The Sigma I-62 war game, played in February 1962, was the first of a series of classified high level war games played in the Pentagon during the 1960s to strategize the conduct of the burgeoning Vietnam War.[1] These simulations were designed to replicate then-current conditions in Indochina, with an aim toward predicting future foreign affairs events. The conclusion drawn from Sigma I-62 was that American intervention in Vietnam would be unsuccessful.[2]
Sigma I-62 background[]
The United States gradually sank into its role in Indochina as the French departed. Having assumed the French responsibilities in the region, the U.S. found itself facing a volatile future there. In October 1961, President John F. Kennedy was presented with two potential courses of action in Vietnam. His staff members, Walter Rostow and retired General Maxwell Taylor recommended an increase in military advisers and a commitment of 8,000 U.S. combat troops to South Vietnam. A conflicting recommendation by Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and the Joint Chiefs of Staff called for committing six American combat divisions, comprising 200,000 soldiers. Kennedy held a decision on combat troops in abeyance,[3] though he forwarded 1,000 added advisers to South Vietnam,[4] including Farm Gate instructors from the Special Air Warfare Center at Eglin Air Force Base.[5]
In Laos, the ongoing course of events had already led to the start of the Laotian Civil War. Troops of the Royal Lao Government were engaged in a slow motion battle at the Luang Namtha near the Chinese border as 1961 turned into 1962.[6]
Sigma I-62 game play[]
In February 1962, some members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff secretly war gamed the unfolding situation in Southeast Asia. American interests were represented by the Blue Team, communist adherents by the Red Team. The opposing Blue and Red Teams customary in war games were designated the friendly and enemy forces as was usual; however, several smaller teams were sometimes subsumed under Red and Blue Teams. Over the course of the games, the Red Team at times contained the Yellow Team for the Peoples Republic of China, the Brown Team for the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, the Black Team for the Viet Cong,[7] and Green for the USSR.[8]
Preparation for these simulations was quite extensive. A game staff of as many as 45 people researched and developed the scenarios. The actual play of the war game involved 30 to 35 participants. They were staffed with high ranking officials standing in to represent both domestic and foreign characters; stand-ins were chosen for their expertise concerning those they were called upon to represent. The games were supervised by a Control appointed to oversee both sides. As the Control Team, McGeorge Bundy and Maxwell Taylor umpired. There are four or five simulations per year, solicited secretively from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency, and major military commands.[9]
From the beginning, Blue Team admitted that because of the communist head start in hidden guerrilla warfare, civic action programs were curbed. The war game director noted, "...it appears that Red wanted to win without a war while Blue wanted not to lose also without a war."[10] The conclusion drawn from Sigma I-62 was that American intervention in Vietnam would be unsuccessful.[2]
Sigma I-62 was held two years before American combat troops were landed in Vietnam, and two and a half years prior to the Tonkin Gulf Incident.[11] In later years, results of Sigma war games would be dubbed "eerily prophetic".[12]
Notes[]
- ↑ Staff, p. C-34. [1] Retrieved 15 November 2014.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ball, pp. 92–93.
- ↑ The History Place, [2] Retrieved 10 November 2014.
- ↑ The History Learning Site [3] Retrieved 10 November 2014.
- ↑ Churchill, p. 12.
- ↑ Conboy, Morrison, pp. 67–73.
- ↑ Allen, pp. 193–208.
- ↑ Gibbons, pp. 17–19.
- ↑ Allen, pp. 31–32.
- ↑ Buzzanco, pp. 125–126.
- ↑ Warner, p. 141.
- ↑ McMasters, p. 283.
References[]
- Allen, Thomas B. (1987) War Games: The Secret World of the Creators, Players, and Policy Makers Rehearsing World War III Today. McGraw-Hill. ISBNs 0070011958, 9780070011953.
- Ball, Moya A. (1992) Vietnam-on-the-Potomac: (Praeger Series in Political Communication). Praeger, ISBNs 0275938816, 978-0275938819.
- Buzzanco, Robert. (1997) Masters of War: Military Dissent and Politics in the Vietnam Era. Cambridge University Press. ISBNs 0521599407, 978-0521599405.
- Churchill, Jan. (1997) Hit My Smoke!: Forward Air Controllers in Southeast Asia. Sunflower University Press, ISBN 0-89745-215-1, ISBN 978-0-89745-215-1
- Conboy, Kenneth and James Morrison, (1995) Shadow War: The CIA's Secret War in Laos. Paladin Press. ISBN 0-87364-825-0.
- Gibbons, William Conrad (1995) The U.S. Government and the Vietnam War. Princeton University Press. ISBNs 0691006350, 978-0691006352.
- McMaster, H. R. (1998) Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam. Harper Perennial. ISBNs 0060929081, 978-0060929084.
- Staff members, (1967). SIGMA – 67 FINAL REPORT, Joint War Games Agency/Joint Chiefs of Staff. ISBNs 1287044530, 9781287044536.
- Warner, Roger. Back Fire: The CIA's Secret War in Laos and Its Link to the War in Vietnam. Simon & Schuster, 1995. ISBNs 0684802929, 9780684802923.
The original article can be found at Sigma I-62 war game and the edit history here.