrator|sabot rounds]] used by Coalition tanks. This equipment enabled them to engage and destroy Iraqi tanks from more than three times the range that Iraqi tanks could engage Coalition tanks. The Iraqi crews used old, cheap steel penetrators against the advanced [[Chobham Armour]] of the U.S. and British tanks, with ineffective results. The Iraqis also failed to exploit the advantage that could be gained from using [[urban warfare]] — fighting within Kuwait City – which could have inflicted significant casualties on the attacking forces. Urban combat reduces the range at which fighting occurs, and can negate some of the technological advantages of well-equipped forces.
Line 420: Line 415:
 
In Coalition-occupied Iraqi territory, a peace conference was held where a ceasefire agreement was negotiated and signed by both sides. At the conference, Iraq was approved to fly armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian infrastructure. Soon after, these helicopters and much of Iraq's military were used to fight a [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|uprising in the south]]. The rebellions were encouraged by an airing of "The Voice of Free Iraq" on 2 February 1991, which was broadcast from a CIA-run radio station out of Saudi Arabia. The Arabic service of the Voice of America supported the uprising by stating that the rebellion was large, and that they soon would be liberated from Saddam.<ref>[[Robert Fisk|Fisk, Robert]]. ''[[Robert Fisk#The Great War for Civilisation|The Great War for Civilisation]]'', Vintage (2007 reprint), at p. 646.</ref>
 
In Coalition-occupied Iraqi territory, a peace conference was held where a ceasefire agreement was negotiated and signed by both sides. At the conference, Iraq was approved to fly armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian infrastructure. Soon after, these helicopters and much of Iraq's military were used to fight a [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|uprising in the south]]. The rebellions were encouraged by an airing of "The Voice of Free Iraq" on 2 February 1991, which was broadcast from a CIA-run radio station out of Saudi Arabia. The Arabic service of the Voice of America supported the uprising by stating that the rebellion was large, and that they soon would be liberated from Saddam.<ref>[[Robert Fisk|Fisk, Robert]]. ''[[Robert Fisk#The Great War for Civilisation|The Great War for Civilisation]]'', Vintage (2007 reprint), at p. 646.</ref>
   
In the North, Kurdish leaders took American statements that they would support an uprising to heart, and began fighting, hoping to trigger a coup d'état. However, when no U.S. support came, Iraqi generals remained loyal to Saddam and brutally crushed the [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|Kurdish uprising]]. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Turkey and Kurdish areas of Iran. These events later resulted in [[no-fly zone]]s being established in northern and southern Iraq. In Kuwait, the Emir was restored, and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians, due to [[Palestine Liberation Organization|PLO]] support of Saddam. Yasser Arafat didn't apologize for his support of Iraq, but after his death, the Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas' authority formally apologized in 2004.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4089961.stm |work=BBC News | title=Abbas apology to Kuwait over Iraq | date=12 December 2004}}</ref>
+
In the North, Kurdish leaders took American statements that they would support an uprising to heart, and began fighting, hoping to trigger a coup d'état. However, when no U.S. support came, Iraqi generals remained loyal to Saddam and brutally crushed the [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|Kurdish uprising]]. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Turkey and Kurdish areas of Iran. These events later resulted in no-fly zones being established in northern and southern Iraq. In Kuwait, the Emir was restored, and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians, due to [[Palestine Liberation Organization|PLO]] support of Saddam. Yasser Arafat didn't apologize for his support of Iraq, but after his death, the Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas' authority formally apologized in 2004.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4089961.stm |work=BBC News | title=Abbas apology to Kuwait over Iraq | date=12 December 2004}}</ref>
   
 
There was some criticism of the Bush administration, as they chose to allow Saddam to remain in power instead of pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, ''[[A World Transformed]]'', Bush and [[Brent Scowcroft]] argued that such a course would have fractured the alliance, and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.
 
There was some criticism of the Bush administration, as they chose to allow Saddam to remain in power instead of pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, ''[[A World Transformed]]'', Bush and [[Brent Scowcroft]] argued that such a course would have fractured the alliance, and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.
Line 431: Line 426:
 
And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|title="Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', 29 September 2004|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/national/192908_cheney29.html |accessdate=7 January 2005 | date=28 September 2004}}</ref>|Dick Cheney}}
 
And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|title="Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', 29 September 2004|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/national/192908_cheney29.html |accessdate=7 January 2005 | date=28 September 2004}}</ref>|Dick Cheney}}
   
Instead of a greater involvement of its own military, the U.S. hoped that Saddam would be overthrown in an internal ''coup d'état''. The CIA used its assets in Iraq to organize a revolt, but the Iraqi government defeated the effort.{{citation needed|date=November 2013}}
+
Instead of a greater involvement of its own military, the U.S. hoped that Saddam would be overthrown in an internal ''coup d'état''. The CIA used its assets in Iraq to organize a revolt, but the Iraqi government defeated the effort.{{citation needed|date=November 2014}}
   
 
On 10 March 1991, 540,000 U.S. troops began moving out of the Persian Gulf.
 
On 10 March 1991, 540,000 U.S. troops began moving out of the Persian Gulf.
Line 446: Line 441:
 
[[File:Challenger-ODS-1.JPEG|thumb|left|[[British Army]] [[Challenger 1]] main battle tank during Operation Desert Storm.]]
 
[[File:Challenger-ODS-1.JPEG|thumb|left|[[British Army]] [[Challenger 1]] main battle tank during Operation Desert Storm.]]
   
The United Kingdom committed the largest contingent of any European state that participated in the war's combat operations. [[Operation Granby]] was the code name for the operations in the Persian Gulf. [[British Army]] regiments (mainly with the [[1st Armoured Division (United Kingdom)|1st Armoured Division)]], [[Royal Air Force]] squadrons and [[Royal Navy]] vessels were mobilized in the Gulf. The Royal Air Force, using various aircraft, operated from [[Military airbase|airbases]] in Saudi Arabia. Almost 2,500 armored vehicles and 53,462 troops were shipped for action.{{citation needed|date=November 2013}}
+
The United Kingdom committed the largest contingent of any European state that participated in the war's combat operations. [[Operation Granby]] was the code name for the operations in the Persian Gulf. [[British Army]] regiments (mainly with the [[1st Armoured Division (United Kingdom)|1st Armoured Division)]], [[Royal Air Force]] squadrons and [[Royal Navy]] vessels were mobilized in the Gulf. The Royal Air Force, using various aircraft, operated from [[Military airbase|airbases]] in Saudi Arabia. Almost 2,500 armored vehicles and 53,462 troops were shipped for action.{{citation needed|date=November 2014}}
   
 
Chief Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Gulf included [[Type 22 frigate|''Broadsword''-class frigates]], and [[Type 42 destroyer|''Sheffield''-class destroyers]], other R.N. and [[Royal Fleet Auxiliary|R.F.A.]] ships were also deployed. The light aircraft carrier [[HMS Ark Royal (R07)|HMS ''Ark Royal'']] was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea.
 
Chief Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Gulf included [[Type 22 frigate|''Broadsword''-class frigates]], and [[Type 42 destroyer|''Sheffield''-class destroyers]], other R.N. and [[Royal Fleet Auxiliary|R.F.A.]] ships were also deployed. The light aircraft carrier [[HMS Ark Royal (R07)|HMS ''Ark Royal'']] was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea.
Line 455: Line 450:
 
[[File:Iraqi Type 69 destroyed by the French 6th Light Armored Division during the Gulf War.JPEG|thumb|right|French and American soldiers inspecting an Iraqi [[Type 69/79|Type 69]] tank destroyed by the French [[6th Light Armoured Brigade (France)|6th Light Armored Division]] during Operation Desert Storm.]]
 
[[File:Iraqi Type 69 destroyed by the French 6th Light Armored Division during the Gulf War.JPEG|thumb|right|French and American soldiers inspecting an Iraqi [[Type 69/79|Type 69]] tank destroyed by the French [[6th Light Armoured Brigade (France)|6th Light Armored Division]] during Operation Desert Storm.]]
   
The second largest European contingent was from France, which committed 18,000 troops.<ref name="Tread"/> Operating on the left flank of the U.S. XVIII Airborne Corps, the main French Army force was the [[6th Light Armoured Brigade (France)|6th Light Armoured Division]], including troops from the [[French Foreign Legion]]. Initially, the French operated independently under national command and control, but coordinated closely with the Americans (via [[United States Central Command|CENTCOM]]) and Saudis. In January, the Division was placed under the tactical control of the XVIII Airborne Corps. France also deployed several combat aircraft and naval units. The French called their contribution [[Opération Daguet]].
+
The second largest European contingent was from France, which committed 18,000 troops.<ref name="Tread" /> Operating on the left flank of the U.S. XVIII Airborne Corps, the main French Army force was the [[6th Light Armoured Brigade (France)|6th Light Armoured Division]], including troops from the [[French Foreign Legion]]. Initially, the French operated independently under national command and control, but coordinated closely with the Americans (via [[United States Central Command|CENTCOM]]) and Saudis. In January, the Division was placed under the tactical control of the XVIII Airborne Corps. France also deployed several combat aircraft and naval units. The French called their contribution [[Opération Daguet]].
   
 
===Canada===
 
===Canada===
Line 471: Line 466:
 
{{Main|Australian contribution to the 1991 Gulf War}}
 
{{Main|Australian contribution to the 1991 Gulf War}}
   
Australia contributed a Naval Task Group, which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the Persian Gulf and [[Gulf of Oman]], under '''Operation Damask'''. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a U.S. [[hospital ship]], and a [[Clearance Diving Team (RAN)|naval clearance diving team]] took part in de-mining Kuwait’s port facilities following the end of combat operations.
+
Australia contributed a Naval Task Group, which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, under '''Operation Damask'''. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a U.S. [[hospital ship]], and a [[Clearance Diving Team (RAN)|naval clearance diving team]] took part in de-mining Kuwait’s port facilities following the end of combat operations.
   
 
While the Australian forces didn't see combat, they did play a significant role in enforcing the sanctions put in place against Iraq following Kuwait's invasion, as well as other small support contributions to Operation Desert Storm. Following the war's end, Australia deployed a medical unit on [[Operation Habitat]] to northern Iraq as part of [[Operation Provide Comfort]].
 
While the Australian forces didn't see combat, they did play a significant role in enforcing the sanctions put in place against Iraq following Kuwait's invasion, as well as other small support contributions to Operation Desert Storm. Following the war's end, Australia deployed a medical unit on [[Operation Habitat]] to northern Iraq as part of [[Operation Provide Comfort]].
Line 486: Line 481:
 
The increased importance of air attacks from both warplanes and cruise missiles led to controversy over the number of civilian deaths caused during the war's initial stages. Within the war's first 24 hours, more than 1,000 sorties were flown, many against targets in Baghdad. The city was the target of heavy bombing, as it was the seat of power for Saddam and the Iraqi forces' [[Command and Control (Military)|command and control]]. This ultimately led to civilian casualties.
 
The increased importance of air attacks from both warplanes and cruise missiles led to controversy over the number of civilian deaths caused during the war's initial stages. Within the war's first 24 hours, more than 1,000 sorties were flown, many against targets in Baghdad. The city was the target of heavy bombing, as it was the seat of power for Saddam and the Iraqi forces' [[Command and Control (Military)|command and control]]. This ultimately led to civilian casualties.
   
In one noted incident, two [[United States Air Force|USAF]] stealth planes bombed [[Amiriyah shelter bombing|a bunker in Amiriyah]], causing the deaths of 408 Iraqi civilians who were in the shelter.<ref name=CSM2002>Scott Peterson, [http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1022/p01s01-wosc.htm "'Smarter' bombs still hit civilians"], ''Christian Science Monitor,'' 22 October 2002.</ref> Scenes of burned and mutilated bodies were subsequently broadcast, and controversy arose over the bunker's status, with some stating that it was a civilian shelter, while others contended that it was a center of Iraqi military operations, and that the civilians had been deliberately moved there to act as [[human shield]]s.
+
In one noted incident, two [[United States Air Force|USAF]] stealth planes bombed [[Amiriyah shelter bombing|a bunker in Amiriyah]], causing the deaths of 408 Iraqi civilians who were in the shelter.<ref name="CSM2002">Scott Peterson, [http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1022/p01s01-wosc.htm "'Smarter' bombs still hit civilians"], ''Christian Science Monitor,'' 22 October 2002.</ref> Scenes of burned and mutilated bodies were subsequently broadcast, and controversy arose over the bunker's status, with some stating that it was a civilian shelter, while others contended that it was a center of Iraqi military operations, and that the civilians had been deliberately moved there to act as [[human shield]]s.
   
 
An investigation by Beth Osborne Daponte estimated total civilian fatalities at about 3,500 from bombing, and some 100,000 from the war's other effects.<ref name="autogenerated1" /><ref>{{cite web|title=Toting the Casualties of War |url=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2003/nf2003026_0167_db052.htm |work=Businessweek |date=6 February 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Ford |first=Peter |title=Bid to stem civilian deaths tested |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0409/p06s01-woiq.html |work= Christian Science Monitor |date=9 April 2003}}</ref>
 
An investigation by Beth Osborne Daponte estimated total civilian fatalities at about 3,500 from bombing, and some 100,000 from the war's other effects.<ref name="autogenerated1" /><ref>{{cite web|title=Toting the Casualties of War |url=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2003/nf2003026_0167_db052.htm |work=Businessweek |date=6 February 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Ford |first=Peter |title=Bid to stem civilian deaths tested |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0409/p06s01-woiq.html |work= Christian Science Monitor |date=9 April 2003}}</ref>
Line 493: Line 488:
 
The exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, but is believed to have been heavy. Some estimate that Iraq sustained between 20,000 and 35,000 fatalities.<ref name="autogenerated1">Robert Fisk, ''The Great War For Civilisation; The Conquest of the Middle East'' (Fourth Estate, 2005), p.853.</ref> A report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force, estimated 10,000–12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign, and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Keaney |first=Thomas |coauthors=Eliot A. Cohen |title=Gulf War Air Power Survey |publisher=United States Dept. of the Air Force |year=1993 |isbn=0-16-041950-6}}</ref> This analysis is based on Iraqi prisoner of war reports.
 
The exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, but is believed to have been heavy. Some estimate that Iraq sustained between 20,000 and 35,000 fatalities.<ref name="autogenerated1">Robert Fisk, ''The Great War For Civilisation; The Conquest of the Middle East'' (Fourth Estate, 2005), p.853.</ref> A report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force, estimated 10,000–12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign, and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Keaney |first=Thomas |coauthors=Eliot A. Cohen |title=Gulf War Air Power Survey |publisher=United States Dept. of the Air Force |year=1993 |isbn=0-16-041950-6}}</ref> This analysis is based on Iraqi prisoner of war reports.
   
Saddam's government gave high civilian casualty figures in order to draw support from Islamic countries. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign. {{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=265}} According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, 3,664 Iraqi civilians, and between 20,000 and 26,000 military personnel, were killed in the conflict, while 75,000 Iraqi soldiers were wounded.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html |title=Wages of War – Appendix 2: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War |publisher=Comw.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
Saddam's government gave high civilian casualty figures in order to draw support from Islamic countries. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign. {{sfn|Tucker|2010|p = 265}} According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, 3,664 Iraqi civilians, and between 20,000 and 26,000 military personnel, were killed in the conflict, while 75,000 Iraqi soldiers were wounded.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html |title=Wages of War – Appendix 2: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War |publisher=Comw.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
   
 
===Coalition===
 
===Coalition===
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right; float:right; margin: .46em 0 0 .46em;"
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:right; float:right; margin: .46em 0 0 .46em;"
 
|+Coalition troops killed by country
 
|+Coalition troops killed by country
 
!Country
 
!Country
Line 505: Line 500:
 
!Ref
 
!Ref
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United States}} || 294 || 114 || 145 || 35 ||<ref name=cnn/>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|United States}} || 294 || 114 || 145 || 35 ||<ref name="cnn" />
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Senegal}} || 92 || || 92 || ||<ref>[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19910321-0 ASN Aircraft accident Lockheed C-130H Hercules 469 Rash Mishab<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Senegal}} || 92 || || 92 || ||<ref>[http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19910321-0 ASN Aircraft accident Lockheed C-130H Hercules 469 Rash Mishab]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United Kingdom}}|| 47 || 38 || || 9 ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.britains-smallwars.com/gulf/Roll.html |title=Roll of Honour |publisher=Britains-smallwars.com |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|United Kingdom}}|| 47 || 38 || || 9 ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.britains-smallwars.com/gulf/Roll.html |title=Roll of Honour |publisher=Britains-smallwars.com |accessdate=13 May 2011}}</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Saudi Arabia}} || 24 || 18 || 6 || ||.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11661.html |title=Saudi Arabia – Persian Gulf War, 1991 |publisher=Country-data.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref>New York Times. "After the War; 92 Senegalese soldiers die in Saudi Air Crash"http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Saudi Arabia}} || 24 || 18 || 6 || ||.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11661.html |title=Saudi Arabia – Persian Gulf War, 1991 |publisher=Country-data.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref>New York Times. "After the War; 92 Senegalese soldiers die in Saudi Air Crash"http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|France}} || 9 || 9 || || ||<ref name=cnn />
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|France}} || 9 || 9 || || ||<ref name="cnn" />
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|United Arab Emirates}} || 6 || 6 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14256.html |title=The Role of the United Arab Emirates in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|United Arab Emirates}} || 6 || 6 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14256.html |title=The Role of the United Arab Emirates in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Qatar}} || 3 || 3 || || ||<ref name=cnn />
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Qatar}} || 3 || 3 || || ||<ref name="cnn" />
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Syria}} || 2 || || || ||<ref>Miller, Judith. "Syria Plans to Double Gulf Force." ''The New York Times'', 27 March 1991.</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Syria}} || 2 || || || ||<ref>Miller, Judith. "Syria Plans to Double Gulf Force." ''The New York Times'', 27 March 1991.</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Egypt}} || 11 || || 5 || ||.<ref>[http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1991/Soldier-Reported-Dead-Shows-Up-at-Parents-Doorstep/id-6f675aabb4b07225fea68fa64e3f976c "Soldier Reported Dead Shows Up at Parents' Doorstep"]. Associated Press. 22 March 1991.</ref><ref>Schmitt, Eric (22 March 1991). [http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html "After the War"]. ''The New York Times''.</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Egypt}} || 11 || || 5 || ||.<ref>[http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1991/Soldier-Reported-Dead-Shows-Up-at-Parents-Doorstep/id-6f675aabb4b07225fea68fa64e3f976c "Soldier Reported Dead Shows Up at Parents' Doorstep"]. Associated Press. 22 March 1991.</ref><ref>Schmitt, Eric (22 March 1991). [http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html "After the War"]. ''The New York Times''.</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|align=left|{{Flagu|Kuwait}} || 1 || 1 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14245.html |title=Role of Kuwaiti Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |date=24 February 1991 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
+
| align="left" |{{Flagu|Kuwait}} || 1 || 1 || || ||<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14245.html |title=Role of Kuwaiti Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf War |publisher=Country-data.com |date=24 February 1991 |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
   
The DoD reports that U.S. forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths (35 to friendly fire{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=470}}), with [[Scott Speicher|one pilot]] listed as [[Missing in action|MIA]] (his remains were found and identified in August 2009). A further 145 Americans died in non-combat accidents.<ref name=cnn/> The U.K. suffered 47 deaths (9 to friendly fire, all by U.S. forces), France 2,<ref name=cnn /> and the other countries, not including Kuwait, suffered 37 deaths (18 Saudis, 1 Egyptian, 6 UAE, and 3 Qataris).<ref name=cnn>{{Cite journal|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |publisher=CNN |title=In-Depth Specials – Gulf War |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070510125644/http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate=2001 |year=2001 |ref=harv}}</ref> At least 605 Kuwaiti soldiers were still missing 10 years after their capture.<ref>{{Cite journal|first=Nicholas |last=Blanford|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1223/p07s01-wome.html |title=Kuwait hopes for answers on its Gulf War POWs |publisher=Christian Science Monitor |year=2001 |ref=harv}}</ref>
+
The DoD reports that U.S. forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths (35 to friendly fire{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p = 470}}), with [[Scott Speicher|one pilot]] listed as [[Missing in action|MIA]] (his remains were found and identified in August 2009). A further 145 Americans died in non-combat accidents.<ref name="cnn" /> The U.K. suffered 47 deaths (9 to friendly fire, all by U.S. forces), France 2,<ref name="cnn" /> and the other countries, not including Kuwait, suffered 37 deaths (18 Saudis, 1 Egyptian, 6 UAE, and 3 Qataris).<ref name="cnn">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |publisher=CNN |title=In-Depth Specials – Gulf War |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070510125644/http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/ |archivedate=2001 |year=2001 |ref=harv}}</ref> At least 605 Kuwaiti soldiers were still missing 10 years after their capture.<ref>{{Cite journal|first=Nicholas |last=Blanford|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1223/p07s01-wome.html |title=Kuwait hopes for answers on its Gulf War POWs |publisher=Christian Science Monitor |year=2001 |ref=harv}}</ref>
   
The largest single loss of life among Coalition forces happened on 25 February 1991, when an Iraqi [[Al Hussein (missile)|Al Hussein missile]] hit a U.S. military barrack in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 [[United States Army Reserve|U.S. Army Reservists]] from [[Pennsylvania]]. In all, 190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi fire during the war, 113 of whom were American, out of a total of 358 Coalition deaths. Another 44 soldiers were killed, and 57 wounded, by friendly fire. 145 soldiers died of exploding munitions, or non-combat accidents.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=264}}
+
The largest single loss of life among Coalition forces happened on 25 February 1991, when an Iraqi [[Al Hussein (missile)|Al Hussein missile]] hit a U.S. military barrack in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 [[United States Army Reserve|U.S. Army Reservists]] from Pennsylvania. In all, 190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi fire during the war, 113 of whom were American, out of a total of 358 Coalition deaths. Another 44 soldiers were killed, and 57 wounded, by friendly fire. 145 soldiers died of exploding munitions, or non-combat accidents.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p = 264}}
   
 
The largest accident among Coalition forces happened on 21 March 1991, a Royal Saudi Air Force C-130H crashed in heavy smoke on approach to Ras Al-Mishab Airport, Saudi Arabia. 92 Senegalese soldiers were killed.
 
