| This biographical article.
Needs additional citations for verification.
Samuel Loring Morison (born October 30, 1944) is a former American intelligence professional, who was convicted of espionage and theft of government property in 1985, and pardoned in 2001. He was "the only [American] government official ever convicted for giving classified information to the press."
Morison was born in London, England, where his father was stationed during World War II. His paternal grandfather, Samuel Eliot Morison, was a distinguished naval historian, a Rear Admiral in the Naval Reserve and Harvard University professor. Morison spent much of his younger years in New York and Maine. He attended Tabor Academy, a college preparatory school in Massachusetts and graduated from the University of Louisville in 1967.
Morison worked as an intelligence analyst at the Naval Intelligence Support Center (NISC) in Suitland, Maryland, from 1974 to 1984, specializing in Soviet amphibious and mine-laying vessels. During those years, Morison also earned $5,000 per year as a part-time contributor and editor of the American section of the London-based Jane's Fighting Ships, an annual reference work on the world's navies.
Conflicts with his supervisors led Morison to seek a full-time position with Jane's in London. At this time, he began overstepping the boundary of permissible information that could be sent to Jane's. As a GS-12 Soviet amphibious ship analyst with a Top Secret clearance, Morison provided Jane's with three secret satellite photographs that he had taken from the desk of a coworker at NISC in July 1984. Morison cut classified control markings from them before mailing them to Jane's.
In 1984, two images of Soviet aircraft taken by a KH-8 or KH-9 satellite were inadvertently published in records of Congressional hearings. That same year, Jane's Defence Weekly was provided with several images taken by a KH-11 satellite of a Soviet naval shipbuilding facility. A 1984 computer-enhanced KH-11 photo, taken at an oblique angle, was leaked, along with two others, to Jane's Defence Weekly. The image shows the general layout of the Nikolaiev 444 shipyard on the Black Sea. Under construction is a Kiev class aircraft carrier, then known as the Kharkiv, along with an amphibious landing ship.
According to the US Government prosecutors, Morison also provided Jane's with a copy of a classified report on the damage to the Soviet navy base in Severomorsk that resulted from a 1984 explosion.
Prosecution and pardon
A joint investigation by the Naval Investigative Service and the FBI led to Morison, who was arrested on October 1, 1984. A search of his apartment in Crofton, Maryland, revealed several hundred government documents, some of them classified. Investigators never demonstrated any intent to provide information to a hostile intelligence service. Morison was charged with espionage and theft of government property. Morison told investigators that he sent the photographs to Jane's because the "public should be aware of what was going on on the other side", meaning that the new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would transform Soviet capabilities. He said that "if the American people knew what the Soviets were doing, they would increase the defense budget." British intelligence sources thought his motives were patriotic. Prosecutors emphasized personal economic gain and Morison's complaints about his government job. Morison once wrote to his editor at Jane's: "My loyalty to Jane's is above question."
The Reagan administration had been struggling to stop the leaking of government information by administering lie-detector tests and conducting dozens of investigations. It used the prosecution of Morison as a "test case" for applying the Espionage Act of 1917, originally targeted at spies and the delivery of confidential information to foreign governments, to cover the disclosure of information to the press in the manner of the British Official Secrets Act. The government did not claim that Morison's actions had damaged U.S. interests, only that further disclosures of comparable information might eventually enhance Soviet capabilities. A March 1984 report noted that "the unauthorized publication of classified information is a routine daily occurrence in the U.S." but that the applicability of the Espionage Act to such disclosures "is not entirely clear." A Time report said that the Administration, if it failed to convict Morison, would seek additional legislation. Time recognized the ongoing problem: "The Government does need to protect military secrets, the public does need information to judge defense policies, and the line between the two is surpassingly difficult to draw." On October 17, 1985, Morison was convicted in Federal Court on two counts of espionage and two counts of theft of government property. He was sentenced to two years in prison on December 4, 1985. The Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal in 1988.
Following Morison's conviction, the Reagan administration continued its campaign against leaks. In April 1986, an Assistant Under Secretary of Defense was fired for sharing classified information with reporters. In May, CIA Director William Casey threatened to prosecute five news organizations–the Washington Post, the Washington Times, the New York Times, Time and Newsweek–and succeeded in delaying the publication of a Washington Post story.
As a result of the Morison case, policy guidelines for adjudicating security clearances were changed to include consideration of outside activities that present potential conflict of interest.
In 1998, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan asked for appeal on the grounds of "the erratic application of that law and the anomaly of this singular conviction in eighty-one years". He cited examples of serious espionage cases that were not pursued, VENONA and Theodore Hall, and other cases that had been dismissed, including those of Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo.
- New York Times: Anthony Lewis, "Abroad at Home; The Pardons in Perspective," March 3, 2001, accessed March 11, 2011
- New York Times: Stephen Engelberg, "Spy Photos' Sale Leads to Arrest," October 3, 1984, accessed March 11, 2011
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMUEL LORING MORISON. Criminal No. Y-84-00455. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. 604 F. Supp. 655; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21855; 11 Media L. Rep. 1731. March 12, 1985
- TIME: Alessandra Stanley, "Spy vs. Spy Saga," October 15, 1984, accessed March 11, 2011
- Vivian Weil, "Policy Incentives and Constraints on Scientific and Technical Information," Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 13, 24
- Robert F. Ladenson, "Scientific and Technical Information, National Security, and the First Amendment: A Jurisprudential Inquiry," Public Affairs Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 2 (April 1987), 2
- TIME: Anne Constable, George C. Church, "Pluging the Leak of Secrets," January 28, 1985, accessed March 11, 2011
- TIME: "Damming a Leak," October 28, 1985, accessed March 11, 2011
- New York Times: Michael Wright and Caroline Rand Herron, "Two Years for Morison," December 8, 1985, accessed March 11, 2011
- New York Times: James Risen, "Clinton Did Not Consult C.I.A. Chief on Pardon, Official Says," February 17, 2001, accessed March 11, 2011
- TIME: James Kelly, et al., " Press: Shifting the Attack on Leaks," May 19, 1986, accessed March 11, 2011
- Federation of American Scientists: Letter, Moynihan to Clinton, September 29, 1988, accessed March 11, 2011
- U.S. Satellite Imagery, 1960–1999, Jeffrey T. Richelson, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 13 (April 14, 1999). 
- P. Weiss, "The quiet coup: U.S. v. Morison - a victory for secret government," Harper’s, September 1989.
- Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive: "Decade of the Spy", CI Reader: An American Revolution Into the New Millennium
- US Naval Institute debate on Columbus, 1992, YouTube
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|