Military Wiki

An early artist's conception of the Offshore Patrol Cutter, prior to dropping the stern launching ramp.

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) Offshore Patrol Cutter was one design among several new cutter designs developed as part of the Integrated Deepwater System Program.[1]

The cutter was originally proposed to include two rear-launching ramps, each capable of launching and retrieving a RHIB (rigid-hull inflatable boat), without first stopping.[2][3] Unlike smaller cutters, like the Marine Protector, the Offshore Patrol Cutter and the National Security Cutter will be able to launch and retrieve both the Short Range Prosecutor and the larger Long Range Interceptor. The RHIBs will be used for intercepting suspect vessels, or for rescuing swimmers. Both RHIB types are propelled by diesel powered water jets. In 2010 and 2011 some commentators speculated that the entire program was vulnerable to cancellation on budgetary grounds, because of the long delay in finalizing a preliminary design.[4][5][6]

A bill passed by the United States Congress on November 15, 2011, imposed conditions on the Coast Guard's capital expenditures, that revolved around the design of the Offshore Patrol Cutter.[7]

By December 2011 plans for the cutter started to become more concrete.[8] Plans to include a stern launching ramp, as on the National Security Cutters and the Fast Response Cutters, had been eliminated on budgetary grounds.


  1. "Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC)". Integrated Deepwater System Program. Retrieved 2007-09-01. 
  2. "Short Range Prosecutor (SRP)". Integrated Deepwater System Program. Retrieved 2007-09-01. 
  3. "H770 DJ Short Range Prosecutor (technical specifications)". Zodiac Group. Archived from the original on 2004-05-29. Retrieved 2007-09-01. 
  4. Colin Clark (2010-12-07). "Coasties May Lose Cutters to OMB". DoD buzz. Retrieved 2011-12-02. "The program is in its infancy, which may be why OMB wants to cut it before any money starts flowing. Chris Cavas at Navy Times reported that the Coasties are talking to shipbuilders about the best technical and acquisition approaches for the ship. No contracts are due to be awarded for at least another year, so from OMB’s perspective this looks like the best time to save the most money." 
  5. Craig Collins on April 27, 2011 (2011-04-27). "The Coast Guard’s Offshore Patrol Cutter". Defense Media Network. Retrieved 2011-12-02. "The reason rumors continue to swirl about the Coast Guard’s future Offshore Patrol Cutter— including recent speculation that the entire program was to be axed – may simply be that so little has been decided about what the cutter will actually look like. The OPC is a high-profile program, one of the most expensive and talked-about shipbuilding ventures in Coast Guard history, and people are curious." 
  6. Robert Morrisson (2011-01-18). "Is the Palestinian Authority more worthy of funding than the Coast Guard?". David Caller. Retrieved 2011-12-03. "The Obama administration’s Office of Management and Budget has decided to reduce costs by cutting the U.S. Coast Guard’s Offshore Patrol Cutter." 
  7. David Perera (2011-11-28). "House Coast Guard authorization bill decommissions icebreaker within 3 years". Fierce Homeland Security. Retrieved 2011-12-03. "Language in the bill would prevent the Coast Guard from starting production on a seventh NSC until it selects an Offshore Patrol Cutter design. The service released a draft specification for the OPCs to industry in May 2011 and is currently reviewing comments; Coast Guard officials said during an Oct. 13 press call that they couldn't say when they'll release a draft request for proposals." 
  8. Stew Magnuson (2011-12). "Lean Fiscal Times Influence Design Of New Coast Guard Cutter Program". National Defense Magazine. Retrieved 2011-12-03. "The Coast Guard has already made some budget-based decisions as far as what the ship will not feature. Gas turbine engines and a system to launch small boats from the stern are two ideas that have already been rejected, he said." 

External links[]

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).