The largest accident among Coalition forces happened on 21 March 1991, a Royal Saudi Air Force C-130H crashed in heavy smoke on approach to Ras Al-Mishab Airport, Saudi Arabia. 92 Senegalese soldiers were killed.
   
The number of Coalition wounded in combat seems to have been 776, including 458 Americans.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Persian Gulf War – MSN Encarta<!-- Bot generated title -->|url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Arabian_Gulf_War.html|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5kwqLuiZR|archivedate=31 October 2009|ref=harv}}</ref>
+
The number of Coalition wounded in combat seems to have been 776, including 458 Americans.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Persian Gulf War – MSN Encarta|url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761551555_2/Arabian_Gulf_War.html|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5kwqLuiZR|archivedate=31 October 2009|ref=harv}}</ref>
   
 
190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi combatants, the rest of the 379 Coalition deaths being from friendly fire or accidents. This number was much lower than expected. Among the American dead were three female soldiers.
 
190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi combatants, the rest of the 379 Coalition deaths being from friendly fire or accidents. This number was much lower than expected. Among the American dead were three female soldiers.
   
 
====Friendly fire====
 
====Friendly fire====
While the death toll among Coalition forces engaging Iraqi combatants was very low, a substantial number of deaths were caused by accidental attacks from other Allied units. Of the 148 U.S. troops who died in battle, 24% were killed by friendly fire, a total of 35 service personnel.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=207}} A further 11 died in detonations of allied munitions. Nine British military personnel were killed in a friendly fire incident when a [[United States Air Force|USAF]] [[Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II|A-10 Thunderbolt II]] destroyed a group of two [[Warrior tracked armoured vehicle|Warrior]] [[Infantry fighting vehicle|IFVs]].
+
While the death toll among Coalition forces engaging Iraqi combatants was very low, a substantial number of deaths were caused by accidental attacks from other Allied units. Of the 148 U.S. troops who died in battle, 24% were killed by friendly fire, a total of 35 service personnel.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p = 207}} A further 11 died in detonations of allied munitions. Nine British military personnel were killed in a friendly fire incident when a [[United States Air Force|USAF]] [[Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II|A-10 Thunderbolt II]] destroyed a group of two [[Warrior tracked armoured vehicle|Warrior]] [[Infantry fighting vehicle|IFVs]].
   
 
==Controversies==
 
==Controversies==
 
 
===Gulf War Illness===
 
===Gulf War Illness===
 
{{Main|Gulf War syndrome}}
 
{{Main|Gulf War syndrome}}
Line 554: Line 548:
 
{{Main|Highway of Death}}
 
{{Main|Highway of Death}}
   
On the night of 26–27 February 1991, some Iraqi forces began leaving Kuwait on the main highway north of [[Al Jahra]] in a column of some 1,400 vehicles. A patrolling [[Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS|E-8 Joint STARS]] aircraft observed the retreating forces and relayed the information to the DDM-8 air operations center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/jstars-back.htm |title=E-8 Joint-DEATH STAR [JSTARS&#93; |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> These vehicles and the retreating soldiers were subsequently attacked, resulting in a 60&nbsp;km stretch of highway strewn with debris—the Highway of Death.
+
On the night of 26–27 February 1991, some Iraqi forces began leaving Kuwait on the main highway north of [[Al Jahra]] in a column of some 1,400 vehicles. A patrolling [[Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS|E-8 Joint STARS]] aircraft observed the retreating forces and relayed the information to the DDM-8 air operations center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/jstars-back.htm |title=<nowiki>E-8 Joint-DEATH STAR [JSTARS</nowiki>&#93; |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> These vehicles and the retreating soldiers were subsequently attacked, resulting in a 60&nbsp;km stretch of highway strewn with debris—the Highway of Death.
   
 
Chuck Horner, Commander of U.S. and allied air operations has written:
 
Chuck Horner, Commander of U.S. and allied air operations has written:
Line 562: Line 556:
   
 
===Bulldozer assault===
 
===Bulldozer assault===
Another incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the "[[bulldozer]] assault", wherein two brigades from the U.S. [[1st Infantry Division (United States)|1st Infantry Division (Mechanized)]] were faced with a large and complex trench network, as part of the heavily fortified "Saddam Hussein Line". After some deliberation, they opted to use anti-mine [[plow]]s mounted on [[tank]]s and combat earthmovers to simply plow over and bury alive the defending Iraqi soldiers. One newspaper story reported that U.S. commanders estimated thousands of Iraqi soldiers surrendered, escaping live burial during the two-day assault 24–26 February 1991. Patrick Day Sloyan of ''Newsday'' reported, "Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Vulcan armored carriers straddled the trench lines and fired into the Iraqi soldiers as the tanks covered them with mounds of sand. 'I came through right after the lead company,' [Col. Anthony] Moreno said. 'What you saw was a bunch of buried trenches with peoples' arms and things sticking out of them...{{'"}}<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12">"Buried Alive: U.S. Tanks Used Plows To Kill Thousands In Gulf War Trenches" ''Newsday'' (New York), 12 September 1991, p. 1, Patrick Day Sloyan</ref> However, after the war, the Iraqi government claimed to have found only 44 bodies.<ref>{{cite web|title=frontline: the gulf war: appendix: Iraqi death toll |url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html |accessdate=4 December 2005}}</ref> In his book ''The Wars Against Saddam'', John Simpson alleges that U.S. forces attempted to cover up the incident.<ref>John Simpson, The Wars Against Saddam. MacMillan: Basingstoke. 2003.</ref> After the incident, the commander of the 1st Brigade said: "I know burying people like that sounds pretty nasty, but it would be even nastier if we had to put our troops in the trenches and clean them out with bayonets."<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12"/>
+
Another incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the "bulldozer assault", wherein two brigades from the U.S. [[1st Infantry Division (United States)|1st Infantry Division (Mechanized)]] were faced with a large and complex trench network, as part of the heavily fortified "Saddam Hussein Line". After some deliberation, they opted to use anti-mine [[plow]]s mounted on [[tank]]s and combat earthmovers to simply plow over and bury alive the defending Iraqi soldiers. One newspaper story reported that U.S. commanders estimated thousands of Iraqi soldiers surrendered, escaping live burial during the two-day assault 24–26 February 1991. Patrick Day Sloyan of ''Newsday'' reported, "Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Vulcan armored carriers straddled the trench lines and fired into the Iraqi soldiers as the tanks covered them with mounds of sand. 'I came through right after the lead company,' [Col. Anthony] Moreno said. 'What you saw was a bunch of buried trenches with peoples' arms and things sticking out of them...{{'"}}<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12">"Buried Alive: U.S. Tanks Used Plows To Kill Thousands In Gulf War Trenches" ''Newsday'' (New York), 12 September 1991, p. 1, Patrick Day Sloyan</ref> However, after the war, the Iraqi government claimed to have found only 44 bodies.<ref>{{cite web|title=frontline: the gulf war: appendix: Iraqi death toll |url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html |accessdate=4 December 2005}}</ref> In his book ''The Wars Against Saddam'', John Simpson alleges that U.S. forces attempted to cover up the incident.<ref>John Simpson, The Wars Against Saddam. MacMillan: Basingstoke. 2003.</ref> After the incident, the commander of the 1st Brigade said: "I know burying people like that sounds pretty nasty, but it would be even nastier if we had to put our troops in the trenches and clean them out with bayonets."<ref name="Sloyan 1991-9-12" />
   
 
===1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait===
 
===1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait===
 
{{main|1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait}}
 
{{main|1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait}}
A [[1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait]] took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians voluntarily fled Kuwait during the [[Invasion of Kuwait|Iraqi occupation of Kuwait]] due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces,<ref name="ir"/> in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait.<ref name=ir>{{cite web|author=Shafeeq Ghabra|title=The PLO in Kuwait|url=http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/1457|date=May 8, 1991}}</ref> After the Gulf War, the [[Kuwait]]i authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991.<ref name="ir"/> Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader [[Yasser Arafat]] and the [[PLO]] with the dictator [[Saddam Hussein]], who had earlier invaded Kuwait.
+
A [[1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait]] took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians voluntarily fled Kuwait during the [[Invasion of Kuwait|Iraqi occupation of Kuwait]] due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces,<ref name="ir" /> in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait.<ref name="ir">{{cite web|author=Shafeeq Ghabra|title=The PLO in Kuwait|url=http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/1457|date=May 8, 1991}}</ref> After the Gulf War, the Kuwaiti authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991.<ref name="ir" /> Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the [[PLO]] with the dictator [[Saddam Hussein]], who had earlier invaded Kuwait.
   
The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were [[Jordanian people|Jordanian citizens]].<ref name=jor>{{cite web|author=Yann Le Troquer and Rozenn Hommery al-Oudat|title=From Kuwait to Jordan: The Palestinians' Third Exodus|url=http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2538306?uid=3738400&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102826710897|work=Journal of Palestine Studies|year=Spring 1999|pages=37–51}}</ref> In 2013, there were 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin in Kuwait.<ref name=mon>{{cite web|title=Jordanians of Kuwait|url=http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=KU|work=[[Joshua Project]]|year=2013}}</ref> In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian [[citizenship]]) lived in Kuwait.<ref name=monitor>{{cite news|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/palestinians-open-kuwait-embassy.html|work=Al Monitor|title=Palestinians Open Kuwaiti Embassy|date=23 May 2013}}</ref> In total, there are 360,000 Palestinians in Kuwait as of 2012-2013.
+
The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were [[Jordanian people|Jordanian citizens]].<ref name="jor">{{cite web|author=Yann Le Troquer and Rozenn Hommery al-Oudat|title=From Kuwait to Jordan: The Palestinians' Third Exodus|url=http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2538306?uid=3738400&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102826710897|work=Journal of Palestine Studies|year=Spring 1999|pages=37–51}}</ref> In 2013, there were 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin in Kuwait.<ref name="mon">{{cite web|title=Jordanians of Kuwait|url=http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=KU|work=[[Joshua Project]]|year=2013}}</ref> In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian citizenship) lived in Kuwait.<ref name="monitor">{{cite news|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/palestinians-open-kuwait-embassy.html|work=Al Monitor|title=Palestinians Open Kuwaiti Embassy|date=23 May 2013}}</ref> In total, there are 360,000 Palestinians in Kuwait as of 2012-2013.
   
 
Saudi Arabia expelled Yemeni workers after Yemen supported Saddam during the Gulf War.<ref>"[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/yemen/8557546/Yemens-president-flees-for-medical-treatment-as-search-for-new-leader-begins.html Yemen's president flees for medical treatment as search for new leader begins]". ''The Daily Telegraph''. June 5, 2011</ref>
 
Saudi Arabia expelled Yemeni workers after Yemen supported Saddam during the Gulf War.<ref>"[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/yemen/8557546/Yemens-president-flees-for-medical-treatment-as-search-for-new-leader-begins.html Yemen's president flees for medical treatment as search for new leader begins]". ''The Daily Telegraph''. June 5, 2011</ref>
   
 
===Coalition bombing of Iraq's civilian infrastructure===
 
===Coalition bombing of Iraq's civilian infrastructure===
In the 23 June 1991 edition of ''The Washington Post'', reporter Bart Gellman wrote: "Many of the targets were chosen only secondarily to contribute to the military defeat of [Iraq]. . . . Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society. . . . They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an industrial society. . . ."<ref>23 June 1991, Washington Post, Bart Gellman</ref> In the Jan/Feb 1995 edition of ''Foreign Affairs'', French diplomat Eric Rouleau wrote: "[T]he Iraqi people, who were not consulted about the invasion, have paid the price for their government's madness. . . . Iraqis understood the legitimacy of a military action to drive their army from Kuwait, but they have had difficulty comprehending the Allied rationale for using air power to systematically destroy or cripple Iraqi infrastructure and industry: electric power stations (92 percent of installed capacity destroyed), refineries (80 percent of production capacity), petrochemical complexes, telecommunications centers (including 135 telephone networks), bridges (more than 100), roads, highways, railroads, hundreds of locomotives and boxcars full of goods, radio and television broadcasting stations, cement plants, and factories producing aluminum, textiles, electric cables, and medical supplies."<ref>"The View From France: America's Unyielding Policy toward Iraq," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 1, January/February 1995, pp.61–62</ref> However, the U.N. subsequently spent billions rebuilding hospitals, schools, and [[water purification]] facilities throughout the country.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=[[Middle East Review of International Affairs]] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |authorlink=Michael Rubin}}</ref>
+
In the 23 June 1991 edition of ''The Washington Post'', reporter Bart Gellman wrote: "Many of the targets were chosen only secondarily to contribute to the military defeat of [Iraq]. . . . Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society. . . . They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an industrial society. . . ."<ref>23 June 1991, Washington Post, Bart Gellman</ref> In the Jan/Feb 1995 edition of ''Foreign Affairs'', French diplomat Eric Rouleau wrote: "[T]he Iraqi people, who were not consulted about the invasion, have paid the price for their government's madness. . . . Iraqis understood the legitimacy of a military action to drive their army from Kuwait, but they have had difficulty comprehending the Allied rationale for using air power to systematically destroy or cripple Iraqi infrastructure and industry: electric power stations (92 percent of installed capacity destroyed), refineries (80 percent of production capacity), petrochemical complexes, telecommunications centers (including 135 telephone networks), bridges (more than 100), roads, highways, railroads, hundreds of locomotives and boxcars full of goods, radio and television broadcasting stations, cement plants, and factories producing aluminum, textiles, electric cables, and medical supplies."<ref>"The View From France: America's Unyielding Policy toward Iraq," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 1, January/February 1995, pp.61–62</ref> However, the U.N. subsequently spent billions rebuilding hospitals, schools, and [[water purification]] facilities throughout the country.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=[[Middle East Review of International Affairs]] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |authorlink=Michael Rubin|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120306104728/http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf|archivedate=2012-03-06}}</ref>
   
 
===Abuse of Coalition POWs===
 
===Abuse of Coalition POWs===
During the conflict, Coalition aircrew shot down over Iraq were displayed as [[Prisoner of war|prisoners of war]] on TV, most with visible signs of abuse. Amongst several testimonies to poor treatment,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/ |title=Frontline: War Stories |publisher=Pbs.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Royal Air Force [[Panavia Tornado|Tornado]] crew [[John Nichol (RAF officer)|John Nichol]] and [[John Peters (RAF)|John Peters]] have both alleged that they were tortured during this time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.johnnichol.com/The%20Beginning.htm |title=The Flight That Changed My Life |publisher=Johnnichol.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/4.html |title=War Story:John Peters |publisher=Pbs.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Nichol and Peters were forced to make statements against the war in front of television cameras. Members of British Special Air Service [[Bravo Two Zero]] were captured while providing information about an Iraqi supply line of Scud missiles to Coalition forces. Only one, [[Chris Ryan]], evaded capture while the group's other surviving members were violently tortured.<ref>''The One that Got Away'' by Chris Ryan & ''Bravo Two Zero'' by Andy McNab</ref> Flight surgeon (later General) [[Rhonda Cornum]] was raped by one of her captors<ref name=Time>{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,438760,00.html |title=A Woman's Burden |publisher=''Time magazine'' magazine |date=28 March 2003}}</ref> after the Black Hawk she was riding in was shot down while searching for a downed F-16 pilot.
+
During the conflict, Coalition aircrew shot down over Iraq were displayed as [[Prisoner of war|prisoners of war]] on TV, most with visible signs of abuse. Amongst several testimonies to poor treatment,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/ |title=Frontline: War Stories |publisher=Pbs.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Royal Air Force [[Panavia Tornado|Tornado]] crew [[John Nichol (RAF officer)|John Nichol]] and [[John Peters (RAF)|John Peters]] have both alleged that they were tortured during this time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.johnnichol.com/The%20Beginning.htm |title=The Flight That Changed My Life |publisher=Johnnichol.com |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/4.html |title=War Story:John Peters |publisher=Pbs.org |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Nichol and Peters were forced to make statements against the war in front of television cameras. Members of British Special Air Service [[Bravo Two Zero]] were captured while providing information about an Iraqi supply line of Scud missiles to Coalition forces. Only one, [[Chris Ryan]], evaded capture while the group's other surviving members were violently tortured.<ref>''The One that Got Away'' by Chris Ryan & ''Bravo Two Zero'' by Andy McNab</ref> Flight surgeon (later General) [[Rhonda Cornum]] was raped by one of her captors<ref name="Time">{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,438760,00.html |title=A Woman's Burden |publisher=''Time magazine'' magazine |date=28 March 2003}}</ref> after the Black Hawk she was riding in was shot down while searching for a downed F-16 pilot.
   
 
===Operation Southern Watch===
 
===Operation Southern Watch===
Line 582: Line 576:
 
Since the war, the U.S. has had a continued presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia – a figure that rose to 10,000 during the [[Iraq War|2003 conflict in Iraq]].<ref name="bbc">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2984547.stm|title=US pulls out of Saudi Arabia |accessdate=29 November 2009 |work=BBC News | date=29 April 2003}}</ref> Operation Southern Watch enforced the [[Iraqi no-fly zones|no-fly zones]] over southern Iraq set up after 1991; oil exports through the Persian Gulf's shipping lanes were protected by the Bahrain-based [[United States Fifth Fleet|U.S. Fifth Fleet]].
 
Since the war, the U.S. has had a continued presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia – a figure that rose to 10,000 during the [[Iraq War|2003 conflict in Iraq]].<ref name="bbc">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2984547.stm|title=US pulls out of Saudi Arabia |accessdate=29 November 2009 |work=BBC News | date=29 April 2003}}</ref> Operation Southern Watch enforced the [[Iraqi no-fly zones|no-fly zones]] over southern Iraq set up after 1991; oil exports through the Persian Gulf's shipping lanes were protected by the Bahrain-based [[United States Fifth Fleet|U.S. Fifth Fleet]].
   
Since Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest sites, many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the war was one of the stated motivations behind the [[September 11 attacks|11 September terrorist attacks]],<ref name="bbc"/> the [[Khobar Towers bombing]], and the date chosen for the [[1998 United States embassy bombings|1998 U.S. embassy bombings]] (7 August), which was eight years to the day that U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.<ref>Plotz, David (2001) [http://www.slate.com/default.aspx?id=115404 What Does Osama Bin Laden Want?], Slate</ref> [[Osama bin Laden]] interpreted the Islamic prophet [[Muhammad]] as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".<ref name="holywar-p3">{{Cite book|author=Bergen, Peter L. |title=Holy War Inc. |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2001 |page=3}}</ref> In 1996, bin Laden issued a [[fatwa]], calling for [[United States Armed Forces|U.S. troops]] to leave Saudi Arabia. In a December 1999 interview with [[Rahimullah Yusufzai]], bin Laden said he felt that Americans were "too near to Mecca" and considered this a provocation to the entire Islamic world.<ref name="guardian-20010926">{{Cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080119011449/http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html |archivedate=19 January 2008 |title=Face to face with Osama |work=The Guardian |location=London |date=26 September 2001 | accessdate=30 June 2010 | first=Rahimullah | last=Yusufzai}}</ref>
+
Since Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest sites, many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the war was one of the stated motivations behind the [[September 11 attacks|11 September terrorist attacks]],<ref name="bbc" /> the [[Khobar Towers bombing]], and the date chosen for the [[1998 United States embassy bombings|1998 U.S. embassy bombings]] (7 August), which was eight years to the day that U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.<ref>Plotz, David (2001) [http://www.slate.com/default.aspx?id=115404 What Does Osama Bin Laden Want?], Slate</ref> [[Osama bin Laden]] interpreted the Islamic prophet [[Muhammad]] as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".<ref name="holywar-p3">{{Cite book|author=Bergen, Peter L. |title=Holy War Inc. |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2001 |page=3}}</ref> In 1996, bin Laden issued a fatwa, calling for [[United States Armed Forces|U.S. troops]] to leave Saudi Arabia. In a December 1999 interview with [[Rahimullah Yusufzai]], bin Laden said he felt that Americans were "too near to Mecca" and considered this a provocation to the entire Islamic world.<ref name="guardian-20010926">{{Cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080119011449/http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html |archivedate=19 January 2008 |title=Face to face with Osama |work=The Guardian |location=London |date=26 September 2001 | accessdate=30 June 2010 | first=Rahimullah | last=Yusufzai}}</ref>
   
 
===Sanctions===
 
===Sanctions===
 
{{Main|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Iraq sanctions}}
 
{{Main|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Iraq sanctions}}
 
{{Wikisource|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661}}
 
{{Wikisource|United Nations Security Council Resolution 661}}
On 6 August 1990, after [[Invasion of Kuwait|Iraq's invasion of Kuwait]], the U.N. Security Council adopted [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Resolution 661]] which imposed economic sanctions on Iraq, providing for a full trade [[embargo]], excluding medical supplies, food and other items of humanitarian necessity, these to be determined by the Council's sanctions committee. From 1991 until 2003, the effects of government policy and sanctions regime led to [[hyperinflation]], widespread poverty and malnutrition.
+
On 6 August 1990, after [[Invasion of Kuwait|Iraq's invasion of Kuwait]], the U.N. Security Council adopted [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 661|Resolution 661]] which imposed economic sanctions on Iraq, providing for a full trade embargo, excluding medical supplies, food and other items of humanitarian necessity, these to be determined by the Council's sanctions committee. From 1991 until 2003, the effects of government policy and sanctions regime led to hyperinflation, widespread poverty and malnutrition.
   
