278,272 Pages

RIM-50 Typhon LR
RIM-55 Typhon MR
SAM-N-8 Typhon LR on launcher.jpg
Typhon LR on launcher
Type Long range surface-to-air missile
Place of origin United States
Service history
Used by United States Navy
Production history
Manufacturer Bendix Corporation
Specifications (Typhon LR)
Weight 1,700 lb (770 kg) without booster
3,620 lb (1,640 kg) with booster
Length 15 ft 6 in (4.72 m) without booster
27 ft 7 in (8.41 m) with booster
Diameter 16 in (410 mm) missile
18.5 in (470 mm) booster

Warhead 150 lb (68 kg) high explosive
or W60 nuclear
Detonation
mechanism
proximity fuse

Engine Booster, solid-propellant rocket
Sustainer, Bendix ramjet
Wingspan 3 ft 4 in (1.02 m) missile
5 ft 2 in (1.57 m) booster
Operational
range
200 nmi (230 mi; 370 km)
Flight ceiling 95,000 ft (29,000 m)
Speed Mach 4.0
Guidance
system
Inertial cruise; SARH terminal

Typhon was a missile system developed by the United States Navy in the late 1950s, intended to serve as an integrated air-defense system for Navy fleets. Consisting of the SAM-N-8 Typhon LR, later designated RIM-50A, and the SAM-N-9 Typhon MR, later RIM-55A, paired with the AN/SPG-59 radar system, the cost and expense of the Typhon system led to it being cancelled in favor of the Standard Missile program.

Design and development[edit | edit source]

Development of Typhon was initiated in the late 1950s, as the existing Talos, Terrier, and Tartar ("3T") long-, medium-, and short-ranged missiles were considered to be approaching obsolescence;[1] in the event of a mass attack by Soviet bomber forces, the requirement for each missile to have its own dedicated target illuminator would lead to rapid saturation of the defensive system. The Typhon system, developed under a contract awarded to the Bendix Corporation, would overcome this through the use of the AN/SPG-59 electronically scanned array radar system, capable of tracking and engaging multiple targets simultaneously.[2]

The missile system to complement the radar was originally named Super Talos (long-range) and Super Tartar (short-range), but to avoid confusion with upgrades for the existing missiles was soon renamed Typhon.[3] Typhon LR, the only version of the Typhon missile system to be test-flown, was ramjet-powered and was capable of intercepting high-speed aircraft and missiles, engaging targets in the Mach 3–4 range at between 50 feet (15 m) to 95,000 feet (29,000 m) altitude and 6,000 yards (5,500 m) to 110 nautical miles (130 mi; 200 km) range; a secondary capability in the surface-to-surface role, capable of targeting enemy ships, was also included in the specification.[3] While primarily intended to be armed with a conventional high explosive warhead, Typhon LR was designed to be capable of carrying the W60 nuclear warhead.[4]

Typhon MR was designed to be capable of intercepting aircraft at between 50 feet (15 m) to 50,000 feet (15,000 m) in altitude and 3,000 yards (2,700 m) to 25 nautical miles (29 mi; 46 km) range, but had yet to enter testing before the Typhon project was cancelled.[5]

Operational history[edit | edit source]

In March 1961 the first test launches of the SAM-N-8 Typhon LR took place;[3] beginning in 1962, the test ship USS Norton Sound entered refit to install the Typhon Weapon Control System to allow at-sea tests to be undertaken.[6] However the expense of the Typhon system, combined with the technical issues encountered during development, meant that the program was cancelled in November 1963. The conversion of Norton Sound was allowed to be completed to provide test data,[7] the ship recommissioning in June 1964; following the tests the Typhon equipment was removed in July 1966.[6] In lieu of Typhon, the U.S. Navy developed the Standard Missile family to provide air defense for the fleet, with the RIM-66 Standard and RIM-67 Standard ER missiles replacing Tartar and Terrier respectively.[3]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Citations[edit | edit source]

  1. Senate Committee on Appropriations 1964, p. 521.
  2. Boslaugh 1999, p. 379.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Parsch 2001a
  4. Polmar and Norris 2009, p. 224.
  5. Parsch 2001b
  6. 6.0 6.1 DANFS 1970
  7. Boslaugh 1999, p.180.

Bibliography[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.