During the late 1990s, the U.N. considered relaxing the sanctions imposed because of the hardships suffered by ordinary Iraqis. Studies dispute the number of people who died in south and central Iraq during the years of the sanctions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/newsline/99pr29.htm|title=Iraq surveys show 'humanitarian emergency' |date=12 August 1999|accessdate=29 November 2009}}</ref><ref name=Spagat>{{cite web|url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions |first=Michael |last=Spagat |date=September 2010 |publisher=[[Significance (journal)|Significance]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=[[Middle East Review of International Affairs]] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |authorlink=Michael Rubin}}</ref>
+
During the late 1990s, the U.N. considered relaxing the sanctions imposed because of the hardships suffered by ordinary Iraqis. Studies dispute the number of people who died in south and central Iraq during the years of the sanctions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/newsline/99pr29.htm|title=Iraq surveys show 'humanitarian emergency' |date=12 August 1999|accessdate=29 November 2009}}</ref><ref name="Spagat">{{cite web|url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions |first=Michael |last=Spagat |date=September 2010 |publisher=Significance}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=[[Middle East Review of International Affairs]] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |authorlink=Michael Rubin}}</ref>
   
 
===Draining of the Qurna Marshes===
 
===Draining of the Qurna Marshes===
 
{{Main|Draining of the Qurna Marshes}}
 
{{Main|Draining of the Qurna Marshes}}
The draining of the Qurna Marshes was an irrigation project in Iraq during and immediately after the war, to drain a large area of [[marshes]] in the [[Tigris–Euphrates river system]]. Formerly covering an area of around 3,000 square kilometers, the large complex of [[wetlands]] were almost completely emptied of water, and the local Shi'ite population relocated, following the war and [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|1991 uprisings]]. By 2000, United Nations Environment Programme estimated that 90% of the marshlands had disappeared, causing [[desertification]] of over {{convert|7500|sqmi|km2}}.{{Citation needed|date=November 2013}}
+
The draining of the Qurna Marshes was an irrigation project in Iraq during and immediately after the war, to drain a large area of [[marshes]] in the [[Tigris–Euphrates river system]]. Formerly covering an area of around 3,000 square kilometers, the large complex of wetlands were almost completely emptied of water, and the local Shi'ite population relocated, following the war and [[1991 uprisings in Iraq|1991 uprisings]]. By 2000, United Nations Environment Programme estimated that 90% of the marshlands had disappeared, causing [[desertification]] of over {{convert|7500|sqmi|km2}}.{{Citation needed|date=November 2014}}
   
 
Many international organizations such as the [[United Nations Commission on Human Rights|U.N. Human Rights Commission]], the [[Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq]], the [[Wetlands International]], and Middle East Watch have described the project as a political attempt to force the [[Marsh Arabs]] out of the area through water diversion tactics.<ref>{{cite web
 
Many international organizations such as the [[United Nations Commission on Human Rights|U.N. Human Rights Commission]], the [[Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq]], the [[Wetlands International]], and Middle East Watch have described the project as a political attempt to force the [[Marsh Arabs]] out of the area through water diversion tactics.<ref>{{cite web
Line 604: Line 598:
 
{{Main|Gulf War oil spill}}
 
{{Main|Gulf War oil spill}}
   
On 23 January, Iraq dumped {{convert|400|e6USgal|m3}} of crude oil into the Persian Gulf {{#tag:Ref|Note: The cited supporting source<ref name=dukemag030403 /> uses the alternative term ''Arabian Gulf'' to name this body of water. This article uses the more common and more generally recognized term ''Persian Gulf''. For more information, see the [[Persian Gulf naming dispute]] article.}}, causing the largest offshore oil spill in history at that time.<ref name=dukemag030403>{{cite web|url=http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/030403/oil1.html |title=Duke Magazine-Oil Spill-After the Deluge, by Jeffrey Pollack-Mar/Apr 2003 |publisher=Dukemagazine.duke.edu |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> It was reported as a deliberate natural resources attack to keep U.S. Marines from coming ashore (''Missouri'' and ''Wisconsin'' had shelled [[Failaka Island]] during the war to reinforce the idea that there would be an amphibious assault attempt).<ref name="Desert Storm">{{cite web|title = V: "Thunder And Lightning"- The War With Iraq (Subsection:The War At Sea) |work= The United States Navy in "Desert Shield" / "Desert Storm"| url = http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm |publisher= [[United States Navy]] |accessdate=26 November 2006}}</ref> About 30–40% of this came from allied raids on Iraqi coastal targets.<ref>{{Cite book| author = Leckie, Robert |title = The Wars of America | publisher = Castle Books | year = 1998}}</ref>
+
On 23 January, Iraq dumped {{convert|400|e6USgal|m3}} of crude oil into the Persian Gulf {{#tag:Ref|Note: The cited supporting source<ref name=dukemag030403 /> uses the alternative term ''Arabian Gulf'' to name this body of water. This article uses the more common and more generally recognized term ''Persian Gulf''. For more information, see the [[Persian Gulf naming dispute]] article.}}, causing the largest offshore oil spill in history at that time.<ref name="dukemag030403">{{cite web|url=http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/030403/oil1.html |title=Duke Magazine-Oil Spill-After the Deluge, by Jeffrey Pollack-Mar/Apr 2003 |publisher=Dukemagazine.duke.edu |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> It was reported as a deliberate natural resources attack to keep U.S. Marines from coming ashore (''Missouri'' and ''Wisconsin'' had shelled [[Failaka Island]] during the war to reinforce the idea that there would be an amphibious assault attempt).<ref name="Desert Storm">{{cite web|title = V: "Thunder And Lightning"- The War With Iraq (Subsection:The War At Sea) |work= The United States Navy in "Desert Shield" / "Desert Storm"| url = http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm |publisher= [[United States Navy]] |accessdate=26 November 2006}}</ref> About 30–40% of this came from allied raids on Iraqi coastal targets.<ref>{{Cite book| author = Leckie, Robert |title = The Wars of America | publisher = Castle Books | year = 1998}}</ref>
   
 
===Kuwaiti oil fires===
 
===Kuwaiti oil fires===
Line 623: Line 617:
 
International response to the crisis on developing states came with the channeling of aid through The Gulf Crisis Financial Co-ordination Group. They were 24 states, comprising most of the OECD countries plus some Gulf states: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait. The members of this group agreed to disperse $14 billion in development assistance.
 
International response to the crisis on developing states came with the channeling of aid through The Gulf Crisis Financial Co-ordination Group. They were 24 states, comprising most of the OECD countries plus some Gulf states: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait. The members of this group agreed to disperse $14 billion in development assistance.
   
The World Bank responded by speeding up the disbursement of existing project and adjustment loans. The International Monetary Fund adopted two lending facilities – the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Compensatory & Contingency Financing Facility (CCFF). The European Community offered $2 billion{{clarify|date=August 2011}} in assistance.<ref name="odi.org.uk" />
+
The World Bank responded by speeding up the disbursement of existing project and adjustment loans. The International Monetary Fund adopted two lending facilities – the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Compensatory & Contingency Financing Facility (CCFF). The European Community offered $2 billion{{clarify|date=August 2015}}
  +
in assistance.<ref name="odi.org.uk" />
   
 
==Media coverage==
 
==Media coverage==
Line 629: Line 624:
 
The war was heavily televised. For the first time, people all over the world were able to watch live pictures of [[missile]]s hitting their targets and fighters departing from aircraft carriers. Allied forces were keen to demonstrate their weapons' accuracy.
 
The war was heavily televised. For the first time, people all over the world were able to watch live pictures of [[missile]]s hitting their targets and fighters departing from aircraft carriers. Allied forces were keen to demonstrate their weapons' accuracy.
   
In the United States, the "big three" network anchors led the war's [[News broadcasting|network news]] coverage: ABC's [[Peter Jennings]], CBS's [[Dan Rather]], and NBC's [[Tom Brokaw]] were anchoring their evening newscasts when air strikes began on 16 January 1991. ABC News correspondent Gary Shepard, reporting live from Baghdad, told Jennings of the city's quietness. But, moments later, Shepard was back on the air as flashes of light were seen on the horizon and tracer fire was heard on the ground.
+
In the United States, the "big three" network anchors led the war's [[News broadcasting|network news]] coverage: ABC's [[Peter Jennings]], CBS's [[Dan Rather]], and NBC's Tom Brokaw were anchoring their evening newscasts when air strikes began on 16 January 1991. ABC News correspondent Gary Shepard, reporting live from Baghdad, told Jennings of the city's quietness. But, moments later, Shepard was back on the air as flashes of light were seen on the horizon and tracer fire was heard on the ground.
   
 
On CBS, viewers were watching a report from correspondent Allen Pizzey, who was also reporting from Baghdad, when the war began. Rather, after the report was finished, announced that there were unconfirmed reports of flashes in Baghdad and heavy [[air traffic]] at bases in Saudi Arabia. On the "NBC Nightly News", correspondent [[Mike Boettcher]] reported unusual air activity in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Moments later, Brokaw announced to his viewers that the air attack had begun.
 
On CBS, viewers were watching a report from correspondent Allen Pizzey, who was also reporting from Baghdad, when the war began. Rather, after the report was finished, announced that there were unconfirmed reports of flashes in Baghdad and heavy [[air traffic]] at bases in Saudi Arabia. On the "NBC Nightly News", correspondent [[Mike Boettcher]] reported unusual air activity in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Moments later, Brokaw announced to his viewers that the air attack had begun.
Line 647: Line 642:
 
A British crew from CBS News (David Green and Andy Thompson), equipped with satellite transmission equipment traveled with the front line forces and, having transmitted live TV pictures of the fighting en route, arrived the day before the forces in Kuwait City, broadcasting live television from the city and covering the entrance of the Arab forces the next day.
 
A British crew from CBS News (David Green and Andy Thompson), equipped with satellite transmission equipment traveled with the front line forces and, having transmitted live TV pictures of the fighting en route, arrived the day before the forces in Kuwait City, broadcasting live television from the city and covering the entrance of the Arab forces the next day.
   
Alternative media outlets provided views in opposition to the war. Deep Dish Television compiled segments from independent producers in the U.S. and abroad, and produced a ten-hour series that was distributed internationally, called [http://www.deepdishtv.org/Series/Default.aspx?id=4 The Gulf Crisis TV Project]. The series' first program [http://www.archive.org/details/ddtv_50_war_oil_and_power War, Oil and Power] was compiled and released in 1990, before the war broke out. [http://www.archive.org/details/ddtv_56_new_world_order News World Order] was the title of another program in the series; it focused on the media's complicity in promoting the war, as well as Americans' reactions to the media coverage. In San Francisco, as a local example, Paper Tiger Television West produced a weekly cable television show with highlights of mass demonstrations, artists' actions, lectures, and protests against mainstream media coverage at newspaper offices and television stations. Local media outlets in cities across the country screened similar oppositional media.
+
Alternative media outlets provided views in opposition to the war. Deep Dish Television compiled segments from independent producers in the U.S. and abroad, and produced a ten-hour series that was distributed internationally, called [http://www.deepdishtv.org/Series/Default.aspx?id=4 The Gulf Crisis TV Project]. The series' first program [http://www.archive.org/details/ddtv_50_war_oil_and_power War, Oil and Power] was compiled and released in 1990, before the war broke out. [http://www.archive.org/details/ddtv_56_new_world_order News World Order] was the title of another program in the series; it focused on the media's complicity in promoting the war, as well as Americans' reactions to the media coverage. In San Francisco, as a local example, Paper Tiger Television West produced a weekly cable television show with highlights of mass demonstrations, artists' actions, lectures, and protests against mainstream media coverage at newspaper offices and television stations. Local media outlets in cities across the country screened similar oppositional media.
   
 
The organization [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] (FAIR) critically analyzed media coverage during the war in various articles and books, such as the 1991 ''Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship was at Home''.<ref name="fair.org.1518">{{cite web |ref=harv|year= 2010 |url = http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1518|title = Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship Was at Home|publisher = [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] (FAIR)| accessdate =14 October 2010 | last=Naureckas| first= Jim}}</ref>
 
The organization [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] (FAIR) critically analyzed media coverage during the war in various articles and books, such as the 1991 ''Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship was at Home''.<ref name="fair.org.1518">{{cite web |ref=harv|year= 2010 |url = http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1518|title = Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship Was at Home|publisher = [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] (FAIR)| accessdate =14 October 2010 | last=Naureckas| first= Jim}}</ref>
Line 659: Line 654:
 
[[Global Positioning System]] units were important in enabling Coalition units to easily navigate across the desert. Since military GPS receivers were not available for most troops, many used commercially available units. To permit these to be used to best effect, the "selective availability" feature of the GPS system was turned off for the duration of Desert Storm, allowing these commercial receivers to provide the same precision as the military equipment.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=sVgf41ic6LgC&lpg=PA55&ots=lNtb0Fdpys&dq=gulf%20war%20gps&pg=PR4#v=onepage&q=gulf%20war%20gps&f=false|title=GPS for Dummies|first=Joel|last=McNamara}}</ref>
 
[[Global Positioning System]] units were important in enabling Coalition units to easily navigate across the desert. Since military GPS receivers were not available for most troops, many used commercially available units. To permit these to be used to best effect, the "selective availability" feature of the GPS system was turned off for the duration of Desert Storm, allowing these commercial receivers to provide the same precision as the military equipment.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=sVgf41ic6LgC&lpg=PA55&ots=lNtb0Fdpys&dq=gulf%20war%20gps&pg=PR4#v=onepage&q=gulf%20war%20gps&f=false|title=GPS for Dummies|first=Joel|last=McNamara}}</ref>
   
[[Airborne early warning and control|Airborne Warning and Control System]] (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important. Two examples of this are the U.S. Navy's [[Grumman E-2 Hawkeye]] and the U.S. Air Force's [[Boeing E-3 Sentry]]. Both were used in command and control area of operations. These systems provided essential communications links between air, ground, and naval forces. It's one of several reasons why Coalition forces dominated the air war.
+
Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important. Two examples of this are the U.S. Navy's [[Grumman E-2 Hawkeye]] and the U.S. Air Force's [[Boeing E-3 Sentry]]. Both were used in command and control area of operations. These systems provided essential communications links between air, ground, and naval forces. It's one of several reasons why Coalition forces dominated the air war.
   
 
American-made color photocopiers were used to produce some of Iraq's battle plans. Some of the copiers contained concealed high-tech transmitters that revealed their positions to American [[electronic warfare aircraft]], leading to more precise bombings.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18527456 |title=Something wrong with our **** chips today |work=The Economist |date= 7 April 2011|accessdate=13 June 2011}}</ref>
 
American-made color photocopiers were used to produce some of Iraq's battle plans. Some of the copiers contained concealed high-tech transmitters that revealed their positions to American [[electronic warfare aircraft]], leading to more precise bombings.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18527456 |title=Something wrong with our **** chips today |work=The Economist |date= 7 April 2011|accessdate=13 June 2011}}</ref>
Line 669: Line 664:
 
Scud missiles utilize inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some missiles caused extensive casualties, while others caused little damage. Concerns were raised of possible chemical or biological warheads on these rockets, but if they existed, they weren't used.
 
Scud missiles utilize inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some missiles caused extensive casualties, while others caused little damage. Concerns were raised of possible chemical or biological warheads on these rockets, but if they existed, they weren't used.
   
The U.S. [[MIM-104 Patriot|Patriot missile]] was used in combat for the first time. The U.S. military claimed a high effectiveness against Scuds at the time, but later analysis gives figures as low as nine percent, with forty-five percent of the 158 Patriot launches being against debris or false targets.<ref name="Cirincione"/> The [[Ministry of Defence (Netherlands)|Dutch Ministry of Defense]], which also sent Patriot missiles to protect civilians in Israel and Turkey, later disputed the higher claim.<ref name=nederland2009 /> Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile's failure to engage an incoming Scud, resulting in deaths.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html |title=The Patriot Missile Failure |publisher=Ima.umn.edu |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Both the U.S. Army and the missile manufacturers maintained the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War.<ref name="Cirincione">{{cite web |first=Joseph |last=Cirincione |authorlink=Joseph Cirincione |title=The Performance of the Patriot Missile in the war |url=http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |archiveurl=http://replay.web.archive.org/20031223120310/http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |publisher=[[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]]|date=October 1992 |archivedate=23 December 2003 | format=PDF|accessdate=4 December 2005}}</ref>
+
The U.S. [[MIM-104 Patriot|Patriot missile]] was used in combat for the first time. The U.S. military claimed a high effectiveness against Scuds at the time, but later analysis gives figures as low as nine percent, with forty-five percent of the 158 Patriot launches being against debris or false targets.<ref name="Cirincione" /> The [[Ministry of Defence (Netherlands)|Dutch Ministry of Defense]], which also sent Patriot missiles to protect civilians in Israel and Turkey, later disputed the higher claim.<ref name="nederland2009" /> Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile's failure to engage an incoming Scud, resulting in deaths.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html |title=The Patriot Missile Failure |publisher=Ima.umn.edu |accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> Both the U.S. Army and the missile manufacturers maintained the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War.<ref name="Cirincione">{{cite web |first=Joseph |last=Cirincione |authorlink=Joseph Cirincione |title=The Performance of the Patriot Missile in the war |url=http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |archiveurl=http://replay.web.archive.org/20031223120310/http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf |publisher=[[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]]|date=October 1992 |archivedate=23 December 2003 | format=PDF|accessdate=4 December 2005}}</ref>
   
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 700: Line 695:
 
{{Refbegin|50em}}
 
{{Refbegin|50em}}
 
* {{cite web|last=Arbuthnot |first= Felicity |title=Allies Deliberately Poisoned Iraq Public Water Supply in Gulf War |url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/091700-01.htm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 17 September 2000 |publisher= Sunday Herald |location=Scotland}}
 
* {{cite web|last=Arbuthnot |first= Felicity |title=Allies Deliberately Poisoned Iraq Public Water Supply in Gulf War |url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/091700-01.htm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 17 September 2000 |publisher= Sunday Herald |location=Scotland}}
* {{Cite news|last=Atkinson |first= Rick |coauthors= Devroy, Ann |title=U.S. Claims Iraqi Nuclear Reactors Hit Hard |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012091.htm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 12 January 1991 |work=Washington Post | date=31 July 1998}}
+
* {{Cite news|last=Atkinson |first= Rick |coauthors= Devroy, Ann |title=U.S. Claims Iraqi Nuclear Reactors Hit Hard |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012091.htm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 31 July 1998 |work=Washington Post}}
 
* {{cite web|last= Austvik |first= Ole Gunnar | title=''The War Over the Price of Oil''| url=http://www.kaldor.no/energy/glob9205.htm |year=1993 |publisher= International Journal of Global Energy Issues}}
 
* {{cite web|last= Austvik |first= Ole Gunnar | title=''The War Over the Price of Oil''| url=http://www.kaldor.no/energy/glob9205.htm |year=1993 |publisher= International Journal of Global Energy Issues}}
 
* {{cite web|last= Bard |first= Mitchell |title=The Gulf War |url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html |accessdate=25 May 2009 |publisher= Jewish Virtual Library}}
 
* {{cite web|last= Bard |first= Mitchell |title=The Gulf War |url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Gulf_War.html |accessdate=25 May 2009 |publisher= Jewish Virtual Library}}
Line 717: Line 712:
 
* {{cite web|first=Ronald Andrew |last=Hoskinson |coauthors =Jarvis, Norman |title=Gulf War Photo Gallery |url=http://www.hoskinson.net/gulfwar/ |accessdate=4 December 2005 |year= 1994}}
 
* {{cite web|first=Ronald Andrew |last=Hoskinson |coauthors =Jarvis, Norman |title=Gulf War Photo Gallery |url=http://www.hoskinson.net/gulfwar/ |accessdate=4 December 2005 |year= 1994}}
 
* {{Cite news|first= Gilles |last= Kepel |title= From the Gulf War to the Taliban Jihad / Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam |year=2002}}
 
* {{Cite news|first= Gilles |last= Kepel |title= From the Gulf War to the Taliban Jihad / Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam |year=2002}}
* {{Cite book|first=Jon |last=Latimer |authorlink=Jon Latimer|title=Deception in War |location=London |publisher= John Murray |year= 2001 |isbn=0-7195-5605-8}}
+
* {{Cite book|first=Jon |last=Latimer |title=Deception in War |location=London |publisher= John Murray |year= 2001 |isbn=0-7195-5605-8}}
 
* {{Cite news|first=Allan |last=Little |title=Iraq coming in from the cold? |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/from_our_own_correspondent/newsid_34000/34588.stm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 1 December 1997 |publisher=BBC}}
 
* {{Cite news|first=Allan |last=Little |title=Iraq coming in from the cold? |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/from_our_own_correspondent/newsid_34000/34588.stm |accessdate=4 December 2005 |date= 1 December 1997 |publisher=BBC}}
 
* {{cite web|first=Richard S |last= Lowry |title=The Gulf War Chronicles |publisher= iUniverse |year=2003 and 2008 |url=http://www.gwchronicles.com}}
 
* {{cite web|first=Richard S |last= Lowry |title=The Gulf War Chronicles |publisher= iUniverse |year=2003 and 2008 |url=http://www.gwchronicles.com}}
Line 761: Line 756:
 
* ''[[The Fist of God]]'' (by [[Frederick Forsyth]]) ISBN 0-553-09126-3 {{OCLC|29595052}}
 
* ''[[The Fist of God]]'' (by [[Frederick Forsyth]]) ISBN 0-553-09126-3 {{OCLC|29595052}}
 
* ''To Die in Babylon'' by [[Harold Livingston]]
 
* ''To Die in Babylon'' by [[Harold Livingston]]
* ''Hogs'' [[dime novel]] series by James Ferro
+
* ''Hogs'' dime novel series by James Ferro
 
* ''Burning Desert'' by Zahida Zaidi
 
* ''Burning Desert'' by Zahida Zaidi
 
* ''Bravo Two Zero – The true story of an SAS Patrol behind enemy lines in Iraq'' (by [[Andy McNab]]) ISBN 0-440-21880-2 {{OCLC|31057589}}
 
* ''Bravo Two Zero – The true story of an SAS Patrol behind enemy lines in Iraq'' (by [[Andy McNab]]) ISBN 0-440-21880-2 {{OCLC|31057589}}
Line 780: Line 775:
   
 
{{Gulf War}}
 
{{Gulf War}}
  +
{{Iraq topics}}
 
 
{{Middle East conflicts}}
 
{{Middle East conflicts}}
 
{{American conflicts}}
 
{{American conflicts}}
{{US history}}
 
{{Wikipedia|Gulf War}}
 
   
 
{{Wikipedia|Gulf War}}
 
{{Wikipedia|Gulf War}}
 
 
[[Category:Gulf War|*]]
 
[[Category:Gulf War|*]]
 
[[Category:Conflicts in 1990]]
 
[[Category:Conflicts in 1990]]

Revision as of 14:37, 17 May 2020

Gulf War
Gulf War Photobox
Clockwise from top: USAF F-15Es, F-16s, and a USAF F-15C flying over burning Kuwaiti oil wells; British troops from the Staffordshire Regiment in Operation Granby; camera view from a Lockheed AC-130; Highway of Death; M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle
Date2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991
(6 months, 3 weeks and 5 days)
(Operation Desert Storm officially ended on 30 November 1995)[2]
LocationIraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Israel
Result

Decisive Coalition victory

  • Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait; Emir Jaber III restored
  • Sanctions against Iraq
  • Heavy casualties and destruction of Iraqi and Kuwaiti infrastructure
Belligerents

Coalition forces:

Flag of Kuwait Kuwait
United States
Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom
Flag of Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
Flag of France France
Flag of Canada Canada
Flag of Egypt Egypt
Flag of Syria Syria
Flag of Qatar Qatar
Flag of the United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates

Flag of Iraq (1963-1991) Iraq

Kuwait Republic of Kuwait
Commanders and leaders

Kuwait Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah
Flag of the United States George H. W. Bush
Flag of the United States Dan Quayle
Flag of the United States Dick Cheney
Flag of the United States Colin Powell
Flag of the United States Norman Schwarzkopf
Flag of the United States Charles Horner
Flag of the United States Frederick Franks
Flag of the United States Calvin Waller
Flag of the United States John A. Warden III
Flag of the United Kingdom Margaret Thatcher
Flag of the United Kingdom John Major
Flag of the United Kingdom Patrick Hine
Flag of the United Kingdom Andrew Wilson
Flag of the United Kingdom Peter de la Billière
Flag of the United Kingdom John Chapple
Flag of Saudi Arabia King Fahd
Flag of Saudi Arabia Prince Abdullah
Flag of Saudi Arabia Prince Sultan
Flag of Saudi Arabia Turki Al-Faisal
Flag of Saudi Arabia Saleh Al-Muhaya
Flag of Saudi Arabia Khalid bin Sultan[3][4]
Flag of Canada Kenneth J. Summers
Flag of France François Mitterrand
Flag of France Michel Roquejeoffre
Flag of Egypt Hosni Mubarak
Flag of Egypt Mohamed Hussein Tantawi
Flag of Syria Hafez al-Assad
Flag of Syria Mustafa Tlass
Flag of the United Arab Emirates Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan
Czechoslovakia Ján Való
Turkey Mikail Sağlam

Turkey Oğuzhan Metin

Iraq Saddam Hussein
Flag of Iraq (1963-1991) Ali Hassan al-Majid
Flag of Iraq (1963-1991) Salah Aboud Mahmoud

Flag of Iraq (1963-1991) Hussein Kamel al-Majid
Strength
956,600 including 697,000 U.S. troops[5][6] 650,000 soldiers
Casualties and losses
Coalition:
190 killed by enemy action, 44 killed by friendly fire, 248 killed by in-theater accidents
Total: 482 Killed
458 wounded[7] - 776 wounded[8]
Kuwait:
200 KIA[9]

20,000–35,000 killed

75,000+ wounded[8]

Kuwaiti civilian losses:
Over 1,000 killed[10]
Iraqi civilian losses:
About 3,664 killed[11]
Other civilian losses:
2 Israeli civilians killed directly, 297 injured[12]
72 Israeli civilians killed indirectly[13]

1 Saudi civilian killed, 65 injured[14]



The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) was a war waged by a U.N.-authorized coalition force from 34 nations led by the United States against Iraq in response to Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait.

The war is also known under other names, such as the Persian Gulf War, First Gulf War, Gulf War I, or the First Iraq War,[15][16][17] before the term "Iraq War" became identified instead with the 2003 Iraq War (also referred to in the U.S. as "Operation Iraqi Freedom").[18] Kuwait's invasion by Iraqi troops that began 2 August 1990 was met with international condemnation, and brought immediate economic sanctions against Iraq by members of the U.N. Security Council. U.S. President George H. W. Bush deployed U.S. forces into Saudi Arabia, and urged other countries to send their own forces to the scene. An array of nations joined the Coalition, the biggest coalition since World War II. The great majority of the Coalition's military forces were from the U.S., with Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Egypt as leading contributors, in that order. Saudi Arabia paid around US$36 billion of the US$60 billion cost.[19]

The war was marked by the beginning of live news on the front lines of the fight, with the primacy of the U.S. network CNN.[20][21][22] The war has also earned the nickname Video Game War after the daily broadcast images on board the U.S. bombers during Operation Desert Storm.[23][24]

The initial conflict to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait began with an aerial bombardment on 17 January 1991. This was followed by a ground assault on 24 February. This was a decisive victory for the Coalition forces, who liberated Kuwait and advanced into Iraqi territory. The Coalition ceased their advance, and declared a cease-fire 100 hours after the ground campaign started. Aerial and ground combat was confined to Iraq, Kuwait, and areas on Saudi Arabia's border. Iraq launched Scud missiles against Coalition military targets in Saudi Arabia and against Israel.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 passed in April 1991 established formal cease-fire terms. The controversies over enforcing this and subsequent resolutions would lead to the outbreak of another war 12 years later.

Etymology

The following names have been used to describe the conflict itself:

  • Gulf War and Persian Gulf War have been the most common terms for the conflict used within Western countries. These names have been used by the overwhelming majority of popular historians and journalists in the United States. The major problem with these terms is that the usage is ambiguous, having now been applied to at least three conflicts: see Gulf War (disambiguation). With no consensus of naming, various publications have attempted to refine the name. Some variants include:
    • War in the Gulf
    • 1990 Gulf War
    • The One-Year War: reference to the original Mobile Suit Gundam television show, likely due the Gulf War being relatively short just like the conflict presented in the television show.
    • Gulf War (1990–1991)
    • First Gulf War: to distinguish it from the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the subsequent war.
    • Second Gulf War: to distinguish it from the Iran–Iraq War.
  • Liberation of Kuwait (Arabic: تحرير الكويت taḥrīr al-kuwayt) is the term used by Kuwait and most of the Coalition's Arab states including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates.
  • In addition to "Gulf War" (French: la Guerre du Golfe), the names War of Kuwait and Second Gulf War are commonly used in France[25] and Germany.[26]
  • Mother of Battles (Arabic: أم المعارك umm al-ma‘ārik) is the term used by Iraq.
  • Other names sometimes used include Iraq-Kuwait conflict and U.N.-Iraq conflict.

Operational names

Most of the Coalition states used various names for their operations and the war's operational phases. These are sometimes incorrectly used as the conflict's overall name, especially the U.S. Desert Storm:

  • Operation Desert Shield was the U.S. operational name for the U.S. buildup of forces and Saudi Arabia's defense from 2 August 1990, to 16 January 1991.
  • Operation Desert Storm was the U.S. name of the airland conflict from 17 January 1991, through 11 April 1991.
    • Operation Desert Sabre (early name Operation Desert Sword) was the U.S. name for the airland offensive against the Iraqi Army in the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations (the "100-hour war") from 24–28 February 1991, in itself, part of Operation Desert Storm.
  • Operation Desert Farewell was the name given to the return of U.S. units and equipment to the U.S. in 1991 after Kuwait's liberation, sometimes referred to as Operation Desert Calm.
  • Operation Granby was the British name for British military activities during the operations and conflict.
  • Opération Daguet was the French name for French military activities in the conflict.
  • Operation FRICTION was the name of the Canadian operations
  • Operazione Locusta (Italian for Locust) was the Italian name for the operations and conflict.

In addition, various phases of each operation may have a unique operational name.

Campaign names

The U.S. divided the conflict into three major campaigns:

  • Defense of Saudi Arabian country for the period 2 August 1990, through 16 January 1991.
  • Liberation and Defense of Kuwait for the period 17 January 1991, through 11 April 1991.
  • Southwest Asia Cease-Fire for the period 12 April 1991, through 30 November 1995, including Operation Provide Comfort.

History

Background

Throughout the Cold War, Iraq had been an ally of the Soviet Union, and there was a history of friction between it and the United States. The U.S. was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–Palestinian politics, and its disapproval of the nature of the peace between Israel and Egypt. The U.S. also disliked Iraqi support for many Arab and Palestinian militant groups such as Abu Nidal, which led to Iraq's inclusion on the developing U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism on 29 December 1979. The U.S. remained officially neutral after Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980, which became the Iran–Iraq War, although it provided resources, political support, and some "non-military" aircraft.[27] In March 1982, Iran began a successful counteroffensive (Operation Undeniable Victory), and the U.S. increased its support for Iraq to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender. In a U.S. bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Ostensibly this was because of improvement in the regime’s record, although former U.S. Assistant Defense Secretary Noel Koch later stated, "No one had any doubts about [the Iraqis'] continued involvement in terrorism... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."[28] With Iraq's newfound success in the war, and the Iranian rebuff of a peace offer in July, arms sales to Iraq reached a record spike in 1982. When Iraqi President Saddam Hussein expelled Abu Nidal to Syria at the U.S.' request in November 1983, the Reagan administration sent Donald Rumsfeld to meet Saddam as a special envoy and to cultivate ties. By the time the ceasefire with Iran was signed in August 1988, Iraq was heavily debt-ridden and tensions within society were rising.[29] Most of its debt was owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused.[30]

Ku-map

Map of Kuwait

The Iraq-Kuwait dispute also involved Iraqi claims to Kuwait as Iraqi territory.[27] Kuwait had been a part of the Ottoman Empire's province of Basra, something that Iraq claimed made it rightful Iraq territory.[31] Its ruling dynasty, the al-Sabah family, had concluded a protectorate agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for its foreign affairs to the United Kingdom. The UK drew the border between the two countries in 1922, making Iraq virtually landlocked.[27] Kuwait rejected Iraqi attempts to secure further provisions in the region.[31]

Iraq also accused Kuwait of exceeding its OPEC quotas for oil production. In order for the cartel to maintain its desired price of $18 a barrel, discipline was required. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait were consistently overproducing; the latter at least in part to repair losses caused by Iranian attacks in the Iran–Iraq War and to pay for the losses of an economic scandal. The result was a slump in the oil price – as low as $10 a barrel – with a resulting loss of $7 billion a year to Iraq, equal to its 1989 balance of payments deficit.[32] Resulting revenues struggled to support the government's basic costs, let alone repair Iraq's damaged infrastructure. Jordan and Iraq both looked for more discipline, with little success.[33] The Iraqi government described it as a form of economic warfare,[33] which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait slant-drilling across the border into Iraq's Rumaila oil field.[34] At the same time, Saddam looked for closer ties with those Arab states that had supported Iraq in the war. This was supported by the U.S., who believed that Iraqi ties with pro-Western Gulf states would help bring and maintain Iraq inside the U.S.' sphere of influence.[35]

In 1989, it appeared that Saudi-Iraqi relations, strong during the war, would be maintained. A pact of non-interference and non-aggression was signed between the countries, followed by a Kuwaiti-Iraqi deal for Iraq to supply Kuwait with water for drinking and irrigation, although a request for Kuwait to lease Iraq Umm Qasr was rejected.[35] Saudi-backed development projects were hampered by Iraq's large debts, even with the demobilization of 200,000 soldiers. Iraq also looked to increase arms production so as to become an exporter, although the success of these projects was also restrained by Iraq's obligations; in Iraq, resentment to OPEC's controls mounted.[36]

Iraq's relations with its Arab neighbors – in particular Egypt – were degraded by mounting violence in Iraq against expatriate groups, well-employed during the war, by Iraqi unemployed, among them demobilized soldiers. These events drew little notice outside the Arab world because of fast-moving events in Eastern Europe. The U.S. did, however, begin to condemn Iraq's human rights record, including the well-known use of torture.[37] The UK also condemned the execution of Farzad Bazoft, a journalist working for the British newspaper The Observer.[27] Following Saddam's declaration that "binary chemical weapons" would be used on Israel if it used military force against Iraq, Washington halted part of its funding.[38] A U.N. mission to the Israeli-occupied territories, where riots had resulted in Palestinian deaths, was vetoed by the U.S., making Iraq deeply skeptical of U.S. foreign policy aims in the region, combined with the U.S.' reliance on Middle Eastern energy reserves.[39]

In early July 1990, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the CIA reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the U.S. naval fleet in the Persian Gulf was placed on alert. Saddam believed an anti-Iraq conspiracy was developing– Kuwait had begun talks with Iran, and Iraq's rival Syria had arranged a visit to Egypt.[40] On 15 July 1990, Saddam's government laid out its combined objections to the Arab League, including that policy moves were costing Iraq $1 billion a year, that Kuwait was still using the Rumaila oil field, that loans made by the U.A.E. and Kuwait could not be considered debts to its "Arab brothers".[40] He threatened force against Kuwait and the U.A.E. saying "The policies of some Arab rulers are American... They are inspired by America to undermine Arab interests and security." [41] The U.S. sent aerial planes and combat ships to the Persian Gulf in response to these threats.[42] Discussions in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, mediated on the Arab League's behalf by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, were held on 31 July and led Mubarak to believe that a peaceful course could be established.[43]

On the 25th, Saddam met with April Glaspie, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, in Baghdad. the Iraqi leader attacked American policy with regards to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates:

"So what can it mean when America says it will now protect its friends? It can only mean prejudice against Iraq. This stance plus maneuvers and statements which have been made has encouraged the U.A.E. and Kuwait to disregard Iraqi rights... If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and force. We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. But we too can harm you. Everyone can cause harm according to their ability and their size. We cannot come all the way to you in the United States, but individual Arabs may reach you... We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends." [44]

Glaspie replied:

"I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait... Frankly, we can only see that you have deployed massive troops in the south. Normally that would not be any of our business. But when this happens in the context of what you said on your national day, then when we read the details in the two letters of the Foreign Minister, then when we see the Iraqi point of view that the measures taken by the U.A.E. and Kuwait is, in the final analysis, parallel to military aggression against Iraq, then it would be reasonable for me to be concerned." [44]

Saddam stated that he would attempt last-ditch negotiations with the Kuwaitis but Iraq "would not accept death".[44]

According to Glaspie's own account, she stated in reference to the precise border between Kuwait and Iraq, "(...) that she had served in Kuwait 20 years before; 'then, as now, we took no position on these Arab affairs'."[45] Glaspie similarly believed that war was not imminent.[43]

Invasion of Kuwait

Kuwaiti main battle tanks

Kuwaiti Armed Forces M-84 main battle tanks.

Iraqi T-72 tanks

Iraqi Army T-72M main battle tanks. The T-72M tank was a common Iraqi battle tank used in the Gulf War.

A-4KUs 13Feb1991

Kuwait Air Force McDonnell Douglas A-4KU Skyhawk ground-attack aircraft.

Iraqi Model 214ST SuperTransport helicopter, 1991

Iraqi Air Force Bell 214ST transport helicopter.

The result of the Jeddah talks was an Iraqi demand for $10 billion to cover the lost revenues from Rumaila; the Kuwaiti response was to offer $9 billion. The Iraqi response was to immediately order the invasion.[46] On 2 August 1990, Iraq launched the invasion by bombing Kuwait's capital, Kuwait City.

At the time of the invasion, the Kuwaiti military was believed to have numbered 16,000 men, arranged into three armored, one mechanised infantry and one under-strength artillery brigade.[47] The pre-war strength of the Kuwait Air Force was around 2,200 Kuwaiti personnel, with 80 aircraft and forty helicopters.[47] In spite of Iraqi saber-rattling, Kuwait didn't have its forces on alert; the army had been stood down on 19 July.[48]

By 1988, at the Iran–Iraq War's end, the Iraqi Army was the world's fourth largest army; it consisted of 955,000 standing soldiers and 650,000 paramilitary forces in the Popular Army. According to John Childs and André Corvisier, a low estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding 4,500 tanks, 484 combat aircraft and 232 combat helicopters.[49] According to Michael Knights, a high estimate shows the Iraqi Army capable of fielding one million men and 850,000 reservists, 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, 700 combat aircraft and helicopters; and held 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias, and had a strong air defense.[50]

Iraqi commandos infiltrated the Kuwaiti border first to prepare for the major units which began the attack at midnight. The Iraqi attack had two prongs, with the primary attack force driving south straight for Kuwait City down the main highway, and a supporting attack force entering Kuwait farther west, but then turning and driving east, cutting off Kuwait City from the country's southern half. The commander of a Kuwaiti armored battalion, 35th Armoured Brigade, deployed them against the Iraqi attack and was able to conduct a robust defense (Battle of the Bridges), near Al Jahra, west of Kuwait City.[51]

Kuwaiti aircraft scrambled to meet the invading force, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. A few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces.[9]

The main Iraqi thrust into Kuwait City was conducted by commandos deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city from the sea, while other divisions seized the airports and two airbases. The Iraqis attacked the Dasman Palace, the Royal Residence of Kuwait's Emir, Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, which was defended by the Emiri Guard supported with M-84 tanks. In the process, the Iraqis killed Fahad Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Emir's youngest brother.

Within 12 hours, most resistance had ended within Kuwait and the royal family had fled, leaving Iraq in control of most of Kuwait.[46] After two days of intense combat, most of the Kuwaiti military were either overrun by the Iraqi Republican Guard, or had escaped to Saudi Arabia. The Emir and key ministers were able to get out and head south along the highway for refuge in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi ground forces consolidated their control of Kuwait City, then headed south and redeployed along the Saudi border. After the decisive Iraqi victory, Saddam initially installed a puppet regime known as the "Provisional Government of Free Kuwait" before installing his cousin Ali Hassan al-Majid as Kuwait's governor on 8 August.

Run-up to the war

Diplomatic means

A key element of US political-military and energy economic planning occurred in early 1984. The Iran-Iraq war had been going on for five years and there were significant casualties on both sides, reaching hundreds of thousands. Within the Reagan National Security Council concern was growing that the war could spread beyond the boundaries of the two belligerents. A National Security Planning Group meeting was called chaired by then Vice President George Bush to review US options. It was determined that there was a high likelihood that the conflict would spread into Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, but that the US had little capability to defend the region. Furthermore it was determined that a prolonged war in the region would induce much higher oil prices and threaten the fragile recovery of the world economy which was just beginning to gain momentum. On 22 May 1984, President Reagan was briefed on the project conclusions in the Oval Office by William Flynn Martin who had served as the head of the NSC staff that organized the study.The full declassified presentation can be seen here.[52] The conclusions were threefold:  first oil stocks needed to be increased among members of the International Energy Agency and, if necessary, released early in the event of oil market disruption; second the United States needed to beef up the security of friendly Arab states in the region and thirdly an embargo should be placed on sales of military equipment to Iran and Iraq. The Plan was approved by the President and later affirmed by the G-7 leaders headed by Margaret Thatcher in the London Summit of 1984. The plan was implemented and became the basis for US preparedness to respond to the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait in 1991.

Within hours of the invasion, Kuwait and U.S. delegations requested a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, which passed Resolution 660, condemning the invasion and demanding a withdrawal of Iraqi troops.[53] On 3 August, the Arab League passed its own resolution, which called for a solution to the conflict from within the League, and warned against outside intervention; Iraq and Libya were the only two Arab League states which opposed a resolution for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. The PLO opposed it as well.[54] The Arab states of Yemen and Jordan – a Western ally which bordered Iraq and relied on the country for economic support[55] – opposed military intervention from non-Arab states.[56] The Arab state of Sudan aligned itself with Saddam.[55]

On 6 August, Resolution 661 placed economic sanctions on Iraq.[57] Resolution 665 followed soon after, which authorized a naval blockade to enforce the sanctions. It said the "use of measures commensurate to the specific circumstances as may be necessary ... to halt all inward and outward maritime shipping in order to inspect and verify their cargoes and destinations and to ensure strict implementation of resolution 661."[58]

Bush troops

President Bush visiting American troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.

From the beginning, U.S. officials insisted on a total Iraqi pullout from Kuwait, without any linkage to other Middle Eastern problems, fearing any concessions would strengthen Iraqi influence in the region for years to come.[59]

On 12 August 1990, Saddam "propose[d] that all cases of occupation, and those cases that have been portrayed as occupation, in the region, be resolved simultaneously". Specifically, he called for Israel to withdraw from occupied territories in Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and "mutual withdrawals by Iraq and Iran and arrangement for the situation in Kuwait." He also called for a replacement of U.S. troops that mobilized in Saudi Arabia in response to Kuwait's invasion with "an Arab force", as long as that force did not involve Egypt. Additionally, he requested an "immediate freeze of all boycott and siege decisions" and a general normalization of relations with Iraq.[60] From the beginning of the crisis, President Bush was strongly opposed to any "linkage" between Iraq's occupation of Kuwait and the Palestinian issue.[61]

File:Stuartlockwood.jpg

Saddam Hussein detained several Westerners, with video footage shown on state television

On 23 August, Saddam appeared on state television with Western hostages to whom he had refused exit visas. In the video, he asks a young British boy, Stuart Lockwood, whether he is getting his milk, and goes on to say, through his interpreter, "We hope your presence as guests here will not be for too long. Your presence here, and in other places, is meant to prevent the scourge of war."[62]

Another Iraqi proposal communicated in August 1990 was delivered to U.S. National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft by an unidentified Iraqi official. The official communicated to the White House that Iraq would "withdraw from Kuwait and allow foreigners to leave" provided that the U.N. lifted sanctions, allowed "guaranteed access to the Persian Gulf through the Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah", and allowed Iraq to "gain full control of the Rumaila oil field that extends slightly into Kuwaiti territory". The proposal also "include[d] offers to negotiate an oil agreement with the United States 'satisfactory to both nations' national security interests,' develop a joint plan 'to alleviate Iraq's economical and financial problems' and 'jointly work on the stability of the gulf.'"[63]

In December 1990, Iraq made a proposal to withdraw from Kuwait provided that foreign troops left the region and that an agreement was reached regarding the Palestinian problem and the dismantlement of both Israel's and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The White House rejected the proposal.[64] The PLO's Yasser Arafat expressed that neither he nor Saddam insisted that solving the Israel-Palestine issues should be a precondition to solving the issues in Kuwait, though he did acknowledge a "strong link" between these problems.[65]

Ultimately, the U.S. stuck to its position that there would be no negotiations until Iraq withdrew from Kuwait and that they should not grant Iraq concessions, lest they give the impression that Iraq benefited from its military campaign.[59] Also, when U.S. Secretary of State James Baker met with Tariq Aziz in Geneva, Switzerland, for last minute peace talks in early 1991, Aziz reportedly made no concrete proposals and did not outline any hypothetical Iraqi moves.[66]

On 29 November 1990, the Security Council passed Resolution 678 which gave Iraq until 15 January 1991 to withdraw from Kuwait and empowered states to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq out of Kuwait after the deadline.

On 14 January 1991, France proposed that the U.N. Security Council call for "a rapid and massive withdrawal" from Kuwait along with a statement to Iraq that Council members would bring their "active contribution" to a settlement of the region's other problems, "in particular, of the Arab-Israeli conflict and in particular to the Palestinian problem by convening, at an appropriate moment, an international conference" to assure "the security, stability and development of this region of the world." The French proposal was supported by Belgium (at the moment one of the rotating Council members), Germany, Spain, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and several non-aligned nations. The U.S., the UK, and the Soviet Union, rejected it; U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Thomas Pickering stated that the French proposal was unacceptable, because it went beyond previous Council resolutions on the Iraqi invasion.[67][68][69] France dropped this proposal when it found "no tangible sign of interest" from Baghdad.[70]

Military means

Multiple F-15E parked during Operation Desert Shield

F-15Es parked during Operation Desert Shield.

One of the West's main concerns was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following Kuwait's conquest, the Iraqi Army was within easy striking distance of Saudi oil fields. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Saddam control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq some 26 billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis had backed Iraq in that war, as they feared the influence of Shia Iran's Islamic revolution on its own Shia minority. After the war, Saddam felt he shouldn't have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by fighting Iran.

Soon after his conquest of Kuwait, Saddam began verbally attacking the Saudis. He argued that the U.S.-supported Saudi state was an illegitimate and unworthy guardian of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. He combined the language of the Islamist groups that had recently fought in Afghanistan with the rhetoric Iran had long used to attack the Saudis.[71]

Stinger Crew Operation Desert Shield

U.S. Army soldiers from the 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade during the Gulf War

Acting on the Carter Doctrine's policy, and out of fear the Iraqi Army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, U.S. President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the U.S. would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia under the codename Operation Desert Shield. Operation Desert Shield began on 7 August 1990 when U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, King Fahd, who had earlier called for U.S. military assistance.[72] This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be Iraq's 19th province and Saddam named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid, as its military-governor.[73]

The U.S. Navy dispatched two naval battle groups built around the aircraft carriers USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and USS Independence to the Gulf, where they were ready by 8 August. The U.S. also sent the battleships USS Missouri and USS Wisconsin to the region. A total of 48 U.S. Air Force F-15s from the 1st Fighter Wing at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia, and immediately commenced round the clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border to discourage further Iraqi military advances. They were joined by 36 F-15 A-Ds from the 36th Tactical Fighter Wing at Bitburg, Germany. The Bitburg contingent was based at Al Kharj Air Base, approximately 1-hour southeast of Riyadh. The 36th TFW would be responsible for 11 confirmed Iraqi Air Force aircraft shot down during the war. There were also two Air National Guard units stationed at Al Kharj Air Base, the South Carolina Air National Guard's 169th Fighter Wing flew bombing missions with 24 F-16s flying 2,000 combat missions and dropping 4 million pounds of munitions, and the New York Air National Guard's 174th Fighter Wing from Syracuse flew 24 F-16s on bombing missions. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via fast sealift ships, allowing a quick buildup.

Creating a coalition

A series of U.N. Security Council resolutions and Arab League resolutions were passed regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. One of the most important was Resolution 678, passed on 29 November 1990, which gave Iraq a withdrawal deadline until 15 January 1991, and authorized "all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660", and a diplomatic formulation authorizing the use of force if Iraq failed to comply.[74]

Bush saudi arabia

General Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. and President George H. W. Bush visit U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia on Thanksgiving Day, 1990.

A coalition of forces opposing Iraq's aggression was formed, consisting of forces from 34 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the U.S. itself.[75] U.S. Army General Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. was designated to be the commander of the Coalition forces in the Persian Gulf area.

Although they didn't contribute any forces, Japan and Germany made financial contributions totaling $10 billion and $6.6 billion respectively. U.S. troops represented 73% of the Coalition’s 956,600 troops in Iraq.

Many of the Coalition's forces were reluctant to join. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair, or didn't want to increase U.S. influence in the Middle East. In the end, however, many nations were persuaded by Iraq’s belligerence towards other Arab states, offers of economic aid or debt forgiveness, and threats to withhold aid.[76]

Justification for intervention
Cheney meeting with Prince Sultan

Cheney meets with Prince Sultan, Minister of Defence and Aviation in Saudi Arabia to discuss how to handle the invasion of Kuwait

The U.S. and the U.N. gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the U.S. moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable geopolitical importance. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion, U.S. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney made the first of several visits to Saudi Arabia where King Fahd requested U.S. military assistance. During a speech in a special joint session of the U.S. Congress given on 11 September 1990, U.S. President George H. W. Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."[77]

The Pentagon stated that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were this information's source, but this was later alleged to be false. A reporter for the St. Petersburg Times acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images made at the time in question, which showed nothing but empty desert.[78]

Powell, Schwarzkopf, and Wolfowitz at Cheney press conference, February 1991

Gen. Colin Powell (left), Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr., and Paul Wolfowitz (right) listen as Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney addresses reporters regarding the 1991 Gulf War.

Other justifications for foreign involvement included Iraq’s history of human rights abuses under Saddam. Iraq was also known to possess biological weapons and chemical weapons, which Saddam had used against Iranian troops during the Iran–Iraq War and against his own country's Kurdish population in the Al-Anfal Campaign. Iraq was also known to have a nuclear weapons program, but the report about it from January 1991 was partially declassified by the CIA on 26 May 2001.[79]

Although there were human rights abuses committed in Kuwait by the invading Iraqi military, the ones best known in the U.S. were inventions of the public relations firm hired by the government of Kuwait to influence U.S. opinion in favor of military intervention. Shortly after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the organization Citizens for a Free Kuwait was formed in the U.S. It hired the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for about $11 million, paid by Kuwait's government.[80]

Among many other means of influencing U.S. opinion (distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to U.S. soldiers deployed in the region, 'Free Kuwait' T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations), the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the U.S. Congress in which a woman identifying herself as a nurse working in the Kuwait City hospital described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.[81]

The story was an influence in tipping both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. A year after the war, however, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The woman who had testified was found to be a member of Kuwait's Royal Family, in fact the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the U.S.[81] She hadn't lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.

The details of the Hill & Knowlton public relations campaign, including the incubator testimony, were published in John R. MacArthur's Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War (Berkeley, CA: University of CA Press, 1992), and came to wide public attention when an Op-ed by MacArthur was published in The New York Times. This prompted a reexamination by Amnesty International, which had originally promoted an account alleging even greater numbers of babies torn from incubators than the original fake testimony. After finding no evidence to support it, the organization issued a retraction. President Bush then repeated the incubator allegations on television.

At the same time, the Iraqi Army committed several well-documented crimes during its occupation of Kuwait, such as the summary execution without trial of three brothers after which their bodies were stacked in a pile and left to decay in a public street.[82] Iraqi troops also ransacked and looted private Kuwaiti homes; one residence was repeatedly defecated in.[83] A resident later commented, "The whole thing was violence for the sake of violence, destruction for the sake of destruction... Imagine a surrealistic painting by Salvador Dalí".[84]

Early battles

Air campaign

F-117 Nighthawk Front

The USAF F-117 Nighthawk, one of the key players in Desert Storm.

The Gulf War began with an extensive aerial bombing campaign on 17 January 1991. The Coalition flew over 100,000 sorties, dropping 88,500 tons of bombs,[85] and widely destroying military and civilian infrastructure.[86] The air campaign was commanded by USAF Lieutenant General Chuck Horner, who briefly served as U.S. Central Command's Commander-in-Chief – Forward while General Schwarzkopf was still in the U.S.

A day after the deadline set in Resolution 678, the Coalition launched a massive air campaign, which began the general offensive codenamed Operation Desert Storm. The first priority for Coalition forces was the destruction of Iraq's Air Force and anti-aircraft facilities. The sorties were launched mostly from Saudi Arabia and the six Coalition carrier battle groups (CVBG) in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.

Destroyed Iraqi T-54A or Type 59

An Iraqi T-54A or Type 59 tank lies destroyed after a Coalition bombing attack during Operation Desert Storm.

The next Coalition targets were command and communication facilities. Saddam Hussein had closely micromanaged Iraqi forces in the Iran–Iraq War, and initiative at lower levels was discouraged. Coalition planners hoped that Iraqi resistance would quickly collapse if deprived of command and control.

The air campaign's third and largest phase targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: Scud missile launchers, weapons research facilities, and naval forces. About one-third of the Coalition's air power was devoted to attacking Scuds, some of which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. U.S. and British special operations forces had been covertly inserted into western Iraq to aid in the search and destruction of Scuds.

Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including Man-portable air-defense systems, were surprisingly ineffective against Coalition aircraft and the Coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 of which were the result of Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground fired weapons.[87][88] One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.[89]

Iraqi missile strikes on Israel and Saudi Arabia

File:Scud TEL launch.jpg

Scud Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) with missile in upright position.

Iraq's government made no secret that it would attack if invaded. Prior to the war's start, Tariq Aziz, Iraq's English-speaking Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, was asked in the aftermath of the failed U.S.-Iraq peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, by a reporter. "Mr. Foreign Minister, if war starts...will you attack?" His response was, "Yes, absolutely, yes."[90][91]

Five hours after the first attacks, Iraq's state radio broadcast declaring that "The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins." Iraq fired eight missiles the next day. These missile attacks were to continue throughout the war. A total of 88 Scud missiles were fired by Iraq during the war's seven weeks.[92]

Iraq hoped to provoke a military response from Israel. The Iraqi government hoped that many Arab states would withdraw from the Coalition, as they would be reluctant to fight alongside Israel.[61] Following the first attacks, Israeli Air Force jets were deployed to patrol the northern airspace with Iraq. Israel prepared to militarily retaliate, as its policy for the previous forty years had always been retaliation. However, President Bush pressured Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir not to retaliate and withdraw Israeli jets, fearing that if Israel attacked Iraq, the other Arab nations would either desert the Coalition or join Iraq. It was also feared that if Israel used Syrian or Jordanian airspace to attack Iraq, they would intervene in the war on Iraq's side or attack Israel. The Coalition promised to deploy Patriot missiles to defend Israel if it refrained from responding to the Scud attacks.[93][94]

The Scud missiles targeting Israel were relatively ineffective, as firing at extreme range resulted in a dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. Jewish Virtual Library states that a total of 74 Israelis died as a result of the Iraqi attacks: two directly and the rest from suffocation and heart attacks.[13] Approximately 230 Israelis were injured.[12] In one incident, a strike on a neighborhood in Tel Aviv caused three deaths and 96 injuries.[95] Extensive property damage was also caused, and according to Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Damage to general property consisted of 1,302 houses, 6142 apartments, 23 public buildings, 200 shops and 50 cars."[96] It was feared that Iraq would fire missiles filled with nerve agents or sarin. As a result, Israel's government issued gas masks to its citizens. When the first Iraqi missiles hit Israel, some people injected themselves with an antidote for nerve gas.

AlHussein-Strike

Aftermath of an Iraq Armed forces strike on U.S. barracks.

In response to the threat of Scuds on Israel, the U.S. rapidly sent a Patriot missile air defense artillery battalion to Israel along with two batteries of MIM-104 Patriot missiles for the protection of civilians.[97] Coalition air forces were also extensively exercised in "Scud hunts" in the Iraqi desert, trying to locate the camouflaged trucks before they fired their missiles at Israel or Saudi Arabia. On the ground, special operations forces also infiltrated Iraq, tasked with locating and destroying Scuds. Once special operations were combined with air patrols, the number of attacks fell sharply, then increased slightly as Iraqi forces adjusted to Coalition tactics.

The Royal Netherlands Air Force also deployed Patriot missiles to counter the Scud threat. The Dutch Defense Ministry later stated that the military use of the Patriot missile system was largely ineffective, but its psychological value was high, even though the Patriot missiles caused far more casualties and property damage than the Scuds themselves did.[98][99] It has been suggested that the sturdy construction techniques used in Israeli cities, coupled with the fact that Scuds were only launched at night, played an important role in limiting the number of casualties from Scud attacks.[12]

As the Scud attacks continued, the Israelis grew increasingly impatient, and considered taking unilateral military action against Iraq. After the attack on Ramat Gan, the Israelis warned that unless the U.S. stopped the Scuds, Israel would. At one point, Israeli commandos were loaded onto helicopters prepared to fly into Iraq, but the mission was called off after a phone call from U.S. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, reporting on the extent of Coalition efforts to destroy Scuds and emphasizing that Israeli intervention could endanger U.S. forces.[100]

In addition to the attacks on Israel, 47 Scud missiles were fired into Saudi Arabia, and one missile was fired at Bahrain and another at Qatar. The missiles were fired at both military and civilian targets. One Saudi civilian was killed, and 78 others were injured. No casualties were reported in Bahrain or Qatar. The Saudi government issued all its citizens and expatriates with gas masks in the event of Iraq using missiles with chemical or biological warheads. The government broadcast alerts and 'all clear' messages over television to warn citizens during Scud attacks.

On 25 February 1991, a Scud missile hit a U.S. Army barracks of the 14th Quartermaster Detachment, out of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, stationed in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 soldiers and injuring over 100.[14]

Battle of Khafji

Question book-new

This article does not contain any citations or references. Please improve this article by adding a reference. For information about how to add references, see Template:Citation.

Battle of Khafji 1991

Military operations during Khafji's liberation

On 29 January, Iraqi forces attacked and occupied the lightly defended Saudi city of Khafji with tanks and infantry. The Battle of Khafji ended two days later when the Iraqis were driven back by the Saudi Arabian National Guard, supported by Qatari forces and U.S. Marines. The allied forces used extensive artillery fire.

Casualties were heavy on both sides, although Iraqi forces sustained substantially more dead and captured than the allied forces. Eleven Americans were killed in two separate friendly fire incidents, an additional 14 U.S. airmen were killed when their AC-130 gunship was shot down by an Iraqi surface-to-air missile, and two U.S. soldiers were captured during the battle. Saudi and Qatari forces had a total of 18 dead. Iraqi forces in Khafji had 60–300 dead and 400 captured.

Khafji was a strategically important city immediately after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Iraq's reluctance to commit several armored divisions to the occupation, and its subsequent use of Khafji as a launching pad into the initially lightly defended eastern Saudi Arabia was assessed by Coalition intelligence as a grave strategic error. Not only would Iraq have secured a majority of Middle Eastern oil supplies, but it would have found itself better able to threaten the subsequent U.S. deployment along superior defensive lines.[101]

Ground campaign

DesertStormMap v2

Ground troop movements 24–28 February 1991 during Operation Desert Storm

The Coalition forces dominated the air with their technological advantages. Coalition forces had the significant advantage of being able to operate under the protection of air supremacy that had been achieved by their air forces before the start of the main ground offensive. Coalition forces also had two key technological advantages:

  1. The Coalition main battle tanks, such as the U.S. M1 Abrams, British Challenger 1, and Kuwaiti M-84AB were vastly superior to the Chinese Type 69 and domestically built T-72 tanks used by the Iraqis, with crews better trained and armored doctrine better developed.
  2. The use of GPS made it possible for Coalition forces to navigate without reference to roads or other fixed landmarks. This, along with aerial reconnaissance, allowed them to fight a battle of maneuver rather than a battle of encounter: they knew where they were and where the enemy was, so they could attack a specific target rather than searching on the ground for enemy forces.

Kuwait's Liberation

U.S. decoy attacks by air attacks and naval gunfire the night before Kuwait's liberation were designed to make the Iraqis believe the main Coalition ground attack would focus on central Kuwait.

3 AD Iraq

U.S. tanks from the 3rd Armored Division along the Line of Departure.

An abandoned Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into Kuwait City during the Gulf War

Iraqi Type 69 tank on the road into Kuwait City during the Gulf War.

An Iraqi T-54, T-55 or Type 59 and T-55A on Basra-Kuwait Highway near Kuwait

Two Iraqi tanks lie abandoned near Kuwait City on 26 February 1991.

For months, American units in Saudi Arabia had been under almost constant Iraqi artillery fire, as well as threats from Scud missile or chemical attacks. On 24 February 1991, the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions, and the 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion crossed into Kuwait and headed toward Kuwait City. They encountered trenches, barbed wire, and minefields. However, these positions were poorly defended, and were overrun in the first few hours. Several tank battles took place, but apart from that, Coalition troops encountered minimal resistance, as most Iraqi troops surrendered. The general pattern was that the Iraqis would put up a short fight before surrendering. However, Iraqi air defenses shot down nine U.S. aircraft. Meanwhile, forces from Arab states advanced into Kuwait from the east, encountering little resistance and suffering few casualties.

Despite the successes of Coalition forces, it was feared that the Iraqi Republican Guard would escape into Iraq before it could be destroyed. It was decided to send British armored forces into Kuwait fifteen hours ahead of schedule, and to send U.S. forces after the Republican Guard. The Coalition advance was preceded by a heavy artillery and rocket barrage, after which 150,000 troops and 1,500 tanks began their advance. Iraqi forces in Kuwait counterattacked against U.S. troops, acting on a direct order from Saddam himself. Despite the intense combat, the Americans repulsed the Iraqis and continued to advance towards Kuwait City.

Kuwaiti forces were tasked with liberating the city. Iraqi troops offered only light resistance. The Kuwaitis lost one soldier killed and one plane shot down, and quickly liberated the city. On 27 February, Saddam ordered a retreat from Kuwait, and President Bush declared it liberated. However, an Iraqi unit at Kuwait International Airport appeared not to have gotten the message, and fiercely resisted. U.S. Marines had to fight for hours before securing the airport, after which Kuwait was declared secure. After four days of fighting, Iraqi forces were expelled from Kuwait. As part of a scorched earth policy, they set fire to nearly 700 oil wells, and placed land mines around the wells to make extinguishing the fires more difficult.

Initial moves into Iraq

Destroyed Iraqi T-62

Iraqi T-62 knocked out by 3rd Armored Division fire

RemnantsofLAV25

Destroyed LAV-25

The war's ground phase was officially designated Operation Desert Saber.[102]

The first units to move into Iraq were three patrols of the British Special Air Service's B squadron, call signs Bravo One Zero, Bravo Two Zero, and Bravo Three Zero, in late January. These eight-man patrols landed behind Iraqi lines to gather intelligence on the movements of Scud mobile missile launchers, which couldn't be detected from the air, as they were hidden under bridges and camouflage netting during the day.[103] Other objectives included the destruction of the launchers and their fiber-optic communications arrays that lay in pipelines and relayed coordinates to the TEL operators that were launching attacks against Israel. The operations were designed to prevent any possible Israeli intervention. Due to lack of sufficient ground cover to carry out their assignment, One Zero and Three Zero abandoned their operations, while Two Zero remained, and was later compromised, with only Sergeant Chris Ryan escaping to Syria.

Elements of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division of the U.S. Army performed a direct attack into Iraq on 15 February 1991, followed by one in force on 20 February that led directly through 7 Iraqi divisions which were caught off guard.[citation needed] From 15–20 February, the Battle of Wadi Al-Batin took place inside Iraq; this was the first of two attacks by 1 Battalion 5th Cavalry of the 1st Cavalry Division. It was a feint attack, designed to make the Iraqis think that a Coalition invasion would take place from the south. The Iraqis fiercely resisted, and the Americans eventually withdrew as planned back into the Wadi Al-Batin. Three U.S. soldiers were killed and nine wounded as well with only 1 M-2 IFV turret destroyed, but they had taken 40 prisoners and destroyed five tanks, and successfully deceived the Iraqis. This attack led the way for the XVIII Airborne Corps to sweep around behind the 1st Cav and attack Iraqi forces to the west. On 22 February 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed ceasefire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within six weeks following a total cease-fire, and called for monitoring of the cease-fire and withdrawal to be overseen by the U.N. Security Council.

The Coalition rejected the proposal, but said that retreating Iraqi forces wouldn't be attacked,[citation needed] and gave twenty-four hours for Iraq to begin withdrawing forces. On 23 February, fighting resulted in the capture of 500 Iraqi soldiers. On 24 February, British and American armored forces crossed the Iraq-Kuwait border and entered Iraq in large numbers, taking hundreds of prisoners. Iraqi resistance was light, and 4 Americans were killed.[104]

Coalition forces enter Iraq

Demolished vehicles line Highway 80 on 18 Apr 1991

Destroyed Iraqi civilian and military vehicles on the Highway of Death.

IrakDesertStorm1991

Aerial view of destroyed Iraqi T-72 tank, BMP-1 and Type 63 armored personnel carriers and trucks on Highway 8 in March 1991

BrennendeOelquellenKuwait1991

The oil fires caused were a result of the scorched earth policy of Iraqi military forces retreating from Kuwait

USAF F16C block 87-0257 remains

Remains of downed F-16C

Bradley on fire

Bradley IFV burns after being hit by Iraqi T-72 fire

Shortly afterwards, the U.S. VII Corps, in full strength and spearheaded by the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, launched an armored attack into Iraq early on 24 February, just to the west of Kuwait, taking Iraqi forces by surprise. Simultaneously, the U.S. XVIII Airborne Corps launched a sweeping "left-hook" attack across southern Iraq's largely undefended desert, led by the U.S. 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and the 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized). This movement's left flank was protected by France's 6th Light Armoured Division Daguet.

The French force quickly overcame Iraq's 45th Infantry Division, suffering light casualties and taking a large number of prisoners, and took up blocking positions to prevent an Iraqi counter-attack on the Coalition's flank. The movement's right flank was protected by the United Kingdom's 1st Armoured Division. Once the allies had penetrated deep into Iraqi territory, they turned eastward, launching a flank attack against the elite Republican Guard before it could escape. The Iraqis resisted fiercely from dug-in positions and stationary vehicles, and even mounted armored charges.

Unlike many previous engagements, the destruction of the first Iraqi tanks did not result in a mass surrender. The Iraqis suffered massive losses and lost dozens of tanks and vehicles, while U.S. casualties were comparatively low, with a single Bradley knocked out. Coalition forces pressed another ten kilometers into Iraqi territory, and captured their objective within three hours. They took 500 prisoners and inflicted heavy losses, defeating Iraq's 26th Infantry Division. A U.S. soldier was killed by an Iraqi land mine, another five by friendly fire, and thirty wounded during the battle. Meanwhile, British forces attacked Iraq's Medina Division and a major Republican Guard logistics base. In nearly two days of some of the war's most intense fighting, the British destroyed 40 enemy tanks and captured a division commander.

Meanwhile, U.S. forces attacked the village of Al Busayyah, meeting fierce resistance. They suffered no casualties, but destroyed a considerable amount of military hardware and took prisoners.

On 25 February 1991, Iraqi forces fired a Scud missile at an American barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The missile attack killed 28 U.S. military personnel.[105]

The Coalition's advance was much swifter than U.S. generals had expected. On 26 February, Iraqi troops began retreating from Kuwait, after they had set its oil fields on fire (737 oil wells were set on fire). A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq-Kuwait highway. Although they were retreating, this convoy was bombed so extensively by Coalition air forces that it came to be known as the Highway of Death. Hundreds of Iraqi troops were killed. American, British, and French forces continued to pursue retreating Iraqi forces over the border and back into Iraq, eventually moving to within 150 miles (240 km) of Baghdad before withdrawing back to Iraq's border with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

One hundred hours after the ground campaign started, on 28 February, President Bush declared a ceasefire, and he also declared that Kuwait had been liberated.

Post-war military analysis

Question book-new

This article does not contain any citations or references. Please improve this article by adding a reference. For information about how to add references, see Template:Citation.


Although it was said in Western media at the time that Iraqi troops numbered approximately 545,000 to 600,000, most experts today believe that the Iraqi Army's qualitative and quantitative descriptions were exaggerated, as they included both temporary and auxiliary support elements. Many Iraqi troops were young, under-resourced, and poorly trained conscripts.

The Coalition committed 540,000 troops, and a further 100,000 Turkish troops were deployed along the Turkish-Iraqi border. This caused a significant force dilution of Iraq's military by forcing it to deploy its forces along all its borders. This allowed the main thrust by the U.S. to possess not only a significant technological advantage, but also a numerical superiority.

The widespread support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War equipped Iraq with military equipment from most major world arms dealers. This resulted in a lack of standardization in this large heterogeneous force, which additionally suffered from poor training and poor motivation. The majority of Iraqi armored forces still used old Chinese Type 59s and Type 69s, Soviet-made T-55s from the 1950s and 1960s, and poor quality Asad Babil tanks (domestically assembled tank based on Polish T-72 hulls with other parts of mixed origin). These machines were not equipped with up-to-date equipment, such as thermal sights or laser rangefinders, and their effectiveness in modern combat was very limited.

The Iraqis failed to find an effective countermeasure to the thermal sights and sabot rounds used by Coalition tanks. This equipment enabled them to engage and destroy Iraqi tanks from more than three times the range that Iraqi tanks could engage Coalition tanks. The Iraqi crews used old, cheap steel penetrators against the advanced Chobham Armour of the U.S. and British tanks, with ineffective results. The Iraqis also failed to exploit the advantage that could be gained from using urban warfare — fighting within Kuwait City – which could have inflicted significant casualties on the attacking forces. Urban combat reduces the range at which fighting occurs, and can negate some of the technological advantages of well-equipped forces.

The Iraqis also tried to use Soviet military doctrine, but the implementation failed due to the lack of skill of their commanders, and the preventive Coalition air strikes on communication centers and bunkers.

The end of active hostilities

Gulf War Saudi Flag

Civilians and Coalition military forces wave Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian flags as they celebrate the retreat of Iraqi forces from Kuwait as a result of Operation Desert Storm

Persian Gulf Veterans National Medal of US

Persian Gulf Veterans National Medal of the U.S. military.

In Coalition-occupied Iraqi territory, a peace conference was held where a ceasefire agreement was negotiated and signed by both sides. At the conference, Iraq was approved to fly armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian infrastructure. Soon after, these helicopters and much of Iraq's military were used to fight a uprising in the south. The rebellions were encouraged by an airing of "The Voice of Free Iraq" on 2 February 1991, which was broadcast from a CIA-run radio station out of Saudi Arabia. The Arabic service of the Voice of America supported the uprising by stating that the rebellion was large, and that they soon would be liberated from Saddam.[106]

In the North, Kurdish leaders took American statements that they would support an uprising to heart, and began fighting, hoping to trigger a coup d'état. However, when no U.S. support came, Iraqi generals remained loyal to Saddam and brutally crushed the Kurdish uprising. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Turkey and Kurdish areas of Iran. These events later resulted in no-fly zones being established in northern and southern Iraq. In Kuwait, the Emir was restored, and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians, due to PLO support of Saddam. Yasser Arafat didn't apologize for his support of Iraq, but after his death, the Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas' authority formally apologized in 2004.[107]

There was some criticism of the Bush administration, as they chose to allow Saddam to remain in power instead of pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, A World Transformed, Bush and Brent Scowcroft argued that such a course would have fractured the alliance, and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.

In 1992, the U.S. Defense Secretary during the war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:

I would guess if we had gone in there, we would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.[108]

— Dick Cheney

Instead of a greater involvement of its own military, the U.S. hoped that Saddam would be overthrown in an internal coup d'état. The CIA used its assets in Iraq to organize a revolt, but the Iraqi government defeated the effort.[citation needed]

On 10 March 1991, 540,000 U.S. troops began moving out of the Persian Gulf.

Coalition involvement

Various Arabic Troops during Operation Desert Storm

Coalition troops from Egypt, Syria, Oman, France and Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm.

Coalition members included Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Kuwait, Malaysia, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America.[109]

Germany and Japan provided financial assistance and donated military hardware, but didn't send direct military assistance. This later became known as checkbook diplomacy.

United Kingdom

Challenger-ODS-1

British Army Challenger 1 main battle tank during Operation Desert Storm.

The United Kingdom committed the largest contingent of any European state that participated in the war's combat operations. Operation Granby was the code name for the operations in the Persian Gulf. British Army regiments (mainly with the 1st Armoured Division), Royal Air Force squadrons and Royal Navy vessels were mobilized in the Gulf. The Royal Air Force, using various aircraft, operated from airbases in Saudi Arabia. Almost 2,500 armored vehicles and 53,462 troops were shipped for action.[citation needed]

Chief Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Gulf included Broadsword-class frigates, and Sheffield-class destroyers, other R.N. and R.F.A. ships were also deployed. The light aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal was deployed to the Mediterranean Sea.

Special operations forces were deployed in the form of several SAS squadrons.

France

Iraqi Type 69 destroyed by the French 6th Light Armored Division during the Gulf War

French and American soldiers inspecting an Iraqi Type 69 tank destroyed by the French 6th Light Armored Division during Operation Desert Storm.

The second largest European contingent was from France, which committed 18,000 troops.[109] Operating on the left flank of the U.S. XVIII Airborne Corps, the main French Army force was the 6th Light Armoured Division, including troops from the French Foreign Legion. Initially, the French operated independently under national command and control, but coordinated closely with the Americans (via CENTCOM) and Saudis. In January, the Division was placed under the tactical control of the XVIII Airborne Corps. France also deployed several combat aircraft and naval units. The French called their contribution Opération Daguet.

Canada

A fighter jet taking off from a runway

Canadian CF-18 Hornets participated in combat during the Gulf War.

Canada was one of the first countries to condemn Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and it quickly agreed to join the U.S.-led coalition. In August 1990, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney committed the Canadian Forces to deploy a Naval Task Group. The destroyers HMCS Terra Nova and HMCS Athabaskan joined the maritime interdiction force supported by the supply ship HMCS Protecteur in Operation Friction. The Canadian Task Group led the Coalition's maritime logistics forces in the Persian Gulf. A fourth ship, HMCS Huron, arrived in-theater after hostilities had ceased and was the first allied ship to visit Kuwait.

Following the U.N.-authorized use of force against Iraq, the Canadian Forces deployed a CF-18 Hornet and CH-124 Sea King squadron with support personnel, as well as a field hospital to deal with casualties from the ground war. When the air war began, the CF-18s were integrated into the Coalition force and were tasked with providing air cover and attacking ground targets. This was the first time since the Korean War that Canada's military had participated in offensive combat operations. The only CF-18 Hornet to record an official victory during the conflict was an aircraft involved in the beginning of the Battle of Bubiyan against the Iraqi Navy.[110]

The Canadian Commander in the Middle East was Commodore Kenneth J. Summers.

Australia

HMAS Sydney 1991

HMAS Sydney in the Persian Gulf in 1991.

Australia contributed a Naval Task Group, which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, under Operation Damask. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a U.S. hospital ship, and a naval clearance diving team took part in de-mining Kuwait’s port facilities following the end of combat operations.

While the Australian forces didn't see combat, they did play a significant role in enforcing the sanctions put in place against Iraq following Kuwait's invasion, as well as other small support contributions to Operation Desert Storm. Following the war's end, Australia deployed a medical unit on Operation Habitat to northern Iraq as part of Operation Provide Comfort.

Argentina

Argentina participated in the war through the Operation Bishop, sending the destroyer ARA Almirante Brown (D-10) and the corvette ARA Spiro (P-43). Later, that fleet was replaced by the corvette ARA Rosales (P-42) and transport ship ARA Bahía San Blas (B-4).

Casualties

US Navy 090813-N-1522S-007 Members of a Navy honor guard carry the remains of Capt

Sailors from a U.S. Navy honor guard carry Scott Speicher's remains

Civilian

The increased importance of air attacks from both warplanes and cruise missiles led to controversy over the number of civilian deaths caused during the war's initial stages. Within the war's first 24 hours, more than 1,000 sorties were flown, many against targets in Baghdad. The city was the target of heavy bombing, as it was the seat of power for Saddam and the Iraqi forces' command and control. This ultimately led to civilian casualties.

In one noted incident, two USAF stealth planes bombed a bunker in Amiriyah, causing the deaths of 408 Iraqi civilians who were in the shelter.[111] Scenes of burned and mutilated bodies were subsequently broadcast, and controversy arose over the bunker's status, with some stating that it was a civilian shelter, while others contended that it was a center of Iraqi military operations, and that the civilians had been deliberately moved there to act as human shields.

An investigation by Beth Osborne Daponte estimated total civilian fatalities at about 3,500 from bombing, and some 100,000 from the war's other effects.[112][113][114]

Iraqi

The exact number of Iraqi combat casualties is unknown, but is believed to have been heavy. Some estimate that Iraq sustained between 20,000 and 35,000 fatalities.[112] A report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force, estimated 10,000–12,000 Iraqi combat deaths in the air campaign, and as many as 10,000 casualties in the ground war.[115] This analysis is based on Iraqi prisoner of war reports.

Saddam's government gave high civilian casualty figures in order to draw support from Islamic countries. The Iraqi government claimed that 2,300 civilians died during the air campaign. [116] According to the Project on Defense Alternatives study, 3,664 Iraqi civilians, and between 20,000 and 26,000 military personnel, were killed in the conflict, while 75,000 Iraqi soldiers were wounded.[117]

Coalition

Coalition troops killed by country
Country Total Enemy
action
Accident Friendly
fire
Ref
Flag of the United States United States 294 114 145 35 [118]
Flag of Senegal Senegal 92 92 [119]
Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom 47 38 9 [120]
Flag of Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia 24 18 6 .[121][122]
Flag of France France 9 9 [118]
Flag of the United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates 6 6 [123]
Flag of Qatar Qatar 3 3 [118]
Flag of Syria Syria 2 [124]
Flag of Egypt Egypt 11 5 .[125][126]
Flag of Kuwait Kuwait 1 1 [127]

The DoD reports that U.S. forces suffered 148 battle-related deaths (35 to friendly fire[128]), with one pilot listed as MIA (his remains were found and identified in August 2009). A further 145 Americans died in non-combat accidents.[118] The U.K. suffered 47 deaths (9 to friendly fire, all by U.S. forces), France 2,[118] and the other countries, not including Kuwait, suffered 37 deaths (18 Saudis, 1 Egyptian, 6 UAE, and 3 Qataris).[118] At least 605 Kuwaiti soldiers were still missing 10 years after their capture.[129]

The largest single loss of life among Coalition forces happened on 25 February 1991, when an Iraqi Al Hussein missile hit a U.S. military barrack in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 U.S. Army Reservists from Pennsylvania. In all, 190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi fire during the war, 113 of whom were American, out of a total of 358 Coalition deaths. Another 44 soldiers were killed, and 57 wounded, by friendly fire. 145 soldiers died of exploding munitions, or non-combat accidents.[130]

The largest accident among Coalition forces happened on 21 March 1991, a Royal Saudi Air Force C-130H crashed in heavy smoke on approach to Ras Al-Mishab Airport, Saudi Arabia. 92 Senegalese soldiers were killed.

The number of Coalition wounded in combat seems to have been 776, including 458 Americans.[131]

190 Coalition troops were killed by Iraqi combatants, the rest of the 379 Coalition deaths being from friendly fire or accidents. This number was much lower than expected. Among the American dead were three female soldiers.

Friendly fire

While the death toll among Coalition forces engaging Iraqi combatants was very low, a substantial number of deaths were caused by accidental attacks from other Allied units. Of the 148 U.S. troops who died in battle, 24% were killed by friendly fire, a total of 35 service personnel.[132] A further 11 died in detonations of allied munitions. Nine British military personnel were killed in a friendly fire incident when a USAF A-10 Thunderbolt II destroyed a group of two Warrior IFVs.

Controversies

Gulf War Illness

Many returning Coalition soldiers reported illnesses following their action in the war, a phenomenon known as Gulf War syndrome or Gulf War illness. There has been widespread speculation and disagreement about the causes of the illness and the reported birth defects. Some factors considered as possibilities include exposure to depleted uranium, chemical weapons, anthrax vaccines given to deploying soldiers, and/or infectious diseases. Major Michael Donnelly, a USAF officer during the War, helped publicize the syndrome and advocated for veterans' rights in this regard.

Effects of depleted uranium

GWI DU map

Approximate area and major clashes in which DU rounds were used.

Depleted uranium was used in the war in tank kinetic energy penetrators and 20–30 mm cannon ordnance. DU is a pyrophoric, genotoxic, and teratogenic heavy metal. Many have cited its use during the war as a contributing factor to a number of instances of health issues in the conflict's veterans and surrounding civilian populations. However, scientific opinion on the risk is mixed.[133][134]

Highway of Death

On the night of 26–27 February 1991, some Iraqi forces began leaving Kuwait on the main highway north of Al Jahra in a column of some 1,400 vehicles. A patrolling E-8 Joint STARS aircraft observed the retreating forces and relayed the information to the DDM-8 air operations center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.[135] These vehicles and the retreating soldiers were subsequently attacked, resulting in a 60 km stretch of highway strewn with debris—the Highway of Death.

Chuck Horner, Commander of U.S. and allied air operations has written:

[By February 26], the Iraqis totally lost heart and started to evacuate occupied Kuwait, but airpower halted the caravan of Iraqi Army and plunderers fleeing toward Basra. This event was later called by the media "The Highway of Death." There were certainly a lot of dead vehicles, but not so many dead Iraqis. They'd already learned to scamper off into the desert when our aircraft started to attack. Nevertheless, some people back home wrongly chose to believe we were cruelly and unusually punishing our already whipped foes.

[...]
By February 27, talk had turned toward terminating the hostilities. Kuwait was free. We were not interested in governing Iraq. So the question became "How do we stop the killing."[136]

Bulldozer assault

Another incident during the war highlighted the question of large-scale Iraqi combat deaths. This was the "bulldozer assault", wherein two brigades from the U.S. 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized) were faced with a large and complex trench network, as part of the heavily fortified "Saddam Hussein Line". After some deliberation, they opted to use anti-mine plows mounted on tanks and combat earthmovers to simply plow over and bury alive the defending Iraqi soldiers. One newspaper story reported that U.S. commanders estimated thousands of Iraqi soldiers surrendered, escaping live burial during the two-day assault 24–26 February 1991. Patrick Day Sloyan of Newsday reported, "Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Vulcan armored carriers straddled the trench lines and fired into the Iraqi soldiers as the tanks covered them with mounds of sand. 'I came through right after the lead company,' [Col. Anthony] Moreno said. 'What you saw was a bunch of buried trenches with peoples' arms and things sticking out of them...'"[137] However, after the war, the Iraqi government claimed to have found only 44 bodies.[138] In his book The Wars Against Saddam, John Simpson alleges that U.S. forces attempted to cover up the incident.[139] After the incident, the commander of the 1st Brigade said: "I know burying people like that sounds pretty nasty, but it would be even nastier if we had to put our troops in the trenches and clean them out with bayonets."[137]

1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait

A 1990 Palestinian exodus from Kuwait took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians voluntarily fled Kuwait during the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces,[140] in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait.[140] After the Gulf War, the Kuwaiti authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991.[140] Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the PLO with the dictator Saddam Hussein, who had earlier invaded Kuwait.

The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were Jordanian citizens.[141] In 2013, there were 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin in Kuwait.[142] In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian citizenship) lived in Kuwait.[143] In total, there are 360,000 Palestinians in Kuwait as of 2012-2013.

Saudi Arabia expelled Yemeni workers after Yemen supported Saddam during the Gulf War.[144]

Coalition bombing of Iraq's civilian infrastructure

In the 23 June 1991 edition of The Washington Post, reporter Bart Gellman wrote: "Many of the targets were chosen only secondarily to contribute to the military defeat of [Iraq]. . . . Military planners hoped the bombing would amplify the economic and psychological impact of international sanctions on Iraqi society. . . . They deliberately did great harm to Iraq's ability to support itself as an industrial society. . . ."[145] In the Jan/Feb 1995 edition of Foreign Affairs, French diplomat Eric Rouleau wrote: "[T]he Iraqi people, who were not consulted about the invasion, have paid the price for their government's madness. . . . Iraqis understood the legitimacy of a military action to drive their army from Kuwait, but they have had difficulty comprehending the Allied rationale for using air power to systematically destroy or cripple Iraqi infrastructure and industry: electric power stations (92 percent of installed capacity destroyed), refineries (80 percent of production capacity), petrochemical complexes, telecommunications centers (including 135 telephone networks), bridges (more than 100), roads, highways, railroads, hundreds of locomotives and boxcars full of goods, radio and television broadcasting stations, cement plants, and factories producing aluminum, textiles, electric cables, and medical supplies."[146] However, the U.N. subsequently spent billions rebuilding hospitals, schools, and water purification facilities throughout the country.[147]

Abuse of Coalition POWs

During the conflict, Coalition aircrew shot down over Iraq were displayed as prisoners of war on TV, most with visible signs of abuse. Amongst several testimonies to poor treatment,[148] Royal Air Force Tornado crew John Nichol and John Peters have both alleged that they were tortured during this time.[149][150] Nichol and Peters were forced to make statements against the war in front of television cameras. Members of British Special Air Service Bravo Two Zero were captured while providing information about an Iraqi supply line of Scud missiles to Coalition forces. Only one, Chris Ryan, evaded capture while the group's other surviving members were violently tortured.[151] Flight surgeon (later General) Rhonda Cornum was raped by one of her captors[152] after the Black Hawk she was riding in was shot down while searching for a downed F-16 pilot.

Operation Southern Watch

Since the war, the U.S. has had a continued presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia – a figure that rose to 10,000 during the 2003 conflict in Iraq.[153] Operation Southern Watch enforced the no-fly zones over southern Iraq set up after 1991; oil exports through the Persian Gulf's shipping lanes were protected by the Bahrain-based U.S. Fifth Fleet.

Since Saudi Arabia houses Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest sites, many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the war was one of the stated motivations behind the 11 September terrorist attacks,[153] the Khobar Towers bombing, and the date chosen for the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings (7 August), which was eight years to the day that U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.[154] Osama bin Laden interpreted the Islamic prophet Muhammad as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".[155] In 1996, bin Laden issued a fatwa, calling for U.S. troops to leave Saudi Arabia. In a December 1999 interview with Rahimullah Yusufzai, bin Laden said he felt that Americans were "too near to Mecca" and considered this a provocation to the entire Islamic world.[156]

Sanctions

On 6 August 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the U.N. Security Council adopted Resolution 661 which imposed economic sanctions on Iraq, providing for a full trade embargo, excluding medical supplies, food and other items of humanitarian necessity, these to be determined by the Council's sanctions committee. From 1991 until 2003, the effects of government policy and sanctions regime led to hyperinflation, widespread poverty and malnutrition.

During the late 1990s, the U.N. considered relaxing the sanctions imposed because of the hardships suffered by ordinary Iraqis. Studies dispute the number of people who died in south and central Iraq during the years of the sanctions.[157][158][159]

Draining of the Qurna Marshes

The draining of the Qurna Marshes was an irrigation project in Iraq during and immediately after the war, to drain a large area of marshes in the Tigris–Euphrates river system. Formerly covering an area of around 3,000 square kilometers, the large complex of wetlands were almost completely emptied of water, and the local Shi'ite population relocated, following the war and 1991 uprisings. By 2000, United Nations Environment Programme estimated that 90% of the marshlands had disappeared, causing desertification of over 7,500 square miles (19,000 km2).[citation needed]

Many international organizations such as the U.N. Human Rights Commission, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, the Wetlands International, and Middle East Watch have described the project as a political attempt to force the Marsh Arabs out of the area through water diversion tactics.[160]

Oil spill

On 23 January, Iraq dumped 400 million US gallons (1,500,000 m3) of crude oil into the Persian Gulf [162], causing the largest offshore oil spill in history at that time.[161] It was reported as a deliberate natural resources attack to keep U.S. Marines from coming ashore (Missouri and Wisconsin had shelled Failaka Island during the war to reinforce the idea that there would be an amphibious assault attempt).[163] About 30–40% of this came from allied raids on Iraqi coastal targets.[164]

Kuwaiti oil fires

Operation Desert Storm 22

Oil well fires rage outside Kuwait City in 1991

The Kuwaiti oil fires were caused by the Iraqi military setting fire to 700 oil wells as part of a scorched earth policy while retreating from Kuwait in 1991 after conquering the country but being driven out by Coalition forces. The fires started in January and February 1991 and the last one was extinguished by November 1991.[165]

The resulting fires burned out of control because of the dangers of sending in firefighting crews. Land mines had been placed in areas around the oil wells, and a military cleaning of the areas was necessary before the fires could be put out. Somewhere around 6 million barrels (950,000 m3) of oil were lost each day. Eventually, privately contracted crews extinguished the fires, at a total cost of US$1.5 billion to Kuwait.[166] By that time, however, the fires had burned for approximately ten months, causing widespread pollution.

Cost

The cost of the war to the United States was calculated by the U.S. Congress to be $61.1 billion.[167] About $52 billion of that amount was paid by other countries: $36 billion by Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other Arab states of the Persian Gulf; $16 billion by Germany and Japan (which sent no combat forces due to their constitutions). About 25% of Saudi Arabia's contribution was paid in the form of in-kind services to the troops, such as food and transportation.[167] U.S. troops represented about 74% of the combined force, and the global cost was therefore higher.

Effect on developing countries

Apart from the impact on the Gulf states themselves, the resulting economic disruptions after the crisis affected many states. The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) undertook a study in 1991 to assess the effects on developing states and the international community's response. A briefing paper finalized on the day that the conflict ended draws on their findings which had two main conclusions: Many developing states were severely affected and while there has been a considerable response to the crisis, the distribution of assistance was highly selective.[168]

The ODI factored in elements of "cost" which included oil imports, remittance flows, re-settlement costs, loss of export earnings and tourism. For Egypt, the cost totaled $1 billion, 3% of GDP. Yemen had a cost of $830 million, 10% of GDP, while it cost Jordan $1.8 billion, 32% of GDP.

International response to the crisis on developing states came with the channeling of aid through The Gulf Crisis Financial Co-ordination Group. They were 24 states, comprising most of the OECD countries plus some Gulf states: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait. The members of this group agreed to disperse $14 billion in development assistance.

The World Bank responded by speeding up the disbursement of existing project and adjustment loans. The International Monetary Fund adopted two lending facilities – the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Compensatory & Contingency Financing Facility (CCFF). The European Community offered $2 billion[Clarification needed]

in assistance.[168]

Media coverage

The war was heavily televised. For the first time, people all over the world were able to watch live pictures of missiles hitting their targets and fighters departing from aircraft carriers. Allied forces were keen to demonstrate their weapons' accuracy.

In the United States, the "big three" network anchors led the war's network news coverage: ABC's Peter Jennings, CBS's Dan Rather, and NBC's Tom Brokaw were anchoring their evening newscasts when air strikes began on 16 January 1991. ABC News correspondent Gary Shepard, reporting live from Baghdad, told Jennings of the city's quietness. But, moments later, Shepard was back on the air as flashes of light were seen on the horizon and tracer fire was heard on the ground.

On CBS, viewers were watching a report from correspondent Allen Pizzey, who was also reporting from Baghdad, when the war began. Rather, after the report was finished, announced that there were unconfirmed reports of flashes in Baghdad and heavy air traffic at bases in Saudi Arabia. On the "NBC Nightly News", correspondent Mike Boettcher reported unusual air activity in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Moments later, Brokaw announced to his viewers that the air attack had begun.

Still, it was CNN whose coverage gained the most popularity and indeed its wartime coverage is often cited as one of the landmark events in the network's development. CNN correspondents John Holliman and Peter Arnett and CNN anchor Bernard Shaw relayed audio reports from Baghdad's Al-Rashid Hotel as the air strikes began. The network had previously convinced the Iraqi government to allow installation of a permanent audio circuit in their makeshift bureau. When the telephones of all of the other Western TV correspondents went dead during the bombing, CNN was the only service able to provide live reporting. After the initial bombing, Arnett remained behind and was, for a time, the only American TV correspondent reporting from Iraq.

In the United Kingdom, the BBC devoted the FM portion of its national speech radio station BBC Radio 4 to an eighteen-hour rolling news format creating Radio 4 News FM. The station was short lived, ending shortly after President Bush declared the ceasefire and Kuwait's liberation. However, it paved the way for the later introduction of Radio Five Live.

Two BBC journalists, John Simpson and Bob Simpson (no relation), defied their editors and remained in Baghdad to report on the war's progress. They were responsible for a report which included an "infamous cruise missile that travelled down a street and turned left at a traffic light."[169]

Newspapers all over the world also covered the war and Time magazine published a special issue dated 28 January 1991, the headline "WAR IN THE GULF" emblazoned on the cover over a picture of Baghdad taken as the war began.

U.S. policy regarding media freedom was much more restrictive than in the Vietnam War. The policy had been spelled out in a Pentagon document entitled Annex Foxtrot. Most of the press information came from briefings organized by the military. Only selected journalists were allowed to visit the front lines or conduct interviews with soldiers. Those visits were always conducted in the presence of officers, and were subject to both prior approval by the military and censorship afterward. This was ostensibly to protect sensitive information from being revealed to Iraq. This policy was heavily influenced by the military's experience with the Vietnam War, in which public opposition within the U.S. grew throughout the war's course. It wasn't only the limitation of information in the Middle East; media were also restricting what was shown about the war with more graphic depictions like Ken Jarecke's image of a burnt Iraqi soldier being pulled from the American AP wire whereas in Europe it was given extensive coverage.[170][171][172]

At the same time, the war's coverage was new in its instantaneousness. About halfway through the war, Iraq's government decided to allow live satellite transmissions from the country by Western news organizations, and U.S. journalists returned en masse to Baghdad. NBC's Tom Aspell, ABC's Bill Blakemore, and CBS News' Betsy Aaronfiled filed reports, subject to acknowledged Iraqi censorship. Throughout the war, footage of incoming missiles was broadcast almost immediately.

A British crew from CBS News (David Green and Andy Thompson), equipped with satellite transmission equipment traveled with the front line forces and, having transmitted live TV pictures of the fighting en route, arrived the day before the forces in Kuwait City, broadcasting live television from the city and covering the entrance of the Arab forces the next day.

Alternative media outlets provided views in opposition to the war. Deep Dish Television compiled segments from independent producers in the U.S. and abroad, and produced a ten-hour series that was distributed internationally, called The Gulf Crisis TV Project. The series' first program War, Oil and Power was compiled and released in 1990, before the war broke out. News World Order was the title of another program in the series; it focused on the media's complicity in promoting the war, as well as Americans' reactions to the media coverage. In San Francisco, as a local example, Paper Tiger Television West produced a weekly cable television show with highlights of mass demonstrations, artists' actions, lectures, and protests against mainstream media coverage at newspaper offices and television stations. Local media outlets in cities across the country screened similar oppositional media.

The organization Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) critically analyzed media coverage during the war in various articles and books, such as the 1991 Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship was at Home.[173]

Technology

Missouri missile BGM-109 Tomahawk

The USS Missouri launches a Tomahawk missile. The Gulf War was the last conflict in which battleships were deployed in a combat role (as of 2011)

Precision-guided munitions, such as the U.S. Air Force's AGM-130 guided missile, were heralded as key in allowing military strikes to be made with a minimum of civilian casualties compared to previous wars, although they weren't used as often as more traditional, less accurate bombs. Specific buildings in downtown Baghdad could be bombed while journalists in their hotels watched cruise missiles fly by.

Precision-guided munitions amounted to approximately 7.4% of all bombs dropped by the Coalition. Other bombs included cluster bombs, which disperse numerous submunitions,[174] and daisy cutters, 15,000-pound bombs which can disintegrate everything within hundreds of yards.

Global Positioning System units were important in enabling Coalition units to easily navigate across the desert. Since military GPS receivers were not available for most troops, many used commercially available units. To permit these to be used to best effect, the "selective availability" feature of the GPS system was turned off for the duration of Desert Storm, allowing these commercial receivers to provide the same precision as the military equipment.[175]

Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) and satellite communication systems were also important. Two examples of this are the U.S. Navy's Grumman E-2 Hawkeye and the U.S. Air Force's Boeing E-3 Sentry. Both were used in command and control area of operations. These systems provided essential communications links between air, ground, and naval forces. It's one of several reasons why Coalition forces dominated the air war.

American-made color photocopiers were used to produce some of Iraq's battle plans. Some of the copiers contained concealed high-tech transmitters that revealed their positions to American electronic warfare aircraft, leading to more precise bombings.[176]

Scud and Patriot missiles

Scud downed by Patriot missiles

Military personnel examine the remains of a Scud

The role of Iraq's Scud missiles featured prominently in the war. Scud is a tactical ballistic missile that the Soviet Union developed and deployed among the forward deployed Red Army divisions in East Germany. The role of the Scuds which were armed with nuclear and chemical warheads was to destroy command, control, and communication facilities and delay full mobilization of Western German and Allied Forces in Germany. It could also be used to directly target ground forces.

Scud missiles utilize inertial guidance which operates for the duration that the engines operate. Iraq used Scud missiles, launching them into both Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some missiles caused extensive casualties, while others caused little damage. Concerns were raised of possible chemical or biological warheads on these rockets, but if they existed, they weren't used.

The U.S. Patriot missile was used in combat for the first time. The U.S. military claimed a high effectiveness against Scuds at the time, but later analysis gives figures as low as nine percent, with forty-five percent of the 158 Patriot launches being against debris or false targets.[177] The Dutch Ministry of Defense, which also sent Patriot missiles to protect civilians in Israel and Turkey, later disputed the higher claim.[99] Further, there is at least one incident of a software error causing a Patriot missile's failure to engage an incoming Scud, resulting in deaths.[178] Both the U.S. Army and the missile manufacturers maintained the Patriot delivered a "miracle performance" in the Gulf War.[177]

See also

References

  1. "Den 1. Golfkrig". Forsvaret.dk. 24 September 2010. http://www.forsvaret.dk/SOK/Internationalt/Tidligere/Golf1/Pages/default.aspx. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  2. "Historical Events on 30th November". Historyorb.com. http://www.historyorb.com/events/november/30. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  3. Persian Gulf War, the Sandhurst-trained Prince Khaled bin Sultan al-Saud was co-commander with General Norman Schwarzkopf www.casi.org.uk/discuss
  4. General Khaled was Co-Commander, with U.S. General Norman Schwarzkopf, of the allied coalition that liberated Kuwait www.thefreelibrary.com
  5. Gulf War Coalition Forces (Latest available) by country www.nationmaster.com
  6. Hersh, Seymour (2005). Chain of Command. Penguin Books. p. 181. 
  7. 2010 World Almanac and Book of Facts, Pg. 176, Published 2009, Published by World Almanac Books; ISBN 1-60057-105-0
  8. 8.0 8.1 "Persian Gulf War". MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 31 October 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5kwqMXGNZ. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait; 1990 (Air War). Acig.org. Retrieved on 12 June 2011 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "airCombatInformationGroup" defined multiple times with different content
  10. "The Use of Terror during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait". The Jewish Agency for Israel. Archived from the original on 24 January 2005. http://web.archive.org/web/20050124091425/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/actual/iraq/3.html. Retrieved 22 June 2010. 
  11. "The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict". Project on Defense Alternatives. http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html#1.%20Iraqi%20civilian%20fatalities%20in%20the%201991%20Gulf. Retrieved 9 May 2009. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Fetter, Steve; Lewis, George N.; Gronlund, Lisbeth (28 January 1993). "Why were Casualties so low?". London. pp. 293–296. Digital object identifier:10.1038/361293a0. http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/4282/1/1993-Nature-Scud.pdf.  Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "publicpolicy.umd.edu" defined multiple times with different content
  13. 13.0 13.1 The Gulf War
  14. 14.0 14.1 "DOD: Information Paper- Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles". Iraqwatch.org. http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  15. "Frontline Chronology" (PDF). Public Broadcasting Service. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/cron/. Retrieved 20 March 2007. 
  16. "Tenth anniversary of the Gulf War: A look back". CNN. 17 January 2001. Archived from the original on 17 January 2001. http://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html. 
  17. Kenneth Estes. "ISN: The Second Gulf War (1990–1991) – Council on Foreign Relations". Cfr.org. http://www.cfr.org/publication/13865/isn.html. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  18. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34387.pdf
  19. Peters, John E; Deshong, Howard (1995). Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia. RAND Corporation. ISBN 0-8330-2329-2. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR629.pdf. [page needed]
  20. Memória Globo, access on 29 March 2011.
  21. "Livraria da Folha – Livro conta como Guerra do Golfo colocou a CNN no foco internacional – 08/09/2010". .folha.uol.com.br. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/livrariadafolha/794646-livro-conta-como-guerra-do-golfo-colocou-a-cnn-no-foco-internacional.shtml. Retrieved 13 May 2011. 
  22. A Guerra do Golfo, accessed on 29 March 2011
  23. A Guerra do Golfo, os Estados Unidos e as Relações Internacionais accessed on 29 March 2011.
  24. Guerra/Terrorismo – O maior bombardeio da história, access on 27 November 2011.
  25. fr:Guerre du Koweït (1990-1991)
  26. de:Golfkrieg, de:Zweiter Golfkrieg
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 Stork, Joe; Lesch, Ann M. (November–December 1990). "Background to the Crisis: Why War?". Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP). pp. 11–18. JSTOR http://www.jstor.org/stable/3012998. 
  28. Douglas A. Borer (2003). "Inverse Engagement: Lessons from U.S.-Iraq Relations, 1982–1990". U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection. U.S. Army. http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume1/july_2003/7_03_2v2.html. Retrieved 12 October 2006. 
  29. Simons (2003). p. 333.
  30. Simons (2003). pp. 341–342.
  31. 31.0 31.1 Simons (2003). pp. 343–344.
  32. Simons (2003). pp. 339–340.
  33. 33.0 33.1 Simons (2003). p. 341.
  34. Cleveland, William L. A History of the Modern Middle East. 2nd Ed pg. 464
  35. 35.0 35.1 Simons (2003). p. 334.
  36. Simons (2003). p. 335.
  37. Simons (2003). p. 336.
  38. Simons (2003). pp. 337–338.
  39. Simons (2003). p. 338.
  40. 40.0 40.1 Simons (2003). p. 343.
  41. Iraq Threatens Emirates And Kuwait on Oil Glut New York Times 18 July 1990
  42. U.S. Deploys Air and Sea Forces After Iraq Threatens 2 Neighbors New York Times 25 July 1990
  43. 43.0 43.1 Finlan (2003). pp. 25–26.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Excerpts From Iraqi Document on Meeting With U.S. Envoy New York Times 23 September 1990
  45. "Saddam's message of friendship to president Bush (Wikileaks telegram 90BAGHDAD4237)". U.S. Department of State. 25 July 1990. http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/1990/07/90BAGHDAD4237.html. Retrieved 2. January 2011. 
  46. 46.0 46.1 Finlan (2003). p. 26.
  47. 47.0 47.1 "Kuwait: Organization and Mission of the Forces". Library of Congress Country Studies. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+kw0058). Retrieved 14 April 2012. 
  48. Finlan (2003). p. 25.
  49. Childs, John; Corvisier, André (1994). A Dictionary of Military History and the Art of War. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 403. ISBN 9780631168485. 
  50. Knights, Michael (2005). Cradle of Conflict: Iraq and the Birth of Modern U.S. Military Power. United States Naval Institute. p. 20. ISBN 9781591144441. 
  51. Dan Vaught. "Eyewitness, Col. Fred Hart 1". Users.lighthouse.net. http://users.lighthouse.net/danvaught/eyewitness01.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  52. http://www.wpainc.com/Archive/Reagan%20Administration/WFM%20Papers%20from%20Reagan%20Archives/Iran-Iraq/Presentation%20on%20Gulf%20Oil%20Disruption%205-22-84.pdf
  53. Finlan (2003). p. 29.
  54. "Myths & Facts – The Gulf Wars". Jewishvirtuallibrary.org. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf12.html. Retrieved 13 May 2011. 
  55. 55.0 55.1 "The 1991 Gulf War And Jordan's Economy". June 2002. http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2002/issue2/jv6n2a7.html. 
  56. Deese, David A. "Persian Gulf War, Desert Storm – War with Iraqi". The History Professor. Concord Learning Systems. http://www.laughtergenealogy.com/bin/histprof/misc/desertstorm.html. 
  57. *Finlan (2003). p. 29. *"Resolution 661 (1990)". United Nations. http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm. Retrieved 13 April 2012. 
  58. Lori Fisler Damrosch, International Law, Cases and Materials, West Group, 2001
  59. 59.0 59.1 Friedman, Thomas L. (22 August 1990). "Confrontation in the Gulf: Behind Bush's Hard Line; Washington Considers a Clear Iraqi Defeat To Be Necessary to Bolster Its Arab Allies". New York. pp. A1. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/22/world/confrontation-gulf-behind-bush-s-hard-line-washington-considers-clear-iraqi.html?scp=1&sq=Confrontation+in+the+Gulf%3A+Behind+Bush%27s+Hard+Line&st=nyt. Retrieved 16 September 2010. 
  60. "Confrontation in the Gulf; Proposals by Iraqi President: Excerpts From His Address". New York. 13 August 1990. pp. A8. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/13/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-proposals-by-iraqi-president-excerpts-from-his-address.html. Retrieved 17 October 2010. 
  61. 61.0 61.1 Waldman, Shmuel (2005). Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Feldheim Publishers, p. 179. ISBN 1-58330-806-7
  62. BBC News. "1990: Outrage at Iraqi TV hostage show". Retrieved 2 September 2007.
  63. Royce, Knut (29 August 1990). "MIDDLE EAST CRISIS Secret Offer Iraq Sent Pullout Deal to U.S". New York. http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969813/MIDDLE-EAST-CRISIS-Secret-Offer-Iraq-Sent-Pullout-Deal-to-U-S-ALL-EDITIONS. Retrieved 17 October 2010. 
  64. Royce, Knut (3 January 1991). "Iraq Offers Deal to Quit Kuwait U.S. rejects it, but stays 'interested'". Long Island, N.Y. p. 5. http://www.scribd.com/doc/38969954/Iraq-Offers-Deal-to-Quit-Kuwait-U-S-rejects-it-but-stays-interested-NASSAU-AND-SUFFOLK-Edition. Retrieved 24 October 2010. 
  65. Tyler, Patrick E. (3 January 1991). "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; Arafat Eases Stand on Kuwait-Palestine Link". New York. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-arafat-eases-stand-on-kuwait-palestine-link.html. Retrieved 17 October 2010. 
  66. Friedman, Thomas L. (11 1991). "CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF; As U.S. Officials See It, Hands of Aziz Were Tied". pp. A10. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/11/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-as-us-officials-see-it-hands-of-aziz-were-tied.html?scp=151&sq=Iraq&st=nyt. Retrieved 30 September 2010. 
  67. See Paul Lewis, "Confrontation in the Gulf: The U.N.; France and 3 Arab States Issue an Appeal to Hussein," New York Times, 15 January 1991, p. A12
  68. Michael Kranish et al., "World waits on brink of war: Late effort at diplomacy in gulf fails," Boston Globe, 16 January 1991, p. 1
  69. Ellen Nimmons, A.P., "Last-ditch pitches for peace; But U.S. claims Iraqis hold key," Houston Chronicle, 15 January 1991, p. 1
  70. CONFRONTATION IN THE GULF: France; Paris Says Its Last-Ditch Peace Effort Has Failed New York Times 16 January 1991
  71. Gilles Kepel Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.
  72. "The Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm Timeline". Archived from the original on 25 May 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080526135240rn_1/www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45404. Retrieved 30 June 2010. 
  73. "15 Years After Desert Storm, U.S. Commitment to Region Continues". Archived from the original on 2011-06=-08. http://web.archive.org/web/20110608084842/http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14792. Retrieved 29 March 2007. 
  74. "Essential Documents: UN Security Council Resolution 678". Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/publication/11205/un_security_council_resolution_678_iraq_kuwait.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F408%2Fkuwait. 
  75. "The Unfinished War: A Decade Since Desert Storm". CNN In-Depth Specials. 2001. Archived from the original on 17 March 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080317110507/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/. Retrieved 5 April 2008. 
  76. Lynch, Colum (1 November 2006). "Security Council Seat Tied to Aid". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/31/AR2006103101217.html. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  77. Bush, George H. W. (11 September 1990). "Address Before a Joint Session of Congress". Miller Center of Public Affairs. http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3425. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  78. "Photos don't show buildup". St. Petersburg Times. 6 January 1991. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/tampabay/access/50586247.html?dids=50586247:50586247&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+6%252C+1991&author=JEAN+HELLER&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.A&desc=Photos+don%2527t+show+buildup. Retrieved 13 January 2012. 
  79. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Volume 59, page 33, Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science (Chicago, Ill.), Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Organization), 2003.
  80. "How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf | Center for Media and Democracy". Prwatch.org. http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy10.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  81. 81.0 81.1 Rowse, Ted (1992). "Kuwaitgate – killing of Kuwaiti babies by Iraqi soldiers exaggerated". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on 2012-05-29. http://archive.is/oZMm. 
  82. Makiya 1993, p 40.
  83. Makiya 1993, pp 31–33
  84. Makiya 1993, p 32.
  85. name=cnnstats Edwin E. Moïse. "Limited War : The Stereotypes". Clemson University. http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/FacultyPages/EdMoise/limit1.html. Retrieved 2 July 2010. 
  86. Operation Desert Storm globalsecurity.com
  87. "CNN.com In-depth specials — Gulf War (via Internet Archive)". CNN. 2001. Archived from the original on 12 June 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080612131747/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/. Retrieved 23 March 2008. 
  88. Lee, Robin J. (2002). "Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft Attrition in Desert Storm". http://www.rjlee.org/aaloss.html. Retrieved 30 January 2012. "Sources: Gulf War Airpower Survey, Vol. 5; Norman Friedman, Desert Victory; World Air Power Journal. Additionally, Mark Bovankovich and LT Chuck Chase offered corrections and several intriguing details on these incidents. All errors, however, remain entirely mine." 
  89. Atkinson, Rick (1994). Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 47. ISBN 0-395-71083-9
  90. Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order, 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 332.
  91. Post Video To Facebook (9 January 1991). "Geneva Meeting on Persian Gulf Crisis". C-SPAN. http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/176306&start=607&end=657. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  92. Rostker, Bernard (2000). "Information Paper: Iraq's Scud Ballistic Missiles". Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control from 2000-2006. http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dodscud.htm. Retrieved 21 May 2009. 
  93. Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order, 1990–1991 (Princeton, 1993), 331–41.
  94. Thomas, Gordon, Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad
  95. Atkinson, Rick; Balz, Dan (23 January 1991). "Scud Hits Tel Aviv, Leaving 3 Dead, 96 Hurt". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012291.htm. Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  96. The Gulf War (1991)
  97. "Three Isrealis killed as Scuds hit Tel Aviv". The Tech. 1991. http://tech.mit.edu/V110/N60/war1.60n.html. Retrieved 11 January 2009. 
  98. Sprey, Pierre M. "Evaluating Weapons: Sorting the Good from the Bad." CDI, February 2011.
  99. 99.0 99.1 "Betrokkenheid van Nederland" (in Dutch). Ministerie van Defensie. 2009. http://www.defensie.nl/landmacht/onderwijs/werkstukken_basisvorming/golfoorlog/betrokkenheid_van_nederland. Retrieved 11 January 2009. 
  100. Cheney, Richard: In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir
  101. Higgins 2012.
  102. John Pike. "Operation Desert Sabre / Gulf War Ground Campaign". Globalsecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/desert_sabre.htm. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  103. Riley 2010, p. 207.
  104. Andrew Leydon. "Carriers in the Persian Gulf War". Leyden.com. http://www.leyden.com/gulfwar/week6.html. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  105. twentieth century battlefields, the gulf war
  106. Fisk, Robert. The Great War for Civilisation, Vintage (2007 reprint), at p. 646.
  107. "Abbas apology to Kuwait over Iraq". BBC News. 12 December 2004. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4089961.stm. 
  108. ""Cheney changed his view on Iraq", by Charles Pope, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 29 September 2004". 28 September 2004. http://www.seattlepi.com/national/192908_cheney29.html. Retrieved 7 January 2005. 
  109. 109.0 109.1 Crocker III, H. W. (2006). Don't Tread on Me. New York: Crown Forum. p. 384. ISBN 978-1-4000-5363-6. 
  110. Morin, Jean H.; Gimblett, Richard Howard (1997). Operation Friction, 1990–1991: The Canadian Forces in the Persian Gulf. Dundurn Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-55002-257-5. 
  111. Scott Peterson, "'Smarter' bombs still hit civilians", Christian Science Monitor, 22 October 2002.
  112. 112.0 112.1 Robert Fisk, The Great War For Civilisation; The Conquest of the Middle East (Fourth Estate, 2005), p.853.
  113. "Toting the Casualties of War". Businessweek. 6 February 2003. http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/feb2003/nf2003026_0167_db052.htm. 
  114. Ford, Peter (9 April 2003). "Bid to stem civilian deaths tested". Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0409/p06s01-woiq.html. 
  115. Keaney, Thomas; Eliot A. Cohen (1993). Gulf War Air Power Survey. United States Dept. of the Air Force. ISBN 0-16-041950-6. 
  116. Tucker 2010, p. 265.
  117. "Wages of War – Appendix 2: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War". Comw.org. http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8ap2.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  118. 118.0 118.1 118.2 118.3 118.4 118.5 "In-Depth Specials – Gulf War". CNN. 2001. Archived from the original on 2001. http://web.archive.org/web/20070510125644/http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gulf.war/facts/gulfwar/. 
  119. ASN Aircraft accident Lockheed C-130H Hercules 469 Rash Mishab
  120. "Roll of Honour". Britains-smallwars.com. http://www.britains-smallwars.com/gulf/Roll.html. Retrieved 13 May 2011. 
  121. "Saudi Arabia – Persian Gulf War, 1991". Country-data.com. http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-11661.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  122. New York Times. "After the War; 92 Senegalese soldiers die in Saudi Air Crash"http://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/22/world/after-the-war-92-senegalese-soldiers-die-in-saudi-arabia-air-crash.html
  123. "The Role of the United Arab Emirates in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War". Country-data.com. http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14256.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  124. Miller, Judith. "Syria Plans to Double Gulf Force." The New York Times, 27 March 1991.
  125. "Soldier Reported Dead Shows Up at Parents' Doorstep". Associated Press. 22 March 1991.
  126. Schmitt, Eric (22 March 1991). "After the War". The New York Times.
  127. "Role of Kuwaiti Armed Forces in the Persian Gulf War". Country-data.com. 24 February 1991. http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14245.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  128. Tucker 2010, p. 470.
  129. Blanford, Nicholas (2001). "Kuwait hopes for answers on its Gulf War POWs". Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1223/p07s01-wome.html. 
  130. Tucker 2010, p. 264.
  131. "Persian Gulf War – MSN Encarta". Persian Gulf War – MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 31 October 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5kwqLuiZR. 
  132. Tucker 2010, p. 207.
  133. Hindin R. et al. (2005). "Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective". p. 17. Digital object identifier:10.1186/1476-069X-4-17. PMC 1242351. PMID 16124873. http://www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/17. 
  134. Marshall, AC (2005). "An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects Using a Gulf War Case Study" (PDF). Sandia National Laboratories. http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2005/054331.pdf. Retrieved 16 July 2012. 
  135. John Pike. "E-8 Joint-DEATH STAR [JSTARS]". Globalsecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/jstars-back.htm. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  136. Clancy & Horner 1999, pp. 499–500.
  137. 137.0 137.1 "Buried Alive: U.S. Tanks Used Plows To Kill Thousands In Gulf War Trenches" Newsday (New York), 12 September 1991, p. 1, Patrick Day Sloyan
  138. "frontline: the gulf war: appendix: Iraqi death toll". http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html. Retrieved 4 December 2005. 
  139. John Simpson, The Wars Against Saddam. MacMillan: Basingstoke. 2003.
  140. 140.0 140.1 140.2 Shafeeq Ghabra (May 8, 1991). "The PLO in Kuwait". http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/1457. 
  141. Yann Le Troquer and Rozenn Hommery al-Oudat (Spring 1999). "From Kuwait to Jordan: The Palestinians' Third Exodus". Journal of Palestine Studies. pp. 37–51. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2538306?uid=3738400&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102826710897. 
  142. "Jordanians of Kuwait". Joshua Project. 2013. http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=KU. 
  143. "Palestinians Open Kuwaiti Embassy". Al Monitor. 23 May 2013. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/04/palestinians-open-kuwait-embassy.html. 
  144. "Yemen's president flees for medical treatment as search for new leader begins". The Daily Telegraph. June 5, 2011
  145. 23 June 1991, Washington Post, Bart Gellman
  146. "The View From France: America's Unyielding Policy toward Iraq," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 1, January/February 1995, pp.61–62
  147. Rubin, Michael (December 2001). "Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance?". Middle East Review of International Affairs. pp. 100–115. Archived from the original on 2012-03-06. http://web.archive.org/web/20120306104728/http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf. 
  148. "Frontline: War Stories". Pbs.org. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  149. "The Flight That Changed My Life". Johnnichol.com. http://www.johnnichol.com/The%20Beginning.htm. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  150. "War Story:John Peters". Pbs.org. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/war/4.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  151. The One that Got Away by Chris Ryan & Bravo Two Zero by Andy McNab
  152. "A Woman's Burden". Time magazine magazine. 28 March 2003. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,438760,00.html. 
  153. 153.0 153.1 "US pulls out of Saudi Arabia". BBC News. 29 April 2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2984547.stm. Retrieved 29 November 2009. 
  154. Plotz, David (2001) What Does Osama Bin Laden Want?, Slate
  155. Bergen, Peter L. (2001). Holy War Inc.. Simon & Schuster. p. 3. 
  156. Yusufzai, Rahimullah (26 September 2001). "Face to face with Osama". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 19 January 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080119011449/http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,558075,00.html. Retrieved 30 June 2010. 
  157. "Iraq surveys show 'humanitarian emergency'". 12 August 1999. http://www.unicef.org/newsline/99pr29.htm. Retrieved 29 November 2009. 
  158. Spagat, Michael (September 2010). "Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions". Significance. http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf. 
  159. Rubin, Michael (December 2001). "Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance?". Middle East Review of International Affairs. pp. 100–115. http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm. 
  160. "Marsh Arabs". http://www1.american.edu/ted/marsh.htm. Retrieved 1 August 2010. 
  161. 161.0 161.1 "Duke Magazine-Oil Spill-After the Deluge, by Jeffrey Pollack-Mar/Apr 2003". Dukemagazine.duke.edu. http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/030403/oil1.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  162. Note: The cited supporting source[161] uses the alternative term Arabian Gulf to name this body of water. This article uses the more common and more generally recognized term Persian Gulf. For more information, see the Persian Gulf naming dispute article.
  163. "V: "Thunder And Lightning"- The War With Iraq (Subsection:The War At Sea)". The United States Navy in "Desert Shield" / "Desert Storm". United States Navy. http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/ds5.htm. Retrieved 26 November 2006. 
  164. Leckie, Robert (1998). The Wars of America. Castle Books. 
  165. Wellman, Robert Campbell (14 February 1999). ""Iraq and Kuwait: 1972, 1990, 1991, 1997." Earthshots: Satellite Images of Environmental Change". U.S. Geological Survey. http://earthshots.usgs.gov. http://earthshots.usgs.gov/Iraq/Iraqtext. Retrieved 27 July 2010. 
  166. Husain, T. (1995). Kuwaiti Oil Fires: Regional Environmental Perspectives. Oxford: BPC Wheatons Ltd. p. 68. 
  167. 167.0 167.1 "How much did the Gulf War cost the US?". People.psych.cornell.edu. 20 May 1997. http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~fhoran/gulf/GW_cost/GW_payments.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 
  168. 168.0 168.1 "The Impact of the Gulf Crisis on Developing Countries". ODI Briefing Paper. March 1991. http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=5466&title=gulf-crisis-impact-ldcs. Retrieved 29 June 2011. 
  169. Peter Ruff (31 July 2006). "Obituary : Bob Simpson". London. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/jul/31/broadcasting.guardianobituaries. Retrieved 4 September 2011. 
  170. Lori Robertson (2007). "Images of War". AJR. http://www.ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=3759. Retrieved 20 July 2007. 
  171. Ken Jarecke's account to the BBC World Service programme (9 May 2005). "Picture power: Death of an Iraqi soldier". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4528745.stm. Retrieved 14 October 2010. 
  172. Lucas, Dean (2007). "Famous Pictures Magazine – Iraqi Soldier". Famous Pictures Magazine. http://www.famouspictures.org/iraqi-soldier/. Retrieved 23 May 2013. 
  173. Naureckas, Jim (2010). "Gulf War Coverage: The Worst Censorship Was at Home". Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1518. Retrieved 14 October 2010. 
  174. "Dumb Bombs". Fas.org. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cluster.htm. Retrieved 18 March 2010. 
  175. McNamara, Joel. GPS for Dummies. http://books.google.com/books?id=sVgf41ic6LgC&lpg=PA55&ots=lNtb0Fdpys&dq=gulf%20war%20gps&pg=PR4#v=onepage&q=gulf%20war%20gps&f=false. 
  176. "Something wrong with our **** chips today". The Economist. 7 April 2011. http://www.economist.com/node/18527456. Retrieved 13 June 2011. 
  177. 177.0 177.1 Cirincione, Joseph (October 1992). "The Performance of the Patriot Missile in the war" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on 23 December 2003. http://replay.web.archive.org/20031223120310/http://www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/georgetown/PatriotPaper.pdf. Retrieved 4 December 2005. 
  178. "The Patriot Missile Failure". Ima.umn.edu. http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html. Retrieved 1 February 2011. 

Bibliography

Films

  • Dawn of the World
  • Bravo Two Zero
  • Courage Under Fire
  • The Finest Hour
  • Jarhead
  • Lessons of Darkness (a documentary)
  • Live From Baghdad
  • Heroes of Desert Storm
  • Towelhead
  • Three Kings
  • The Manchurian Candidate
  • Used as a back drop for the film, The Big Lebowski. It is frequently discussed as well.
  • Used in retconned backstory for 2004 film

Novels

  • Third Graders at War - The true story of a Cavalry Scout in the First Infantry Division (by Felix G)
  • Braving the Fear – The True Story of Rowdy US Marines in the Gulf War (by Douglas Foster)
  • Glass (Pray the Electrons Back to Sand) (by James Chapman)
  • The Fist of God (by Frederick Forsyth) ISBN 0-553-09126-3 OCLC 29595052
  • To Die in Babylon by Harold Livingston
  • Hogs dime novel series by James Ferro
  • Burning Desert by Zahida Zaidi
  • Bravo Two Zero – The true story of an SAS Patrol behind enemy lines in Iraq (by Andy McNab) ISBN 0-440-21880-2 OCLC 31057589
  • Summer 1990 Firyal AlShalabi
  • BOB GRAHAM – GULF in the WAR STORY: A US Navy Personnel Manager Confides in You by Bob Graham (at Amazon.com)
  • Jarhead: A Marine's Chronicle of the Gulf War and other battles (by Anthony Swofford) ISBN 0-743-23535-5
  • Savant (by James Follett)

External links


All or a portion of this article consists of text from Wikipedia, and is therefore Creative Commons Licensed under GFDL.
The original article can be found at Gulf War and the edit history here.